ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND: Improving mobility - specifically walking - is an important treatment goal of total knee arthroplasty. Objective indicators for mobility, however, are lacking in clinical evaluations. This study aimed to compare real-world gait and turning between individuals scheduled for total knee arthroplasty and healthy controls, using continuous monitoring with inertial measurement units. METHODS: Real-world gait and turning data were collected for 5-7 days in individuals scheduled for total knee arthroplasty (n = 34) and healthy controls (n = 32) using inertial measurement units on the feet and lower back. Gait and turning parameters were compared between groups using a linear regression model. Data was further analyzed by stratification of gait bouts based on bout length, and turns based on turning angle and turning direction. FINDINGS: Dominant real-world gait speed was 0.21 m/s lower in individuals scheduled for total knee arthroplasty compared to healthy controls. Stride time was 0.05 s higher in individuals scheduled for total knee arthroplasty. Step time asymmetry was not different between the groups. Regarding walking activity, individuals scheduled for total knee arthroplasty walked 72 strides/h less than healthy controls, and maximum bout length was 316 strides shorter. Irrespective of the size of the turn, turning velocity was lower in individuals scheduled for total knee arthroplasty. INTERPRETATION: Individuals scheduled for total knee arthroplasty showed specific walking and turning limitations in the real-world. Parameters derived from inertial measurement units reflected a rich profile of real-world mobility measures indicative of walking limitation of individuals scheduled for total knee arthroplasty, which may provide a relevant outcome dimension for future studies.