Accuracy and Safety of Non-Image Guided Trigger Finger Injections: A Cadaveric Study.

BACKGROUND: Stenosing flexor tenosynovitis is commonly treated by injection of corticosteroids into the flexor tendon sheath. However, there is no consensus in the literature regarding the optimal technique, specifically when not utilizing ultrasound guidance. Here, we present a cadaver study in which 3 common techniques of flexor sheath injection were compared with regard to their accuracy and safety profiles. METHODS: Fifteen fresh-frozen cadaver hands (60 digits) were evenly divided into 3 groups (20 digits per group). Digits in each group were injected with methylene blue dye using 1 of the 3 techniques (palmar-to-bone, palmar supra-tendinous, and mid-axial). The fingers were then dissected and were inspected for location of dye, as well as injury to tendon or digital nerves. RESULTS: The mid-axial technique demonstrated the greatest accuracy with the highest rate of all intra-sheath injection, 15 of 20 digits (75%), while the palmar-to-bone technique produced the most combined intra- and extra-sheath injections, 13 of 20 digits, (65%) and the palmar supra-tendinous technique resulted in the most all extra-sheath injections, 9 of 20 digits (45%). The difference in rates of all intra-sheath injection was significant (P = .01). The mid-axial technique also produced the fewest intra-tendinous injections 0 of 20, although this result did not reach statistical significance (P = .15). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to other common non-image guided flexor tendon sheath injection techniques, the mid-axial injection technique was found to be the most accurate in producing all intra-sheath injection and least likely to result in intra-tendinous injection.

Hemorrhagic complications of ventriculostomy placement: a meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The reported intracerebral hemorrhage rate due to ventriculostomy placement varies widely. As studies emerge regarding alternative techniques of ventriculostomy placement, and placement by non-neurosurgeons, further definition of the true intracerebral hemorrhage rate associated with ventriculostomy is warranted. We performed a meta-analysis of the existing literature to further elucidate the incidence of intracerebral hemorrhage due to ventriculostomy. METHODS: We performed an extensive literature search using Ovid MEDLINE and PubMed for relevant studies published after 1970. Only studies with more than 25 ventriculostomy procedures were included. Data were extracted regarding number of hemorrhages, clinically significant hemorrhages, and the use of routine post-ventriculostomy CT scanning. We performed subgroup analyses based on the use of routine post-ventriculostomy CT scanning. Chi-squared test was used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: Overall, 102 hemorrhagic complications from 1,790 ventriculostomies were reported, a hemorrhage rate of 5.7%. Of the 102 hemorrhages, 11 were clinically significant (clinically significant hemorrhage rate = 0.61%). In studies that used routine post-placement CT scans, the hemorrhage rate was 10.06%, compared to a hemorrhage rate of 1.53% in studies in which routine CT scans were not performed (P < 0.001). Eight clinically significant hemorrhages (0.91%) were identified in the studies utilizing routine post-procedural CT scanning, compared to three clinically significant hemorrhages (0.33%) in studies without routine CT scans (P = 0.113). CONCLUSION: The overall hemorrhage risk associated with ventriculostomy placement based on the existing literature is 5.7%. Clinically significant hemorrhage due to ventriculostomy is less than 1%. Modifications of technique that might reduce hemorrhage risk, and the utility of routine post-procedural CT scanning, merit further investigation.