Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Water Health ; 18(2): 229-238, 2020 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32300095

ABSTRACT

The aim of this study was to identify the main sources of fecal pollution at popular beaches and rivers in the island of Trinidad. Escherichia coli enumeration and microbial source tracking (MST) were used to identify the primary sources of fecal bacteria contamination at the sites. Nineteen sites exceeded USEPA water quality standards for safe recreational use. Highest levels of fecal contamination were recorded on the central and west coasts of the island and included Brickfield River (4,839 MPN 100 ml-1), Orange Valley Bay (2,406.6 MPN 100 ml-1) and Chaguaramas Bay (1,921.2 MPN 100 ml-1). MST detected human (HF183) fecal pollution at ∼63%, birds at ∼67%, chicken at ∼36% and cattle (BacCow) at ∼34% of the sites. MST is a useful and rapid method for identifying major sources of fecal pollution in rivers and beaches. In Trinidad water bodies, the main sources of fecal pollution were humans and birds. The large number of sites with elevated levels of fecal pollution detected is particularly alarming and represents a serious public health risk.


Subject(s)
Bathing Beaches , Environmental Monitoring , Feces , Rivers , Water Pollution/analysis , Animals , Cattle , Humans , Trinidad and Tobago , Water Microbiology
2.
Mar Pollut Bull ; 60(7): 1117-21, 2010 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20570293

ABSTRACT

Traditional and molecular methods (PCR) were used to detect, quantify and identify the source of fecal pollution in coastal sites of Puerto Rico and Trinidad. Enterococci and Escherichia coli standard plate counts were used as a general indicator of fecal contamination while the PCR detection of Bifidobacteria adolescentis and human or bovine specific Bacteroidales were used to examine potential sources. Seven of 14 sites in Trinidad including Maracas Bay which is a major public beach contained significant fecal contamination based on enterococci numbers counts exceeding established thresholds for areas of direct contact. Forty six percent of the 27 stations in Puerto Rico were over the established thresholds for enterococci and 49% according to E. coli counts. About 31% of the stations examined in Puerto Rico had evidence of human derived fecal contamination. Human fecal pollution was detected in only one station from Trinidad. Bovine derived contamination was detected only once.


Subject(s)
Environmental Monitoring , Feces/microbiology , Seawater/microbiology , Water Microbiology , Water Pollutants/analysis , Animals , Cattle , Escherichia coli/isolation & purification , Geography , Humans , Puerto Rico , Risk Assessment , Trinidad and Tobago
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL