Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 19 de 19
Filter
1.
Trop Med Infect Dis ; 4(1)2019 Feb 27.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30818803

ABSTRACT

Leptospirosis is an endemic zoonotic disease in Brazil and is widespread throughout rural populations in the state of Rio Grande do Sul. This study aimed to identify presumptive infecting Leptospira serogroups in human and animal cases and describe their occurrences within the ecoregions of the state by animal species. Data for human and animal leptospirosis cases were gathered from the government's passive surveillance systems and presumptive infecting serogroups were identified based on a two-fold titer difference in serogroups in the microscopic agglutination test (MAT) panel. A total of 22 different serogroups were reported across both human and animal cases. Serogroup Icterohaemorrhagiae was the most common among humans, while serogroup Sejroe predominated among animal cases, particularly bovines. Each ecoregion had a large distribution of cases, with 51% of the human cases in the Parana⁻Paraiba ecoregion, and 81% of the animal cases in the Savannah ecoregion. Identifying and mapping the serogroups circulating using the One Health approach is the first step for further understanding the distribution of the disease in the state. This study has the potential to aid in guiding public health and agricultural practices, furthering the need for a human vaccine in high-risk populations to complement control and prevention efforts.

2.
PLoS Negl Trop Dis ; 8(3): e2741, 2014 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24625681

ABSTRACT

In Brazil, epizootics among New World monkey species may indicate circulation of yellow fever (YF) virus and provide early warning of risk to humans. Between 1999 and 2001, the southern Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul initiated surveillance for epizootics of YF in non-human primates to inform vaccination of human populations. Following a YF outbreak, we analyzed epizootic surveillance data and assessed YF vaccine coverage, timeliness of implementation of vaccination in unvaccinated human populations. From October 2008 through June 2009, circulation of YF virus was confirmed in 67 municipalities in Rio Grande do Sul State; vaccination was recommended in 23 (34%) prior to the outbreak and in 16 (24%) within two weeks of first epizootic report. In 28 (42%) municipalities, vaccination began more than two weeks after first epizootic report. Eleven (52%) of 21 laboratory-confirmed human YF cases occurred in two municipalities with delayed vaccination. By 2010, municipalities with confirmed YF epizootics reported higher vaccine coverage than other municipalities that began vaccination. In unvaccinated human populations timely response to epizootic events is critical to prevent human yellow fever cases.


Subject(s)
Primate Diseases/epidemiology , Yellow Fever Vaccine/administration & dosage , Yellow Fever/epidemiology , Yellow Fever/veterinary , Yellow fever virus/isolation & purification , Animals , Brazil/epidemiology , Epidemiological Monitoring , Haplorhini , Humans , Primate Diseases/virology , Vaccination/methods , Yellow Fever/prevention & control , Yellow Fever/virology
3.
Bol. epidemiol. (Porto Alegre, Online) ; 16(2): 1-3, jun. 2014. ilus
Article in Portuguese | Coleciona SUS, CONASS, SES-RS | ID: biblio-1129620

ABSTRACT

Aborda a implementação das ações de Atenção à Saúde durante o período da Copa do Mundo FIFA™ 2014, tanto para a população visitante como para a residente pelas Secretaria de Estado da Saúde do Rio Grande do Sul (SES/RS) e a Secretaria Municipal de Saúde de Porto Alegre (SMS POA) e sobre as várias participações em Reuniões das Câmaras Temáticas da Saúde para a Copa (nacional e estadual), além das promovidas pela Agência Nacional de Vigilância Sanitária (ANVISA). (AU)


Subject(s)
Humans , Delivery of Health Care , Public Health Surveillance/methods , Anniversaries and Special Events
5.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 17(8): 1467-71, 2011 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21801625

ABSTRACT

To identify risk factors for death from pandemic (H1N1) 2009, we obtained data for 157 hospitalized patients with confirmed cases of this disease. Multivariate analysis showed that diabetes and class III obesity were associated with death. These findings helped define priority vaccination groups in Brazil.


Subject(s)
Diabetes Complications/mortality , Influenza, Human/complications , Influenza, Human/mortality , Obesity/mortality , Pandemics , Brazil/epidemiology , Child, Preschool , Diabetes Complications/epidemiology , Female , Hospitalization , Humans , Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype/pathogenicity , Influenza, Human/epidemiology , Male , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Obesity/complications , Obesity/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Risk Factors , Vaccination
6.
Rev Panam Salud Publica ; 29(4): 243-51, 2011 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21603769

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe rubella outbreaks and control strategies in the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul before rubella elimination. METHODS: We analyzed rubella and congenital rubella syndrome surveillance data for the state of Rio Grande do Sul and calculated age- and gender-specific incidence of confirmed rubella cases in 2007. We obtained data on measles-rubella doses administered during the outbreak from the state immunization program and reviewed the timing of suspect case notification and implementation of control measures. RESULTS: Of 2,842 confirmed rubella cases reported to the state health department in 2007, 2,145 (75.5%) were in males (39.5 cases per 100,000 population) and 697 (24.5%) were in females (12.3 per 100,000 population). Incidence among 15- to 39-year-olds was 1.8 to 5.5 times higher in males than in females. Rubella genotype 2B was detected in nasopharyngeal specimens from 13 patients from multiple chains of transmission. Eight children were born with congenital rubella syndrome (5.9 cases per 100 000 births in 2008). Delayed notification of initial cases hampered early control efforts, resulting in outbreak spread throughout the state. Rubella transmission was interrupted after mass vaccination of adult men and women as part of a national vaccination campaign. CONCLUSIONS: Routine vaccination strategies and mass vaccination of adolescents and adults for accelerated rubella control and elimination should target men and women.


Subject(s)
Disease Outbreaks , Rubella Vaccine , Rubella/epidemiology , Rubella/prevention & control , Adolescent , Adult , Brazil/epidemiology , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Humans , Infant , Male , Middle Aged , Vaccination/methods , Young Adult
7.
Rev. panam. salud pública ; 29(4): 243-251, abr. 2011. graf, mapas, tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-587822

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To describe rubella outbreaks and control strategies in the Brazilian state of Rio Grande do Sul before rubella elimination. METHODS: We analyzed rubella and congenital rubella syndrome surveillance data for the state of Rio Grande do Sul and calculated age- and gender-specific incidence of confirmed rubella cases in 2007. We obtained data on measles-rubella doses administered during the outbreak from the state immunization program and reviewed the timing of suspect case notification and implementation of control measures. RESULTS: Of 2 842 confirmed rubella cases reported to the state health department in 2007, 2 145 (75.5 percent) were in males (39.5 cases per 100 000 population) and 697 (24.5 percent) were in females (12.3 per 100 000 population). Incidence among 15- to 39-year-olds was 1.8 to 5.5 times higher in males than in females. Rubella genotype 2B was detected in nasopharyngeal specimens from 13 patients from multiple chains of transmission. Eight children were born with congenital rubella syndrome (5.9 cases per 100 000 births in 2008). Delayed notification of initial cases hampered early control efforts, resulting in outbreak spread throughout the state. Rubella transmission was interrupted after mass vaccination of adult men and women as part of a national vaccination campaign. CONCLUSIONS: Routine vaccination strategies and mass vaccination of adolescents and adults for accelerated rubella control and elimination should target men and women.


OBJETIVO: Describir los brotes de rubéola y las estrategias para el control de la enfermedad anteriores a la eliminación de la rubéola en el estado brasileño de Rio Grande do Sul. MÉTODOS: Se analizaron los datos de vigilancia epidemiológica sobre la rubéola y el síndrome de rubéola congénita del estado de Rio Grande do Sul y se calculó la incidencia específica por edad y sexo de los casos confirmados de rubéola en el 2007. A partir del programa de vacunación estatal se obtuvieron datos sobre las dosis de vacunación antisarampionosa y antirrubeólica administradas durante el brote y se analizaron el momento de notificación de los casos sospechosos y la puesta en práctica de medidas de control. RESULTADOS: De los 2842 casos confirmados de rubéola notificados al departamento de salud estatal en el 2007, 2 145 (75,5 por ciento) correspondieron a hombres (39,5 casos por 100000 habitantes) y 697 (24,5 por ciento) a mujeres (12,3 por 100000 habitantes). La incidencia en las personas de 15 a 39 años de edad fue de 1,8 a 5,5 veces mayor en los varones que en las mujeres. En 13 pacientes provenientes de distintas cadenas de transmisión se detectó el genotipo 2B del virus de la rubéola en muestras obtenidas de la nasofaringe. Nacieron 8 niños con síndrome de rubéola congénita (5,9 casos por 100000 nacimientos en el 2008). La demora en la notificación de los casos iniciales obstaculizó la adopción temprana de medidas de control, lo que hizo que el brote se propagara a todo el estado. La transmisión de la rubéola se interrumpió después de la vacunación masiva de varones y mujeres adultos como parte de una campaña nacional de vacunación. CONCLUSIONES: Las estrategias de vacunación sistemática y la vacunación masiva de adolescentes y adultos tendientes a acelerar el control y la eliminación de la rubéola deben dirigirse tanto a varones como a mujeres.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Adult , Middle Aged , Young Adult , Disease Outbreaks , Rubella Vaccine , Rubella/epidemiology , Rubella/prevention & control , Brazil/epidemiology , Vaccination/methods
9.
Open educational resource in Portuguese | CVSP - Brazil | ID: una-1742

ABSTRACT

Vídeo que apresenta o histórico e a situação mundial, em 2010, da influenza A, subtipo H1N1, mais conhecida como gripe A. Informa sobre as fases de contenção, pandemia e mitigação, aspectos gerais, mutações do vírus, modos de transmissão, período de incubação a transmissibilidade e a sazonalidade, aspectos clínicos, grupos de risco, espectro clínico, complicações, exames de sangue, exames de imagem para os casos mais complicados, apresentação de casos graves e imagens para análise do comprometimento do pulmão, as condutas em casos mais simples e em casos mais graves com síndrome respiratória aguda grave, notificação a vigilância municipal. Lista os sinais de alerta a serem observados em pacientes com o vírus ou com suspeita e as medidas de prevenção e controle.


Subject(s)
Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype , Primary Health Care , Epidemiology
10.
Open educational resource in Portuguese | CVSP - Brazil | ID: una-1771

ABSTRACT

O vídeo trata da dengue, que é considerada um dos maiores problemas de saúde pública do Brasil. Informa sobre os modos de transmissão, diagnóstico e tratamento. Lista as principais indicações para a internação hospitalar de pacientes com a doença e fornece orientação aos profissionais com relação a notificação de casos suspeitos ou confirmados de dengue ao serviço de vigilância epidemiológica.


Subject(s)
Dengue Virus , Dengue , Epidemiological Monitoring , Public Health
11.
Reprod Toxicol ; 25(1): 120-3, 2008 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17977696

ABSTRACT

The rubella virus is a potent human teratogen. The highest risk of this infection occurs during pregnancy, as the virus may cause fetal damage known as congenital rubella syndrome (CRS). Since the rubella vaccine is made with attenuated live virus, there is a high level of anxiety concerning exposure during pregnancy. Although no case of CRS has been proved in children of immunized susceptible pregnant women, a risk below 1.6% cannot be ruled out. Our main purpose was to evaluate the occurrence of CRS in women who were vaccinated against rubella and did not know that they were pregnant, or became pregnant within 30 days after vaccination. We collected, prospectively, data on 171 pregnant women who were susceptible at the time of vaccination and compared them with data on the total population of pregnant women in the state of Rio Grande do Sul (RS), Brazil. A serologic sample was collected in 149 infants of susceptible mothers. A total of 10 infants (6.7%) had anti-rubella antibodies. When these were compared with the results obtained in the total population of births in RS, no difference was found in mean birth weight, low birth weight and sex. None of the ten infants with IgM(+) presented congenital defects involving CRS, during the physical examinations performed at the time of birth and at 3 months of age. Our study allows the safety of rubella vaccination to be extended to pregnant women.


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Medical Errors , Rubella Syndrome, Congenital/virology , Rubella Vaccine/adverse effects , Rubella virus/immunology , Rubella/prevention & control , Vaccination/adverse effects , Adult , Brazil , Female , Humans , Immunization Schedule , Immunoglobulin G/blood , Immunoglobulin M/blood , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Live Birth , Male , Pregnancy , Prospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Rubella Vaccine/administration & dosage , Vaccines, Attenuated/adverse effects
12.
Sci. med ; 17(3): 119-123, 2007.
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: lil-490565

ABSTRACT

Objetivos: Avaliar a ocorrência de Síndrome da Rubéola Congênita em mulheres que foram vacinadas contra rubéola e que não sabiam que estavam grávidas, ou que engravidaram até 30 dias após a vacinação. Métodos: foram coletados, prospectivamente, dados de 171 gestantes que se encontravam suscetíveis no momento da vacinação. No momento do parto foi colhido sangue dos recém-nascidos para exames. Todos os bebês com IgM anti rubéola positiva foram clinicamente avaliados conforme protocolo para detecção de sequelas da síndrome da rubéola congênita. Foi realizada a coleta de secreção nasofaríngea para isolamento e identificação viral. Resultados: foi coletada amostra sorológica de 152 bebês, filhos de mãe suscetíveis. Um total de 10 bebês (6,3%) apresentou presença de anticorpos IgM anti-rubéola, ou seja, foram infectados pelo vírus vacinal durante a gestação. Nenhum deles apresentou defeitos congênitos relacionados à rubéola. Conclusões: o estudo permite ampliar a segurança da vacinação para rubéola em mulheres grávidas.


Subject(s)
Pregnancy , Carcinogenic Danger , Rubella , Rubella Vaccine
13.
Rev. panam. salud pública ; 20(5): 299-306, nov. 2006. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-444602

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the seroprevalence for measles, mumps, and rubella in school-age children (6-12 years old) before and after the administration of three triple combined viral vaccines. METHODS: In two municipal schools of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, 692 blood samples were collected before vaccination and 636 samples 21 to 30 days after vaccination during 1996. IgG antibody seropositivity was investigated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (measles and mumps with Enzygnost [Behring, Marburg, Germany]; rubella with Rubenostika [Organon Teknica, Boxtel, the Netherlands]). The vaccines compared were: A: E-Zagreb, L-Zagreb, and Wistar RA 27/3 (Tresivac); B: Moraten, J-Lynn, and Wistar RA 27/3 (M-M-R II); and C: Schwarz, Urabe AM-9, and Wistar RA 27/3 (Trimovax). RESULTS: Before vaccination, 79.2 percent [95 percent confidence interval (CI) = 76.0 percent-82.2 percent] of the samples were positive for measles, 69.4 percent (95 percent CI = 65.8 percent-72.8 percent) for mumps, and 55.4 percent (95 percent CI = 51.6 percent-59.2 percent) for rubella. After vaccination with the A, B, and C vaccines, seropositivity was 100.0 percent, 99.5 percent, and 100.0 percent, respectively for measles; 99.5 percent, 94.5 percent, and 92.0 percent for mumps; and 92.6 percent, 91.3 percent, and 88.6 percent for rubella. CONCLUSIONS: About one-fifth (20.8 percent) of the schoolchildren who could have been vaccinated against measles at age 9 months had levels of antibodies insufficient for protection. In the sample of schoolchildren without previous vaccination against mumps and rubella, high proportions of susceptible levels were found. All vaccines were immunogenic, but vaccine A yielded a seroconversion rate of 99.5 percent for the mumps component, which was significantly higher than the other two vaccines (P < 0.01).


OBJETIVO: Se evaluó la seroprevalencia para sarampión, paperas y rubéola en niños en edad escolar (6-12 años) antes y después de la administración de tres vacunas triples antivirales combinadas. MÉTODOS: Se colectaron 692 muestras de sangre antes de la vacunación y 636 muestras entre 21 y 30 días después de la vacunación a niños de dos escuelas municipales de Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil, durante 1996. Se investigó la seropositividad de anticuerpos de la clase IgG mediante un ensayo de inmunoadsorción enzimática tipo ELISA (sarampión y paperas con Enzygnost [Behring, Marburgo, Alemania] y rubéola con Rubenostika [Organon Teknica, Boxtel, Países Bajos]). Las vacunas comparadas fueron: a) E-Zagreb, L-Zagreb y Wistar RA 27/3 (Tresivac); b) Moraten, J-Lynn y Wistar RA 27/3 (M-M-R II); y c) Schwarz, Urabe AM-9 y Wistar RA 27/3 (Trimovax). RESULTADOS: Antes de la vacunación, 79,2 por ciento (intervalo de confianza [IC] 95 por ciento: 76,0 a 82,2) de las muestras fueron positivas para sarampión, 69,4 por ciento (IC 95 por ciento: 65,8 a 72,8) para paperas y 55,4 por ciento (IC 95 por ciento: 51,6 a 59,2) para rubéola. Después de la vacunación con las vacunas A, B y C, la seropositividad fue de 100 por ciento, 99,5 por ciento y 100 por ciento, respectivamente para sarampión; de 99,5 por ciento, 94,5 por ciento y 92,0 por ciento para paperas; y de 92,6 por ciento, 92,3 por ciento y 88,6 por ciento para rubéola. CONCLUSIONES: Alrededor de un quinto (20,8 por ciento) de los escolares que pudieron haber sido vacunados contra el sarampión a los 9 meses de edad tenían niveles de anticuerpos insuficientes para protegerlos. En la muestra de escolares sin vacunación previa contra paperas y rubéola se encontró una alta proporción de niños susceptibles. Todas las vacunas fueron inmunogénicas, pero la vacuna A produjo una tasa de seroconversión de 99,5 por ciento para el componente de paperas, significativamente mayor que la de las otras dos vacunas (P < 0,01).


Subject(s)
Child , Female , Humans , Male , Antibodies, Viral/blood , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/immunology , Brazil , Double-Blind Method , Measles/blood , Measles/epidemiology , Measles/prevention & control , Mumps/blood , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/prevention & control , Rubella/blood , Rubella/epidemiology , Rubella/prevention & control , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Time Factors
14.
Rev Panam Salud Publica ; 20(5): 299-306, 2006 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17316487

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the seroprevalence for measles, mumps, and rubella in school-age children (6-12 years old) before and after the administration of three triple combined viral vaccines. METHODS: In two municipal schools of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil, 692 blood samples were collected before vaccination and 636 samples 21 to 30 days after vaccination during 1996. IgG antibody seropositivity was investigated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (measles and mumps with Enzygnost [Behring, Marburg, Germany]; rubella with Rubenostika [Organon Teknica, Boxtel, the Netherlands]). The vaccines compared were: A: E-Zagreb, L-Zagreb, and Wistar RA 27/3 (Tresivac); B: Moraten, J-Lynn, and Wistar RA 27/3 (M-M-R II); and C: Schwarz, Urabe AM-9, and Wistar RA 27/3 (Trimovax). RESULTS: Before vaccination, 79.2% [95% confidence interval (CI)=76.0%-82.2%] of the samples were positive for measles, 69.4% (95% CI=65.8%-72.8%) for mumps, and 55.4% (95% CI=51.6%-59.2%) for rubella. After vaccination with the A, B, and C vaccines, seropositivity was 100.0%, 99.5%, and 100.0%, respectively for measles; 99.5%, 94.5%, and 92.0% for mumps; and 92.6%, 91.3%, and 88.6% for rubella. CONCLUSIONS: About one-fifth (20.8%) of the schoolchildren who could have been vaccinated against measles at age 9 months had levels of antibodies insufficient for protection. In the sample of schoolchildren without previous vaccination against mumps and rubella, high proportions of susceptible levels were found. All vaccines were immunogenic, but vaccine A yielded a seroconversion rate of 99.5% for the mumps component, which was significantly higher than the other two vaccines (P<0.01).


Subject(s)
Antibodies, Viral/blood , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/immunology , Brazil , Child , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male , Measles/blood , Measles/epidemiology , Measles/prevention & control , Mumps/blood , Mumps/epidemiology , Mumps/prevention & control , Rubella/blood , Rubella/epidemiology , Rubella/prevention & control , Seroepidemiologic Studies , Time Factors
16.
Rev Panam Salud Publica ; 12(4): 240-6, 2002 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-12431355

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of adverse events following the administration of three commercially available measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) combination vaccines. METHODS: A randomized double-blind clinical trial was performed in 1996 that involved a total of 10 142 students 6-12 years of age in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, in Brazil. An MMR vaccine containing the Edmonston-Zagreb, Leningrad-Zagreb, and RA 27/3 strains ("vaccine A") was administered to 2 226 students (21.9% of the total); an MMR vaccine with the Moraten, Jeryl Lynn, and Wistar 27/3 strains ("vaccine B") was administered to 2 216 children (21.8%); and an MMR vaccine containing the Schwartz, Urabe AM-9, and Wistar 27/3 strains ("vaccine C") was given to 2 179 students (21.5%). A control group of 3 521 students (34.7%) was not vaccinated. Both the vaccinated subjects and the control subjects were followed daily for 30 days to detect any clinical manifestations. RESULTS: Adverse events were more frequent in the vaccinated children than in the control group (P < 0.01). In terms of causing parotitis, vaccine A had a relative risk (RR) of 5.72 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 3.11-10.54) when compared with vaccine B, and an RR of 2.33 (95% CI = 1.52-3.58) when compared with vaccine C. Vaccine A was also associated with an increased risk of lymphadenopathy when compared with vaccine B (RR = 3.11; 95% CI = 1.78-5.45) and with vaccine C (RR = 2.22; 95% CI = 1.35-3.66). Vaccine C was associated with an increased risk of parotitis when compared with vaccine B (RR = 2.46; 95% CI = 1.26-4.80). Three cases of aseptic meningitis were detected among the children in the study group, but only one case of vaccine-related aseptic meningitis was identified, among the children receiving vaccine A. CONCLUSIONS: The three MMR vaccines that we studied are associated with different risks of adverse events. We found vaccine A to cause more reactions than the two other vaccines, especially vaccine B. In addition, vaccine A presented both a temporal and a cause-and-effect association with one case of aseptic meningitis. We hope that this study will contribute information that can be used in choosing MMR vaccines with safe and effective strains, especially for mass vaccination strategies.


Subject(s)
Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/adverse effects , Child , Double-Blind Method , Female , Humans , Male
18.
Rev. panam. salud pública ; 12(4): 240-246, Oct. 2002. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: lil-327422

ABSTRACT

Objective. To compare the incidence of adverse events following the administration of three commercially available measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) combination vaccines. Methods. A randomized double-blind clinical trial was performed in 1996 that involved a total of 10 142 students 6-12 years of age in the state of Rio Grande do Sul, in Brazil. An MMR vaccine containing the Edmonston-Zagreb, Leningrad-Zagreb, and RA 27/3 strains ("vaccine A") was administered to 2 226 students (21.9 percent of the total); an MMR vaccine with the Moraten, Jeryl Lynn, and Wistar 27/3 strains ("vaccine B") was administered to 2 216 children (21.8 percent); and an MMR vaccine containing the Schwartz, Urabe AM-9, and Wistar 27/3 strains ("vaccine C") was given to 2 179 students (21.5 percent). A control group of 3 521 students (34.7 percent) was not vaccinated. Both the vaccinated subjects and the control subjects were followed daily for 30 days to detect any clinical manifestations. Results. Adverse events were more frequent in the vaccinated children than in the control group (P < 0.01). In terms of causing parotitis, vaccine A had a relative risk (RR) of 5.72 (95 percent confidence interval (CI) = 3.11-10.54) when compared with vaccine B, and an RR of 2.33 (95 percent CI = 1.52-3.58) when compared with vaccine C. Vaccine A was also associated with an increased risk of lymphadenopathy when compared with vaccine B (RR = 3.11; 95 percent CI = 1.78-5.45) and with vaccine C (RR = 2.22; 95 percent CI = 1.35-3.66). Vaccine C was associated with an increased risk of parotitis when compared with vaccine B (RR = 2.46; 95 percent CI = 1.26-4.80). Three cases of aseptic meningitis were detected among the children in the study group, but only one case of vaccine-related aseptic meningitis was identified, among the children receiving vaccine A. Conclusions. The three MMR vaccines that we studied are associated with different risks of adverse events. We found vaccine A to cause more reactions than the two other vaccines, especially vaccine B. In addition, vaccine A presented both a temporal and a cause-and-effect association with one case of aseptic meningitis. We hope that this study will contribute information that can be used in choosing MMR vaccines with safe and effective strains, especially for mass vaccination strategies


Objetivos. Comparar la incidencia de acontecimientos adversos tras la administración de tres vacunas combinadas contra el sarampión, la parotiditis y la rubéola que ya están en el mercado. Métodos. En 1996 se realizó un ensayo clínico aleatorizado, doblemente enmascarado, en el que participaron 10 142 estudiantes de 6 a 12 años del estado de Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil. Las vacunas utilizadas contenían: A) las cepas EdmonstonZagreb, Leningrado-Zagreb y RA 27/3A; B) las cepas Moraten, Jeryl Lynn y Wistar 27/3, y C) las cepas Schwartz, Urabe AM-9 y Wistar 27/3. La vacuna A se administró a 2 226 niños (21,9%), la B a 2 216 (21,8%), y la C a 2 179 (21,5%). El grupo de control lo formaron 3 521 niños (34,7%) no vacunados. Todos los participantes fueron observados diariamente durante 30 días para detectar posibles manifestaciones clínicas. Resultados. Los acontecimientos adversos fueron más frecuentes en los niños vacunados que en el grupo de control (P < 0,01). El riesgo relativo (RR) de tumefacción parotídea con la vacuna A fue de 5,72 (intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC95]: 3,11 a 10,54) en comparación con la vacuna B, y de 2,33 (IC95: 1,52 a 3,58) en comparación con la vacuna C. La vacuna A también se asoció a un mayor riesgo de linfadenopatía que las vacunas B (RR = 3,11; IC95: 1,78 a 5,45) y C (RR = 2,22; IC95: 1,35 a 3,66). La vacuna C se asoció a un mayor riesgo de tumefacción parotídea que la vacuna B (RR = 2,46; IC95: 1,26 a 4,80). En los niños vacunados se detectaron tres casos de meningitis aséptica, pero solo uno, que recibió la vacuna A, se relacionó con la vacuna. Conclusiones. Las tres vacunas estudiadas se asociaron a diferentes riesgos de acontecimientos adversos. La vacuna A causó más reacciones que las otras dos, en particular más que la vacuna B. Además, la vacuna A presentó una asociación temporal y causal con un caso de meningitis aséptica. Este estudio aporta información que puede ser utilizada para elegir vacunas contra el sarampión, la parotiditis y la rubéola a base de cepas eficaces y seguras, especialmente para la vacunación en masa


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine/adverse effects , Double-Blind Method
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL