ABSTRACT
Excision repair cross-complementation group 2 (ERCC2) encodes the DNA helicase xeroderma pigmentosum group D, which functions in transcription and nucleotide excision repair. Point mutations in ERCC2 are putative drivers in around 10% of bladder cancers (BLCAs) and a potential positive biomarker for cisplatin therapy response. Nevertheless, the prognostic significance directly attributed to ERCC2 mutations and its pathogenic role in genome instability remain poorly understood. We first demonstrated that mutant ERCC2 is an independent predictor of prognosis in BLCA. We then examined its impact on the somatic mutational landscape using a cohort of ERCC2 wild-type (n = 343) and mutant (n = 39) BLCA whole genomes. The genome-wide distribution of somatic mutations is significantly altered in ERCC2 mutants, including T[C>T]N enrichment, altered replication time correlations, and CTCF-cohesin binding site mutation hotspots. We leverage these alterations to develop a machine learning model for predicting pathogenic ERCC2 mutations, which may be useful to inform treatment of patients with BLCA.
Subject(s)
Mutation , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms , Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group D Protein , Humans , Urinary Bladder Neoplasms/genetics , Xeroderma Pigmentosum Group D Protein/genetics , PrognosisABSTRACT
Glioblastoma is a highly aggressive disease with poor survival outcomes. An emerging body of literature links the role of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS), well-known for its function in the cardiovascular system, to the progression of cancers. We studied the expression of RAS-related genes (ATP6AP2, AGTR1, AGTR2, ACE, AGT, and REN) in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) glioblastoma cohort, their relationship to patient survival, and association with tumour microenvironment pathways. The expression of RAS genes was then examined in 12 patient-derived glioblastoma cell lines treated with chemoradiation. In cases of glioblastoma within the TCGA, ATP6AP2, AGTR1, ACE, and AGT had consistent expressions across samples, while AGTR2 and REN were lowly expressed. High expression of AGTR1 was independently associated with lower progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.01) and had a non-significant trend for overall survival (OS) after multivariate analysis (p = 0.095). The combined expression of RAS receptors (ATP6AP2, AGTR1, and AGTR2) was positively associated with gene pathways involved in hypoxia, microvasculature, stem cell plasticity, and the molecular characterisation of glioblastoma subtypes. In patient-derived glioblastoma cell lines, ATP6AP2 and AGTR1 were upregulated after chemoradiotherapy and correlated with an increase in HIF1A expression. This data suggests the RAS is correlated with changes in the tumour microenvironment and associated with glioblastoma survival outcomes.
Subject(s)
Glioblastoma , Renin-Angiotensin System , Humans , Renin-Angiotensin System/genetics , Up-Regulation/genetics , Glioblastoma/genetics , Tumor Microenvironment , Receptors, Cell Surface/metabolism , Prorenin ReceptorABSTRACT
Gynecological and obstetric infectious diseases are crucial to women's health. There is growing evidence that links the presence of Fusobacterium nucleatum (F. nucleatum), an anaerobic oral commensal and potential periodontal pathogen, to the development and progression of various human diseases, including cancers. While the role of this opportunistic oral pathogen has been extensively studied in colorectal cancer in recent years, research on its epidemiological evidence and mechanistic link to gynecological diseases (GDs) is still ongoing. Thus, the present review, which is the first of its kind, aims to undertake a comprehensive and critical reappraisal of F. nucleatum, including the genetics and mechanistic role in promoting adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) and various GDs, including cancers. Additionally, this review discusses new conceptual advances that link the immunomodulatory role of F. nucleatum to the development and progression of breast, ovarian, endometrial, and cervical carcinomas through the activation of various direct and indirect signaling pathways. However, further studies are needed to explore and elucidate the highly dynamic process of host-F. nucleatum interactions and discover new pathways, which will pave the way for the development of better preventive and therapeutic strategies against this pathobiont.
Subject(s)
Fusobacterium nucleatum , Pregnancy Outcome , Humans , Female , Fusobacterium nucleatum/pathogenicity , Pregnancy , Fusobacterium Infections/complications , Fusobacterium Infections/microbiology , Genital Diseases, Female/microbiology , Neoplasms/microbiologyABSTRACT
Glioblastoma cells can restrict the DNA-damaging effects of temozolomide (TMZ) and radiation therapy (RT) using the DNA damage response (DDR) mechanism which activates cell cycle arrest and DNA repair pathways. Ataxia-telangiectasia and Rad3-Related protein (ATR) plays a pivotal role in the recognition of DNA damage induced by chemotherapy and radiation causing downstream DDR activation. Here, we investigated the activity of gartisertib, a potent ATR inhibitor, alone and in combination with TMZ and/or RT in 12 patient-derived glioblastoma cell lines. We showed that gartisertib alone potently reduced the cell viability of glioblastoma cell lines, where sensitivity was associated with the frequency of DDR mutations and higher expression of the G2 cell cycle pathway. ATR inhibition significantly enhanced cell death in combination with TMZ and RT and was shown to have higher synergy than TMZ+RT treatment. MGMT promoter unmethylated and TMZ+RT resistant glioblastoma cells were also more sensitive to gartisertib. Analysis of gene expression from gartisertib treated glioblastoma cells identified the upregulation of innate immune-related pathways. Overall, this study identifies ATR inhibition as a strategy to enhance the DNA-damaging ability of glioblastoma standard treatment, while providing preliminary evidence that ATR inhibition induces an innate immune gene signature that warrants further investigation.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms , Glioblastoma , Humans , Temozolomide/pharmacology , Temozolomide/therapeutic use , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Glioblastoma/genetics , Glioblastoma/radiotherapy , Dacarbazine/pharmacology , Dacarbazine/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/therapeutic use , Tumor Suppressor Proteins/metabolism , Cell Death , Cell Line , DNA , Cell Line, Tumor , DNA Modification Methylases/genetics , DNA Modification Methylases/metabolism , DNA Repair Enzymes/genetics , DNA Repair Enzymes/metabolism , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Brain Neoplasms/genetics , Brain Neoplasms/radiotherapy , Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins/genetics , Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated Proteins/metabolismABSTRACT
Vasculogenic mimicry (VM), the ability of tumour cells to form functional microvasculature without an endothelial lining, may contribute to anti-angiogenic treatment resistance in glioblastoma. We aimed to assess the extent of VM formation in primary and recurrent glioblastomas and to determine whether VM vessels also express prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), a pathological vessel marker. Formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue from 35 matched pairs of primary and recurrent glioblastoma was immunohistochemically labelled for PSMA and CD34 and stained with periodic acid-Schiff (PAS). Vascular structures were categorised as endothelial vessels (CD34+/PAS+) or VM (CD34-/PAS+). Most blood vessels in both primary and recurrent tumours were endothelial vessels, and these significantly decreased in recurrent tumours (p < 0.001). PSMA was expressed by endothelial vessels, and its expression was also decreased in recurrent tumours (p = 0.027). VM was observed in 42.86% of primary tumours and 28.57% of recurrent tumours. VM accounted for only a small proportion of the tumour vasculature and VM density did not differ between primary and recurrent tumours (p = 0.266). The functional contribution of VM and its potential as a treatment target in glioblastoma require further investigation.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma, the most common primary malignant brain tumour in adults, is a highly vascular tumour characterised by abnormal angiogenesis. Additional mechanisms of tumour vascularisation have also been reported in glioblastoma, including the formation of tumour cell-derived vessels by vasculogenic mimicry (VM) or the transdifferentiation of tumour cells to endothelial cells. VM and endothelial transdifferentiation have frequently been reported as distinct processes, however, the use of both terms to describe a single process of vascularisation also occurs. Some overlapping characteristics have also been reported when identifying each process. We therefore aimed to determine the markers consistently attributed to VM and endothelial transdifferentiation in the glioblastoma literature. METHODS: Ovid MEDLINE and Ovid Embase were searched for studies published between January 1999 and July 2021 that assessed VM or tumour to endothelial transdifferentiation in human glioblastoma. The online systematic review tool Covidence was used for screening and data extraction. Extracted data included type of tumour-derived vasculature reported, methods and techniques used, and markers investigated. Studies were grouped based on type of vasculature reported for further assessment. RESULTS: One hundred and thirteen of the 419 unique records identified were included for analysis. VM was reported in 64/113 studies, while tumour to endothelial transdifferentiation was reported in 16/113 studies. The remaining studies used both terms to describe a single process, did not define the process that occurred, or concluded that neither VM nor endothelial transdifferentiation occurred. Absence of CD34 and/or CD31 in vascular structures was the most common indicator of VM, while expression of CD34 and/or CD31, in addition to various other endothelial, stem cell or tumour cell markers, indicated tumour to endothelial transdifferentiation. CONCLUSION: Cells derived from tumour to endothelial transdifferentiation express typical endothelial markers including CD34 and CD31, while tumour cells contributing to VM lack CD34 and CD31 expression. Additional tumour markers are required to identify transdifferentiation in glioblastoma tissue, and this process requires further characterisation.
Subject(s)
Glioblastoma , Adult , Humans , Glioblastoma/pathology , Endothelial Cells/metabolism , Cell Transdifferentiation , Neovascularization, Pathologic/metabolism , Cell Differentiation , Biomarkers, TumorABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: A lack of clarity exists regarding contraceptive uptake and counselling among women with cancer, despite these women having unique family planning needs. This study aimed to systematically review the available literature and produce an overall summary estimate of contraceptive use and counselling among women with cancer across the cancer care continuum. METHODS: A systematic search of articles reporting on contraceptive counselling and/or contraceptive use among women of reproductive age (15-49 years) with cancer across the cancer care continuum (e.g. diagnosis, treatment, survivorship) was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Maternity and Infant Care and Cochrane Library. Two independent reviewers conducted the data screening, data extraction and risk of bias assessment. Qualitative synthesis and meta-analyses were conducted to summarise the key findings. RESULTS: We included 21 articles involving 3835 participants in this review. Studies varied according to the cancer population and time along the cancer care continuum it was assessed. Of the studies that reported the overall contraceptive prevalence among women diagnosed with cancer (n = 8), contraceptive use ranged from 25 to 92%. Of the four studies that focused on cancer survivors, the contraceptive prevalence ranged from 47 to 84%. When the prevalence of these studies was pooled, a crude summary prevalence of 64% (62% among women with cancer versus 68% among cancer survivors) was found. The rate of contraceptive counselling was assessed in ten studies. A pooled prevalence of 50% (44% among women with cancer versus 58% among cancer survivors) was found, with the prevalence ranging from 12 to 78% among individual studies depending on the point in the cancer care continuum that it was provided. When contraceptive counselling was provided, it was found to significantly increase contraceptive use although biases were identified in its application. CONCLUSIONS: Contraceptive counselling interventions as part of standard cancer care have the potential to not only empower women with cancer and cancer survivors to make informed choices regarding their reproductive health but also provide the ability to plan future pregnancies for times of better health.
Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Neoplasms , Female , Pregnancy , Humans , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Contraceptive Agents , Family Planning Services , Counseling , Neoplasms/epidemiology , Neoplasms/therapyABSTRACT
The advent of molecular targeted therapies has made a significant impact on survival of women with ovarian cancer who have defects in homologous recombination repair (HRR). High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most common histological subtype of ovarian cancer, with over 50% displaying defective HRR. Poly ADP ribose polymerases (PARPs) are a family of enzymes that catalyse the transfer of ADP-ribose to target proteins, functioning in fundamental cellular processes including transcription, chromatin remodelling and DNA repair. In cells with deficient HRR, PARP inhibitors (PARPis) cause synthetic lethality leading to cell death. Despite the major advances that PARPis have heralded for women with ovarian cancer, questions and challenges remain, including: can the benefits of PARPis be brought to a wider range of women with ovarian cancer; can other drugs in clinical use function in a similar way or with greater efficacy than currently clinically approved PARPis; what can we learn from long-term responders to PARPis; can PARPis sensitise ovarian cancer cells to immunotherapy; and can synthetic lethal strategies be employed more broadly to develop new therapies for women with ovarian cancer. We examine these, and other, questions with focus on improving outcomes for women with ovarian cancer.
ABSTRACT
Melanoma gave science a window into the role immune evasion plays in the development of malignancy. The entire spectrum of immune focused anti-cancer therapies has been subjected to clinical trials in this disease, with limited success until the immune checkpoint blockade era. That revolution launched first in melanoma, heralded a landscape change throughout cancer that continues to reverberate today.
Subject(s)
Melanoma , Programmed Cell Death 1 Receptor , B7-H1 Antigen , CTLA-4 Antigen , Humans , Immunotherapy , Melanoma/drug therapyABSTRACT
Glioblastoma is a highly aggressive, invasive and treatment-resistant tumour. The DNA damage response (DDR) provides tumour cells with enhanced ability to activate cell cycle arrest and repair treatment-induced DNA damage. We studied the expression of DDR, its relationship with standard treatment response and patient survival, and its activation after treatment. The transcriptomic profile of DDR pathways was characterised within a cohort of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) wild-type glioblastoma from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and 12 patient-derived glioblastoma cell lines. The relationship between DDR expression and patient survival and cell line response to temozolomide (TMZ) or radiation therapy (RT) was assessed. Finally, the expression of 84 DDR genes was examined in glioblastoma cells treated with TMZ and/or RT. Although distinct DDR cluster groups were apparent in the TCGA cohort and cell lines, no significant differences in OS and treatment response were observed. At the gene level, the high expression of ATP23, RAD51C and RPA3 independently associated with poor prognosis in glioblastoma patients. Finally, we observed a substantial upregulation of DDR genes after treatment with TMZ and/or RT, particularly in RT-treated glioblastoma cells, peaking within 24 h after treatment. Our results confirm the potential influence of DDR genes in patient outcome. The observation of DDR genes in response to TMZ and RT gives insight into the global response of DDR pathways after adjuvant treatment in glioblastoma, which may have utility in determining DDR targets for inhibition.
Subject(s)
Glioblastoma , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/pharmacology , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/therapeutic use , DNA Damage/genetics , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Glioblastoma/genetics , Glioblastoma/radiotherapy , Humans , Temozolomide/pharmacology , Temozolomide/therapeutic use , Transcriptome/geneticsABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Platinum chemoresistance results in high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) disease recurrence. Recent treatment advances using checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy has not benefited platinum-resistant HGSOC. In ovarian cancer, DNA methyltransferase inhibitors (DNMTi) block methylation and allow expression of silenced genes, primarily affecting immune reactivation pathways. We aimed to determine the epigenome and transcriptome response to sequential treatment with DNMTi and carboplatin in HGSOC. METHODS: In vitro studies with azacitidine or carboplatin alone and in sequential combination. Response was determined by cell growth, death and apoptosis. Genome-wide DNA methylation levels and transcript expression were compared between untreated and azacitidine and carboplatin sequential treatment. RESULTS: Sequential azacitidine and carboplatin significantly slowed cell growth in 50% of cell lines compared to carboplatin alone. The combination resulted in significantly higher cell death in 25% of cell lines, and significantly higher cell apoptosis in 37.5% of cell lines, than carboplatin alone. Pathway analysis of upregulated transcripts showed that the majority of changes were in immune-related pathways, including those regulating response to checkpoint inhibitors. CONCLUSIONS: Sequential azacitidine and carboplatin treatment slows cell growth, and demethylate and upregulate pathways involved in immune response, suggesting that this combination may be used to increase HGSOC response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in platinum-resistant patients who have exhausted all currently-approved avenues of treatment.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Azacitidine/administration & dosage , Carboplatin/administration & dosage , Immunity/drug effects , Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous/drug therapy , Ovarian Neoplasms/drug therapy , Cell Growth Processes/drug effects , Cell Growth Processes/immunology , Cell Line, Tumor , DNA Methylation/drug effects , DNA Methylation/immunology , Female , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Neoplasm Grading , Neoplasms, Cystic, Mucinous, and Serous/immunology , Ovarian Neoplasms/immunology , Signal Transduction/drug effects , Signal Transduction/immunology , Up-Regulation/drug effects , Up-Regulation/immunologyABSTRACT
Purpose: Drug repurposing offers the opportunity for chemotherapy to be used to reestablish sensitivity to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy. Here we investigated the clinical and translational aspects of an early phase II study of azacitidine and carboplatin priming for anti-PDL1 immunotherapy (avelumab) in patients with advanced ICB-resistant melanoma. Experimental Design: A total of 20 participants with ICB-resistant metastatic melanoma received 2 × 4-week cycles of azacitidine and carboplatin followed by ICB rechallenge with anti-PD-L1 avelumab. The primary objective was overall response rate after priming and ICB rechallenge. Secondary objectives were clinical benefit rate (CBR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Translational correlation analysis of HLA-A and PD-L1 expression, RNA sequencing, and reduced representation bisulfite sequencing of biopsies at baseline, after priming and after six cycles of avelmuab was performed. Results: The overall response rate (ORR) determined after azacitidine and carboplatin priming was 10% (2/20) with two partial responses (PR). The ORR determined after priming followed by six cycles of avelumab (week 22) was 10%, with 2 of 20 participants achieving immune partial response (iPR). The CBR for azacitidine and carboplatin priming was 65% (13/20) and after priming followed by six cycles of avelumab CBR was 35% (n = 7/20). The median PFS was 18.0 weeks [95% confidence interval (CI): 14.87-21.13 weeks] and the median OS was 47.86 weeks (95% CI: 9.67-86.06 weeks). Translational correlation analysis confirmed HLA-A generally increased after priming with azacitidine and carboplatin, particularly if it was absent at the start of treatment. Average methylation of CpGs across the HLA-A locus was decreased after priming and T cells, in particular CD8+, showed the greatest increase in infiltration. Conclusions: Priming with azacitidine and carboplatin can induce disease stabilization and resensitization to ICB for metastatic melanoma. Significance: There are limited treatments for melanoma once resistance to ICB occurs. Chemotherapy induces immune-related responses and may be repurposed to reinstate the response to ICB. This study provides the first evidence that chemotherapy can provide clinical benefit and increase OS for ICB-resistant melanoma.
Subject(s)
Azacitidine , Carboplatin , Drug Repositioning , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors , Melanoma , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/administration & dosage , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/adverse effects , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Azacitidine/administration & dosage , Azacitidine/adverse effects , Azacitidine/therapeutic use , Biomarkers , Carboplatin/administration & dosage , Carboplatin/adverse effects , Carboplatin/therapeutic use , DNA Damage/drug effects , DNA Methylation/drug effects , Epigenesis, Genetic/drug effects , HLA-A Antigens , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/administration & dosage , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/adverse effects , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Immunotherapy/methods , Melanoma/drug therapy , T-Lymphocytes/metabolism , Translational Research, BiomedicalABSTRACT
High-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) is the most common ovarian cancer subtype, and the overall survival rate has not improved in the last three decades. Currently, most patients develop recurrent disease within 3 years and succumb to the disease within 5 years. This is an important area of research, as the major obstacle to the treatment of HGSOC is the development of resistance to platinum chemotherapy. The cause of chemoresistance is still largely unknown and may be due to epigenetics modifications that are driving HGSOC metastasis and treatment resistance. The identification of epigenetic changes in chemoresistant HGSOC enables the development of epigenetic modulating drugs that may be used to improve outcomes. Several epigenetic modulating drugs have displayed promise as drug targets for HGSOC, such as demethylating agents azacitidine and decitabine. Others, such as histone deacetylase inhibitors and miRNA-targeting therapies, demonstrated promising preclinical results but resulted in off-target side effects in clinical trials. This article reviews the epigenetic modifications identified in chemoresistant HGSOC and clinical trials utilizing epigenetic therapies in HGSOC.
ABSTRACT
Immunotherapies targeting tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) that express the immune checkpoint molecule programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) have shown promise in preclinical glioblastoma models but have had limited success in clinical trials. To assess when glioblastoma is most likely to benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors we determined the density of TILs in primary and recurrent glioblastoma. Thirteen cases of matched primary and recurrent glioblastoma tissue were immunohistochemically labelled for CD3, CD8, CD4 and PD-1, and TIL density assessed. CD3+ TILs were observed in all cases, with the majority of both primary (69.2%) and recurrent (61.5%) tumours having low density of TILs present. CD8+ TILs were observed at higher densities than CD4+ TILs in both tumour groups. PD-1+ TILs were sparse and present in only 25% of primary and 50% of recurrent tumours. Quantitative analysis of TILs demonstrated significantly higher CD8+ TIL density at recurrence (p = 0.040). No difference was observed in CD3+ (p = 0.191), CD4+ (p = 0.607) and PD-1+ (p = 0.070) TIL density between primary and recurrent groups. This study shows that TILs are present at low densities in both primary and recurrent glioblastoma. Furthermore, PD-1+ TILs were frequently absent, which may provide evidence as to why anti-PD-1 immunotherapy trials have been largely unsuccessful in glioblastoma.
ABSTRACT
Trial data support an absence of an exposure-survival relationship for pembrolizumab. As these relationships remain unexamined in a real-world setting, we determined them in metastatic melanoma prospectively in an observational study. Translational objectives included identifying biomarkers of progressive disease (PD). Checkpoint blockade naïve patients receiving 2 mg/kg Q3W pembrolizumab had pharmacokinetic and clinical outcome data collected. Trough, a valid surrogate for drug exposure, was assessed using ELISA. T-cell exhaustion and chemokine markers were determined using flow cytometry. Geometric means of exposures and biomarkers were tested against objective response groups using one-way ANOVA. The cohort was split by the median into high versus low pembrolizumab exposure groups. Kaplan-Meier progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) curves were estimated for high versus low exposure, compared using the log rank test. The high pembrolizumab exposure group (n = 14) experienced substantially longer median OS (not reached vs. 48 months, p = .014), than the low exposure group (n = 14). A similar positive exposure PFS relationship was found (median not reached vs. 48 months, p = .045). The frequency of TIM-3 expression on CD4+ T cells was significantly higher in PD (mean 27.8%) than complete response (CR) (13.38%, p = .01) and partial response (12.4%, p = .05). There was a near doubling of CXCR6 and TIM-3 co-expression on CD4+ T cells in PD (mean 23.3%) versus CR (mean 11.4, p = .003) and partial response (9.8%, p = .0001). We describe positive exposure-PFS and exposure-OS relationships for pembrolizumab in metastatic melanoma. TIM-3, alongside co-expression of CXCR6 and TIM-3 on circulating CD4+ T cells are potential bio markers of treatment failure.
Subject(s)
Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/therapeutic use , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/therapeutic use , Melanoma/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/blood , Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized/pharmacology , Hepatitis A Virus Cellular Receptor 2/immunology , Humans , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/blood , Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors/pharmacology , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Melanoma/immunology , Melanoma/mortality , Melanoma/pathology , Middle Aged , Progression-Free Survival , Receptors, CXCR6/immunology , T-Lymphocytes/drug effects , T-Lymphocytes/immunologyABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: The aggressive, invasive and treatment resistant nature of glioblastoma makes it one of the most lethal cancers in humans. Total surgical resection is difficult, and a combination of radiation and chemotherapy is used to treat the remaining invasive cells beyond the tumour border by inducing DNA damage and activating cell death pathways in glioblastoma cells. Unfortunately, recurrence is common and a major hurdle in treatment, often met with a more aggressive and treatment resistant tumour. A mechanism of resistance is the response of DNA repair pathways upon treatment-induced DNA damage, which enact cell-cycle arrest and repair of DNA damage that would otherwise cause cell death in tumour cells. CONCLUSIONS: In this review, we discuss the significance of DNA repair mechanisms in tumour formation, aggression and treatment resistance. We identify an underlying trend in the literature, wherein alterations in DNA repair pathways facilitate glioma progression, while established high-grade gliomas benefit from constitutively active DNA repair pathways in the repair of treatment-induced DNA damage. We also consider the clinical feasibility of inhibiting DNA repair in glioblastoma and current strategies of using DNA repair inhibitors as agents in combination with chemotherapy, radiation or immunotherapy. Finally, the importance of blood-brain barrier penetrance when designing novel small-molecule inhibitors is discussed.
Subject(s)
Brain Neoplasms/genetics , DNA Damage , DNA Repair/genetics , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/genetics , Glioblastoma/genetics , Antineoplastic Agents, Alkylating/therapeutic use , Brain Neoplasms/drug therapy , Cell Cycle Checkpoints/drug effects , Cell Cycle Checkpoints/genetics , DNA Repair/drug effects , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm/drug effects , Glioblastoma/drug therapy , Humans , Models, Genetic , Temozolomide/therapeutic useABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Resistance to targeted and immune checkpoint blockade treatment remains a major problem in patients with advanced metastatic melanoma. To overcome this problem, there needs to be a decrease in burden of disease as well as re-establishing of immune sensitivity. The aim of this early phase 2 clinical trial is to investigate a novel way of sequencing and combining decitabine and carboplatin to decrease methylation and increase DNA repair resulting in a decrease in the disease burden and to re-establish sensitivity to the immune response. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-site early phase 2 clinical trial will be conducted in 30 patients with metastatic melanoma that are resistant to all approved therapies. Patients will receive 2 × 4-week cycles of decitabine 7âmg/m IVI/day for 5 days (D1-D5) followed by Carboplatin AUC 5 IVI on D8; Week 3 and Week 4 no treatment. The primary objective is to determine DNA methylation and DNA repair levels before, and immediately after treatment; quantify immune-response markers (PDL-1, PD-1, CD4/CD8, and CD68) in blood, tumor and microenvironment before treatment and after 2 cycles. The secondary outcome objective is to quantify response rate (RR) to administration of 2 cycles of decitabine and carboplatin cycle using response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST 1.1) criteria. This data will be used to calculate sample size and determine statistical analysis plan for larger Phase 2 study. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Protocol version 1.1 was reviewed and approved by the Hunter New England Health Human Research Ethics Committee (Reference No: 15/12/16/3.08, NSW HREC Reference No: HREC/15/HNE/505) and site-specific approval from the Calvary Mater Hospital Newcastle, NSW, Australia (NSW SSA Reference No: SSA/16/HNE/224). Primary and secondary outcomes and safety data will be disseminated through publications. TRIAL REGISTRATION DETAILS: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry ACTRN12616000440426.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use , Carboplatin/therapeutic use , Decitabine/therapeutic use , Melanoma/drug therapy , Clinical Trials, Phase II as Topic , Humans , Melanoma/pathology , Pilot ProjectsSubject(s)
Coronavirus Infections/drug therapy , Drug Repositioning/economics , Financing, Government , Pneumonia, Viral/drug therapy , Australia , Betacoronavirus , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/virology , Drug Repositioning/methods , Humans , Investments , Leadership , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/virology , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
Immune checkpoint blockade has transformed outcomes across solid organ tumours. Monoclonal antibodies targeting the negative inhibitory cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 and programmed-death 1/programmed death-ligand 1 axis can lead to deep and durable responses across several tumour streams in the advanced setting. This immunotherapy approach is increasingly used earlier in the treatment paradigm. A rapidly evolving regulatory, reimbursement and drug development landscape has accompanied this novel class of immunotherapy. Unfortunately, only a small proportion of patients respond meaningfully to these agents. Here we review how the underlying tumoural genomic, histological and immunological characteristics interact within various patient phenotypes, leading to variations in response to checkpoint blockade. Concurrently, we outline the clinical trial and real-world evidence that allows for appropriate selection of agent, dose and schedule in solid organ malignancies. An exploration of current trends in basic and translational research in immune checkpoint blockade accompanies a commentary on future clinical directions for checkpoint blockade in oncology.