Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 44
Filter
1.
iScience ; 25(5): 104225, 2022 May 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35494238

ABSTRACT

Understanding the regulation of normal and malignant human hematopoiesis requires comprehensive cell atlas of the hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) regulatory microenvironment. Here, we develop a tailored bioinformatic pipeline to integrate public and proprietary single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) datasets. As a result, we robustly identify for the first time 14 intermediate cell states and 11 stages of differentiation in the endothelial and mesenchymal BM compartments, respectively. Our data provide the most comprehensive description to date of the murine HSC-regulatory microenvironment and suggest a higher level of specialization of the cellular circuits than previously anticipated. Furthermore, this deep characterization allows inferring conserved features in human, suggesting that the layers of microenvironmental regulation of hematopoiesis may also be shared between species. Our resource and methodology is a stepping-stone toward a comprehensive cell atlas of the BM microenvironment.

2.
Nefrología (Madrid) ; 40(3): 272-278, mayo-jun. 2020. graf, tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-187525

ABSTRACT

La reciente aparición de la pandemia por el coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 ha impactado de forma muy importante en la población general. Los pacientes en tratamiento renal sustitutivo (TRS) no han sido ajenos a esta situación y por sus características resultan especialmente vulnerables. Presentamos los resultados del análisis del Registro COVID-19 de la S.E.N. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: EL Registro comenzó a funcionar el 18 de marzo de 2020. Recoge variables epidemiológicas, datos del contagio y diagnóstico, clínica acompañante, tratamientos y desenlace. Se trata de un registro "on line". Los pacientes fueron diagnosticados de infección por SARS-Cov-2 en base a los resultados de la PCR del virus, realizada tanto en pacientes que habían manifestado clínica compatible o tenían signos sospechosos como en aquellos a los que se había hecho como cribado tras algún contacto conocido con otro enfermo. RESULTADOS: A fecha 11 de abril el Registro disponía de datos de 868 pacientes, procedentes de todas las Comunidades Autónomas. La modalidad de TRS más representada es la hemodiálisis en centro (HDC) seguida de los pacientes trasplantados. La clínica de presentación es similar a la población general. Un porcentaje muy elevado (85%) requirió ingreso hospitalario, un 8% en unidades de cuidados intensivos. Los tratamientos más utilizados fueron hidroxicloroquina, lopinavirritonavir y esteroides. La mortalidad es elevada y alcanza el 23%: los pacientes fallecidos estaban con más frecuencia en HDC, desarrollaban más frecuentemente neumonía y recibían en menos ocasiones lopinavir-ritonavir y esteroides. La edad y la neumonía se asociaban de forma independiente al riesgo de fallecer. CONCLUSIONES: La infección por SARS-CoV-2 afecta ya a un número importante de pacientes españoles en TRS, fundamentalmente aquellos que están en HDC, las tasas de hospitalización son muy elevadas y la mortalidad es elevada; la edad y el desarrollo de neumonía son factores asociados a mortalidad


The recent appearance of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic has had a significant impact on the general population. Patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT) have not been unaware of this situation and due to their characteristics they are especially vulnerable. We present the results of the analysis of the COVID-19 Registry of the Spanish Society of Nephrology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Registry began operating on March 18th, 2020. It collects epidemiological variables, contagion and diagnosis data, signs and symptoms, treatments and outcomes. It is an "online" registry. Patients were diagnosed with SARS-Cov-2 infection based on the results of the PCR of the virus, carried out both in patients who had manifested compatible symptoms or had suspicious signs, as well as in those who had undergone screening after some contac, acquainted with another patient. RESULTS: As of April 11, the Registry had data on 868 patients, from all the Autonomous Communities. The most represented form of TRS is in-center hemodialysis (ICH) followed by transplant patients. Symptoms are similar to the general population. A very high percentage (85%) required hospital admission, 8% in intensive care units. The most used treatments were hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir-ritonavir, and steroids. Mortality is high and reaches 23%; deceased patients were more frequently on ICH, developed pneumonia more frequently, and received less frequently lopinavir-ritonavir and steroids. Age and pneumonia were independently associated with the risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 infection already affects a significant number of Spanish patients on RRT, mainly those on ICH, hospitalization rates are very high and mortality is high; age and the development of pneumonia are factors associated with mortality


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Betacoronavirus , Pandemics , Renal Dialysis/mortality , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/therapy , Renal Insufficiency, Chronic/virology , Kidney Transplantation/adverse effects , Hemodialysis Units, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Spain/epidemiology , Risk Factors
3.
Nefrologia (Engl Ed) ; 40(3): 272-278, 2020.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32389518

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The recent appearance of the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic has had a significant impact on the general population. Patients on renal replacement therapy (RRT) have not been unaware of this situation and due to their characteristics they are especially vulnerable. We present the results of the analysis of the COVID-19 Registry of the Spanish Society of Nephrology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The Registry began operating on March 18th, 2020. It collects epidemiological variables, contagion and diagnosis data, signs and symptoms, treatments and outcomes. It is an online registry. Patients were diagnosed with SARS-CoV-2 infection based on the results of the PCR of the virus, carried out both in patients who had manifested compatible symptoms or had suspicious signs, as well as in those who had undergone screening after some contact acquainted with another patient. RESULTS: As of April 11, the Registry had data on 868 patients, from all the Autonomous Communities. The most represented form of RRT is in-center hemodialysis (ICH) followed by transplant patients. Symptoms are similar to the general population. A very high percentage (85%) required hospital admission, 8% in intensive care units. The most used treatments were hydroxychloroquine, lopinavir-ritonavir, and steroids. Mortality is high and reaches 23%; deceased patients were more frequently on ICH, developed pneumonia more frequently, and received less frequently lopinavir-ritonavir and steroids. Age and pneumonia were independently associated with the risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: SARS-CoV-2 infection already affects a significant number of Spanish patients on RRT, mainly those on ICH, hospitalization rates are very high and mortality is high; age and the development of pneumonia are factors associated with mortality.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/epidemiology , Nephrology/statistics & numerical data , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/epidemiology , Registries/statistics & numerical data , Renal Replacement Therapy/statistics & numerical data , Age Factors , Aged , COVID-19 , Chi-Square Distribution , Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Female , Hemodialysis Units, Hospital/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Intensive Care Units/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , SARS-CoV-2 , Societies, Medical , Spain/epidemiology , Statistics, Nonparametric , Symptom Assessment/statistics & numerical data , Transplant Recipients/statistics & numerical data
15.
Med. clín (Ed. impr.) ; 150(5): 185-187, mar. 2018. tab
Article in Spanish | IBECS | ID: ibc-171018

ABSTRACT

Introducción y objetivo: Los cribados nutricionales permiten detectar el riesgo nutricional, deben estar validados y su utilidad contrastada con un patrón de referencia. El objetivo de este trabajo es conocer la validez, el comportamiento y la concordancia de 3 herramientas de cribado nutricional respecto a la valoración nutricional completa. Material y métodos: Subanálisis de un estudio transversal y descriptivo sobre prevalencia de desnutrición relacionada con la enfermedad. La muestra fue seleccionada de pacientes ambulatorios, hospitalizados e institucionalizados. Se realizaron los cribados MUST, MNAsf y MST, una valoración nutricional completa a todos los pacientes y se empleó el consenso SENPE-SEDOM para el diagnóstico. Resultados: En los pacientes ambulatorios tanto el MUST como el MNAsf presentan una validez similar respecto a la valoración nutricional completa (AUC 0,871 y 0,883, respectivamente). En los institucionalizados la herramienta MUST es la de mayor validez (AUC 0,815) y en los hospitalizados, tanto el MUST como el MST (AUC 0,868 y 0,853, respectivamente). Conclusiones: Es imprescindible la utilización de cribados nutricionales para detectar la desnutrición relacionada con la enfermedad e invertir bien los recursos disponibles. Según nuestros resultados, el cribado MUST es el más apropiado en centros hospitalarios y de tercera edad (AU)


Introduction and objective: Nutritional screening allows for the detection of nutritional risk. Validated tools should be implemented, and their usefulness should be contrasted with a gold standard. The aim of this study is to discover the validity, efficacy and reliability of 3 nutritional screening tools in relation to complete nutritional assessment. Material and methodology: A sub-analysis of a cross-sectional and descriptive study on the prevalence of disease-related malnutrition. The sample was selected from outpatients, hospitalized and institutionalized patients. MUST, MNAsf and MST screening were employed. A nutritional assessment of all the patients was undertaken. The SENPE-SEDOM consensus was used for the diagnosis. Results: In the outpatients, both MUST and MNAsf have a similar validity in relation to the nutritional assessment (AUC 0.871 and 0.883, respectively). In the institutionalized patients, the MUST screening method is the one that shows the greatest validity (AUC 0.815), whereas in the hospitalized patients, the most valid methods are both MUST and MST (AUC 0.868 and 0.853, respectively). Conclusions: It is essential to use nutritional screening to invest the available resources wisely. Based on our results, MUST is the most suitable screening method in hospitalized and institutionalized patients (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Nutritive Value , Malnutrition/epidemiology , Cross-Sectional Studies/methods , Risk Assessment/methods , Food and Nutritional Surveillance , 28599
19.
Med Clin (Barc) ; 150(5): 185-187, 2018 03 09.
Article in English, Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28947299

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Nutritional screening allows for the detection of nutritional risk. Validated tools should be implemented, and their usefulness should be contrasted with a gold standard. The aim of this study is to discover the validity, efficacy and reliability of 3 nutritional screening tools in relation to complete nutritional assessment. MATERIAL AND METHODOLOGY: A sub-analysis of a cross-sectional and descriptive study on the prevalence of disease-related malnutrition. The sample was selected from outpatients, hospitalized and institutionalized patients. MUST, MNAsf and MST screening were employed. A nutritional assessment of all the patients was undertaken. The SENPE-SEDOM consensus was used for the diagnosis. RESULTS: In the outpatients, both MUST and MNAsf have a similar validity in relation to the nutritional assessment (AUC 0.871 and 0.883, respectively). In the institutionalized patients, the MUST screening method is the one that shows the greatest validity (AUC 0.815), whereas in the hospitalized patients, the most valid methods are both MUST and MST (AUC 0.868 and 0.853, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: It is essential to use nutritional screening to invest the available resources wisely. Based on our results, MUST is the most suitable screening method in hospitalized and institutionalized patients.


Subject(s)
Diagnostic Screening Programs , Inpatients/statistics & numerical data , Institutionalization/statistics & numerical data , Malnutrition/epidemiology , Nutrition Assessment , Nutrition Surveys , Outpatients/statistics & numerical data , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Area Under Curve , Cross-Sectional Studies , Humans , Malnutrition/diagnosis , Middle Aged , Nutritional Status , Prevalence , ROC Curve , Reproducibility of Results , Sampling Studies , Sensitivity and Specificity
20.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 35(1): e64-e65, 2018 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29164681

ABSTRACT

The first vaccine that shows significant potential in providing broad coverage against serogroup B meningococcal disease has recently been approved. Because of its newness, potential adverse events need to be reported. Here we report a case of urticarial vasculitis, a rare disease in children, in probable relationship with the novel vaccine.


Subject(s)
Meningococcal Infections/prevention & control , Meningococcal Vaccines/adverse effects , Neisseria meningitidis, Serogroup B/immunology , Vasculitis, Leukocytoclastic, Cutaneous/diagnosis , Child , Female , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Humans , Skin/pathology , Vasculitis, Leukocytoclastic, Cutaneous/etiology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL