Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Biomolecules ; 10(5)2020 05 20.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32443870

ABSTRACT

Depression has a multifactorial etiology that arises from environmental, psychological, genetic, and biological factors. Environmental stress and genetic factors acting through immunological and endocrine responses generate structural and functional changes in the brain, inducing neurogenesis and neurotransmission dysfunction. Terpineol, monoterpenoid alcohol, has shown immunomodulatory and neuroprotective effects, but there is no report about its antidepressant potential. Herein, we used a single lipopolysaccharide (LPS) injection to induce a depressive-like effect in the tail suspension test (TST) and the splash test (ST) for a preventive and therapeutic experimental schedule. Furthermore, we investigated the antidepressant-like mechanism of action of terpineol while using molecular and pharmacological approaches. Terpineol showed a coherent predicted binding mode mainly against CB1 and CB2 receptors and also against the D2 receptor during docking modeling analyses. The acute administration of terpineol produced the antidepressant-like effect, since it significantly reduced the immobility time in TST (100-200 mg/kg, p.o.) as compared to the control group. Moreover, terpineol showed an antidepressant-like effect in the preventive treatment that was blocked by a nonselective dopaminergic receptor antagonist (haloperidol), a selective dopamine D2 receptor antagonist (sulpiride), a selective CB1 cannabinoid receptor antagonist/inverse agonist (AM281), and a potent and selective CB2 cannabinoid receptor inverse agonist (AM630), but it was not blocked by a nonselective adenosine receptor antagonist (caffeine) or a ß-adrenoceptor antagonist (propranolol). In summary, molecular docking suggests that CB1 and CB2 receptors are the most promising targets of terpineol action. Our data showed terpineol antidepressant-like modulation by CB1 and CB2 cannabinoid receptors and D2-dopaminergic receptors to further corroborate our molecular evidence.


Subject(s)
Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Antidepressive Agents/therapeutic use , Cannabinoid Receptor Modulators/therapeutic use , Depression/drug therapy , Dopamine Agents/therapeutic use , Monoterpenes/therapeutic use , Animals , Binding Sites , Depression/etiology , Hindlimb Suspension/adverse effects , Lipopolysaccharides/toxicity , Male , Mice , Molecular Docking Simulation , Protein Binding , Receptors, Cannabinoid/chemistry , Receptors, Cannabinoid/metabolism , Receptors, Dopamine D2/chemistry , Receptors, Dopamine D2/metabolism
2.
Eur J Med Chem ; 179: 765-778, 2019 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31284086

ABSTRACT

Chagas disease, Human African Trypanosomiasis, and schistosomiasis are neglected parasitic diseases for which new treatments are urgently needed. To identify new chemical leads, we screened the 400 compounds of the Open Access Malaria Box against the cysteine proteases, cruzain (Trypanosoma cruzi), rhodesain (Trypanosoma brucei) and SmCB1 (Schistosoma mansoni), which are therapeutic targets for these diseases. Whereas just three hits were observed for SmCB1, 70 compounds inhibited cruzain or rhodesain by at least 50% at 5 µM. Among those, 15 commercially available compounds were selected for confirmatory assays, given their potency, time-dependent inhibition profile and reported activity against parasites. Additional assays led to the confirmation of four novel classes of cruzain and rhodesain inhibitors, with potency in the low-to mid-micromolar range against enzymes and T. cruzi. Assays against mammalian cathepsins S and B revealed inhibitor selectivity for parasitic proteases. For the two competitive inhibitors identified (compounds 7 and 12), their binding mode was predicted by docking, providing a basis for structure-based optimization efforts. Compound 12 also acted directly against the trypomastigote and the intracellular amastigote forms of T. cruzi at 3 µM. Therefore, through a combination of experimental and computational approaches, we report promising hits for optimization in the development of new trypanocidal drugs.


Subject(s)
Cysteine Proteases/metabolism , Cysteine Proteinase Inhibitors/pharmacology , Drug Discovery , Malaria/drug therapy , Schistosoma mansoni/metabolism , Trypanocidal Agents/pharmacology , Animals , Cysteine Proteinase Inhibitors/chemical synthesis , Cysteine Proteinase Inhibitors/chemistry , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Malaria/metabolism , Molecular Structure , Parasitic Sensitivity Tests , Schistosoma mansoni/drug effects , Structure-Activity Relationship , Trypanocidal Agents/chemical synthesis , Trypanocidal Agents/chemistry , Trypanosoma brucei brucei/drug effects , Trypanosoma brucei brucei/metabolism , Trypanosoma cruzi/drug effects , Trypanosoma cruzi/metabolism
3.
Eur J Med Chem ; 71: 282-9, 2014 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24321832

ABSTRACT

A series of bis-(arylmethylidene)-cycloalkanones was synthesized by cross-aldol condensation. The activity of the compounds was evaluated against amastigotes forms of Trypanosoma cruzi and promastigotes forms of Leishmania amazonensis. The cytotoxicity of the active compounds on uninfected fibroblasts or macrophages was established in vitro to evaluate the selectivity of their antiparasitic effects. Six compounds displayed trypanocidal activity against amastigotes intracellular forms of T. cruzi with IC50 values ranging from 7.0 to 249 µM. Besides these six compounds, eight other molecules exhibited significant leishmanicidal activity (IC50 values ranging from 0.6 to 110.4 µM). Two compounds can be considered as promising antiparasitic lead molecules because they showed IC50 values in the low-micromolar range (≤1.2 µM) with an adequate SI (≥19.9). To understand the mechanism of action of these compounds, two possible molecular targets were investigated: trypanothione reductase (TR) and cruzain.


Subject(s)
Antiprotozoal Agents/chemistry , Antiprotozoal Agents/pharmacology , Leishmania mexicana/drug effects , Trypanosoma cruzi/drug effects , Animals , Cell Line , Chagas Disease/drug therapy , Fibroblasts/drug effects , Fibroblasts/parasitology , Humans , Leishmaniasis, Cutaneous/drug therapy , Macrophages/drug effects , Macrophages/parasitology , Mice , Models, Molecular
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL