Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 1 de 1
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ann Transplant ; 19: 214-24, 2014 May 09.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24811685

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Series of observations indicate PK/PD variability challenging the accuracy of the body-weight based busulfan (Bu) dosing schedule for (HSCT) conditioning therapy. The purpose of this communication is to describe the frequency of dose changes in initially body-weight-based fixed IV Bu dose and to emphasize the importance of TDM. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-two children (ages 2 months-18 years) were treated with IV busulfan doses based on body weight for myeloablation. TDM utilizing a limited sample strategy (trough concentration immediately before the 5th dose, followed by samples immediately after the end of the 2-h infusion peak, 4 h, and 6 h from initiation of the infusion) was performed in 46 of 62 subjects. Busulfan concentrations were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). AUC was calculated according to the trapezoidal rule. RESULTS: We observed trough levels of 25-1244 µg/L, peak levels of 849-4586 µg/L, and AUC of 2225-12818 µg/L·h following body weight-based high-dose busulfan. The doses were changed in 54% of cases. AUC in 5 of 9 patients with VOD were within target, in 3 patients AUS was higher, and in 1 patient AUC was lower. One of the 2 patients with neurotoxicity had higher AUC. Engraftment was 100%, but relapse occurred in 25% of cases. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that even with IV busulfan, intra-individual PK/PD variability is challenging. Although AUC does not necessarily correspond with outcomes (due to the role of other factors the fact that doses were changed in 54% of cases underlines the importance of TDM.


Subject(s)
Busulfan/administration & dosage , Drug Monitoring/methods , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Myeloablative Agonists/administration & dosage , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Adjuvants, Immunologic/administration & dosage , Adolescent , Body Weight , Busulfan/adverse effects , Busulfan/pharmacokinetics , Child , Child, Preschool , Chromatography, High Pressure Liquid , Ditiocarb/administration & dosage , Dose-Response Relationship, Drug , Humans , Infant , Infusions, Intravenous , Myeloablative Agonists/adverse effects , Myeloablative Agonists/pharmacokinetics , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL