Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 6 de 6
Filter
1.
J Contin Educ Nurs ; 55(4): 161-164, 2024 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38551506

ABSTRACT

One-on-one mentoring is not a fit for all transition to practice programs because of the need to recruit large numbers of mentors several times a year and the cost associated with supporting many mentor/mentee relationships. A group mentoring model is sustainable because it can foster a collaborative learning environment and emphasize knowledge sharing, skill acquisition, and emotional support within the group dynamic. Models can be replicated and applied in any setting. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2024;55(4):161-164.].


Subject(s)
Mentoring , Mentors , Humans , Mentors/psychology , Program Evaluation
2.
J Cancer Surviv ; 18(1): 53-58, 2024 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38183579

ABSTRACT

The Stanford Cancer Survivorship Program is a key initiative of Stanford Cancer Institute. The program's mission is to improve the experience and outcomes of patients and family caregivers throughout all phases of the cancer trajectory by advancing survivorship research, clinical care, and education. The four pillars of the program include clinical care delivery with a focus on primary care-survivorship collaboration and expanding specialty services, education and training of healthcare professionals, transdisciplinary patient-oriented research, and community engagement. Cross-cutting areas of expertise include the following: (a) adolescents and young adults (AYAs), (b) mental health and patient self-management, (c) integration of primary care, and (d) postgraduate medical education. The clinical care model includes embedded survivorship clinics within disease groups in outpatient clinics, novel clinics designed to address unmet needs such as sexual health for women, and primary care-based faculty-led survivorship clinics for patients undergoing active cancer care requiring co-management, those who have completed active therapy and those at high risk for cancer due to genetic risk. Educational initiatives developed to date include an online course and medical textbook for primary care clinicians, a lecture series, monthly research team meetings, and rotations for medical trainees. Patient-facing activities include webinars and a podcast series designed to promote awareness, thus expanding the provision of expert-vetted information. Ongoing research focuses on oncofertility and family building after cancer, improving communication for AYAs, changing mindsets to improve quality of life through targeted digital interventions, increasing capacity to care for cancer survivors, and strengthening collaboration with community partners. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Stanford's Cancer Survivorship Program includes a robust transdisciplinary and interdisciplinary research, training and clinical platform that is committed to advancing access and improving care for people living with and beyond cancer, through innovation in design and care delivery.


Subject(s)
Cancer Survivors , Neoplasms , Adolescent , Young Adult , Humans , Female , Quality of Life/psychology , Delivery of Health Care , Survivorship , Caregivers , Neoplasms/therapy
3.
J Nurs Adm ; 53(3): 181-182, 2023 Mar 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36821502

ABSTRACT

As the advanced practice provider (APP) workforce continues to rapidly grow in healthcare, there is a greater need for APP leadership positions. Often, these positions are organically designated to the best clinicians on the team, who may not have leadership experience. Stanford Health Care Center for Advanced Practice embarked on formalized leadership training using a newly developed administration specialty within the APP Fellowship Program to support new leader transition.


Subject(s)
Fellowships and Scholarships , Leadership , Humans , Delivery of Health Care , Workforce
4.
JCO Oncol Pract ; 17(11): e1688-e1697, 2021 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33830852

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Cancer care guidelines recommend regular distress screening of patients, with approximately one in three patients with cancer experiencing significant distress. However, the implementation of such programs is variable and inconsistent. We sought to assess the feasibility of implementing a hybrid electronic and paper screening tool for distress in all patients coming to a large academic cancer center and an associated integrated network site. METHODS: Patients at an academic cancer center (Stanford Cancer Center) and its associated integrated network site received either an electronic or on-paper modified Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Global Health questionnaire, to assess overall health and distress. We used the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance implementation framework to test and report on the feasibility of using this questionnaire. Iterative workflow changes were made to implement the questionnaire throughout the healthcare system, including processes to integrate with existing electronic health records. RESULTS: From June 2015 to December 2017, 53,954 questionnaires representing 26,242 patients were collected. Approximately 30% of the questionnaires were completed before the visit on an electronic patient portal. The number of patients meeting the positive screen threshold remained around 40% throughout the study period. Following assessment, there were 3,763 referrals to cancer supportive services. Of note, those with a positive screen were more likely to have a referral to supportive care (odds ratio, 6.4; 95% CI, 5.8 to 6.9; P < .0001). CONCLUSION: The hybrid electronic and on-paper use of a commonly available patient-reported outcome tool, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Global Health, as a large-scale distress screening method, is feasible at a large integrated cancer center.


Subject(s)
Early Detection of Cancer , Neoplasms , Humans , Information Systems , Mass Screening , Neoplasms/diagnosis , Patient Reported Outcome Measures , Surveys and Questionnaires
5.
Semin Oncol Nurs ; 31(1): 60-6, 2015 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25636396

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To describe the current literature and future directions of survivorship care for the adult blood cancer population including unique features, identification of needs, practice guidelines, care models and the implications for nursing. DATA SOURCES: Peer reviewed literature, government and national advocacy organization reports, professional organization guidelines. CONCLUSION: Adult blood cancer survivors are a heterogeneous population that often receives complicated treatments to live a longer life. Survivorship needs among this population are often unmet throughout the cancer care continuum. The limited research literature and guidelines point to survivorship care strategies from the day of diagnosis to enhance long-term outcomes and improve quality of life. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Nurses are experts in symptom management and central to preventing, detecting, measuring, educating, and treating the effects of cancer and its treatment. Moreover, nurses are key to implementing strategies to support blood cancer survivors, families, and caregivers from the day of diagnosis to the last day of life.


Subject(s)
Continuity of Patient Care/organization & administration , Hematologic Neoplasms/mortality , Hematologic Neoplasms/therapy , Patient Care Planning/organization & administration , Quality of Life , Survivors/statistics & numerical data , Adult , Female , Hematologic Neoplasms/diagnosis , Humans , Interdisciplinary Communication , Male , Middle Aged , Oncology Nursing/organization & administration , Patient Care Team/organization & administration , Psychology , Risk Assessment , Self-Help Groups , Survival Rate , Survivors/psychology , Treatment Outcome
6.
Support Care Cancer ; 22(11): 2973-80, 2014 Nov.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24879390

ABSTRACT

PURPOSE: Little is known about melanoma survivors' long-term symptoms, sun protection practices, and support needs from health providers. METHODS: Melanoma survivors treated at Stanford Cancer Center from 1995 through 2011 were invited to complete a heath needs survey. We compared responses of survivors by sex, education, time since diagnosis (long-term vs. short-term survivors), and extent of treatment received (wide local excision (WLE) alone versus WLE plus additional surgical or medical treatment (WLE+)). RESULTS: One hundred sixty melanoma survivors (51 % male; 61 % long-term; 73 % WLE+) provided evaluable data. On average, patients were 62 years of age (SD = 14), highly educated (75 % college degree), and Caucasian (94 %). Overall, participants rated anxiety as the most prevalent symptom (34 %). Seventy percent reported that their health provider did not address their symptoms, and 53 % requested education about melanoma-specific issues. Following treatment, women spent significantly less time seeking a tan compared with men (p = 0.01), had more extremity swelling (p = 0.014), and expressed higher need for additional services (p = 0.03). Long-term survivors decreased their use of tanning beds (p = 0.03) and time spent seeking a tan (p = 0.002) and were less likely to receive skin screening every 3-6 months (p < 0.001) compared with short-term survivors. WLE+ survivors reported greater physical long-term effects than WLE survivors (p ≤ 0.001) following treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Melanoma survivors experience continuing symptoms long after treatment, namely anxiety, and they express a need for information about long-term melanoma effects, psychosocial support, and prevention of further skin cancer.


Subject(s)
Health Behavior , Melanoma/psychology , Needs Assessment , Skin Neoplasms/psychology , Survivors/psychology , Data Collection , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL
...