Modified frailty index (mFI): is it a predictor for early postoperative complications in arthroplasty surgery?

OBJECTIVE: It has been demonstrated that the modified frailty index (mFI) is a powerful and effective tool in the prediction of perioperative risk in many surgical fields. In many previous studies, mFI has been found to be successful in prediction of perioperative adverse effects. The aim of this study was to determine whether the mFI can be a predictor for early postoperative complications in arthroplasty surgery. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 145 patients aged 45-85 undergoing primary or revision total knee and hip arthroplasty were included in this prospective study. mFI was calculated in all patients, and patients included in the current study were grouped as "Frail" (n=42) and "Nonfrail" (n=103) patients according to modified frailty index values. Postoperative complications (myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, pulmonary embolism, septic shock, postoperative dialysis requirement, cerebrovascular event, reintubation, prolonged mechanical ventilation, surgical wound complications), duration of hospitalization, requirement for intensive care unit (ICU) admission and rehospitalization and 30-day mortality were recorded and the correlation between mFI and these parameters were evaluated. RESULTS: The mean age was 67.58±9.35 years, and 72.4% of the patients were female. The percentage of frail patients in the current study was 28.9%. The percentage of ASA-1, ASA-2, and ASA-3 patients was 17.2%, 57.2%, and 25.5%, respectively. The rate of ICU admission, MI, septic shock, postoperative dialysis requirement, prolonged MV requirement, hospital readmission, and 30-day mortality were 45.2%, 14.3%, 16.7%, 16.7%, 14.3%, 11.9%, and 16.7%, respectively in the frail group and were 7.8%, 1%, 1.9%, 2.9, 1.9% and 3.9%, respectively in the nonfrail group. Advanced age, male gender, high ASA score and prolonged duration of surgery were found to be predictive factors for postoperative complications. Advanced age, high ASA score and prolonged duration of surgery were found to be predictive factors for ICU admission. Advanced age, male gender and high ASA score were found to be strong predictors of 30-day mortality. CONCLUSIONS: mFI was found to be a strong predictor for postoperative complications and mortality. It is an easy, reliable, and simple method to evaluate frailty during the preoperative period. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05424575.

The administration sequence of propofol and remifentanil does not affect the ED50 and ED95 of rocuronium in rapid sequence induction of anesthesia: a double-blind randomized controlled trial.

OBJECTIVE: The topic of drug administration sequence in rapid sequence induction (RSI) is still an object of interest in terms of rocuronium effectiveness. The aim of this prospective, randomized trial was to evaluate the effect of administration sequence of propofol and remifentanil on ED50 and ED95 of rocuronium in a RSI model. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eighty-four patients were randomized into Group Remifentanil (Group R, n = 43), where induction of general anesthesia started with remifentanil (2 µg/kg) and followed by propofol (2 mg/kg) and rocuronium administrations; and Group Propofol (Group P, n = 41), where induction of general anesthesia started with propofol and followed by remifentanil and rocuronium. First patients in each group were paralyzed by 0.8 mg/kg rocuronium. In case of acceptable intubation as evaluated according to the criteria described by Viby-Mogensen et al, rocuronium dose was decreased by 0.1 mg/kg for the next patient; otherwise, rocuronium dose was increased by 0.1 mg/kg. After three crossover points, increments or decrements in rocuronium dosage were set to 0.05 mg/kg. The process was repeated until a total of ten crossover points were obtained. RESULTS: The ED50 and ED95 doses of rocuronium were similar in Group R (0.182 mg/kg, and 0.244 mg/kg, respectively) and Group P (0.121 mg/kg, and 0.243 mg/kg, respectively) according to 95% CI of the estimates. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of clinically acceptable intubation conditions between the two groups (56.1% in Group R vs. 59% in Group P, p = 0.795). CONCLUSIONS: The choice of administration sequence of propofol and remifentanil does not have an impact on estimated ED50 and ED95 of rocuronium in providing acceptable intubation conditions in the RSI technique.