The utility of DNA methylation profiling in the diagnosis of un-, de- and trans-differentiated melanoma: a series of 11 cases.

AIMS: Melanomas are recognised for their remarkable morphological plasticity. Some tumours may lose conventional features and/or acquire non-melanocytic characteristics, referred to as undifferentiated, dedifferentiated and transdifferentiated melanoma. Despite this phenotypical variability, melanomas typically maintain their cancer driver aberrations, affecting genes such as BRAF, NRAS and NF1. Currently, little is known about whether the DNA methylation profile follows the loss or change of differentiation or is retained despite extensive morphological transformation. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this study we analysed 11 melanoma cases, comprising six males and five females, with a median age of 67 years, including five undifferentiated, four trans-differentiated and two de-differentiated melanomas. Undifferentiated and trans-differentiated tumours either arose in a patient with known melanoma and/or presented in the groin/axilla with molecular alterations consistent with melanoma. Cases with heterologous differentiation resembled chondrosarcoma, osteosarcoma, angiosarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma both morphologically and immunohistochemically, while undifferentiated tumours resembled undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. Methylome profiling was performed, and unsupervised clustering analysis revealed nine cases (five undifferentiated, three trans-differentiated and one de-differentiated) to cluster closely together with conventional melanomas from a reference set. Two cases clustered separately with a distinct group of conventional melanomas exhibiting H3K27me3 loss. CONCLUSIONS: Despite loss of differentiation and phenotypical plasticity, methylation patterns seem to be retained in undifferentiated, de-differentiated and trans-differentiated melanomas and represent useful diagnostic tools to enhance diagnostic precision in these diagnostically challenging cases.

Biological Sample Collection to Advance Research and Treatment: A Fight Osteosarcoma Through European Research and Euro Ewing Consortium Statement.

Osteosarcoma and Ewing sarcoma are bone tumors mostly diagnosed in children, adolescents, and young adults. Despite multimodal therapy, morbidity is high and survival rates remain low, especially in the metastatic disease setting. Trials investigating targeted therapies and immunotherapies have not been groundbreaking. Better understanding of biological subgroups, the role of the tumor immune microenvironment, factors that promote metastasis, and clinical biomarkers of prognosis and drug response are required to make progress. A prerequisite to achieve desired success is a thorough, systematic, and clinically linked biological analysis of patient samples, but disease rarity and tissue processing challenges such as logistics and infrastructure have contributed to a lack of relevant samples for clinical care and research. There is a need for a Europe-wide framework to be implemented for the adequate and minimal sampling, processing, storage, and analysis of patient samples. Two international panels of scientists, clinicians, and patient and parent advocates have formed the Fight Osteosarcoma Through European Research consortium and the Euro Ewing Consortium. The consortia shared their expertise and institutional practices to formulate new guidelines. We report new reference standards for adequate and minimally required sampling (time points, diagnostic samples, and liquid biopsy tubes), handling, and biobanking to enable advanced biological studies in bone sarcoma. We describe standards for analysis and annotation to drive collaboration and data harmonization with practical, legal, and ethical considerations. This position paper provides comprehensive guidelines that should become the new standards of care that will accelerate scientific progress, promote collaboration, and improve outcomes.

Superficial Neurocristic EWSR1::FLI1 Fusion Tumor: A Distinctive, Clinically Indolent, S100 Protein/SOX10-Positive Neoplasm.

It is now understood that identical gene fusions may be shared by different entities. We report a distinctive neoplasm of the skin and subcutis, harboring the Ewing sarcoma-associated EWSR1::FLI1 fusion but differing otherwise from Ewing sarcoma. Slides and blocks for 5 cutaneous neoplasms coded as other than Ewing sarcoma and harboring EWSR1::FLI1 were retrieved. Immunohistochemical and molecular genetic results were abstracted from reports. Methylation profiling was performed. Clinical information was obtained. The tumors occurred in 4 men and 1 woman (median: 25 years of age; range: 19-69 years) and involved the skin/subcutis of the back (2), thigh, buttock, and chest wall (median: 2.4 cm; range: 1-11 cm). Two tumors were present "years" before coming to clinical attention. The lesions were multinodular and circumscribed and consisted of nests of bland, round cells admixed with hyalinized collagenous bands containing spindled cells. Hemorrhage and cystic change were often present; necrosis was absent. All were diffusely S100 protein/SOX10-positive; 4 of 5 were CD99-negative. One tested case was strongly positive for NKX2.2. A variety of other tested markers were either focally positive (glial fibrillary acidic protein, p63) or negative. Molecular genetic results were as follows: EWSR1 exon 7::FLI1 exon 8, EWSR1 exon 11::FLI1 exon 5, EWSR1 exon 11::FLI1 exon 6, EWSR1 exon 7::FLI1 exon 6, and EWSR1 exon 10::FLI1 exon 6. Methylation profiling (3 cases) showed these to form a unique cluster, distinct from Ewing sarcoma. All patients underwent excision with negative margins; one received 1 cycle of chemotherapy. Clinical follow-up showed all patients to be alive without disease (median: 17 months; range: 11-62 months). Despite similar gene fusions, the morphologic, immunohistochemical, epigenetic, and clinical features of these unique EWSR1::FLI1-fused neoplasms of the skin and subcutis differ substantially from Ewing sarcoma. Interestingly, EWSR1 rearrangements involved exons 10 or 11, only rarely seen in Ewing sarcoma, in a majority of cases. Superficial neurocristic EWSR1::FLI1 fusion tumors should be rigorously distinguished from true cutaneous Ewing sarcomas.

ALK-rearranged, CD34-positive spindle cell neoplasms resembling dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans: a study of seven cases.

AIMS: The majority of dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) harbour PDGFB or PDGFD rearrangements. We encountered ALK expression/rearrangement in a PDGFB/D-negative CD34-positive spindle cell neoplasm with features similar to DFSP, prompting evaluation of ALK-rearrangements in DFSP and plaque-like CD34-positive dermal fibroma (P-LDF). METHODS AND RESULTS: We searched the archives of academic institutions for cases previously coded as DFSP and P-LDF. NGS-naïve or PDGFB-negative DFSP were screened for ALK (clone D5F3) expression by immunohistochemistry. NGS or ALK FISH was performed on ALK-positive cases. Methylome profiling studies were performed and compared with conventional DFSP. One case of "DFSP" and two "P-LDF" with ALK expression were identified from the archives, while four cases were detected prospectively. These seven cases (6F:1M; 8 months to 76 years) arose in the dermis of the arm (two), scalp, eyelid, thigh, abdomen, and shoulder and ranged from 0.4 to 4.2 cm. Tumours were composed of spindled cells and displayed a storiform growth pattern. Cytologic atypia was absent, and mitotic figures were scarce (0-2/10 HPFs, high power fields). The lesional cells were diffusely positive for CD34 and ALK and negative for S100 protein. By NGS (n = 5), ALK fusion partners included DCTN1 (2), PLEKHH2, and CLIP2 in DFSP-like cases and FLNA in P-LDF-like lesions. ALK FISH was positive in one (of two) cases previously labelled P-LDF. Methylome profiling of two (of three) ALK-rearranged DFSP-like tumours showed clustering with conventional DFSP in the UMAP dimension reduction plot. To date, no tumour has recurred (n = 2; 26, 27 months). CONCLUSION: We describe a cohort of novel ALK-rearranged tumours with morphologic features similar to DFSP.

Myoepithelial Tumors of Bone With EWSR1::PBX3 Fusion: A Spectrum From Benign to Malignant.

The EWSR1::PBX3 fusion gene, commonly associated with cutaneous syncytial myoepitheliomas, is also found in myoepithelial tumors (METs) of bone and soft tissue. These tumors typically demonstrate benign histology and favorable outcomes. This study examines 6 previously unreported intraosseous METs harboring the EWSR1::PBX3 fusion, focusing on their histopathologic characteristics, immunophenotype, clinical and radiographic profiles, and patient outcomes. The cohort comprised 5 men and 1 woman, aged 25 to 65 years (median age: 31 years), with tumors located in the proximal tibia (3 cases), distal radius (2 cases), and ilium (1 case) and sizes between 3.2 and 12.2 cm (median size: 3.9 cm). Imaging showed osteolytic lesions with varying degrees of cortical involvement and soft tissue extension in 3 cases. Histologically, 4 tumors showed mainly uniform oval-to-spindled cells in syncytial or fascicular arrangements within a collagenous matrix, displaying either bland nuclear features or mild atypia, and low to slightly elevated mitotic activity (≤1 per 10 high-power fields in 3 cases and 6 per 10 high-power fields in 1), classifying them as benign or atypical METs. In contrast, 2 tumors exhibited pronounced nuclear atypia with ovoid, spindled, epithelioid and round cells, hyperchromatic nuclei, inconspicuous nucleoli, increased N/C ratios, high mitotic rates (17 and 19 per 10 high-power fields), and extensive necrosis. Both tumors behaved aggressively-one patient underwent amputation after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation, and the other died within 7 months with the disease still present. Immunohistochemically, the tumors consistently expressed epithelial membrane antigen and S100 but lacked keratin (AE1/AE3) expression. Our study demonstrated that bone METs with EWSR1::PBX3 fusions encompass a histologic continuum from benign to malignant, with benign/atypical METs mirroring their cutaneous analogs in morphology, and malignant variants distinguished by heterogeneous cytologic and architectural features, pronounced nuclear atypia, and high mitotic rates.

Osteosarcoma Arising as a Secondary Malignancy following Treatment for Hematologic Cancer: A Report of 33 Affected Patients from the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group (COSS).

PURPOSE: Osteosarcoma may arise as a secondary cancer following leukemias or lymphomas. We intended to increase the knowledge about such rare events. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We searched the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group's database for individuals who developed their osteosarcoma following a previous hematological malignancy. The presentation and treatment of both malignancies was investigated, and additional neoplasms were noted. Outcomes after osteosarcoma were analyzed and potential prognostic factors were searched for. RESULTS: A total of 33 eligible patients were identified (male: 23, female: 10; median age: 12.9 years at diagnosis of hematological cancer; 20 lymphomas, 13 leukemias). A cancer predisposition syndrome was evident in one patient only. The hematological cancers had been treated by radiotherapy in 28 (1 unknown) and chemotherapy in 26 cases, including bone-marrow transplantation in 9. The secondary bone sarcomas (high-grade central 27, periosteal 2, extra-osseous 2, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma of bone 2) arose after a median lag-time of 9.4 years, when patients were a median of 19.1 years old. Tumors were considered radiation-related in 26 cases (1 unknown). Osteosarcoma-sites were in the extremities (19), trunk (12), or head and neck (2). Metastases at diagnosis affected eight patients. Information on osteosarcoma therapy was available for 31 cases. All of these received chemotherapy. Local therapy involved surgery in 27 patients, with a good response reported for 9/18 eligible patients. Local radiotherapy was given to three patients. The median follow-up was 3.9 (0.3-12.0) years after bone tumor diagnosis. During this period, 21 patients had developed events as defined, and 15 had died, resulting in 5-year event-free and overall survival rates of 40% (standard error: 9%) and 56% (10%), respectively. There were multiple instances of additional neoplasms. Several factors were found to be of prognostic value (p < 0.05) for event-free (osteosarcoma site in the extremities) or overall (achievement of a surgical osteosarcoma-remission, receiving chemotherapy for the hematologic malignancy) survival. CONCLUSIONS: We were able to prove radiation therapy for hematological malignancies to be the predominant risk factor for later osteosarcomas. A resulting overrepresentation of axial and a tendency towards additional neoplasms affects prognosis. Still, selected patients may become long-term survivors with appropriate therapies, which is an argument against therapeutic negligence.

A novel entity of massive multifocal osteolyses in the elderly.

Osteolyses are common findings in elderly patients and most frequently represent malignant or locally aggressive bone tumors, infection, inflammatory and endocrine disorders, histiocytoses, and rare diseases such as Gorham-Stout syndrome. We here report on a novel entity of massive multifocal osteolyses in both shoulders, the right hip and left knee joint and the dens of an 83-year-old patient not relatable to any previously known etiopathology of bone disorders. The soft tissue mass is of myxoid stroma with an unspecific granulomatous inflammatory process, aggressively destroying extensive cortical and cancellous bone segments and encroaching on articulating bones in diarthrodial large joints. Radiological, nuclear medical, serological, histological, and immunohistochemical analyses were incapable of further classifying the disease pattern within the existing scheme of pathology. Quantitative polymerase chain reaction and next generation sequencing revealed that mutations are not suggestive of any known hereditary or acquired bone disease. Possible treatment options include radionuclide therapy for pain palliation and percutaneous radiation to arrest bone resorption while surgical treatment is inevitable for pathological fractures. This case study shall increase the awareness of the musculoskeletal community and motivate to collect further information on this rare but mutilating disorder.

Small cell osteosarcoma versus fusion-driven round cell sarcomas of bone: retrospective clinical, radiological, pathological, and (epi)genetic comparison with clinical implications.

Small cell osteosarcoma (SCOS), a variant of conventional high-grade osteosarcoma (COS), may mimic fusion-driven round cell sarcomas (FDRCS) by overlapping clinico-radiological and histomorphological/immunohistochemical characteristics, hampering accurate diagnosis and consequently proper therapy. We retrospectively analyzed decalcified formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples of 18 bone tumors primarily diagnosed as SCOS by methylation profiling, fusion gene analysis, and immunohistochemistry.In eight cases, the diagnosis of SCOS was maintained, and in 10 cases it was changed into FDRCS, including three Ewing sarcomas (EWSR1::FLI1 in two cases and no identified fusion gene in the third case), two sarcomas with BCOR alterations (KMT2D::BCOR, CCNB3::BCOR, respectively), three mesenchymal chondrosarcomas (HEY1::NCOA2 in two cases and one case with insufficient RNA quality), and two sclerosing epithelioid fibrosarcomas (FUS::CREBL3 and EWSR1 rearrangement, respectively).Histologically, SCOS usually possessed more pleomorphic cells in contrast to the FDRCS showing mainly monomorphic cellular features. However, osteoid was seen in the latter tumors as well, often associated with slight pleomorphism. Also, the immunohistochemical profile (CD99, SATB2, and BCOR) overlapped.Clinically and radiologically, similarities between SCOS and FDRCS were observed, with by imaging only minimal presence or lack of (mineralized) osteoid in most of the SCOSs.In conclusion, discrimination of SCOS, epigenetically related to COS, versus FDRCS of bone can be challenging but is important due to different biology and therefore therapeutic strategies. Methylation profiling is a reliable and robust diagnostic test especially on decalcified FFPE material. Subsequent fusion gene analysis and/or use of specific immunohistochemical surrogate markers can be used to substantiate the diagnosis.

Osteosarcomas With Few Chromosomal Alterations or Adult Onset Are Genetically Heterogeneous.

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary bone malignancy, often detected in children and adolescents and commonly associated with TP53 alterations along with a high number of chromosomal rearrangements. However, osteosarcoma can affect patients of any age, and some tumors display less genetic complexity. Besides TP53 variants, data on key driving mutations are lacking for many osteosarcomas, particularly those affecting adults. To detect osteosarcoma-specific alterations, we screened transcriptomic and genomic sequencing and copy number data from 150 bone tumors originally diagnosed as osteosarcomas. To increase the precision in gene fusion detection, we developed a bioinformatic tool denoted as NAFuse, which extracts gene fusions that are verified at both the genomic and transcriptomic levels. Apart from the already reported genetic subgroups of osteosarcoma with TP53 structural variants, or MDM2 and/or CDK4 amplification, we did not identify any recurrent genetic driver that signifies the remaining cases. Among the plethora of mutations identified, we found genetic alterations characteristic of, or similar to, those of other bone and soft tissue tumors in 8 cases. These mutations were found in tumors with relatively few other genetic alterations or in adults. Due to the lack of clinical context and available tissue, we can question the diagnosis only on a genetic basis. However, our findings support the notion that osteosarcomas with few chromosomal alterations or adult onset seem genetically distinct from conventional osteosarcomas of children and adolescents.

Disruption of the TP53 locus in osteosarcoma leads to TP53 promoter gene fusions and restoration of parts of the TP53 signalling pathway.

TP53 is the most frequently mutated gene in human cancer. This gene shows not only loss-of-function mutations but also recurrent missense mutations with gain-of-function activity. We have studied the primary bone malignancy osteosarcoma, which harbours one of the most rearranged genomes of all cancers. This is odd since it primarily affects children and adolescents who have not lived the long life thought necessary to accumulate massive numbers of mutations. In osteosarcoma, TP53 is often disrupted by structural variants. Here, we show through combined whole-genome and transcriptome analyses of 148 osteosarcomas that TP53 structural variants commonly result in loss of coding parts of the gene while simultaneously preserving and relocating the promoter region. The transferred TP53 promoter region is fused to genes previously implicated in cancer development. Paradoxically, these erroneously upregulated genes are significantly associated with the TP53 signalling pathway itself. This suggests that while the classical tumour suppressor activities of TP53 are lost, certain parts of the TP53 signalling pathway that are necessary for cancer cell survival and proliferation are retained. In line with this, our data suggest that transposition of the TP53 promoter is an early event that allows for a new normal state of genome-wide rearrangements in osteosarcoma. © 2023 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.

EWSR1::WT1 Fusions in Neoplasms Other Than Conventional Desmoplastic Small Round Cell Tumor: Three Tumors Occurring Outside the Female Genital Tract.

Desmoplastic small round cell tumor (DSRCT) is a high-grade, primitive round cell sarcoma classically associated with prominent desmoplastic stroma, coexpression of keratin and desmin, and a characteristic EWSR1::WT1 gene fusion. DSRCT typically arises in the abdominopelvic cavity of young males with diffuse peritoneal spread and poor overall survival. Although originally considered to be pathognomonic for DSRCT, EWSR1::WT1 gene fusions have recently been detected in rare tumors lacking the characteristic morphologic and immunohistochemical features of DSRCT. Here, we report 3 additional cases of neoplasms other than conventional DSCRCT with EWSR1::WT1 gene fusions that occurred outside the female genital tract. Two occurred in the abdominopelvic cavities of a 27-year-old man and a 12-year-old girl, whereas the third arose in the axillary soft tissue of an 85-year-old man. All cases lacked prominent desmoplastic stroma and were instead solid and cystic with peripheral fibrous pseudocapsules and occasional intervening fibrous septa. Necrosis was either absent (1/3) or rare (2/3), and mitotic activity was low (<1 to 3 per 10 hpf). In immunohistochemical studies, there was expression of smooth muscle actin (3/3) and desmin (3/3), rare to focal reactivity for EMA (2/3), and variable expression of CK AE1/AE3 (1/3). Myogenin and MyoD1 were negative, and C-terminus-specific WT1 was positive in both cases tested (2/2). All 3 tumors followed a more indolent clinical course with 2 cases demonstrating no evidence of disease at 20 and 44 months after resection. The patient from case 3 died of other causes at 14 months with no evidence of recurrence. DNA methylation profiling showed that the 3 cases clustered with DSRCT; however, they demonstrated fewer copy number variations with 2 cases having a flat profile (0% copy number variation). Differential methylation analysis with hierarchical clustering further showed variation between the 3 cases and conventional DSRCT. Although further study is needed, our results, in addition to previous reports, suggest that EWSR1::WT1 gene fusions occur in rare and seemingly distinctive tumors other than conventional DSRCT with indolent behavior. Proper classification of these unusual soft tissue tumors with EWSR1::WT1 gene fusions requires direct correlation with tumor morphology and clinical behavior, which is essential to avoid overtreatment with aggressive chemotherapy.

Zoledronic Acid Add-on Therapy for Standard-Risk Ewing Sarcoma Patients in the Ewing 2008R1 Trial.

PURPOSE: The phase III, open-label, prospective, multicenter, randomized Ewing 2008R1 trial (EudraCT2008-003658-13) was conducted in 12 countries to evaluate the effect of zoledronic acid (ZOL) maintenance therapy compared with no add-on regarding event-free survival (EFS, primary endpoint) and overall survival (OS) in standard-risk Ewing sarcoma (EWS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had localized EWS with either good histologic response to induction chemotherapy and/or small tumors (<200 mL). Patients received six cycles of VIDE induction and eight cycles of VAI (male) or eight cycles of VAC (female) consolidation. ZOL treatment started parallel to the sixth consolidation cycle. Randomization was stratified by tumor site (pelvis/other). The two-sided adaptive inverse-normal four-stage design (planned sample size 448 patients, significance level 5%, power 80%) was changed after the first interim analysis using the Müller-Schäfer method. RESULTS: Between April 2010 and November 2018, 284 patients were randomized (142 ZOL/142 no add-on). With a median follow-up of 3.9 years, EFS was not significantly different between ZOL and no add-on group in the adaptive design (HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.43-1.28, P = 0.27, intention-to-treat). Three-year EFS rates were 84.0% (95% CI, 77.7%-90.8%) for ZOL vs. 81.7% (95% CI, 75.2%-88.8%) for no add-on. Results were similar in the per-protocol collective. OS was not different between groups. The 3-year OS was 92.8% (95% CI, 88.4%-97.5%) for ZOL and 94.6% (95% CI, 90.9%-98.6%) for no add-on. Noticeable more renal, neurologic, and gastrointestinal toxicities were observed for ZOL (P < 0.05). Severe renal toxicities occurred more often in the ZOL arm (P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with standard-risk localized EWS, there is no additional benefit from maintenance treatment with ZOL.

Histomorphometric Analysis of 38 Giant Cell Tumors of Bone after Recurrence as Compared to Changes Following Denosumab Treatment.

Giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) is an osteolytic tumor driven by an H3F3A-mutated mononuclear cell with the accumulation of osteoclastic giant cells. We analyzed tissue from 13 patients with recurrence and 25 patients with denosumab therapy, including two cases of malignant transformation. We found a decrease in the total number of cells (p = 0.03), but not in the individual cell populations when comparing primary and recurrence. The patients treated with denosumab showed induction of osteoid formation increasing during therapy. The total number of cells was reduced (p < 0.0001) and the number of H3F3A-mutated tumor cells decreased (p = 0.0001), while the H3F3A wild-type population remained stable. The KI-67 proliferation rate dropped from 10% to 1% and Runx2- and SATB2-positive cells were reduced. The two cases of malignant transformation revealed a loss of the H3F3A-mutated cells, while the KI-67 rate increased. Changes in RUNX2 and SATB2 expression were higher in one sarcoma, while in the other RUNX2 was decreased and SATB2-positive cells were completely lost. We conclude that denosumab has a strong impact on the morphology of GCTB. KI-67, RUNX2 and SATB2 expression differed depending on the benign or malignant course of the tumor under denosumab therapy.

DNA methylation profile discriminates sporadic giant cell granulomas of the jaws and cherubism from their giant cell-rich histological mimics.

Sporadic giant cell granulomas (GCGs) of the jaws and cherubism-associated giant cell lesions share histopathological features and microscopic diagnosis alone can be challenging. Additionally, GCG can morphologically closely resemble other giant cell-rich lesions, including non-ossifying fibroma (NOF), aneurysmal bone cyst (ABC), giant cell tumour of bone (GCTB), and chondroblastoma. The epigenetic basis of these giant cell-rich tumours is unclear and DNA methylation profiling has been shown to be clinically useful for the diagnosis of other tumour types. Therefore, we aimed to assess the DNA methylation profile of central and peripheral sporadic GCG and cherubism to test whether DNA methylation patterns can help to distinguish them. Additionally, we compared the DNA methylation profile of these lesions with those of other giant cell-rich mimics to investigate if the microscopic similarities extend to the epigenetic level. DNA methylation analysis was performed for central (n = 10) and peripheral (n = 10) GCG, cherubism (n = 6), NOF (n = 10), ABC (n = 16), GCTB (n = 9), and chondroblastoma (n = 10) using the Infinium Human Methylation EPIC Chip. Central and peripheral sporadic GCG and cherubism share a related DNA methylation pattern, with those of peripheral GCG and cherubism appearing slightly distinct, while central GCG shows overlap with both of the former. NOF, ABC, GCTB, and chondroblastoma, on the other hand, have distinct methylation patterns. The global and enhancer-associated CpG DNA methylation values showed a similar distribution pattern among central and peripheral GCG and cherubism, with cherubism showing the lowest and peripheral GCG having the highest median values. By contrast, promoter regions showed a different methylation distribution pattern, with cherubism showing the highest median values. In conclusion, DNA methylation profiling is currently not capable of clearly distinguishing sporadic and cherubism-associated giant cell lesions. Conversely, it could discriminate sporadic GCG of the jaws from their giant cell-rich mimics (NOF, ABC, GCTB, and chondroblastoma).

Solitary pulmonary metastases at first recurrence of osteosarcoma: Presentation, treatment, and survival of 219 patients of the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate patient and tumour characteristics, treatment and their impact on survival in patients with a solitary pulmonary metastasis at first relapse of high-grade osteosarcoma. PROCEDURE: Two-hundred and nineteen consecutive patients who had achieved a complete surgical remission and then developed a solitary pulmonary metastasis at first recurrence of high-grade osteosarcoma were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Two hundred and three (94.9%) of 214 patients achieved a second complete remission. After a median time from initial diagnosis of osteosarcoma to first relapse of 2.3 years (range, 0.3-18.8 years), actuarial post-relapse overall survival after 2 and 5 years was 72.0% and 51.2%. Post-relapse event-free survival was 39.1% and 31.1%. Median follow-up time was 3.2 years (range, 0.1-29.4 years). A longer time until first relapse and diagnosis due to imaging were positive prognostic factors in uni- and multivariate analyses, as were a second complete surgical remission and, in regard to death, the absence of a subsequent relapse. The use of salvage chemotherapy and radiotherapy were not associated with patient outcomes, nor was the surgical approach (thoracoscopy vs. thoracotomy) nor the exploration (uni- vs. bilateral). CONCLUSION: Approximately half of the patients who experience a solitary pulmonary relapse at first recurrence of osteosarcoma remain alive 5 years after this first relapse. Only one third will remain disease-free. A complete surgical resection of the lesion is essential for long-term survival while relapse chemotherapy does not seem to improve survival. Innovative therapies are required to improve outcomes.

DNA Methylation Profiling Distinguishes Adamantinoma-Like Ewing Sarcoma From Conventional Ewing Sarcoma.

Adamantinoma-like Ewing sarcoma (ALES) has traditionally been considered a variant of Ewing sarcoma because it generally harbors EWSR1::FLI1 fusions despite showing diffuse positivity for keratins and p40. However, it has become increasingly recognized that different tumors can have identical translocations, including shared fusions between carcinomas and sarcomas, raising questions as to whether ALES might represent a separate entity. Using methylation profiling, we further explored the relationship between Ewing sarcoma and ALES. The archives of multiple institutions were searched for candidate cases of ALES. DNA methylation profiling was performed and results were compared to corresponding data from conventional Ewing sarcoma. Twelve cases of ALES (5 previously reported) were identified in 10 men and 2 women (aged 20-72 years; median age, 41.5 years). Cases included tumors arising in the parotid gland (3), sinonasal cavity (2), submandibular gland (2), thyroid gland (1), neck (1), gingiva (1), hypopharynx (1), and mandible (1). Histologic review consistently showed sheets and nests of basaloid cells within a fibromyxoid or hyalinized stroma. All tumors were positive for at least 1 keratin and CD99 expression, whereas all 10 cases tested were positive for p63 or p40; S100 protein expression was noted in 2 cases. Cases harbored either EWSR1::FLI1 fusions (n = 6), FUS::FLI1 fusions (n = 1), and/or EWSR1 rearrangements (n = 6). Methylation profiling was successful in 11/12 cases evaluated. Unsupervised clustering and dimensionality reduction (Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection) of DNA methylation data revealed a distinct methylation cluster for all 11 cases, including the tumor with the FUS::FLI1 fusion, which clearly segregated them from the conventional Ewing sarcoma. Follow-up (n = 11, 1-154 months) revealed that 4 patients experienced recurrence and 6 developed metastatic disease. ALES demonstrates a distinct methylation signature from conventional Ewing sarcoma. This finding adds to the distinctive immunoprofile of ALES, suggesting that these 2 tumors should be considered distinct entities rather than histologic extremes of the same disease.

Superficial mesenchymal tumours expressing epithelial markers on immunohistochemistry: Diagnostic clues and pitfalls.

The diagnosis of mesenchymal neoplasms arising in the superficial soft tissue can be challenging as some entities are rare and show overlapping features. Moreover, the spectrum of mesenchymal tumours has expanded recently to include potential new entities, some of which have been described after the 5th edition of the World Health Organisation (WHO) classification of soft tissue and bone tumours published in 2020. In the skin and superficial soft tissue, tumours of epidermal, melanocytic and appendageal origin are more commonly encountered than mesenchymal neoplasms. However, specific entities from the latter category can occasionally express epithelial markers on immunohistochemistry, some of them in a strong and diffuse manner. It is therefore crucial to be aware of diagnostic pitfalls when encountering cytokeratin positivity in superficial soft tissue neoplasms. This article provides an overview on the differential diagnosis of these mesenchymal tumours that can sporadically occur also in the skin, including myoepithelial neoplasms, epithelioid sarcoma, keratin positive giant cell tumour of soft tissue / xanthogranulomatous epithelial tumour, superficial CD34-positive fibroblastic tumour / PRDM10-rearranged soft tissue tumour, and perineurioma.

NKX3.1 immunohistochemistry and methylome profiling in mesenchymal chondrosarcoma: additional diagnostic value for a well-defined disease?

Mesenchymal chondrosarcoma (MCS) is a rare and highly aggressive tumour of soft tissue and bone that is defined by an underlying and highly specific fusion transcript involving HEY1 and NCOA2. Histologically, the tumours show a biphasic appearance consisting of an undifferentiated blue and round cell component as well as islands of highly differentiated cartilage. Particularly in core needle biopsies, the chondromatous component can be missed and the non-specific morphology and immunophenotype of the round cell component can cause diagnostic challenges. We applied NKX3.1 immunohistochemistry which was recently reported as a highly specific marker as well as methylome and copy number profiling to a set of 45 well characterised MCS cases to evaluate their potential diagnostic value. Methylome profiling revealed a highly distinct cluster for MCS. Notably, the findings were reproducible also when analysing the round cell and cartilaginous component separately. Furthermore, four outliers were identified by methylome profiling for which the diagnosis had to be revised. NKX3.1 immunohistochemistry showed positivity in 36% of tumours, the majority of which was rather focal and weak. Taken together, NKX3.1 expression showed a low sensitivity but a high specificity in our analysis. Methylome profiling on the other hand represents a sensitive, specific and reliable tool to support the diagnosis of MCS, particularly if only the round cell component is obtained in a biopsy and the diagnosis is not suspected. Furthermore, it can aid in confirming the diagnosis in case RNA sequencing for the HEY1::NCOA2 fusion transcript is not available.

Prominent osteolysis in the maxilla: case report of an odontogenic fibroma mimicking a cyst.

BACKGROUND: Odontogenic fibroma (OF) is a rare benign odontogenic tumor of ectomesenchymal origin, mostly affecting the tooth-bearing portions of the jaws in middle-aged patients. Whilst small lesions tend to be clinically asymptomatic, varying unspecific clinical symptoms occur with an increase in size and may mimic odontogenic or other maxillofacial bone tumors, cysts, or fibro-osseous lesions of the jaws. CASE PRESENTATION: A 31-year-old female patient presented with a hard, non-fluctuating protrusion in the vestibule of the upper right maxilla. It was visualized on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) as space-occupying osteolysis with the displacement of the floor and facial wall of the maxillary sinus, mimicking a cyst-like lesion. The tissue was surgically removed and identified as an OF in the histopathological examination. One year after the surgery, restitution of regular sinus anatomy and physiological intraoral findings were observed. CONCLUSIONS: This case report emphasizes that rare entities, like the maxillary OF presented, often demonstrate nonspecific clinical and radiological findings. Nevertheless, clinicians need to consider rare entities as possible differential diagnoses and plan the treatment accordingly. Histopathological examination is essential to conclude the diagnosis. OF rarely recur after proper enucleation.

[The new WHO classification of jaw tumours]. / Die neue WHO-Klassifikation der Kiefertumoren.

Maxillofacial tumours cover a broad spectrum of lesions, including neoplasms, hamartomatous changes and developmental disorders. Since the beginning of 2022, a beta version of the 5th edition of the WHO classification for head and neck tumours has been available online, and a print version is expected to be published in mid-2023. From a conceptual point of view, little has been changed compared to the 4th edition; the sort order of lesions is more rigorously arranged according to benign and malignant behaviour and identical tumour types are no longer described redundantly in different chapters depending on their location. The diagnostic criteria are now summarized as "essential" and "desirable", and in addition to the clinical features, imaging is now also incorporated, providing an interdisciplinary approach to the classification. A few new entities are included for the first time. This article gives an overview of the main changes introduced in the new WHO classification with a special emphasis on fibro-osseous lesions of the craniofacial skeleton.