ABSTRACT
An intrathecal baclofen pump (ITB) can provide significant relief from excessive spasticity and pain that is difficult to control. However, it is not without its drawbacks. We present a case of a young quadriplegic male who underwent ITB pump placement, suffering four years of transient episodes of severe spasticity with withdrawal symptoms. Multiple adjustments were made to his ITB pump dosing without relief. Extensive workup including interrogation of the pump, serial abdominal radiographs, and fluoroscopic catheter dye study revealed no abnormalities. Intraoperatively, it was discovered that the initial catheter anchoring occurred directly adjacent to the vertebrae, leading to a position-dependent catheter occlusion. He underwent the replacement of his ITB pump and catheter. During surgical revision, emphasis was placed on reducing the length of the catheter outside the spine, anchoring to the supraspinous fascia with avoidance of bony prominences or post-laminectomy sites. After surgery, the patient's spasticity improved, and at the eight-month follow-up, he had no complications, resulting in a mean baclofen dose of 300.2 µg/day. This report highlights the potential risk of life-threatening intrathecal baclofen withdrawal secondary to postural changes, providing technical considerations to prevent recurrences. It also raises awareness regarding patients who are more susceptible to transient catheter occlusion after a spinal cord injury.
ABSTRACT
Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS) is a neurological disorder characterized by persistent limb symptoms. With there being no definitive tests, diagnosis can be challenging. The Budapest criteria are the standard for diagnosis. The underlying mechanisms of CRPS involve changes in skin innervation, sensitization of the nervous system, inflammatory cytokines, and genetic and psychological factors. Treatment typically involves a multidisciplinary approach. We present a case of a 71-year-old male with CRPS involving the right upper extremity and a complex history of management including physical therapy, oxycodone, muscle relaxers, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and multiple stellate ganglion blocks. The patient manages his pain with off-label medications, including methadone, duloxetine, and pregabalin. In the United States, the management of chronic pain may be affected by potential usage restrictions imposed by the Food and Drug Omnibus Reform Act (FDORA). Under this new act, physicians may face limitations in prescribing off-label medications for specific diagnoses. We aim to highlight the need for prioritizing patient care and individualized treatment in healthcare policy decision-making.
ABSTRACT
The advent of novel immunotherapies in the treatment of cancers has dramatically changed the landscape of the oncology field. Recent developments in checkpoint inhibition therapies, tumor-infiltrating lymphocyte therapies, chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapies, and cancer vaccines have shown immense promise for significant advancements in cancer treatments. Immunotherapies act on distinct steps of immune response to augment the body's natural ability to recognize, target, and destroy cancerous cells. Combination treatments with immunotherapies and other modalities intend to activate immune response, decrease immunosuppression, and target signaling and resistance pathways to offer a more durable, long-lasting treatment compared to traditional therapies and immunotherapies as monotherapies for cancers. This review aims to briefly describe the rationale, mechanisms of action, and clinical efficacy of common immunotherapies and highlight promising combination strategies currently approved or under clinical development. Additionally, we will discuss the benefits and limitations of these immunotherapy approaches as monotherapies as well as in combination with other treatments.