ABSTRACT
Home hospitalization represents an alternative to traditional hospitalization, providing comparable clinical safety for hematological patients. At-home therapies can range from the delivery of intravenous antibiotics to more complex scenarios, such as the care during the early period after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. Early discharge from conventional hospitalization is feasible and helps reduce hospital resources and waiting lists. The coordinated efforts of multidisciplinary teams, including hematologists, nurses, and pharmacists, ensure patient safety and continuity of care. The traditional model of home hospitalization relies on home visits and telephone consultations with physicians and nurses. However, the use of eHealth technologies, such as MY-Medula, can enhance communication and monitoring, and thereby improve patient outcomes with no additional costs. The active involvement of a clinical pharmacist in home hospitalization programs is essential, not only for the proper logistical management of the medication but also to ensure its appropriateness, optimize treatment, address queries from the team and patients, and promote adherence. In conclusion, the implementation of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy home hospitalization programs that use both an eHealth tool and a multidisciplinary care model can optimize patient care and improve quality of life without increasing healthcare costs.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Hospitalization , Pharmacists , Telemedicine , Humans , Home Care Services , Patient Care Team , Quality of LifeABSTRACT
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) recipients are at high risk of severe COVID-19 despite vaccination. Little is known about cellular response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in this population, especially in recently transplanted patients (RTP). In this single-center study we examined cellular and humoral response to the mRNA-1273 (Spikevax®) vaccine in recently transplanted patients (RTP, n = 49), and compared them to long-term transplanted patients (LTTP, n = 19) and healthy controls (n = 20) at three different timepoints: one and three months after the second dose (T1 and T2, respectively, 28 days apart), and one month after the third dose (T3). Controls did not receive a third dose. RTPs showed lower IgG anti-S1 titers than healthy controls at both T1 (mean 0.50 vs 0.94 arbitrary units -AU-, p < 0.0001) and T2 (0.37 vs 0.79 AU, p < 0.0001). They also presented lower titers than LTTPs at T1 (0.50 vs 0.66, p = 0.01), but no differences at T2 (0.37 vs 0.40 AU, p = 0.55). The rate of positive T-cell responses was lower in RTPs than in controls at both T1 and T2 (61.2 % vs 95 %, p = 0.007; 59.2 % vs 100 %, p = 0.001, respectively), but without statistically significant differences between transplanted groups. At T3 no differences were seen between RTPs and LTTPs as well, neither in IgG antibodies (p = 0.82) nor in cellular responses (p = 0.15), although a third dose increased the rate of positive cellular and humoral responses in approximately 50 % of recently transplanted patients. However, active immunosuppressive treatment severely diminished their chances to produce an adequate response.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Vaccines , Humans , Transplant Recipients , 2019-nCoV Vaccine mRNA-1273 , COVID-19 Vaccines , Immunity, Humoral , COVID-19/prevention & control , SARS-CoV-2 , Immunoglobulin GABSTRACT
The use of allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT) for the treatment of hematologic diseases is steadily increasing; however, allo-SCT has the downside of causing considerable treatment-related morbidity and mortality. Mobile technology applied to healthcare (mHealth) has proven to be a cost-effective strategy to improve care and offer new services to people with multimorbidity, but there are little data on its usefulness in allo-SCT recipients. Here we describe a new integrated healthcare model facilitated by an mHealth platform, EMMASalud-MY-Medula, and to report the results of a feasibility and usability pilot study. The MY-Medula platform was developed in 4 phases. First, patient and healthcare professional needs were identified, and technological development and pretesting tests were conducted (phases 1 to 3, January 2016 to March 2021). Then a nonrandomized, prospective, observational, single-center pilot study was conducted (October 2021 to January 2022) at the adult SCT unit of a tertiary university hospital. Twenty-eight volunteer allo-SCT recipients were included in the pilot study, of whom one-half were outpatients in the first-year post-SCT and one-half were affected by steroid-dependent graft-versus-host disease (SR-GVHD). All patients used the MY-Medula app during the 2-month follow-up period, with a median number of visits to the app of 143 (range, 6 to 477). A total of 2067 self-monitoring records were created, and 205 text messages were received, most of them related to symptoms description (47%) and doubts about medication (21%). In 3.4% of the cases, drug dosage was adjusted by the pharmacist because of dosing errors or interactions. At the end of the study, a 6-question Likert-type questionnaire for patients and a 22-question test for healthcare professionals showed a high degree of satisfaction (95% and 100%, respectively) with the new healthcare pathway. Reengineering the follow-up of allo-SCT recipients into an integrated, multidisciplinary model of care facilitated by mHealth tools is feasible and has been associated with high usability and a high degree of satisfaction by patients and healthcare professionals. A randomized trial aiming to determine the cost-effectiveness of MY-Medula-based follow-up post-SCT is currently enrolling participants.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Telemedicine , Adult , Humans , Pilot Projects , Prospective Studies , Feasibility Studies , Transplantation, Homologous , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methodsABSTRACT
PURPOSE: This study aims to describe the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) following the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and explore the risk perception of COVID-19 in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HCT) recipients. METHODS: We performed a single-center prospective study including recently transplanted (< 2 years post-infusion) allogeneic HCT recipients. AEs were assessed through phone calls and graded from 0 to 4, while COVID-19 risk perception was measured using the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire (BIP-Q5). RESULTS: Fifty-four HCT recipients were evaluated. Incidence and grades of AE (94.4% and 85.2% after the first and second dose, respectively) were similar to those described in the general population. The most common AE was pain at the site of injection. Three patients (5.6%) developed a grade ≥ 3 AE. Vaccine-related cytopenias and graft-versus-host disease flares were not observed. Female sex (OR 3.94, 95% CI 1.14-13.58, p = 0.03) and time since HCT (per month since HCT: OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.01-1.18, p = 0.04) were associated with the occurrence of any AE. The patients' risk perception level of COVID-19 decreased over time (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that the mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine is safe in recent HCT recipients and suggests that the perceived risk of COVID-19 decreases over time.