Effects of transcutaneous neuromodulation (TENS) on overactive bladder symptoms in children: a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to investigate whether addition of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) treatment improves the results of standard urotherapy in children with overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-two children with symptoms of OAB and incontinence were included. The children were randomized either to standard urotherapy treatment alone or a combination of standard urotherapy and TENS. The effect variables were taken from a voiding-drinking diary: number of voiding, number of incontinence episodes, and maximum voided volume. RESULTS: Both treatment groups had good treatment results, with no significant difference between the groups. In the standard treatment group 13/28 (46%) were completely dry and 11/28 (40%) had a decrease in incontinence episodes, compared to 16/24 (67%) and 3/24 (13%), respectively, in the standard+TENS group (p=0.303). The number of voiding decreased in two-thirds of the patients in both groups. However, maximal voided volume only increased in the standard treatment group. Subjectively 72% and 80% considered themselves significantly improved or free of symptoms. Previous treatment was registered in 15/55 (27%). All efficacy variables decreased in those with previous treatment, but with no difference between the standard and standard+TENS treatment groups. The only difference noted was when comparing the children without previous treatment in the groups: a significantly higher proportion were completely dry in the TENS group (12/18 [71%] versus 10/22 [48%], p=0.05). CONCLUSION: Our results showed no significant difference overall in treatment response to OAB symptoms between urotherapy only and urotherapy+TENS, whereas a tendency to difference was found in children without previous treatment. Thus with good urotherapy support, TENS only seems to have marginal additional effects on OAB symptoms.

Skilled interaction among professional carers in special accommodations for adult people with learning disabilities.

Communicative difficulties affect interactions between people with learning disabilities and their carers. Despite such difficulties, however, some carers seem to interact successfully with people who have limited ability to communicate verbally and exhibit challenging behaviour. This study aims to illuminate skilled interaction among carers working in special accommodations for people with learning disabilities. Interactions between 16 caregivers and 11 residents with learning disabilities were recorded on video. Verbal and non-verbal interaction skills among the carers were identified. Four caring situations with people with learning disabilities were chosen to illuminate skilled interaction. The transcribed text was subjected to qualitative content analysis and core stories were created. The results show that skilled interaction between the carers and the people with learning disabilities is based upon being confirming, sharing daily life experience, giving time and space, and using congruent and distinct language. In this paper we present examples that offer concrete suggestions of how to promote successful interaction and create meaning in the shared day-to-day life in special accommodations for people with learning disabilities.

Caregivers' reflections on their interactions with adult people with learning disabilities.

People with learning disabilities and their professional carers often have difficulty interacting. The aim of this study was to illuminate carers' reflections on their interactions with adult people with learning disabilities. In a previous study, interactions between 16 carers and 11 residents with learning disabilities were recorded on video. In this study, stimulated recall interviews about the interactions were carried out with all the carers. The text was analysed using qualitative content analysis. The findings indicate that the carers reflected on both successful and unsuccessful interaction. Examples of successful interaction included understanding cues, satisfying needs, and managing challenging behaviours, and the carers reflected on the influences that successful interaction had on security, confidence, and satisfaction among the residents. Examples of unsuccessful interaction included failing to understand cues, failing to satisfy needs and failing to manage challenging behaviours, and the carers reflected on the consequences of such interaction, which included irritation, aggression and violence among the residents. Our findings have implications for interventions aimed at strengthening the competence of carers and developing strategies for managing challenging behaviour, in order to ensure high-quality care and a good working climate.