Social media as a clinical, educational and networking tool for neurosurgeons: A systematic review of literature.

BACKGROUND: The use of social media has been drastic in the field of neurosurgery over the last two decades. Almost 70 % of neurosurgeons use social media platforms such as Facebook, X (formerly Twitter), YouTube, and Instagram for purposes of professional growth. This literature review aims to quantify the use of social media in the field of neurosurgery, its benefits, and implications. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by searching PubMed, Science Direct, and Google Scholar for articles pertaining tosocial media and neurosurgery.Mesh terms employed in the search strategy encompassed "Social Media", "neurosurgery", "education""benefits", "consequences"and related variations.Inclusion criteria involved studiesvaryingin methodology, includingobservational studies, case reports and comprehensive reviewsand investigatingvarious aspects of benefits and limitations of social media for neurosurgeons, encompassing its importance in community building, professional development, contribution to research and publications, mentorship, cultural diversity and other pertinent benefits. RESULTS: The search yielded635articles, with437unique articles screened based on relevance. Following a meticulous screening process,86articles underwent full-text assessment, resulting in the inclusion of22articles meeting the eligibility criteria.Insights were derived onthebenefits of social media,its current limitationsas well astrends and demographics surrounding social media use in neurosurgery. CONCLUSION: In todays modernized world, social media acts as a double-edged sword when it comes to neurosurgery; it offers unparalleled opportunities for collaboration, education, patient engagement, and support while demanding careful use and navigation to mitigate the risks associated with it.

Efficacy and safety of peri-partum Esketamine for prevention of post-partum depression in women undergoing caesarian section: A meta-analysis and systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Postpartum depression (PPD) is a psychiatric condition affecting women post-childbirth. Medication combined with psychotherapy, is the current protocol for its treatment. A meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan 5.4 to explore the efficacy and safety of peri-partum administration of esketamine for preventing PPD. After searching several databases to retrieve the relevant RCTs, seven were included in this analysis, with dichotomous data presented as risk ratio and continuous data as mean difference. The study found a lower incidence of PPD in the esketamine group compared to the control group (RR= 0.37), with significant difference in EPDS scores between the two groups (MD= -1.23) in the first week postpartum. The esketamine group reported a lower prevalence of PPD 4-6 weeks postpartum (RR= 0.48), and no significant difference in EPDS scores after 4 weeks postpartum (MD = -0.10). The esketamine group had a significantly higher incidence of hallucination (RR= 13.85). Other adverse effects, such as dizziness (RR= 4.09), nausea (RR= 0.88), vomiting (RR=0.74), headache (RR=1.52), nightmares (RR=1.22), pruritus (RR=0.29), and drowsiness (RR=1.57) did not show significant differences between the two groups. The study found that esketamine, with manageable side effects, reduces the prevalence of post-partum depression (PPD) after one week as well as after four to six weeks. However, the findings are limited by the limited number of available RCTs, and future research should determine the ideal dosage, the most effective method of administration and the long-term safety profile of esketamine so that it may be considered as an adjunct therapy or a potential sole treatment option.