ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Thymic epithelial neoplasms (TENs) represent a heterogeneous group of rare thoracic malignancies. We analysed the clinicopathological features, survival outcomes, risk factors, and patterns of recurrence in patients undergoing resection. METHODS: Records were reviewed for adult patients with TEN who underwent resection from 2006 to 2019. Survival rates were assessed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed using the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: A total of 100 patients were analysed (51 females, median age 58 years). Thymoma was the most common histology (n = 92), followed by thymic carcinoma (n = 5) and thymic neuroendocrine tumour (n = 3). Stage II (Masaoka) tumours were most common (n = 51), followed by stage I (n = 27). World Health Organization B2/B3 was the most prominent histological subtype (n = 34). Complete resection (R0) was achieved in 91 patients: 86/92 thymoma, 4/5 thymic carcinoma and 1/3 neuroendocrine tumour. The most common treatment modality was surgery alone in 72 patients, followed by surgery and radiation therapy in 24, and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in 3 patients. Only one patient with thymic carcinoma received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The 10-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 86.6% and 83.9%, respectively. Recurrence was most common in neuroendocrine tumours (3/3). Risk factors for recurrence identified on multivariable analyses were: R1/2 resection (hazard ratio 9.30; 95% confidence interval 1.82-36.1), TEN subtype (hazard ratio 8.08; 95% confidence interval 1.24-34.6), and presence of lymphovascular invasion (hazard ratio 9.56; 95% confidence interval 2.56-25.8). CONCLUSIONS: Complete resection remains critical in patients with TEN. Incomplete resection, high-risk histology, and lymphovascular invasion highlight the need for effective adjuvant modalities. Given the rarity of these diseases, emphasis must be placed on collaborative research conducted on TEN.
Subject(s)
Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Thymoma , Thymus Neoplasms , Adult , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Thymus Neoplasms/diagnosis , Thymus Neoplasms/epidemiology , Thymus Neoplasms/surgery , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial/surgery , Neuroendocrine Tumors/surgery , Neoplasm Staging , PrognosisABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: This study investigated the role of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in predicting anastomotic leak (AL) after esophagectomy for esophageal adenocarcinoma. METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database from the McGill University Health Center. Included were all patients with esophageal adenocarcinoma who underwent esophagectomy between 2005 and 2016. Patients with chronic infections, concurrent active malignancies, and autoimmune conditions were excluded. NLR values were obtained on postoperative days (POD) 0, 1, 2, and 3. Receiver operating characteristic curve study and multivariable logistic analysis were conducted to evaluate the diagnostic value of NLR. RESULTS: The study included 330 patients, and AL developed in 16%. Mean NLR values on POD1, 2, and 3 were higher in patients with leaks (20 vs 14 on POD1, P < .001; 20 vs 12 on POD2, P < .001; and 19 vs 10 on POD3, P < .001). The NLR value on POD3 was associated with an area under the curve of 70% and a negative predictive value of 92.4%. Multivariable analyses identified higher American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status Classification, increasing NLR trend (between POD1 and POD3), POD1 NLR, POD2 NLR, and POD3 NLR as independent factors associated with AL. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who developed AL demonstrate higher mean NLR values in the early postoperative period with rising trends. Conversely a low NLR is associated with a high negative predictive value for AL. This simple metric allows risk stratification that may guide treatment decisions in esophagectomy patients.
Subject(s)
Adenocarcinoma/surgery , Anastomotic Leak/blood , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophagectomy/adverse effects , Esophagus/surgery , Inflammation/blood , Risk Assessment/methods , Aged , Anastomosis, Surgical/adverse effects , Anastomotic Leak/diagnosis , Anastomotic Leak/epidemiology , Biomarkers/blood , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Postoperative Period , Prognosis , Quebec/epidemiology , Retrospective StudiesABSTRACT
Background: Surgical site infection (SSI) is one of the most common complications of abdominal surgery and is associated with substantial discomfort, morbidity and cost. The goal of this study was to describe the incidence, bacteriology and risk factors associated with SSI in patients undergoing abdominal surgery. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, all patients aged 14 years or more undergoing abdominal surgery between Feb. 1 and July 31, 2016, at a single large academic hospital were included. Patients undergoing vascular, gynecological, urological or plastic procedures were excluded. Patients were followed prospectively for 30 days. Wound assessment was done with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention definition of SSI. We performed multivariate analysis to identify factors associated with SSI. Results: A total of 337 patients were included. The overall incidence of SSI was 16.3% (55/337); 5 patients (9%) had deep infections, and 25 (45%) had combined superficial and deep infections. The incidence of SSI in open versus laparoscopic operations was 35% versus 4% (p < 0.001). The bacteria most commonly isolated were extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli, followed by Enterococcus species. Only 23% of cultured bacteria were sensitive to the prophylactic antibiotic given preoperatively. The independent predictors of SSI were open surgical approach, emergency operation, longed operation duration and male sex. Conclusion: Potentially modifiable independent risk factors for SSI after abdominal surgery including open surgical approach, contaminated wound class and emergency surgery should be addressed systematically. We recommend tailoring the antibiotic prophylactic regimen to target the commonly isolated organisms in patients at higher risk for SSI.
Contexte: L'infection de plaie opératoire (IPO) est l'une des plus fréquentes complications de la chirurgie abdominale et elle est associée à un inconfort, une morbidité et des coûts substantiels. L'objectif de cette étude était de décrire l'incidence, les données bactériologiques et les facteurs de risque associés à l'IPO chez les patients soumis à une chirurgie abdominale. Méthodes: Dans cette étude de cohorte, tous les patients de 14 ans ou plus soumis à une chirurgie abdominale entre le 1er février et le 31 juillet 2016 dans un seul grand établissement hospitalier universitaire ont été inclus. Les chirurgies vasculaires, gynécologiques, urologiques ou plastiques ont été exclues. Les patients ont été suivis de façon prospective pendant 30 jours. L'évaluation des plaies a été effectuée à partir de la définition de l'IPO des Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Nous avons procédé à une analyse multivariée afin d'identifier les facteurs associés à l'IPO. Résultats: En tout, 337 patients ont été inclus. L'incidence globale des IPO a été de 16,3 % (55/337); 5 patients (9 %) ont présenté des infections profondes, et 25 (45 %) ont présenté des infections superficielles et profondes. L'incidence des IPO lors d'interventions ouvertes c. laparoscopiques a été de 35 % c. 4 % (p < 0,001). Les bactéries les plus souvent isolées étaient Escherichia coli productrices de ß-lactamases à spectre élargi, suivies du genre Enterococcus. Seulement 23 % des bactéries cultivées se sont révélées sensibles à l'antibioprophylaxie administrée avant l'intervention. Les prédicteurs indépendants d'une IPO étaient l'approche chirurgicale ouverte, le caractère urgent de l'intervention, sa durée prolongée et le fait d'être de sexe masculin. Conclusion: Dans le contexte de la chirurgie abdominale, les facteurs de risque d'IPO indépendants potentiellement modifiables, incluant l'approche ouverte, la classification de la contamination de la plaie et le caractère urgent de la chirurgie, méritent d'être systématiquement pris en compte et corrigés. Nous recommandons une antibioprophylaxie adaptée pour cibler les agents souvent isolés chez les patients exposés à un risque plus élevé d'IPO.
Subject(s)
Abdomen/surgery , Elective Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Adolescent , Adult , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Incidence , Male , Prospective Studies , Risk Factors , Saudi Arabia/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/etiology , Surgical Wound Infection/microbiology , Young AdultABSTRACT
Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) are the most common mesenchymal tumors of the digestive system, although they account for only 0.1-3% of all gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. They can arise anywhere along the GI tract with gastric predominance. Concurrent occurrence of GIST and gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) neoplasm is rare. We report a 55-year-old gentleman presenting with a polyp at the GEJ and a synchronous, large, and pedunculated gastric mass at the greater curvature. Those were treated with a wedge resection of the gastric pedunculated mass with negative margins along with transgastric submucosal resection of the GEJ polyp. Pathological examination confirmed synchronous invasive GEJ adenocarcinoma and a high-grade gastric GIST.