An intra-laboratory validation of the Integrated Model for the Differentiation of Skin Reactions (IMDS): discrimination between (photo)allergic and (photo)irritant skin reactions in mice.

We recently presented a modified local lymph node test which made it possible to quickly and reliably differentiate between irritative and allergic skin reactions with extremely simple parameters. The Integrated Model for the Differentiation of Skin Reactions (IMDS) test combines measurement of cell proliferation in draining lymph nodes with measurement of primary ear swelling after topical application of the test substance on three consecutive days. In contrast to the 'classic' skin sensitisation test in guinea-pigs the IMDS test is considerably faster and is based on objective measured data, not subjective skin evaluations. Like the Local Lymph Node Assay (LLNA), measurement of allergic potential in the IMDS test is based on the underlying immunological mechanisms, but also considers the behaviour of immune competent cells following non-specific activation by irritants. In addition, the IMDS test can employ UV radiation after application of the substance and, therefore, make differentiation possible between different types of skin photoreaction (photoallergy and photoirritation) after both topical and systemic administration. Attempts to achieve this kind of discrimination with the LLNA necessitate considerably greater expenditure, as proliferation in the draining lymph nodes can also be induced by moderate to extreme (photo)irritants. In a previous paper in which we presented the IMDS test, we examined each type of reaction in reference to one single standard; the next logical step was therefore a broad-based intra-laboratory validation. An important factor in the validation was the use of standards that had been thoroughly examined in both guinea pig and mouse systems and were also relevant with regard to estimation of the risk for humans. The data presented here show that the IMDS is a simple and reliable tool for obtaining fast and reproducible assessments of potential (photo)allergic and (photo)irritant skin reactions to substances.

Analyses of cutaneous fluoroquinolones photoreactivity using the integrated model for the differentiation of skin reactions.

Currently available test models for the differentiation of photoallergic and photoirritant reactions are extremely time consuming and the protocols are very heterogeneous. In vitro tests are of proven value in predicting irritant or toxic effects, but these tests fail to predict chemical-induced allergic side effects. We developed test systems for this endpoint which is not easily detected by existing assays. In a previous publication we were able to discriminate between a contact sensitizer and a skin irritant with a combination of primary ear swelling analysis and cell counting of the ear-draining lymph nodes [Toxicol. Appl. Pharm. 153 (1998) 83; Arch. Toxicol. 73 (2000) 501]. This combination of tests was called the Integrated Model for the Differentiation of chemical-induced allergic and irritant Skin reactions (IMDS). In addition, it had been shown before that inclusion of UV irradiation in the local lymph node assay enables discrimination of photoallergic from photoirritant reactions after dermal application [Photodermatol. Photoimmunol. Photomed. 10 (1994) 57]. Because of the fact that fluoroquinolones are known to induce photoreactions after oral but not dermal treatment, the aim of the present study was to apply the IMDS for the fast and reliable differentiation of photoreactions due to fluoroquinolones after oral treatment. Enoxacin, lomefloxacin, ofloxacin, sparfloxacin and BAY y 3118 were tested in this system. We found a good correlation between the results of UV light-irradiated IMDS and a guinea pig model with the quinolones as far as photoirritancy was concerned. This holds true also for the photoallergic standard olaquindox and the photoirritant standard 8-methoxypsoralen. However, in contrast to the guinea pig assays the IMDS is fast and extremely predictive for the risk of both photosensitization and photoirritancy depending on the route of exposure. Thus, the UV light-irradiated IMDS turned out to be a good tool for the preclinical risk assessment procedure in terms of discriminating photoreactions. In addition, flow cytometric analyses were used to underline the fact that antigen-independent activation occurred after the induction of photoirritant reactions.