A prospective randomized trial comparing continuous versus intermittent feeding methods in very low birth weight neonates.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effects of continuous versus intermittent feedings on physical growth, gastrointestinal tolerance, and macronutrient retention in very low birth weight infants ( < 1500 gm). STUDY DESIGN: Very low birth weight neonates stratified by birth weight were randomly assigned to either continuous (24-hour) or intermittent (every 3 hours) nasogastric feedings. Feedings with half-strength Similac Special Care formula were initiated between day 2 and 3 and were advanced isoenergetically to goal. Daily weights, volume/caloric intakes, weekly anthropometric and dynamic skin-fold thickness measurements, and data on feeding milestones and clinical complications were collected. Nitrogen, carbohydrate, and fat balance studies were performed on a subset of male subjects. RESULTS: Eighty-two neonates with birth weights between 750 and 1500 gm who were born between 27 and 34 weeks of gestation were randomly assigned to continuous (n = 42) and intermittent (n = 40) feeding groups. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics and severity of respiratory distress between groups. There were no significant differences in days to regain birth weight, days to full enteral feedings, days to discharge, and discharge anthropometric measurements between continuously fed and intermittently fed infants, both when evaluated together and according to 250 gm weight intervals. Retention rates of nitrogen, fat, total carbohydrate, and lactose were comparable in the continuously fed (n = 17) and intermittently fed (n = 13) male neonates. Very low birth weight neonates who were fed continuously did not have feeding-related complications. CONCLUSION: Very low birth weight infants achieve similar growth and macronutrient retention rates and have comparable lengths of hospital stay whether they are fed with continuous or intermittent feedings.

Body water estimates in neonatal polycythemia.

To determine whether neonatal polycythemia and its treatment by partial exchange transfusion affect body water estimates, 10 normocythemic and eight polycythemic neonates were studied within 12 hours of birth. Total body water, extracellular water, and plasma volume were estimated immediately prior to and following exchange. Intracellular and interstitial water contents were calculated. There were no significant differences between normocythemic and preexchange polycythemic neonates in mean total body water, extracellular water, interstitial water, and intracellular water contents. In the polycythemic group, exchange did not affect mean total body water, but was associated with decreases in mean extracellular water and mean interstitial water and an increase in mean intracellular water. Mean transcapillary escape rate of T-1824 was not affected by exchange but was quite rapid both before (35 +/- SE 3%/hr) and after the procedure (30 +/- 4.9%/hr). These data suggest that moderate polycythemia in normal term neonates does not affect total and extravascular body water estimates, but that a fluid shift from the extracellular to the intracellular space may accompany the exchange procedure.