Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 416
Filter
1.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39352325

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While structural socioeconomic inequity has been linked with inferior health outcomes, some have postulated reduced access to high-quality care to be the mediator. We assessed whether treatment at high-volume centers (HVC) would mitigate the adverse impact of area deprivation on heart transplantation (HT) outcomes. METHODS: All HT recipients ≥18 years were identified in the 2005-2022 Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network. Neighborhood socioeconomic deprivation was assessed using the previously validated Area Deprivation Index. Recipients with scores in the highest quintile were considered Most Deprived (others: Less Deprived). Hospitals in the highest quartile by cumulative center volume (≥21 transplants/year) were classified as HVC. The primary outcome was post-transplant survival. RESULTS: Of 38,022 HT recipients, 7,579 (20%) were considered Most Deprived. Following risk adjustment, Most Deprived demonstrated inferior survival at 3 (hazard ratio [HR] 1.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.21) and 5 years following transplantation (HR 1.13, CI 1.07-1.20). Similarly, Most Deprived faced greater graft failure at 3 (HR 1.14, CI 1.06-1.22) and 5 years (HR 1.13, CI 1.07-1.20). Evaluating patients transplanted at HVC, Most Deprived continued to face greater mortality at 3 (HR 1.10, CI 1.01-1.21) and 5 years (HR 1.10, CI 1.01-1.19). The interaction between Most Deprived status and care at HVC was not significant, such that transplantation at HVC did not ameliorate the survival disparity between Most and Less Deprived. CONCLUSIONS: Area socioeconomic disadvantage is independently associated with inferior survival. Transplantation at HVC did not eliminate this inequity. Future efforts are needed to increase engagement with longitudinal follow-up care and address systemic root causes to improve outcomes.

2.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 2024 Sep 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39341587

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Psychiatric disorders are common among patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Brain-gut dysfunction and psychotropic medications may have adverse effects on postoperative outcomes of IBD patients. The present work aimed to evaluate the association of psychiatric disorder with outcomes following surgery for IBD. METHODS: This was a retrospective study of adult IBD patients undergoing small bowel, colon, or rectal resection in the 2016-2021 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Psychiatric disorders including psychotic, mood, anxiety, eating, sleep, personality, and childhood-onset behavioral disorders were identified. Records with colorectal cancer were excluded. Multivariable regressions were used to examine the association of psychiatric disorder with outcomes. RESULTS: Of 81,955 patients included in the study, 26.6% had psychiatric disorders. Upon risk adjustment, psychiatric disorder was associated with significantly increased postoperative ileus (AOR 1.11 [95% CI 1.03-1.19]), length of stay (ß +1.4 days [95% CI 1.1-1.7]) and costs (ß +$2,100 [95% CI $1,200-3,100]) compared to no psychiatric disorder. Additionally, patients with psychiatric disorders experienced increased odds of non-home discharge (AOR 1.23 [95% CI 1.12-1.34]) and 30-day readmission (1.32 [1.22-1.43]). Over the study period, the prevalence of psychiatric disorders significantly increased from 24.3% to 28.5% (p<0.001), along with an increase in rates of ileus among patients with psychiatric disorders (8.1 to 15.8%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Psychiatric disorder is associated with significantly greater burden of adverse clinical and financial outcomes following IBD operations. Given the growing prevalence of mental health conditions among patients with IBD, further efforts to optimize preoperative psychiatric care may enhance quality of colorectal surgery.

3.
FASEB J ; 38(18): e70069, 2024 Sep 30.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39315853

ABSTRACT

Coronary plaque rupture remains the prominent mechanism of myocardial infarction. Accurate identification of rupture-prone plaque may improve clinical management. This study assessed the discriminatory performance of electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in human cardiac explants to detect high-risk atherosclerotic features that portend rupture risk. In this single-center, prospective study, n = 26 cardiac explants were collected for EIS interrogation of the three major coronary arteries. Vessels in which advancement of the EIS catheter without iatrogenic plaque disruption was rendered impossible were not assessed. N = 61 vessels underwent EIS measurement and histological analyses. Plaques were dichotomized according to previously established high rupture-risk parameter thresholds. Diagnostic performance was determined via receiver operating characteristic areas-under-the-curve (AUC). Necrotic cores were identified in n = 19 vessels (median area 1.53 mm2) with a median fibrous cap thickness of 62 µm. Impedance was significantly greater in plaques with necrotic core area ≥1.75 mm2 versus <1.75 mm2 (19.8 ± 4.4 kΩ vs. 7.2 ± 1.0 kΩ, p = .019), fibrous cap thickness ≤65 µm versus >65 µm (19.1 ± 3.5 kΩ vs. 6.5 ± 0.9 kΩ, p = .004), and ≥20 macrophages per 0.3 mm-diameter high-power field (HPF) versus <20 macrophages per HPF (19.8 ± 4.1 kΩ vs. 10.2 ± 0.9 kΩ, p = .002). Impedance identified necrotic core area ≥1.75 mm2, fibrous cap thickness ≤65 µm, and ≥20 macrophages per HPF with AUCs of 0.889 (95% CI: 0.716-1.000) (p = .013), 0.852 (0.646-1.000) (p = .025), and 0.835 (0.577-1.000) (p = .028), respectively. Further, phase delay discriminated severe stenosis (≥70%) with an AUC of 0.767 (0.573-0.962) (p = .035). EIS discriminates high-risk atherosclerotic features that portend plaque rupture in human coronary artery disease and may serve as a complementary modality for angiography-guided atherosclerosis evaluation.


Subject(s)
Coronary Artery Disease , Coronary Vessels , Dielectric Spectroscopy , Plaque, Atherosclerotic , Humans , Coronary Artery Disease/pathology , Dielectric Spectroscopy/methods , Male , Female , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/pathology , Plaque, Atherosclerotic/diagnostic imaging , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Aged , Coronary Vessels/pathology , Atherosclerosis/pathology , Risk Factors
4.
JTCVS Open ; 20: 89-100, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39296465

ABSTRACT

Objective: Although national efforts have aimed to improve the safety of inpatient operations, income-based inequities in surgical outcomes persist, and the evolution of such disparities has not been examined in the contemporary setting. We sought to examine the association of community-level household income with acute outcomes of cardiac procedures over the past decade. Methods: All adult hospitalizations for elective coronary artery bypass grafting/valve operations were tabulated from the 2010-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Patients were stratified into quartiles of income, with records in the 76th to 100th percentile designated as highest and those in the 0 to 25th percentile as lowest. To evaluate the change in adjusted risk of in-hospital mortality, complications, and readmission over the study period, estimates were generated for each income level and year. Results: Of approximately 1,848,755 hospitalizations, 406,216 patients (22.0%) were classified as highest income and 451,988 patients (24.4%) were classified as lowest income. After risk adjustment, lowest income remained associated with greater likelihood of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio, 1.61, 95% CI, 1.51-1.72), any postoperative complication (adjusted odds ratio, 1.19, CI, 1.15-1.22), and nonelective readmission within 30 days (adjusted odds ratio, 1.07, CI, 1.05-1.10). Overall adjusted risk of mortality, complications, and nonelective readmission decreased for both groups from 2010 to 2020 (P < .001). Further, the difference in risk of mortality between patients of lowest and highest income decreased by 0.2%, whereas the difference in risk of major complications declined by 0.5% (both P < .001). Conclusions: Although overall in-hospital mortality and complication rates have declined, low-income patients continue to face greater postoperative risk. Novel interventions are needed to address continued income-based disparities and ensure equitable surgical outcomes.

5.
Ann Surg ; 2024 Sep 24.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39315437

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To create a novel comorbidity score tailored for surgical database research. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Despite their use in surgical research, the Elixhauser (ECI) and Charlson Comorbidity Indices (CCI) were developed nearly four decades ago utilizing primarily non-surgical cohorts. METHODS: Adults undergoing 62 operations across 14 specialties were queried from the 2019 National Inpatient Sample (NIS) using International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision (ICD-10) codes. ICD-10 codes for chronic diseases were sorted into Clinical Classifications Software Refined (CCSR) groups. CCSR with non-zero feature importance across four machine learning algorithms predicting in-hospital mortality were used for logistic regression; resultant coefficients were used to calculate the Comorbid Operative Risk Evaluation (CORE) score based on previously validated methodology. Areas under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) with 95% Confidence Intervals (CI) were used to compare model performance in predicting in-hospital mortality for the CORE score, ECI, and CCI. Validation was performed using the 2016-2018 NIS, combined 2018-2019 Florida and New York State Inpatient Databases (SID), and 2016-2022 institutional data. RESULTS: 699,155 records from the 2019 NIS were used for model development. The CORE score better predicted in-hospital mortality compared to the ECI within the NIS (0.90, 95%CI:0.90-0.90 vs. 0.84, 95%CI:0.84-0.84), SID (0.91, 95%CI:0.90-0.91 vs. 0.86, 95%CI:0.86-0.87), and institutional (0.88, 95%CI:0.87-0.89 vs. 0.84, 95%CI:0.83-0.85) databases (all P<0.001). Likewise, it outperformed the CCI for the NIS (0.76, 95%CI:0.76-0.76), SID (0.78, 95%CI:0.77-0.78), and institutional (0.62, 95%CI:0.60-0.64) cohorts (all P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The CORE score may better predict in-hospital mortality after surgery due to comorbid diseases in outcome-based research.

6.
Clin Transplant ; 38(9): e15438, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39189807

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Frailty, a measure of physiological aging and reserve, has been validated as a prognostic indicator of mortality in patients with cirrhosis. However, large-scale analyses of the independent association of frailty with clinical and financial outcomes following liver transplantation (LT) are lacking. METHODS: Adults (≥18 years) undergoing LT were identified in the 2016-2020 National Readmissions Database. Frailty was defined using the binary Johns Hopkins Adjusted Clinical Groups frailty indicator. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were developed to evaluate the independent association of frailty with in-hospital mortality, perioperative complications, and costs. RESULTS: Of an estimated 34 442 patients undergoing LT, 8265 (24%) were frail. After adjustment, frailty was associated with greater odds of mortality (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] 1.80; 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.49-1.18), postoperative length of stay (ß + 11 days; 95% CI: +10, +12), and hospitalization costs (+$86 880; 95% CI: +75 660, +98 100), as well as a two-fold increase in relative risk of nonhome discharge (AOR 2.17, 95% CI: 1.90-2.49). CONCLUSIONS: Frailty is associated with an increased risk of in-hospital mortality, complications, and resource utilization among LT recipients. As the proportion of frail LT patients continues to rise, our findings underscore the need for novel risk-stratification and individualized care protocols for such vulnerable patients.


Subject(s)
Frailty , Hospital Mortality , Liver Transplantation , Postoperative Complications , Humans , Male , Female , Liver Transplantation/economics , Liver Transplantation/mortality , Frailty/economics , Frailty/complications , Middle Aged , Postoperative Complications/economics , Prognosis , Follow-Up Studies , Risk Factors , Aged , Adult , Survival Rate , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies
7.
PLoS One ; 19(8): e0308938, 2024.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39190755

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Disparities in colorectal cancer screening have been documented among people with intellectual and developmental disabilities (IDD). However, surgical outcomes in this population have yet to be studied. The present work aimed to evaluate the association of IDD with outcomes following colorectal cancer resection. METHODS: All adults undergoing resection for colorectal cancer in the 2011-2020 National Inpatient Sample were identified. Multivariable linear and logistic regression models were developed to examine the association of IDD with risk factors as well as outcomes including mortality, complications, costs, length of stay (LOS), and non-home discharge. The study is limited by its retrospective nature and did not capture disease staging or time of diagnosis. RESULTS: Among 722,736 patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection, 2,846 (0.39%) had IDD. Compared to patients without IDD, IDD patients were younger and had a higher burden of comorbidities. IDD status was associated with increased odds of non-elective admission (AOR 1.40 [95% CI 1.14-1.73]) and decreased odds of treatment at high-volume centers (AOR 0.64 [95% CI 0.51-0.81]). Furthermore, IDD patients experienced significantly greater LOS (9 vs 6 days, p<0.001) and hospitalization costs ($23,500 vs $19,800, p<0.001) relative to neurotypical patients. Upon risk adjustment, IDD was significantly associated with 2-fold increased odds of mortality (AOR 2.34 [95% CI 1.48-3.71]), 1.4-fold increase in complications (AOR 1.41 [95% CI 1.15-1.74]), and 6.8-fold increase in non-home discharge (AOR 6.83 [95% CI 5.46-8.56]). CONCLUSIONS: IDD patients undergoing colorectal cancer resection experience increased likelihood of non-elective admission, adverse clinical outcomes, and resource use. Our findings highlight the need for more accessible screening and patient-centered interventions to improve quality of surgical care for this at-risk population.


Subject(s)
Colorectal Neoplasms , Developmental Disabilities , Intellectual Disability , Length of Stay , Humans , Colorectal Neoplasms/surgery , Colorectal Neoplasms/economics , Colorectal Neoplasms/epidemiology , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Intellectual Disability/complications , Intellectual Disability/epidemiology , Intellectual Disability/surgery , Intellectual Disability/economics , Aged , Adult , Developmental Disabilities/epidemiology , Developmental Disabilities/complications , Retrospective Studies , Healthcare Disparities , Treatment Outcome , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Risk Factors
8.
Ann Thorac Surg ; 2024 Aug 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39117259

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cardiogenic shock (CS) remains a leading cause of mortality despite advancements in mechanical circulatory support and other management strategies. In particular, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) requires expertise in cardiac surgery, cardiology, and critical care. The benefits of such expertise may extend beyond patients undergoing ECMO. METHODS: Hospitalizations in adults (aged ≥18 years) with a primary diagnosis of CS who were not undergoing ECMO, cardiac operations, durable left ventricular assist device therapy, or heart transplantation were abstracted from the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Multivariable regression models were developed to assess the association of cardiac surgical and ECMO institutional caseload with clinical and financial outcomes. RESULTS: Of an estimated 70,339 patients with CS identified for study, 33,643 (47.8%) were treated at a high-volume hospital for ECMO (HVH-ECMO). HVH-ECMO was associated with decreased odds of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.75-0.95), respiratory complications (aOR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79-0.94), and nonhome discharge (aOR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.79-0.94). However, HVH-ECMO was associated with a longer length of stay by 1.7 days (95% CI, 1.3-2.1) and higher inpatient costs by $9170 (95% CI, $6,490-$12,060). Although ECMO volume was inversely associated with the predicted risk of in-hospital mortality, institutional volume of cardiac operations was not significantly associated with mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest improved outcomes for patients with CS who were treated at an HVH-ECMO. Multidisciplinary care pathways, including those among surgery, cardiology, and critical care, may influence CS management. Further studies are needed to characterize long-term outcomes of regionalization and ensure equitable access for all populations.

9.
Am J Surg ; : 115851, 2024 Jul 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39107174

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to compare outcomes between cholecystectomy on index versus delayed admission for acute cholangitis. METHODS: The 2011-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database was used to identify adult patients admitted for acute cholangitis who underwent cholecystectomy. Study cohorts were defined based on timing of surgery. Multivariable regressions and Royston-Parmar time-adjusted analysis were used to evaluate the association of cholecystectomy timing and outcomes. RESULTS: Of 65,753 patients, 82.0 â€‹% received surgery on Index and 18.0 â€‹% on Delayed admissions. Following adjustment, Delayed operation was associated with significantly increased odds of mortality (AOR 1.67 [95 â€‹% CI 1.10-2.54]), complications (1.25 [1.13-1.40]), repair of bile duct injury (1.66 [1.15-2.41]), conversion to open (1.69 [1.48-1.93]), and 30-day readmission (3.52 [3.21-3.86]). The Delayed cohort experienced a +$14,200 increment in hospitalization costs relative to Index. CONCLUSIONS: Delayed cholecystectomy for acute cholangitis is significantly associated with adverse postoperative outcomes, suggesting that index cholecystectomy may be safe to perform.

10.
J Am Coll Surg ; 2024 Aug 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39185795

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: The American College of Surgeons (ACS) Committee on Trauma has established a framework for trauma center quality improvement. Despite efforts, recent studies show persistent variation in patient outcomes across national trauma centers. We aimed to investigate whether risk-adjusted mortality varies at the hospital level and if high-performing centers demonstrate better adherence to ACS Verification, Review, and Consultation (VRC) program quality measures. METHODS: We analyzed data from the 2018-2021 ACS TQIP Participant Use Files, focusing on adult admissions at ACS-verified Level I or II trauma centers for blunt, penetrating, or isolated traumatic brain injury. We used mixed-effects models to assess center-specific risk-adjusted mortality and identified high-performing centers (HPTC), defined as those with the lowest decile of overall risk-adjusted mortality. We compared patient and hospital characteristics, outcomes, and adherence to ACS-VRC quality measures between HPTC and non-HPTC. RESULTS: Over the study period, 1,498,602 patients across 442 Level I and II trauma centers met inclusion criteria: 65.3% presenting with blunt injury, 9.3% with penetrating injury, and 25.4% with isolated TBI. Management at HPTC was associated with lower odds of major complications, failure-to-rescue and takeback. Furthermore, HPTC status was associated with increased odds of adherence to several ACS-VRC quality measures, including balanced resuscitation (Odds Ratio [OR] 1.40, 95%Confidence Interval [CI] 1.29-1.51), appropriate pediatric admissions (OR 1.88, 95%CI 1.07-3.68), and substance abuse screening (AOR 1.14, 95%CI 1.12-1.16). CONCLUSION: Significant variation in risk-adjusted mortality persists across trauma centers. Given the association between adherence to quality measures and high-performance, multidisciplinary efforts to refine and implement guidelines are warranted.

11.
Surgery ; 2024 Aug 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39122592

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Transcatheter mitral valve repair offers a minimally invasive treatment option for patients at high risk for traditional open repair. We sought to develop dynamic machine-learning risk prediction models for in-hospital mortality after transcatheter mitral valve repair using a national cohort. METHODS: All adult hospitalization records involving transcatheter mitral valve repair were identified in the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. As a result of initial class imbalance, undersampling of the majority class and subsequent oversampling of the minority class using Synthetic Minority Oversampling TEchnique were employed in each cross-validation training fold. Machine-learning models were trained to predict patient mortality after transcatheter mitral valve repair and compared with traditional logistic regression. Shapley additive explanations plots were also developed to understand the relative impact of each feature used for training. RESULTS: Among 2,450 patients included for analysis, the in-hospital mortality rate was 1.8%. Naïve Bayes and random forest models were the best at predicting transcatheter mitral valve repair postoperative mortality, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.83 ± 0.05 and 0.82 ± 0.04, respectively. Both models demonstrated superior ability to predict mortality relative to logistic regression (P < .001 for both). Medicare insurance coverage, comorbid liver disease, congestive heart failure, renal failure, and previous coronary artery bypass grafting were associated with greater predicted likelihood of in-hospital mortality, whereas elective surgery and private insurance coverage were linked with lower odds of mortality. CONCLUSION: Machine-learning models significantly outperformed traditional regression methods in predicting in-hospital mortality after transcatheter mitral valve repair. Furthermore, we identified key patient factors and comorbidities linked with greater postoperative mortality. Future work and clinical validation are warranted to continue improving risk assessment in transcatheter mitral valve repair .

12.
Surg Open Sci ; 20: 101-105, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39021616

ABSTRACT

Background: Multiagent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAT) has been linked with improved survival for locally advanced (LA) or borderline resectable (BR) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). However, the existence of disparities in its utilization remains to be elucidated. Methods: All adults with PDAC were tabulated from the 2011-2017 Nationwide Cancer Database. Tumor vascular involvement was determined using the clinical T stage and CS_EXTENSION variables. The significance of temporal trends was calculated using Cuzick's non-parametric test. A Cox proportional hazard model was used to assess the impact of NAT utilization on hazard of two-year mortality. A logistic regression model was developed to determine factors associated with receipt of NAT. Results: Of 3811 patients meeting inclusion criteria, 50.8 % received NAT. NAT utilization significantly increased over the study period, from 31.7 % in 2011 to 81.1 % in 2017 (p < 0.001). NAT was associated with significantly reduced two-year mortality (Hazards Ratio 0.34, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI] 0.18-0.67).After adjustment, younger (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 0.97/year, CI 0.96-0.98) and Black (AOR 0.65, CI 0.48-0.89; ref: White) patients demonstrated reduced odds of NAT. Furthermore, patients with Medicare (AOR 0.73, CI 0.59-0.90; ref: Private) or Medicaid insurance (AOR 0.67, CI 0.46-0.97; ref: Private) had lower odds of NAT, as did those treated at non-academic institutions (Community: AOR 0.42, CI 0.35-0.52, Integrated: 0.68, CI 0.54-0.85) or in the lowest education quartile (AOR 0.52, CI 0.29-0.95; ref: Highest). Conclusions: We identified increasing utilization of NAT for BR/LA pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Despite being linked with significantly reduced two-year mortality, socioeconomic disparities affect odds of NAT.

13.
Surgery ; 176(3): 942-948, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38971696

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Given the nonelective nature of most trauma admissions, patients who experience trauma are at a particular risk of discharge against medical advice. Despite the risk of unplanned readmission and financial burden on the health care system, discharge against medical advice among hospitalized patients continues to rise. The present study aimed to assess evolving trends and outcomes associated in patients with discharge against medical advice among patients hospitalized for traumatic injury. METHODS: The 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database was queried to identify all hospitalizations for traumatic injuries. The patient cohort was stratified into those who had discharge against medical advice and those who did not. Temporal trends of discharge against medical advice and associated costs over time were evaluated using nonparametric tests. Multivariable regression models were developed to assess factors associated with discharge against medical advice. Associations of discharge against medical advice with length of stay, hospitalization costs, and unplanned 30-day readmission were subsequently evaluated. RESULTS: Of an estimated 4,969,717 patients, 65,354 (1.3%) had discharge against medical advice after hospitalization for traumatic injury. Over the study period, the incidence of discharge against medical advice increased (nptrend <0.001). After risk adjustment, older age (adjusted odds ratio, 0.98/per year; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-0.98), female sex (adjusted odds ratio, 0.65; 95% confidence interval, 0.64-0.67), and management at high-volume trauma center (adjusted odds ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.69-0.74) were associated with lower odds of discharge against medical advice. Compared with others, discharge against medical advice was associated with decrements in length of stay by 1.3 days (95% confidence interval, 1.1-1.5 days) and index hospitalization costs by $2,200 (5% confidence interval, $1,600-2,900), while having a greater risk of unplanned 30-day readmission (adjusted odds ratio, 2.21; 95% confidence interval, 2.06-2.36). CONCLUSION: The incidence of discharge against medical advice and its associated cost burden have increased in recent years. Community-level interventions and institutional efforts to mitigate discharge against medical advice may improve the quality of care and resource allocation for patients with traumatic injuries.


Subject(s)
Patient Discharge , Patient Readmission , Wounds and Injuries , Humans , Male , Female , Patient Discharge/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Wounds and Injuries/therapy , Wounds and Injuries/economics , Wounds and Injuries/epidemiology , Adult , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Patient Readmission/economics , Risk Factors , Aged , United States/epidemiology , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/economics , Young Adult , Retrospective Studies , Adolescent , Treatment Refusal/statistics & numerical data , Databases, Factual
14.
Surgery ; 176(3): 866-872, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38971697

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Pancreaticoduodenectomy is a highly morbid operation with significant resource utilization. Using a national cohort, we examined the interhospital variation in pancreaticoduodenectomy hospitalization cost in the United States. METHODS: Adults undergoing elective pancreaticoduodenectomy in the setting of pancreatic cancer were tabulated from the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. A 2-level mixed-effects model was developed to evaluate the interhospital variation in pancreaticoduodenectomy hospitalization costs. Institutions within the top decile of risk-adjusted expenditures were defined as high-cost hospitals. Multivariable regression models were fitted to examine the association between high-cost hospital status and outcomes of interest. To account for the effects of complications on expenditures, a subgroup analysis comprising of patients with no adverse events was conducted. RESULTS: The study included an estimated 24,779 patients with a median hospitalization cost of $38,800. After mixed-effects modeling, 40.9% of the cost variation was attributable to hospital, rather than patient, factors. Multivariable regression models revealed an association between high-cost hospital status and greater odds of complications and longer length of stay. Among patients without an adverse event, interhospital cost variation remained significant at 61.0%, and treatment at high-cost hospitals was similarly linked to longer length of stay. CONCLUSION: Our study identified significant interhospital variation in pancreaticoduodenectomy hospitalization costs in the United States. Although high-cost hospital status was associated with increased odds of complications, variation remained significant even among patients without an adverse event. These results suggest the important role of hospital practices as contributors to expenditures. Further efforts to identify drivers of costs and standardize pancreatic surgical care are warranted.


Subject(s)
Hospital Costs , Pancreatic Neoplasms , Pancreaticoduodenectomy , Humans , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/economics , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/adverse effects , Pancreaticoduodenectomy/statistics & numerical data , Male , Pancreatic Neoplasms/surgery , Pancreatic Neoplasms/economics , Female , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Aged , United States , Postoperative Complications/economics , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Length of Stay/economics , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Retrospective Studies , Adult
15.
JACC Adv ; 3(8): 101071, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39050813

ABSTRACT

Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) in pregnancy is a leading cause of maternal morbidity and mortality in the United States, with an increasing prevalence. Objectives: This study aimed to examine risk factors for adverse maternal cardiac, maternal obstetric, and neonatal outcomes as well as costs for pregnant people with CVD at delivery. Methods: Using the National Inpatient Sample 2010-2019 and the Internal Classification of Diseases diagnosis codes, all pregnant people admitted for their delivery hospitalization were included. CVD diagnoses included congenital heart disease, cardiomyopathy, ischemic heart disease, arrhythmias, and valvular disease. Multivariable regressions were used to analyze major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), maternal and fetal complications, length of stay, and resource utilization. Results: Of the 33,639,831 birth hospitalizations included, 132,532 (0.39%) had CVD. These patients experienced more frequent MACE (8.5% vs 0.4%, P < 0.001), obstetric (24.1% vs 16.6%, P < 0.001), and neonatal complications (16.1% vs 9.5%, P < 0.001), and maternal mortality (0.16% vs 0.01%, P < 0.001). Factors associated with MACE included cardiomyopathy (adjusted OR [aOR]: 49.9, 95% CI: 45.2-55.1), congenital heart disease (aOR: 13.8, 95% CI: 12.0-15.9), Black race (aOR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.00-1.08), low income (aOR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.02-1.11), and governmental insurance (aOR: 1.03, 95% CI: 1.00-1.07). On adjusted analysis, CVD was associated with higher odds of maternal mortality (aOR: 9.28, 95% CI: 6.35-13.56), stillbirth (aOR: 1.66, 95% CI: 1.49-1.85), preterm birth (aOR: 1.33, 1.27-1.39), and congenital anomalies (aOR: 1.84, 95% CI: 1.69-1.99). CVD was also associated with an increase of $2,598 (95% CI: $2,419-2,777) per patient during admission for delivery. Conclusions: CVD in pregnancy is associated with higher rates of adverse outcomes. Our study highlights the association of key clinical and demographic factors with CVD during pregnancy to emphasize those at highest risk for complications.

16.
Surg Open Sci ; 20: 77-81, 2024 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38973813

ABSTRACT

Background: Failure to rescue (FTR) is increasingly recognized as a quality metric but remains understudied in emergency general surgery (EGS). We sought to identify patient and operative factors associated with FTR to better inform standardized metrics to mitigate this potentially preventable event. Methods: All adult (≥18 years) non-elective hospitalizations for large bowel resection, small bowel resection, repair of perforated ulcer, laparotomy and lysis of adhesions were identified in the 2016-2020 National Readmissions Database. Patients undergoing trauma-related operations or procedures ≤2 days of admission were excluded. FTR was defined as in-hospital death following acute kidney injury requiring dialysis (AKI), myocardial infarction, pneumonia, respiratory failure, sepsis, stroke, or thromboembolism. Multilevel mixed-effect models were developed to assess factors linked with FTR. Results: Among 826,548 EGS operations satisfying inclusion criteria, 298,062 (36.1 %) developed at least one MAE. Of those experiencing MAE, 43,477 (14.6 %) ultimately did not survive to discharge (FTR). Following adjustment for fixed hospital level effects, only 3.5 % of the variance in FTR was attributable to center-level differences. Relative to private insurance and the highest income quartile, Medicaid insurance (AOR 1.33; 95%CI, 1.23-1.43) and the lowest income quartile (AOR 1.22; 95%CI, 1.17-1.29) were linked with increased odds of FTR.A subset analysis stratified complication-specific rates of FTR by insurance status. Relative to private insurance, Medicaid coverage and uninsured status were linked with greater odds of FTR following perioperative sepsis, pneumonia, and AKI. Conclusion: Our findings underscore the need for increased screening and vigilance following perioperative complications to mitigate disparities in patient outcomes following high-risk EGS.

17.
Mil Med ; 2024 Jul 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38970436

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Congenital heart disease (CHD) is the most common and resource demanding birth defect managed in the United States, with approximately 40,000 children undergoing CHD surgery year. Researchers have compared high-volume to low-volume hospitals and found significant hospital-level variation in major complications, health resource utilization, and health care costs after CHD surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using nationwide representative claim data from the United States Military Health System from 2016 to 2020, TRICARE beneficiaries diagnosed with CHD were tabulated based on ICD-10 codes (International Classification of Diseases, 10th revision). We examined the relationships between total costs and total hospitalizations costs post 1-year CHD diagnosis and presence or absence of High-Quality Hospital (HQH) designation. We applied both the naive generalized linear model (GLM) to control for the observed patient and hospital characteristics and the 2-stage least squares (2SLS) model to account for the unobserved confounding factors. This study was approved by University of Maryland, College Park Institutional Review Board (IRB) (Approval Number: 1576246-2). RESULTS: A relationship between HQH designation and total CHD related costs was not seen across 2SLS model specifications (marginal effect; -$41,579; 95% CI, -$83,429 to $271). For patients diagnosed with a moderate-complex or single ventricle CHD, the association of HQH status was a statistically significant reduction in total costs (marginal effect; -$84,395; 95% CI, -$140,560 to -$28,229) and hospitalization costs (marginal effect; -$73,958; 95% CI, -$121,878 to -$26,039). CONCLUSIONS: It is very imperative for clinicians and patient support advocates to urge policymakers to deliberate the establishment of a quality designation authority for CHD management. These efforts will not only help to identify and standardize quality care metrics but to improve long-term health, effectiveness, and equity in the management of CHD. Furthermore, these efforts can be used to navigate patients to proven HQH, thereby improving care and reducing associated treatment costs for CHD patients.

18.
Surgery ; 176(3): 961-967, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38879383

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: With the aging population in the United States, the incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysms is shifting to older ages. Given changing demographic characteristics and increasing health care expenditures, the present study evaluated the degree of center-level variation in the cost of elective abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. METHODS: We identified all adult (≥18 years) hospitalizations for elective repair of nonruptured abdominal aortic aneurysms in the 2017 to 2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Hierarchical mixed-effects models were used to rank hospitals based on risk-adjusted costs. The interclass coefficient was used to calculate the amount of variation attributable to hospital-level characteristics. High-cost hospitals were classified as centers in the top decile of costs. The association of high-cost hospitals status with outcomes of interest was examined. RESULTS: An estimated 62,626 patients underwent abdominal aortic aneurysm repair, and 5,011 (8.0%) were managed at high-cost hospitals. Compared with non-high-cost hospitals, high-cost hospitals were more commonly large (52.6% vs 48.3%) metropolitan (78.3% vs 66.9%) teaching centers (all P < .001). The interclass coefficient found that 28% of the observed variation in cost is attributable to hospital factors. After adjustment, high-cost hospitals were associated with increased odds of gastrointestinal (adjusted odds ratio = 1.42; 95% CI, 1.05-1.90) and infectious (adjusted odds ratio = 1.35; 95% CI, 1.14-1.59) complications. Finally, the Elixhauser index (ß = +$2,700/unit; 95% CI, $2,500-$3,000) and open repair (ß = +$4,100; 95% CI, $3,100-$5,200) were associated with increased costs. CONCLUSION: We observed significant variation in cost attributable to center-level differences. Our findings have implications for reimbursement paradigms and the establishment of quality and cost benchmarks in the elective repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm.


Subject(s)
Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal , Elective Surgical Procedures , Hospital Costs , Humans , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/surgery , Aortic Aneurysm, Abdominal/economics , Elective Surgical Procedures/economics , Elective Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Female , Male , Aged , United States/epidemiology , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Retrospective Studies
19.
Am J Surg ; 235: 115781, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38834418

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: While race and insurance have been linked with greater likelihood of hernia incarceration and emergent presentation, the association of broader social determinants of health (SDOH) with outcomes following urgent repair remains to be elucidated. STUDY DESIGN: All adult hospitalizations entailing emergent repair for strangulated inguinal, femoral, and ventral hernias were identified in the 2016-2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database. Socioeconomic vulnerability was ascertained using relevant diagnosis codes. Multivariable models were developed to consider the independent associations between socioeconomic vulnerability and study outcomes. RESULTS: Of ∼236,215 patients, 20,306 (8.6 â€‹%) were Vulnerable. Following risk-adjustment, socioeconomic vulnerability remained associated with greater odds of in-hospital mortality, any perioperative complication, increased hospitalization expenditures and higher risk of non-elective readmission. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients undergoing emergent hernia repair, socioeconomic vulnerability was linked with greater morbidity, expenditures, and readmission. As part of patient-centered care, novel screening, postoperative management, and SDOH-informed discharge planning programs are needed to mitigate disparities in outcomes.


Subject(s)
Herniorrhaphy , Patient Readmission , Humans , Herniorrhaphy/economics , Herniorrhaphy/statistics & numerical data , Male , Female , Middle Aged , Aged , Patient Readmission/statistics & numerical data , Patient Readmission/economics , United States/epidemiology , Socioeconomic Factors , Hernia, Ventral/surgery , Hernia, Ventral/economics , Adult , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/economics , Social Determinants of Health , Hospital Mortality , Vulnerable Populations/statistics & numerical data , Hernia, Femoral/surgery , Hernia, Femoral/economics , Hernia, Inguinal/surgery , Hernia, Inguinal/economics
20.
Surgery ; 176(3): 835-840, 2024 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38918109

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Robot-assisted surgery has seen exponential adoption over the last decade. Although the safety and efficacy of robotic surgery in the elective setting have been demonstrated, data regarding robotic emergency general surgery remains sparse. METHODS: All adults undergoing non-elective appendectomy, cholecystectomy, small or large bowel resection, perforated ulcer repair, or lysis of adhesions were identified in the 2008 to 2020 National Inpatient Sample. Temporal trends were analyzed using a rank-based, non-parametric test developed by Cuzick (nptrend). Using laparoscopy as a reference, multivariable regressions were used to evaluate the association between robotic techniques and in-hospital mortality, major complications, and resource use for each emergency general surgery operation. RESULTS: Of an estimated 4,040,555 patients undergoing emergency general surgery, 65,853 (1.6%) were performed using robotic techniques. The robotic proportion of minimally invasive emergency general surgery increased significantly overall, with the largest growth seen in robot-assisted large bowel resections and perforated ulcer repairs. After adjustment for various patient and hospital-level factors, robot-assisted large bowel resection (adjusted odds ratio 0.73, 95% confidence interval 0.58-0.91) and cholecystectomy (adjusted odds ratio 0.66, 95% confidence interval 0.55-0.81) were associated with significantly reduced odds of perioperative blood transfusion compared to traditional laparoscopy. Although robotic techniques were associated with modest reductions in postoperative length of stay, costs were uniformly higher by increments of up to $4,900. CONCLUSION: Robotic surgery appears to be a safe and effective adjunct to laparoscopy in minimally invasive emergency general surgery, although comparable cost-effectiveness has yet to be realized. Increasing use of robotic techniques in emergency general surgery may be attributable in part to reduced complications, including blood loss, in certain operative contexts.


Subject(s)
Acute Care Surgery , Robotic Surgical Procedures , Humans , Acute Care Surgery/economics , Acute Care Surgery/methods , Acute Care Surgery/statistics & numerical data , Acute Care Surgery/trends , Cholecystectomy/methods , Cholecystectomy/trends , Cholecystectomy/statistics & numerical data , Hospital Mortality/trends , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Robotic Surgical Procedures/trends , Robotic Surgical Procedures/statistics & numerical data , Robotic Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Robotic Surgical Procedures/economics , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL