Dose-Response of Primary Bilateral Medial Rectus Resection in Infantile Exotropia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the dose-response relationship for primary bilateral medial rectus resection in children with exotropia, based on outcomes with this procedure. METHODS: Dose-response at both distance and near were calculated as prism diopters correction per millimeter (PD/mm) of rectus resection. All surgeries were performed under general anesthesia through a fornix incision, using doubled-armed 6-0 polyglactin sutures. The resection amount ranged from 5 to 8 mm in each eye, according to the surgical dosage based on the largest angle of preoperative deviation. RESULTS: The mean surgical dose-response for all procedures was 2.83 ± 1.03 PD/mm of resection at distance and near. The overall success rate was 53% at the final examination after a mean follow-up of 21.9 months. Patients with moderate angles (25 to 45 PD) had a higher success rate than those with 50 PD or greater deviation. CONCLUSIONS: Primary bilateral medial rectus resection should be considered as a surgical alternative in childhood exotropia, particularly for moderate and constant deviations. [J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus. 2022;59(1):24-27.].

Effect of phase-plate adjustment on retinal image sharpness and visible retinal area on ultrawide field imaging.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate changes in image sharpness across ultrawide field (UWF) images and the effect of phase-plate adjustment on image contrast and extent of visible retinal area (VRA). METHODS: This was a single site evaluation of 200° UWF images acquired with phase-plate adjustment (California, Optos, plc) and without (200TX, Optos, plc). Images were acquired using standardized protocol. VRA was manually outlined on each image and quantified using customized software. Mean image sharpness was evaluated using an automated method within the full VRA of each image and within the peripheral region of the VRA. The VRA and image sharpness were evaluated and compared between the two devices. RESULTS: Twenty eyes of 10 healthy volunteers were evaluated. Devices with and without phase-plate adjustment produced a similar extent of VRA. Eye steering increased VRA in devices with and without phase-plate adjustment by 39.3% and 34.3%, respectively. Regardless of gaze direction, mean sharpness of the full VRA was reduced in peripheral area with or without phase-plate adjustment. Compared to images without phase-plate adjustment, use of phase-plate adjustment reduced the loss of peripheral image sharpness in all fields (-4.2 to -26.0%; p < 0.001 all fields). The sharpness of the peripheral area for on-axis images was 61.5% higher with phase-plate adjustment. CONCLUSIONS: The use of phase-plate adjustment does not alter the extent of VRA. However, for on-axis images the loss of sharpness in the periphery is 4.5-fold less with phase-plate adjustment, potentially reducing the need to steer images and improving lesion detection in these areas.

Hemorrhage and/or Microaneurysm Severity and Count in Ultrawide Field Images and Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Photography.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate detection of hemorrhage and/or microaneurysm (H/Ma) using ultrawide field (UWF) retinal imaging as compared with standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) 7-field photographs (ETDRS photos). DESIGN: Single-site comparative study of UWF images and ETDRS photos. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred twenty-six eyes of 69 patients with no diabetic retinopathy (DR) or mild or moderate nonproliferative DR (NPDR). METHODS: Stereoscopic 200° UWF images and stereoscopic 35mm 30° 7-field color photographs were acquired on the same visit. Images were graded for severity and distribution of H/Ma. H/Mas were counted in ETDRS fields 2 to 7 in both ETDRS photos and UWF images. H/Mas in the UWF peripheral fields were also counted. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Kappa (κ) and weighted κ statistics for agreement. Number of H/Ma within and outside ETDRS fields identified in UWF images and ETDRS photos. RESULTS: Distribution of DR severity by ETDRS photos was 24 (19.0%) no DR, 48 (38.1%) mild NPDR, and 54 (42.9%) moderate NPDR. A total of 748 of 756 fields (98.9%) were gradable for H/Mas on ETDRS photos and UWF images. Simple κ/weighted κ statistics for severity of H/Ma: all fields 0.61/0.69, field 2 0.70/0.77, field 3 0.62/0.73, field 4 0.50/0.62, field 5 0.54/0.65, field 6 0.64/0.70, and field 7 0.58/0.63 with overall exact agreement in 81.3% and within 1 step in 97.9% of fields. A greater proportion of fields was graded a more severe H/Ma level in UWF images than in the corresponding ETDRS photos (UWF: 12.7% vs. ETDRS: 6.5%). Evaluating comparable areas in UWF images and ETDRS photos (fields 2-7), a mean of 42.8 H/Mas were identified using ETDRS photos and 48.8 in UWF images (P = 0.10). An additional mean of 21.3 H/Mas (49.8% increase, P < 0.0001) were identified in the peripheral fields of the UWF images. CONCLUSIONS: There is good to excellent agreement between UWF images and ETDRS photos in determining H/Ma severity, with excellent correlation of H/Ma counts within ETDRS photo fields. UWF peripheral fields identified 49.8% more H/Ma, suggesting a more severe H/Ma in 12.7% of eyes. Given the additional lesions detected in peripheral fields and the known risks associated with H/Ma and peripheral lesions, quantification of H/Ma using UWF images may provide a more accurate representation of DR disease activity and potential greater accuracy in predicting DR progression.

Evidence-Based Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema.

Diabetes mellitus is a chronic disease that affects 415 million people worldwide. Despite treatment advances, diabetic eye disease remains a leading cause of vision loss worldwide. Diabetic macular edema (DME) is a common cause of vision loss in diabetic patients. The pathophysiology is complex and involves multiple pathways that ultimately lead to central retinal thickening and, if untreated, visual loss. First-line treatment of DME has evolved from focal/grid laser established by the Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) to intravitreous pharmacologic therapy. Landmark prospective clinical trials examining the effect of intravitreous injections of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) inhibitors in the treatment of DME have demonstrated improved visual outcomes over focal grid laser. This review focuses on the scientific evidence treatment of DME, disease pathophysiology, clinical disease course, current treatment standards, and emerging novel therapeutic approaches.

Evidence-Based Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy.

Diabetic retinopathy (DR) is the most frequent microvascular complication from diabetes and requires annual screening and at least annual follow-up. A systemic approach to optimize blood glucose and blood pressure may halt progression to severe stages of DR and obviate the need for ocular treatment. Although there is evidence of benefit from fenofibrate or intravitreous antiVEGF treatment for eyes with nonproliferative DR (NPDR), these therapies are not standard care for NPDR at this time. Some patients with severe NPDR, especially those with type 2 diabetes, benefit from early panretinal photocoagulation (PRP). Once DR progresses to proliferative DR (PDR), treatment is often necessary to prevent visual loss. PRP remains mainstay treatment for PDR with high-risk characteristics. However, intravitreous antiVEGF injections appear to be a safe and effective treatment alternative for PDR through at least two years. Vitreoretinal surgery is indicated for PDR cases with non-clearing vitreous hemorrhage and/or tractional retinal detachment.

Retinoblastoma in Jordan, 2003-2013: ocular survival and associated factors.

PURPOSE: To determine ocular survival and factors affecting globe survival in patients diagnosed with retinoblastoma at King Hussein Cancer Center (KHCC). METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records of 71 Jordanian patients (45 males and 26 females) diagnosed with retinoblastoma (114 eyes) between June 2003 and May 2013 was conducted. Patient sociodemographic and relevant characteristics were collected from records. Patients with bilateral retinoblastoma were treated with chemoreduction and focal consolidation. Lens-sparing radiation therapy and enucleation were reserved for eyes that failed chemoreduction combined with focal therapy. In cases of unilateral retinoblastoma, primary enucleation was recommended for eyes with advanced unilateral disease (Reese-Ellsworth classification groups IV and V). Kaplan-Meier survival and Cox regression multilevel analysis were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 12 months. The follow-up period ranged from 0.25-160 months (mean 26.9 months). The Kaplan-Meier estimate of globe survival of the 114 eyes was 68.0% at 1 year, 63.3% at 2 years, and 62.1% at 5 years. The mean survival time was 101.6 months (95% confidence interval, CI, 87.6-115.6 months). In multivariable-adjusted analysis, advanced stage of the disease (hazard ratio, HR, 5.1, 95% CI 2.3-11.6), unilateral disease (HR 3.3, 95% CI 1.4-8.1), and delay in diagnosis (HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-5.5) were significantly associated with increased hazard of enucleation. CONCLUSION: The overall ocular survival rate for eyes with retinoblastoma was close to regional and international figures. Disease stage, laterality, and delay in diagnosis were significant predictors of enucleation.