Clipping a Positive Lymph Node Improves Accuracy of Nodal Staging After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer Patients, but Does It Drive Management Changes?

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy for cN+ breast cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) is controversial because the false-negative rate (FNR) is high. Identification of three or more SLNs with a dual tracer improves these results, and inclusion of a clipped lymph node (CLN) (targeted axillary dissection [TAD]) may be even more effective. METHODS: A retrospective, single-institution analysis of consecutive cN+ patients undergoing NAC from 2019 to 2021 was performed. Patients routinely underwent placement of a clip in the positive lymph node before NAC, and TAD was performed after completion of therapy. RESULTS: The study analyzed 73 patients, and the identification rate for CLN was 98.6% (72/73). A complete response in the lymph nodes was achieved for 43 (59%) of the 73 patients. Overall, the CLN was not a SLN in 18 (25%) of 73 cases, and for women who had one or two and those who had three or more SLNs identified, this occurred in 11 (32%) and 7 (21%) of 34 cases, respectively. Failure of SLN or TAD to identify a positive residual lymph node status after NAC occurred in 10 (15%) of 69 and 2 (3%) of 73 cases, respectively (p = 0.01). In four cases, a SLN was not retrieved (5.5%), and two of these cases had a positive CLN. In three cases, the CLN was the only positive node and did not match with a SLN, directing lymphadenectomy and oncologic management change in two cases. Therefore, 7 (10%) of 73 cases had a change in surgical or oncologic management with TAD. CONCLUSIONS: For a conservative axillary treatment in this setting, TAD is an effective method. It is more accurate than SLN alone and allows management changes. Further studies are warranted.

Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Definitive Results with a Long-Term Follow-Up Evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM) is increasingly used for women with breast cancer who are not candidates for conservative surgery. The authors previously reported satisfying results with NSM after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). METHODS: From 2010 to 2020, 1072 women underwent mastectomy at the authors' institution. In this group, 433 NSMs were performed (40%). The only contraindications to NSM were close proximity to the nipple-areola complex (NAC), bloody discharge, and Paget disease. RESULTS: In 112 cases involving 111 women, NSM followed NACT (group 1), whereas it was performed as primary surgery in 321 instances involving 306 women (group 2). At 5 years, local relapse was 7% in group 1 and 2% in group 2, although in the multivariate analysis, locoregional relapses (LRRs) did not differ between the two groups. An increased incidence of local relapse was associated with higher tumor stage (stage III; p = 0.046) and age younger than 51 years (p = 0.038). For 34 (30.3%) of the 111 women in group 1 with a pathologic complete response (pCR), no LRRs were recorded. Only one NAC recurrence was observed. Overall survival with each tumor stage did not differ between the two groups. No differences in complications were observed. Cosmetic results were satisfying in 83.8% of the cases and did not get worse after NACT. CONCLUSIONS: The study data definitively confirm that NSM is safe even after NACT, with good cosmetic results and complications comparable with those in the primary surgery setting. Tumor stage and age were the only independent factors for local relapse. Patients with pCR enjoyed optimal locoregional control.

Long-Term Outcomes of Once-Daily Accelerated Partial-Breast Irradiation With Tomotherapy: Results of a Phase 2 Trial.

PURPOSE: We report long-term outcomes of phase 2 trial on patients with invasive breast cancer treated with accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) using tomotherapy after breast conservative surgery. METHODS AND MATERIALS: From December 2010 to December 2018, we treated 338 women with APBI-tomotherapy: 38.5 Gy in 10 once-daily fractions. Patients selected were age ≥50 years old, with ≤3 cm in size unifocal tumor and at least 2 mm of clear margins. Disease outcomes were analyzed by clinicopathologic characteristics, molecular phenotypes, and American Society for Radiation Oncology (ASTRO) 2017 updated consensus groupings. RESULTS: The median age was 65 years (range, 50-86). The invasive ductal (87.5%) and the luminal A-like molecular phenotype (70%) were the most common tumors. Overall 242 patients (71.6%) were considered "suitable" for enrollment in APBI according to the eligibility criteria of the ASTRO-2017 consensus statement. With a median follow-up of 76 months (range, 17-113), 2 patients (0.6%) had an invasive ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR), and 2 patients (0.6%) had an axillary ipsilateral failure. The rate of local control in terms of free of IBTR was 99.4% and locoregional control (no recurrence in ipsilateral breast as well as in regional nodes) was 98.8%. Progression-free survival was 98.4% and 92% at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Acute and late skin toxicity, graded according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, were 7.7% (G1) and 0.6% (G2) and 4.4% (G1) and 1.1% (G2), respectively. There were no grade 3/4 toxicities, however. Very few patients (2%) or physicians (2%) assessed cosmetic outcome as fair or poor at the 2-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: This phase 2 trial on APBI-tomotherapy shows excellent long-term results. Once-daily fractionation schedule was well tolerated with a low rate of adverse events and worse cosmetic outcome. In this series, even among those deemed cautionary or unsuitable for APBI by ASTRO criteria, we demonstrated a low rate of IBTR.