Determining the residual volume in peritoneal dialysis using low molecular weight markers.

BACKGROUND: Variation in residual volume between peritoneal dialysis dwells creates uncertainty in ultrafiltration determination, dialysis efficiency, and poses a risk of overfill if the residual volume is large. Measuring the dilution of a marker molecule during fluid fill offers a convenient approach, however, estimation accuracy depends on the choice of dilution marker. We here evaluate the feasibility of creatinine and urea as dilution markers compared to albumin-based residual volumes and three-pore model estimations. METHOD: This clinical, retrospective analysis comprises 56 residual volume estimations from 20 individuals, based on the dilution of pre-fill dialysate creatinine, urea and albumin concentrations during the dialysis fluid fill phase. Outcomes were compared individually. Bias induced by ultrafiltration, marker molecule mass-transfer and influence of fluid glucose contents was quantified using the three-pore model. Linear regression established conversion factors enabling conversion between the various marker molecules. RESULTS: Creatinine-based calculations overestimated residual volumes by 115 mL (IQR 89-149) in 1.5% dwells and 252 mL (IQR 179-313) in 4.25% glucose dwells. In hypertonic dwells, ultrafiltration was 52 mL (IQR 38-66), while intraperitoneal creatinine mass increased by 67% during fluid fill, being the leading cause of overestimation. Albumin-based volumes conformed strongly with three-pore model estimates. Correction factors effectively enabled marker molecule interchangeability. CONCLUSIONS: Mass-transfer of low molecular weight marker molecules is associated with residual volume overestimation. However, by applying correction factors, creatinine and urea dilution can still provide reasonable estimates, particularly when the purpose is to exclude the presence of a very large residual volume.

Dual SGLT1/SGLT2 inhibitor phlorizin reduces glucose transport in experimental peritoneal dialysis.

INTRODUCTION: Glucose absorption during peritoneal dialysis (PD) is commonly assumed to occur via paracellular pathways. We recently showed that SGLT2 inhibition did not reduce glucose absorption in experimental PD, but the potential role of glucose transport into cells is still unclear. Here we sought to elucidate the effects of phlorizin, a non-selective competitive inhibitor of sodium glucose co-transporters 1 and 2 (SGLT1 and SGLT2), in an experimental rat model of PD. METHODS: A 120-min PD dwell was performed in 12 anesthetised Sprague-Dawley rats using 1.5% glucose fluid with a fill volume of 20 mL with (n = 6) or without (n = 6) intraperitoneal phlorizin (50 mg/L). Several parameters for peritoneal water and solute transport were monitored during the treatment. RESULTS: Phlorizin markedly increased the urinary excretion of glucose, lowered plasma glucose and increased plasma creatinine after PD. Median glucose diffusion capacity at 60 min was significantly lower (p < 0.05) being 196 µL/min (IQR 178-213) for phlorizin-treated animals compared to 238 µL/min (IQR 233-268) in controls. Median fractional dialysate glucose concentration at 60 min (D/D 0) was significantly higher (p < 0.05) in phlorizin-treated animals being 0.65 (IQR 0.63-0.67) compared to 0.61 (IQR 0.60-0.62) in controls. At 120 min, there was no difference in solute or water transport across the peritoneal membrane. CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that a part of glucose absorption during the initial part of the dwell occurs via transport into peritoneal cells.

Phloretin Improves Ultrafiltration and Reduces Glucose Absorption during Peritoneal Dialysis in Rats.

BACKGROUND: Harmful glucose exposure and absorption remain major limitations of peritoneal dialysis (PD). We previously showed that inhibition of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 did not affect glucose transport during PD in rats. However, more recently, we found that phlorizin, a dual blocker of sodium glucose cotransporters 1 and 2, reduces glucose diffusion in PD. Therefore, either inhibiting sodium glucose cotransporter 1 or blocking facilitative glucose channels by phlorizin metabolite phloretin would reduce glucose transport in PD. METHODS: We tested a selective blocker of sodium glucose cotransporter 1, mizagliflozin, as well as phloretin, a nonselective blocker of facilitative glucose channels, in an anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rat model of PD. RESULTS: Intraperitoneal phloretin treatment reduced glucose absorption by >30% and resulted in a >50% higher ultrafiltration rate compared with control animals. Sodium removal and sodium clearances were similarly improved, whereas the amount of ultrafiltration per millimole of sodium removed did not differ. Mizagliflozin did not influence glucose transport or osmotic water transport. CONCLUSIONS: Taken together, our results and previous results indicate that blockers of facilitative glucose channels may be a promising target for reducing glucose absorption and improving ultrafiltration efficiency in PD.

Optimised versus standard automated peritoneal dialysis regimens pilot study (OptiStAR): A randomised controlled crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: The continuous global rise of end-stage kidney disease creates a growing demand of economically beneficial home-based kidney replacement therapies such as peritoneal dialysis (PD). However, undesirable absorption and exposure of peritoneal tissues to glucose remain major limitations of PD. METHODS: We compared a reference (standard) automated PD regimen 6 × 2 L 1.36% glucose (76 mmol/L) over 9 h with a novel, theoretically glucose sparing (optimised) prescription consisting of 'ultrafiltration cycles' with high glucose strength (126 mmol/L) and 'clearance cycles' with ultra-low, physiological glucose (5 mmol/L) for approximately 40% of the treatment time. Twenty-one prevalent PD patients underwent the optimised regimen (7 × 2 L 2.27% glucose + 5 × 2 L 0.1% glucose over 8 h) and the standard regimen in a crossover fashion. Six patients were excluded from data analysis. RESULTS: Median glucose absorption was 43 g (IQR 41-54) and 44 g (40-55) for the standard and optimised intervention, respectively (p = 1). Ultrafiltration volume, weekly Kt/V creatinine and urea were significantly improved during optimised interventions, while no difference in sodium removal was detected. Post hoc analysis showed significantly improved ultrafiltration efficiency (ml ultrafiltration per gram absorbed glucose) during optimised regimens. No adverse events were observed except one incidence of drain pain. CONCLUSION: Optimised treatments were feasible and well tolerated in this small pilot study. Despite no difference in absorbed glucose, results indicate possible improvements of ultrafiltration efficiency and small solute clearances by optimised regimens. Use of optimised prescriptions as glucose sparing strategy should be evaluated in larger study populations.

SGLT2 inhibition does not reduce glucose absorption during experimental peritoneal dialysis.

INTRODUCTION: Unwanted glucose absorption during peritoneal dialysis (PD) remains a clinical challenge, especially in diabetic patients. Recent experimental data indicated that inhibitors of the sodium and glucose co-transporter (SGLT)-2 could act to reduce glucose uptake during PD, which raises the question of whether glucose absorption may also occur via intracellular or trans-cellular pathways. METHODS: We performed PD in anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats using a fill volume of 20 mL with either 1.5% glucose fluid or 4.25% glucose fluid for 120 min dwell time to evaluate the effects of SGLT2 inhibition by empagliflozin on peritoneal water and solute transport. To assess the diffusion capacity of glucose, we developed a modified equation to measure small solute diffusion capacity, taking convective- and free water transport into account. RESULTS: SGLT2 inhibition markedly increased the urinary excretion of glucose and lowered plasma glucose after PD compared to sham groups. Glucose absorption for 1.5% glucose was 165 mg 95% CI (145-178) in sham animals and 157 mg 95% CI (137-172) for empagliflozin-treated animals. For 4.25% glucose, absorption of glucose was 474 mg 95% CI (425-494) and 472 mg 95% CI (420-506) for sham and empagliflozin groups, respectively. No significant changes in the transport of sodium or water across the peritoneal barrier could be detected. CONCLUSION: We could not confirm recent findings that SGLT2 inhibition reduced glucose absorption and increased osmotic water transport during experimental PD.

Novel Method for Osmotic Conductance to Glucose in Peritoneal Dialysis.

INTRODUCTION: The osmotic conductance to glucose (OCG) is a crucial determinant of ultrafiltration (UF) in peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients and can be used to monitor membrane integrity in patients on long-term PD. It has been proposed that OCG can be assessed based on drained volumes in 2 consecutive 1-hour glucose dwells, usually 1.5% and 4.25% glucose, in a so-called double mini-peritoneal equilibration test (dm-PET). However, recent data indicated that the dm-PET provides a poor estimate of OCG unless the residual volume (RV) is taken into account. We introduce an easy, robust, and accurate method to measure OCG and compare it with conventional methods. METHODS: In a prospective cohort of 21 PD patients, a modified version of the dm-PET was performed, along with the determination of RV before, between, and after dwells. Based on computer simulations derived from the 3-pore model (TPM) for membrane permeability, we developed and validated a novel single-dwell method to estimate OCG. We next validated the equation in an independent cohort consisting of 32 PD patients. RESULTS: Single-dwell OCG correlated more closely with actual UF (r = 0.94 vs. r = 0.07 for conventional dm-PET), sodium sieving, and free water transport (FWT) compared with other methods. These findings were replicated in the validation cohort in which OCG calculated using the single-dwell method closely correlated with parameters of osmotic water transport, even when RV was not taken into account, using only drained volumes. CONCLUSION: We propose a novel, easy, and robust single-dwell method to determine OCG in individual patients and to monitor membrane integrity over time on PD.

Optimized vs. Standard Automated Peritoneal Dialysis Regimens (OptiStAR): study protocol for a randomized controlled crossover trial.

BACKGROUND: It has been estimated that automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) is currently the fastest growing renal replacement therapy in the world. However, in light of the growing number of diabetic patients on peritoneal dialysis (PD), the unwanted glucose absorption during APD remains problematic. Recent results, using an extended 3-pore model of APD, indicated that large reductions in glucose absorption are possible by using optimized bi-modal treatment regimens, having "UF cycles" using a higher glucose concentration, and "Clearance cycles" using a low concentration or, preferentially, no glucose. The present study is designed to test the theoretical prediction of a lower glucose absorption using these novel regimes. METHODS: This study is a randomized single-center, open-label, prospective study. Prevalent PD patients between 18 and 75 years old without known catheter problems or recent peritonitis are eligible for inclusion. Patients are allocated to a first treatment session of either standard APD (6 × 2 L 1.36% over 9 h) or optimized APD (7 × 2 L 2.27% + 5 × 2 L 0.1% over 8 h). A second treatment session using the other treatment will be performed in a crossover fashion. Samples of the dialysis fluid will be taken before and after the treatment, and the volume of the dialysate before and after the treatment will be carefully assessed. The primary endpoint is difference in glucose absorption between the optimized and standard treatment. Secondary endpoints are ultrafiltration, sodium removal, Kt/V urea, and Kt/V Creatinine. The study will be closed when a total of 20 patients have successfully completed the interventions or terminated according to interim analysis. A Monte Carlo power analysis shows that the study has 80% power to detect a difference of 10 g (in line with that of theoretical results) in glucose absorption between the two treatments in 10 patients. DISCUSSION: The present study is the first clinical investigation of optimized bi-modal treatments proposed by recent theoretical studies. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04017572. Registration date: July 12, 2019, retrospectively registered.