Hormone replacement therapy and cervical cancer: a systematic review of the literature.

Gynecological tumor treatment, including cervical cancer (CC) treatment, often leads to iatrogenic premature menopause. This highlights the critical importance of investigating indications for hormone replacement therapy (HRT), as most patients, thanks to the improvement in diagnosis and treatment, have to deal with the sequelae of their cancer treatments for many years. This systematic review aims to provide an overview of the current knowledge regarding the risks of HRT and CC. In particular, we aim to investigate whether the use of HRT can increase CC incidence, and evaluate its risk in CC survivors. A systematic review, in agreement with PRISMA guidelines, of the English literature present in PubMed and SCOPUS has been performed. A total of 2805 articles have been screened, of which 10 were considered eligible. Several studies reported a significantly reduced risk of developing cervical squamous cell carcinoma in postmenopausal women treated with HRT, while a weak increase in the incidence of adenocarcinoma has been shown. No evidence reports a harmful effect of HRT on CC oncological outcome, while several benefits, in terms of reduced metabolic risk and increased quality of life, have been described, thus concluding that HRT should be offered to young CC survivors for the management of early menopause.

Endometrial stromal sarcoma: A review of rare mesenchymal uterine neoplasm.

OBJECTIVE: This review aims to analyze the pathological aspects, diagnosis and treatment of rare mesenchymal uterine tumors. METHODS: On August 2019, a systematic review of the literature was done on Pubmed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and Google Scholar search engines. The systematic review was carried out in agreement with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyzes statement (PRISMA). The following words and key phrases have been searched: "endometrial stromal sarcoma", "low-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma", "high-grade endometrial stromal sarcoma", "uterine sarcoma", "mesenchymal uterine tumors" and "uterine stromal sarcoma". Across these platforms and research studies, five main aspects were analyzed: the biological characteristics of the neoplasms, the number of cases, the different therapeutic approaches used, the follow-up and the oncological outcomes. RESULTS: Of the 94 studies initially identified, 55 were chosen selecting articles focusing on endometrial stromal sarcoma. Of these fifty-five studies, 46 were retrospective in design, 7 were reviews and 2 randomized phases III trials. CONCLUSION: Endometrial stromal sarcomas are rare mesenchymal uterine neoplasms and surgery represents the standard treatment. For uterus-limited disease, the remove en bloc with an intact resection of the tumor (without the use of morcellation) is strongly recommended. For advanced-stage disease, the standard surgical treatment is adequate cytoreduction with metastatectomy. Pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy is not recommended in patients with Low-grade Endometrial Stromal Sarcoma (ESS), while is not clear whether cytoreduction of advanced tumors improves patient survival in High-grade ESS. Administration of adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy is not routinely used and its role is still debated.