Anti-spike antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines in people with schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder.

Importance: Individuals with schizophrenia are at higher risk for severe COVID-19 illness and severe breakthrough infection following vaccination. It is unclear whether immune response to vaccination differs in this population. Objective: To assess whether anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody titers after vaccination differ in people with a diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder (SZ) compared to controls without a psychiatric disorder. Design: This cohort study assessed antibody response following the first and second dose of mRNA vaccines at longitudinal timepoints, up to 7 weeks following the first dose of vaccine. Setting: A multi-center study including psychiatric healthcare settings in the United States and Europe. Participants: 205 adults with no history of COVID-19 infection, including 106 individuals with SZ and 99 controls without a psychiatric disorder, who received their first dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine between December 20, 2020 and May 27, 2021. Main outcomes and measures: Mean SARS-CoV-2 anti-Spike IgG antibody levels within 7 weeks after the first dose of vaccination. Results: A total of 205 individuals (mean [SD] age, 44.7 [12.0] years; 90 [43.9%] male) were included, of which 106 (51.7%) were diagnosed with SZ. SZ was associated with lower mean log antibody levels (-0.15; 95% CI, -0.27 to -0.03, P = 0.016) after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, smoking, days since vaccination, and vaccine manufacturer. In secondary analyses of dose-specific responses, SZ was associated with a lower mean log antibody level after the second dose of vaccine (-0.23; 95% CI -0.39 to -0.06, P = 0.006), but not the first dose of vaccine (0.00; 95% CI -0.18- 0.19, P = 0.96). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of individuals with SZ and a control group without psychiatric disorders, SZ was associated with lower SARS-CoV-2 anti-spike antibody levels following 2 doses of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. This highlights the need for further studies assessing vaccine immunogenicity in individuals with schizophrenia.

Aberrant resting-state functional connectivity of the globus pallidus interna in first-episode schizophrenia.

BACKGROUND: The striatal-pallidal pathway plays an important role in cognitive control and modulation of behaviors. Globus pallidus interna (GPi), as a primary output structure, is crucial in modulating excitation and inhibition. Studies of GPi in psychiatric illnesses are lacking given the technical challenges of examining this small and functionally diverse subcortical structure. METHODS: 71 medication-naïve first episode schizophrenia (FES) participants and 73 healthy controls (HC) were recruited at the Shanghai Mental Health Center. Clinical symptoms and imaging data were collected at baseline and, in a subset of patients, 8 weeks after initiating treatment. Resting-state functional connectivity of sub-regions of the GP were assessed using a novel mask that combines two atlases to create 8 ROIs in the GP. RESULTS: Baseline imaging data from 63 FES patients and 55 HC met quality standards and were analyzed. FES patients exhibited less negative connectivity and increased positive connectivity between the right anterior GPi and several cortical and subcortical areas at baseline compared to HC (PFWE < 0.05). Positive functional connectivity between the right anterior GPi and several brain areas, including the right dorsal anterior cingulate gyrus, was associated with severity of positive symptoms (PFWE < 0.05) and predicted treatment response after 8 weeks (n = 28, adjusted R2 = 0.486, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results implicate striatal-pallidal-thalamic pathways in antipsychotic efficacy. If replicated, these findings may reflect failure of neurodevelopmental processes in adolescence and early adulthood that decrease functional connectivity as an index of failure of the limbic/associative GPi to appropriately inhibit irrelevant signals in psychosis.

Minimum clinically important difference (MCID) of the personal impact of epilepsy scale (PIES).

INTRODUCTION: The Personal Impact of Epilepsy Scale (PIES) assesses patient functional status in subscales of (1) seizure impact, (2) medication effects, (3) mood & social status, and (4) overall quality of life. This study was designed to determine the Minimal Clinically Important Change (MCID) in PIES subscale and total scores that demonstrate improvement. METHODS: To ascertain the correspondence of PIES score change and clinical status change (improved, same, worse) in each PIES subscale and total score, we used two distinct retrospective anchor-based assessments of clinical status (patient self-assessment and trained rater assessment) across two clinic visits. Mean PIES scores were compared between clinical status groups, controlling for days between visits and initial clinical status. Personal Impact of Epilepsy Scale score change was quantified for each group to determine MCID. A small prospective proof-of-concept study was conducted in a separate subject group. RESULTS: Patient self-report anchor analysis demonstrated lower (better) PIES scores in the "improved" group vs the "worse" group on the mood & social subscale (p < .001) and total score (p = .002), with a similar trend on the seizure subscale (p = 0.056). Clinical rater anchor analysis demonstrated lower PIES scores in the "improved" vs "worse" group in the mood & social subscale (p = .029) and a trend in total score (p = .082). For the "improved" group, the reduction in PIES scores between visits averaged across both anchor analyses was 8.14% for subscales and 8.67% for total score. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: Reduction of 8% on a PIES subscale or total score indicates meaningful improvement in patient clinical status, and is designated the MCID for this instrument. Personal Impact of Epilepsy Scale can be useful in day-to-day clinical care and as an outcome metric in clinical research.