Antecedentes y objetivo: La interrupción del embarazo en pacientes con enfermedades reumatológicas es controvertida y pocas veces se realiza un análisis bioético. En este estudio analizamos el caso de una paciente embarazada con nefritis lúpica sin respuesta a tratamiento a quien se le planteó la interrupción del embarazo. Métodos: Se aplicó el modelo integral, incluyendo distintos sistemas normativos para el análisis del dilema. Resultados: Desde el utilitarismo es justificable la interrupción del embarazo, buscando el mayor beneficio para la mayoría de las partes. La deontología justifica tanto continuar como interrumpir el embarazo, centrando la importancia en la acción misma y en la autonomía. Para la ética de la virtud, la importancia de las decisiones recae en la persona que realiza la acción buscando el florecimiento: la interrupción del embarazo sería justificable. Discusión y conclusiones: La interrupción del embarazo sería una solución adecuada según el modelo integral. El análisis bioético de casos paradigmáticos es fundamental para asegurar el mejor actuar posible en casos similares en reumatología.(AU)
Background and objective: Termination of pregnancy in patients with rheumatic diseases is controversial and a bioethical analysis is rarely performed. In this study we analysed the case of a pregnant patient with lupus nephritis unresponsive to treatment, for whom termination of pregnancy is considered. Methods: The integrative model was applied combining different normative ethical theories. Results: From a utilitarian perspective, termination of pregnancy is justifiable, seeking the greatest benefit for the greatest number of stakeholders. Deontology justifies both terminating and continuing the pregnancy, focusing on the action itself and on autonomy. In virtue ethics the importance of decisions rests with the person who performs the action seeking flourishing; termination of pregnancy would be justifiable. Discussion and conclusions: Interruption of pregnancy is a justifiable solution following the integrative model. Bioethical analysis of paradigmatic cases is essential to ensure the best possible action and as a precedent for future similar situations in rheumatology.(AU)
Humans , Female , Adult , Abortion, Spontaneous , Lupus Nephritis/complications , Pregnancy Complications , Pregnant Women , Bioethics , Rheumatology , Rheumatic Diseases , Bioethical Issues , Inpatients , Physical Examination , Lupus Erythematosus, Systemic
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Termination of pregnancy in patients with rheumatic diseases is controversial and a bioethical analysis is rarely performed. In this study we analysed the case of a pregnant patient with lupus nephritis unresponsive to treatment, for whom termination of pregnancy is considered. METHODS: The integrative model was applied combining different normative ethical theories. RESULTS: From a utilitarian perspective, termination of pregnancy is justifiable, seeking the greatest benefit for the greatest number of stakeholders. Deontology justifies both terminating and continuing the pregnancy, focusing on the action itself and on autonomy. In virtue ethics the importance of decisions rests with the person who performs the action seeking flourishing; termination of pregnancy would be justifiable. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Interruption of pregnancy is a justifiable solution following the integrative model. Bioethical analysis of paradigmatic cases is essential to ensure the best possible action and as a precedent for future similar situations in rheumatology.
Abortion, Induced , Lupus Nephritis , Female , Humans , Pregnancy , Abortion, Induced/ethics
The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic was devastating worldwide. The introduction of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 vaccination has reduced transmission, hospitalizations, and deaths, with infrequent major side effects. We present the case of a 51-year-old woman with rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis following COVID-19 vaccination with ChAdOx1 (AstraZeneca). Workup and histopathologic examination demonstrated active extracapillary proliferative lesions in cellular and fibrocellular crescents with extensive fibrinoid necrosis and karyorrhexis with diffuse glomerulonephritis, as well as positive perinuclear antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies. Treatment with cyclophosphamide and steroids was initiated with the improvement of renal function. Similar cases were seen with influenza vaccination, potentially describing vaccination as a possible trigger for anti-myeloperoxidase rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis.
