Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
2.
J Cutan Pathol ; 45(11): 839-846, 2018 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30039879

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The gold standard for the diagnosis of melanocytic lesions is histologic examination. However, as histologic examination can have its limitations, there are many clinical scenarios in which additional testing may be appropriate in an attempt to render a definitive diagnosis. METHODS: A literature review for three ancillary tests-comparative genomic hybridization (CGH)/single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and gene expression profiling by quantitative reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR)-was compiled and current use patterns were tabulated. Survey of the practice patterns of these tests by dermatopathologists was also accessed in the attendees of the American Society of Dermatopathology Annual Meeting (Chicago, 2016). RESULTS: Here we summarize the use of these molecular tests in melanocytic lesions. We found that 54.4% of the respondents surveyed utilize (or expect consultants to utilize) molecular testing of melanocytic lesions in their practice when appropriate. CONCLUSIONS: CGH/SNP arrays, FISH testing, and qRT-PCR applied to melanocytic lesions have allowed for more accurate classification. Just over half of those surveyed use molecular testing for melanocytic lesion with the majority sending their cases out for completion of the molecular test.


Subject(s)
Melanoma/diagnosis , Molecular Diagnostic Techniques/methods , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/statistics & numerical data , Skin Neoplasms/diagnosis , Comparative Genomic Hybridization , Dermatology/methods , Humans , In Situ Hybridization, Fluorescence , Melanoma/genetics , Pathology/methods , Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction , Skin Neoplasms/genetics
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL