[Partnership development between two hospitals: the integration process of Interventional Cardiology Units between the San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital and the Local Health Unit Torino 3]. / Lo sviluppo di una partnership tra Aziende Sanitarie: l'integrazione dei laboratori di Emodinamica tra l'Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Luigi Gonzaga di Orbassano e l'Azienda Sanitaria Locale Torino 3.

BACKGROUND: The healthcare sector is among the most complex ones where partnerships and interdependencies between different hospitals can achieve real technical and managerial operational models aimed at optimizing resources. However, the construction of this type of interdependence is not simple to implement, making it necessary to integrate at different organizational and professional levels. The aim of this work is to present the integration process and results achieved during the first 3 years of experience after a synergic integration of the interventional cath lab units of the San Luigi Gonzaga University Hospital, Orbassano and the Infermi Hospital Local Health Unit TO 3, Rivoli. METHODS: Starting from March 2016, data concerning number and type of procedures as well as the distribution of workloads of each operator in the two cath labs were recorded and monitored. Moreover, numbers of urgent procedures performed as well as the door-to-balloon time in case of primary angioplasty were recorded. RESULTS: Compared to the first 12 months of non-integrated activity, the number of procedures remained constant with an overall trend of activity increase (total procedures: +2.6% from 2016 to 2017; +8.7% from 2017 to 2018). No statistically significant differences were found in the average door-to-balloon time, either by stratifying by period (year 2015 vs 2016 vs 2017 vs 2017 vs 2018) or by single institution. All ST-elevation myocardial infarctions were treated at the arrival site, displacing the medical availability team. The mortality rate and the number of complications were not different compared to the trend recorded in previous years. The implementation of joint programs with an exchange of expertise between operators has allowed the rapid development of skills necessary for the execution of structural heart procedures not previously performed in one of the operating centers. CONCLUSIONS: The model of an integrated cath lab unit represents an example of a partnership between two hospitals, which allows a synergistic growth of professional skills, even facing daily logistical challenges. The integration has made it possible to expand the number and type of procedures performed as well to join the on-call equipe without impacting on the door-to-balloon time in case of primary coronary angioplasty.

Clinical characteristics and management of COVID-19 patients accessing the emergency department in a hospital in Northern Italy in March and April 2020.

BACKGROUND: the emergency due to SARS-CoV-2 pandemic struck the national and regional health system that needed an effort to reorganise and increase resources to cope with a sudden, uncertain, and previously unknown situation. This study was conducted in the immediate aftermath of this difficult period. OBJECTIVES: to describe clinical characteristics, short-term outcomes, and management of SARS-CoV-2 positive patients that accessed the emergency department (ED) of the San Luigi Gonzaga hospital of Orbassano (Turin district, Piedmont Region, Northern Italy) in March and April 2020. Furthermore, this study aimed at investigating if a difference in patients characteristics, clinical management, and outcomes was present during time. DESIGN: comparison of different periods in a clinical cohort. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: for each patient who accessed the ED and tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 swab, the ED medical record was collected and a descriptive analysis was performed on demographical characteristics, pre-existing comorbidities, parameters measured at triage, imaging exams results, lab tests results, separately for patients admitted at the ED in four different periods. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: discharge from ED, admission to hospital wards (low and high intensity of care), short term in-hospital mortality, hospital length of stay. The association between patients' characteristics and the main outcomes was measured using multivariable logistic models. RESULTS: age of patients increased significantly from March to April, together with female prevalence and associated comorbid conditions. A significant difference in symptoms at presentation was not observed nor it was in laboratory test results. Severity at triage and need of intensive care resources were higher in the first weeks, together with the typical clinical presentation with respiratory failure and imaging with signs of bilateral interstitial pneumonia. Accordingly, in-hospital mortality was higher in the first period. Nevertheless, nearly half of patients in the first period were discharged directly from ED showing mild COVID-19 cases. On the contrary, in April an increasing need of hospitalisation in low intensity of care beds was observed, whereas mild cases stopped to access the ED. CONCLUSIONS: the results of this study suggest that in few weeks of COVID-19 epidemic both management of the patients at the hospital level - and probably at territorial level resulting in a different population who accessed to the ED - and the clinical characteristics of the COVID-19 patients changed.

[Overcrowding in emergency departments: the case of the San Giovanni Battista (Molinette) university hospital in Turin (Italy)]. / Il sovraffollamento dei Dipartimenti di Emergenza: il caso dell'Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Giovanni Battista (Molinette) di Torino.

Overcrowding in Emergency Departments (ED) is a common phenomenon worldwide, especially in metropolitan areas. The main reason for overcrowding is not inappropriate emergency department use by patients but rather a shortage of available hospital beds which results in extended ED stays for patients who need emergency admission. The aims of this study, conducted at the San Giovanni Battista (Molinette) University hospital in Turin (Italy), were a) to verify the existence of overcrowding in the hospital ED and b) to test whether, as stated in the literature, overcrowding is due to restricted access to hospital beds for patients needing emergency admission, and to identify contributing factors. Results show the existence of overcrowding and confirm the hypothesized cause.

Guidelines for preoperative assessment: impact on clinical practice and costs.

OBJECTIVE: To describe preoperative evaluation in the San Giovanni Battista Hospital in Turin and to forecast the economic impact when preoperative assessment guidelines are implemented. DESIGN: We enrolled, in a month, 702 consecutive patients, excluding cardiac, thoracic, neuro- and vascular surgery, as well as emergency operations. Preoperative assessment data were collected individually, followed by simulating various applications of guidelines based on: (i) preoperative tests relying on full medical history and physical examination to discriminate preoperative risk patients; (ii) organization of a preoperative evaluation unit and tests before patient hospitalization. MAIN MEASURES: Mean number of tests prescribed, preoperative assessment cost per patient. RESULTS: The application of preoperative guidelines would decrease the mean number of tests prescribed from 20 laboratory and 1.9 instrumental to, respectively, 3 and 1.4 per patient. Tests deemed inappropriate by guidelines did not add any relevant clinical information to our study. Economic analysis estimates a reduction of 63% in cost per patient for preoperative tests by introducing guideline criteria (from 69 euros to 26 euros). As regards the cost per patient for preoperative evaluation and hospital stay (115 euros considering only variable costs, 580 euros including all costs), the application of the guidelines would reduce costs by 41-52% according to different cost evaluation approaches for hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Preoperative guidelines fully introduced in practice could notably increase efficiency without affecting the quality of care.

[Hospital mortality at a cardiosurgical unit in Torino: international comparisons and time trend]. / Mortalità ospedaliera in una unità di cardiochirurgia di Torino: confronti internazionali e andamento temporale.

OBJECTIVE: To compare hospital mortality in a cardiac surgery unit with external data and to assess changes in time (patients undergoing surgery in two different periods). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Data on risk factors for hospital mortality were collected from clinical records (retrospectively for the first period and prospectively for the second) for all patients undergoing open heart surgery at the Heart Surgery Unit of the University of Turin (Italy) during 1991 and 1995 (n = 1794) and 1999 (n = 892). Comparisons of in-hospital mortality, expressed as Standardized Mortality Ratios (SMR), were adjusted for risk factors defined according to EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation). RESULTS: In the first and second period, complete information on all the 17 EuroSCORE items was available for 58.3% and 89.6% patients respectively. After exclusion of patients with one or more missing data, observed and expected numbers of death were found to be very similar, with SMRs ranging between 0.82 (isolated bypass in the second period) and 1.06 ("other" surgery in the first period). Mortality was higher among patients with missing data, but at least in 1999 the latter had a limited impact on the overall estimates. Compared to the first period, mortality was reduced during 1999 (from 5.9% to 5.4%), in particular for isolated bypass (from 4.4% to 3.4%). CONCLUSIONS: In the unit under investigation, hospital mortality following heart surgery was similar to that predicted from EuroSCORE and seemed to be lower in 1999 than in 1991-95, particularly for isolated bypass. Incompleteness of data on individual risk factors may have been a source of bias, especially when data were collected retrospectively.