Synchronous Periampullary Tumors in a Patient With Pancreas Divisum and Neurofibromatosis Type 1.

INTRODUCTION: In this study, we describe for the first time a Neurofibromatosis type 1 patient with pancreas divisum, multiple periampullary tumors and germline pathogenic variants in NF1 and CFTR genes. CASE REPORT: A 62-year-old female NF1 patient presented with weakness, choluria, nausea, and diffuse abdominal pain to an emergency room service. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed an abdominal mass involving the periampullary region and pancreas divisum. After surgical resection, three synchronous neoplasms were detected including two ampullary tumors (adenocarcinoma of the major ampulla and a neuroendocrine tumor of the minor ampulla) and a gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST). Germline multigene panel testing (MGPT) identified two pathogenic heterozygous germline variants: NF1 c.838del and CFTR c.1210-34TG[12]T[5]. CONCLUSION: This is the first report of a Neurofibromatosis type 1 patient with pancreas divisum and multiple periampullary tumors harboring pathogenic germline variants in NF1 and CFTR genes. The identification of two germline variants and a developmental anomaly in this patient may explain the unusual and more severe findings and underscores the importance of comprehensive molecular analyses in patients with complex phenotypes.

Ultrasound Assessment of Disease Activity Prevents Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug (DMARD) Escalation and May Reduce DMARD-Related Direct Costs in Rheumatoid Arthritis With Fibromyalgia: An Exploratory Study.

OBJECTIVES: as an objective measure, ultrasound (US) could prevent rheumatoid arthritis (RA) overtreatment induced by concomitant fibromyalgia (FM). Our goal was to study how patients with RA and FM who underwent a US examination differed from those without a US examination in terms of overall disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) escalation and biologic DMARD-related direct costs. METHODS: Patients with RA and FM were seen between 2011 and 2017. In cases of 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28) overestimation, patients were referred to undergo a US examination. The US group underwent a US examination to confirm disease activity, and the DAS28 group had disease activity assessment based solely on the DAS28. RESULTS: Of 230 patients with RA, 22 women with RA and FM (DAS28 group, n = 9; and US group, n = 13) were seen in 316 visits (115.68 patient-years). The DMARD treatment was escalated in 27.1% of visits in the DAS28 group versus 17.3% in the US group (P = .046). The relative risk of DMARD escalation in the DAS28 group compared to the US group was 1.57 (95% confidence interval, 1.01-2.43). In sum total, US$240,784.52 were spent on biologics throughout the entire study period. Basing biologic DMARD prescriptions on US results could save an average of US$405.66 per patient-year. CONCLUSIONS: In this real-life study of patients with RA and FM, a US examination was associated with less DMARD escalation and could reduce biologic DMARD direct costs. Specifically, synovitis as scored by power Doppler US could be useful as a treatment target for RA in patients with DAS28 overestimation due to FM, but further studies are necessary.