ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A connection has been established between ocular structural changes and various neurodegenerative diseases. Several studies utilizing optical coherence tomography (OCT) have detected signs of ocular structural alterations among individuals with Huntington's disease (HD). The inconsistent results reported in the literature regarding alterations in the retina and choroid encouraged us to conduct this systematic review and meta-analysis to accumulate the findings. METHODS: A systematic search was carried out in three electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus) to find studies reporting OCT measurements in HD cases compared with healthy controls (HC). A fixed-effects or random-effects meta-analysis was conducted according to the detected heterogeneity level. Furthermore, subgroup and sensitivity analyses, meta-regression, and quality assessment were performed. RESULTS: Eleven studies were included in the systematic review and 9 studies with a total population of 452 participants (241 cases, and 211 HC) underwent meta-analysis. Results of the analysis denoted that subfoveal choroid had a significantly reduced thickness in HD eyes compared to HC (p < 0.0001). Moreover, our analysis indicated that HD cases had a significantly thinner average (p = 0.0130) and temporal peripapillary retinal nerve fiber layer (pRNFL) (p = 0.0012) than HC. However, subjects with pre-HD had insignificant differences in average (p = 0.44) and temporal pRNFL thickness (p = 0.33) with the HC group. CONCLUSION: Results of the current systematic review and meta-analysis revealed the significant thinning of average and temporal pRNFL and subfoveal choroid in HD compared to HC. However, OCT currently might be considered insensitive to be applied in the pre-HD population at least until further longitudinal investigations considering variables such as the duration between OCT measurement and disease onset validating OCT as a routine diagnostic tool in HD clinics.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Impaired immune response in multiple myeloma renders the patients vulnerable to infections, such as COVID-19, and may cause worse response to vaccines. Researchers should analyze this issue to enable the planning for special preventive measures, such as increased booster doses. Therefore, this meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the response and efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines in patients with multiple myeloma. METHODS: This meta-analysis followed PRISMA 2020 guidelines, conducting a comprehensive database search using specified keywords. Study selection involved a two-phase title/abstract and full-text screening process. Data extraction was performed by two researchers, and statistical analysis involved meta-analysis, subgroup analysis based on vaccine dosage and study time, random effects meta-regression, and heterogeneity testing using the Q test. RESULTS: The meta-analysis revealed that patients with multiple myeloma (MM) had a lower likelihood of developing detectable antibodies after COVID-19 vaccination compared to healthy controls (Log odds ratio with 95% CI: -3.34 [-4.08, -2.60]). The analysis of antibody response after different doses showed consistent lower seropositivity in MM patients (after first dose: -2.09, [-3.49, -0.69], second: -3.80, 95%CI [-4.71, -3.01], a booster dose: -3.03, [-5.91, -0.15]). However, there was no significant difference in the mean level of anti-S antibodies between MM patients and controls (Cohen's d -0.72, [-1.86, 0.43]). Evaluation of T-cell responses indicated diminished T-cell-mediated immunity in MM patients compared to controls. Seven studies reported clinical response, with breakthrough infections observed in vaccinated MM patients. CONCLUSIONS: These findings highlight the impaired humoral and cellular immune responses in MM patients after COVID-19 vaccination, suggesting the need for further investigation and potential interventions.