ABSTRACT
AIM: We investigated whether the effect of low-dose aspirin on endothelium-dependent vasodilation and arterial stiffness in people with Type 2 diabetes is different from a matched control group. We examined acute and chronic effects, and effects over the 24h dosing interval. METHODS: In an open-label parallel group intervention study, we included 21 participants with Type 2 diabetes and 21 age- and sex-matched controls. Endothelium-dependent vasodilation was assessed as the reactive hyperaemia index (lnRHI) measured by peripheral arterial tonometry (EndoPAT® ). Arterial stiffness was assessed as pulse wave velocity (PWV) measured by applanation tonometry (SphygmoCor® ). Measurements were performed prior to aspirin intake and 1h after aspirin administration (75 mg). Participants were then treated for 6 days, and measurements were repeated at 24 h and 1 h after aspirin intake. RESULTS: Baseline lnRHI did not differ between groups. The controls had an immediate increase in lnRHI after the first aspirin tablet. This was not observed in participants with diabetes (difference between groups; P < 0.05). After 1 week, both groups demonstrated increased lnRHI compared with baseline (P < 0.01). In participants with diabetes, lnRHI was significantly lower 24 h after aspirin administration compared with 1 h after administration (P < 0.05). This difference was not observed in controls (P = 0.84, difference between groups; P = 0.12). The effect on PWV did not differ between groups. CONCLUSION: Aspirin had a reduced immediate effect on endothelium-dependent vasodilation in participants with diabetes. Both groups had improved endothelial function after 1 week of treatment. Further, the effect of aspirin on endothelial function may be declining during a 24 h dosing interval in people with Type 2 diabetes. (Clinical Trial Registry No: 2016-000515-32).
Subject(s)
Aspirin/pharmacology , Cardiovascular System/drug effects , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/physiopathology , Endothelium, Vascular/drug effects , Aged , Aspirin/therapeutic use , Cardiovascular System/physiopathology , Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2/drug therapy , Endothelium, Vascular/physiology , Female , Humans , Male , Matched-Pair Analysis , Middle Aged , Pulse Wave Analysis , Vascular Stiffness/drug effects , Vasodilation/drug effectsABSTRACT
The source of cells for tissue engineering applications remains a hurdle, predominantly for procedures in which there is insufficient time to harvest a patient's own cells. Animal cells are readily available, but undergo immune rejection. Rejection of animal (i.e., xenogeneic) tissue involves practically every component of the immune system. The initial phase, hyperacute rejection (HAR), involves natural xenoreactive antibodies and the complement system, and leads to endothelial cell lysis and rapid tissue destruction. The cell-surface epitope, galactose-alpha(1,3)-galactose (alphaGal), is presumed to play a key role in HAR. The later stage of immune response (delayed xenograft rejection or DXR), is mediated by immune cells such as monocytes. Carbohydrates are likely also involved in DXR, but their role in this phase of the immune response is less clear. A better understanding of all stages of xenogeneic immune rejection may make it feasible to create cell lines that are immune tolerant. In these studies, we have genetically modified bovine endothelial cells to study the roles of carbohydrates in immune rejection. Our studies suggest that one or more epitopes other than alphaGal may influence complement-mediated lysis. Furthermore, antibodies, as instigators in the complement response, and monocytes appear to recognize different cell surface epitopes.
Subject(s)
Cell Line , Endothelium, Vascular/immunology , Galactosyltransferases/immunology , Graft Rejection/genetics , Graft Rejection/immunology , Transplantation, Heterologous/immunology , Animals , Endothelium, Vascular/cytology , Endothelium, Vascular/transplantation , Galactosyltransferases/genetics , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Tissue Engineering , Transplantation ImmunologyABSTRACT
Various research groups around the world are actively investigating cardiovascular prostheses of biological origin. This review article discusses the need for such bioprosthetics and the potential role for natural tissues in cardiovascular applications such as cardiac valves and vascular grafts. Upon implantation, unmodified natural materials are subject to chemical and enzymatic degradation, seriously decreasing the life of the prosthesis. Therefore, methods such as glutaraldehyde and polyepoxide crosslinking treatments and dye-mediated photooxidation have been developed to stabilize the tissue while attempting to maintain its natural mechanical properties. Also, residual cellular components in a bioprosthetic material have been associated with undesired effects, such as calcification and immunological recognition, and thus have been the motivation for various decellularization processes. The effects of these stabilization and decellularization treatments on mechanical, biological and chemical properties of treated tissues have been investigated, specifically with regard to calcification, immunogenicity, and cytotoxicity concerns. Despite significant advances in the area of cardiovascular prostheses, there has yet to be developed a completely biocompatible, long-lasting implant. However, with the recent advent of tissue engineering, the possibility of applying selective cell seeding to naturally derived bioprosthetics moves us closer to a living tissue replacement.