ABSTRACT
Background: Developmental Coxa Vara (DCV) consists on a pathological reduction in head-shaft angle (HSA) and increased femoral retroversion. Several case series reported outcomes on proximal femoral valgus osteotomy (PFVO), but no evidence synthesis had been conducted. This systematic review aimed to (1) analyze success rate and complications, (2) report the degree of correction according to the HSA and the Hilgenreiner Epiphyseal Angle (HEA), compare success rate and degree of correction of subtrochanteric (SVO) vs intertrochanteric (IVO) osteotomy, and (4) difference in success rate and correction between patients in which an internal (IF) or external fixation (EF) technique was used. Methods: Four databases (PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews) were searched until February 20th, 2024 according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Studies presenting outcomes on PFVO for DCV with >2 years follow-up and >5 patients were included. Review articles, language other than English and coxa vara secondary to other conditions were excluded. Study quality was evaluated through MINORS criteria. Results: 10 case series (level of evidence IV) were located for a total of 153 patients and 192 hips. Baseline results were as follows: male/female ratio was 1.45, mean age at surgery was 6.7 ± 1.5 and follow-up 5.1 ± 5.5 years. Overall success rate was 88.8%, with failure considered as any indication to revision surgery. Complications included loss of correction (10.9%), deep (1.0%) or superficial wound infection (2.6%). Revision surgery was performed in 18 hips (9.4%). Average correction was measured through HSA (preoperative 94.6 ± 8.1, postoperative 134.4 ± 10.2, change 38.2 ± 7.5°, p < 0.001) and HEA (preoperative 71.9 ± 5.5, postoperative 31.7 ± 5.7°, change 33.7 ± 10.5°, p < 0.001). Success rate was similar between osteotomy techniques (SVO: 91.0%; IVO: 94.1%; p = 0.48) and fixation strategy (IF: 85.4%; EF 95.8%; p = 0.096). Conclusions: PFVO presented satisfactory results for the treatment of DCV, with similar outcomes concerning the osteotomy site and fixation technique used. HSA and HEA correction were correlated to PFVO success rate. However, coxa vara is a tridimensional deformity, thus other parameters such as posterior sloping angle, mechanical axial deviation and proximal femoral offset should be included in future studies.
ABSTRACT
Aims & objectives: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common surgical procedure for end-stage knee osteoarthritis. However, conventional alignment techniques may lead to postoperative dissatisfaction in up to 20% of cases. Kinematic alignment (KA) has emerged as a new philosophy to restore the native joint line and achieve more natural kinematics. Preserving the posterior tibial slope (PTS) and posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is crucial to maintaining the pre-arthritic joint line and improving knee kinematics. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of postoperative PTS changes and their impact on functional outcomes and range of motion. Materials & methods: A retrospective single-center study was conducted on patients who underwent KA-TKA with PCL preservation. The preoperative and postoperative PTS were measured on lateral knee radiographs using the tibial proximal anatomic axis method. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected pre- and postoperatively up to a two-year follow-up. Results: Of the 95 included patients, 62.1% achieved an anatomically similar PTS (within 3° from the preoperative value), while 37.9% experienced noticeable PTS changes. However, no significant associations existed between PTS changes and compromised PROMs (WOMAC, 22.2 and 23.1; FJS, 66.6 and 67.3), ROM (118.5° and 119.4°), or patient satisfaction. No postoperative complications requiring reoperation or component revisions were observed. Conclusion: Preserving or modifying the native PTS during KA-TKA could be confidently undertaken without compromising functional outcomes or patient satisfaction.
ABSTRACT
Background: Periprosthetic femoral fractures (PFFs) are a frequent complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Both modular and non-modular tapered fluted titanium (TFT) stems could be used in total hip revisions (THRs). Nevertheless, the most appropriate femoral stem type is still under debate. The current systematic review aims to analyze the survival rate and all causes of stem revision, the overall complication rate and reason for reoperation, and patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in THR for PFF using the modular tapered titanium stems (MTTS). Methods: A comprehensive search in four databases, PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews databases, was performed, and following the PRISMA guidelines, a systematic review was conducted. Strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied, starting from 1,259 studies. The risk of bias was analyzed according to the MINORS tool system. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed for all data extracted. Results: Eighteen clinical studies were included in the qualitative analysis for a total of 775 patients enrolled. A mean MINORS criteria score of 9.8 [8-12] was reported. The overall survival of MTTS for PFF treatment was 95.4%, with an overall reintervention rate of 10.3% at an average follow-up of 4.5 years. Despite the use of modular components, postoperative hip instability remains the most frequent complication and cause of reintervention in these patients. In addition, a mean postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS) of 78.1 was reported, which was considered acceptable given the high mean age of 74.1 years at the time of the revision. Conclusions: Several therapeutic approaches and a wide variety of implants have been described in the literature for PFF management; however, no one solution has proven superior to others in the PFF treatment. MTTS has become a commonly used treatment option for Vancouver B2 and B3 fractures because they provide good clinical and radiological results with a reasonable survival rate. However, the complication rate of MTTS is still high.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE: To compare the safety and the effectiveness of one-port vs. three-port diagnostic vitrectomy in undiagnosed cases of posterior segment inflammation. METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from 80 consecutive diagnostic vitrectomies performed using a one-port (n = 40) or a three-port approach (n = 40). Cases of suspected postoperative endophthalmitis were not included in the study. Several variables were compared among groups, including length of surgery, postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), diagnostic success and surgical complications. RESULTS: The mean duration of surgery was shorter in the one-port group when compared to the three-port group (15 ± 8 min vs. 49 ± 30; p = 0.0001). The patients were observed for a mean follow-up of 19 months (range 1-84). In the one-port group, the mean BCVA improved from 1.31 ± 0.96 to 0.57 ± 0.59 logarithm of minimum resolution (LogMAR) (p = 0.0009). In the three-port group, BCVA improved from 0.98 ± 0.76 to 0.51 ± 0.76 LogMAR (p = 0.0005). The difference in mean postoperative BCVA between groups was not significative at the last follow-up. One-port vitrectomy yields to a final diagnosis in 80% of the cases, and three-port vitrectomy in 48%. Most of the one-port vitrectomies were carried out under topical anesthesia. After surgery, in both groups three eyes developed a retinal detachment. CONCLUSIONS: In this pilot study, the one-port diagnostic vitrectomy has proven to be as effective and safe as the three-port approach, allowing a reduction in surgical times. One-port diagnostic vitrectomy might be considered as the first option for those cases where more complex surgical procedures are not needed.