Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 12 de 12
Filter
1.
J. investig. allergol. clin. immunol ; 32(1): 23-32, 2022. graf, tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-203881

ABSTRACT

Background: Anaphylaxis is an acute, life-threatening, multiorgan hypersensitivity reaction.Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the causes of anaphylaxis in Portugal in order to improve our knowledge of epidemiology and management.Methods: We implemented a nationwide notification system for anaphylaxis over a 10-year period, with voluntary reporting by allergists. Data on 1783 patients with anaphylaxis were included. Etiopathogenesis, manifestations, and clinical management were characterized in detail for both children and adults.Results: The mean age was 32.7 (20.3) years, and 30% were under 18 years of age; 58% were female. The mean age at the first anaphylaxis episode was 27.5 (20.4) years (ranging from 1 month to 88 years). The main culprits of anaphylaxis were foods (48%), drugs (37%) (main trigger in adults, 48%), and hymenoptera venom (7%). The main culprit foods were shellfish (27%), fresh fruit (17%), cow’s milk (16%), tree nuts (15%), fish (8%), egg (7%), and peanut (7%). The main drugs were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (43%), antibiotics (39%), and anesthetic agents (6%). Other causes included exercise (3%), latex (2%), cold-induced anaphylaxis (2%), and idiopathic anaphylaxis (2%). Most patients (80%) were admitted to the emergency department; only 43% received adrenaline. Anaphylaxis recurred in 41% of patients (21% with ≥3 anaphylactic episodes); 7% used an adrenaline autoinjector device.Conclusions: Food is the leading cause of anaphylaxis in Portugal, while drugs were the main elicitors in adults. We emphasize undertreatment with adrenaline and recurrent episodes, highlighting the need to improve diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to anaphylaxis (AU)


Antecedentes: La anafilaxia es una reacción de hipersensibilidad sistémica potencialmente mortal.Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio fue el identificar las causas de la anafilaxia en Portugal para mejorar el conocimiento de la epidemiologíay del manejo de la enfermedad.Métodos: Durante un período de 10 años, se implementó un sistema nacional de notificación de anafilaxia, por parte de los alergólogos,mediante la emisión de informes voluntarios. Se recogieron datos de 1.783 pacientes con anafilaxia, pediátricos y adultos, relativos a laetiopatogenia, las manifestaciones clínicas y el manejo clínico de la misma.Resultados: La edad media fue de 32,7 ± 20,3 años, siendo el 30% de los pacientes menores de 18 años. El 58% fueron mujeres. Laedad media del primer episodio de anafilaxia fue de 27,5 ± 20,4 años (desde 1 mes hasta 88 años). Los principales agentes responsablesde anafilaxia fueron los alimentos (48%), los medicamentos (37%), que fue el principal desencadenante en los pacientes adultos, y losvenenos de himenópteros (7%). Los principales alimentos responsables fueron: mariscos (27%), frutas frescas (17%), leche de vaca (16%),nueces (15%), pescado (8%), huevo (7%) y cacahuete (7%). Los principales fármacos, fueron los antiinflamatorios no esteroideos (43%),antibióticos (39%) y anestésicos (6%). Entre otras causas implicadas se incluyó: ejercicio físico (3%), látex (2%), frío (2%) e idiopática (2%). La mayoría de los pacientes fueron atendidos en el servicio de urgencias (80%), y solo el 43% recibió tratamiento con adrenalina.La recurrencia de la anafilaxia ocurrió en el 41% de los pacientes (21% con ≥3 episodios anafilácticos). El 7% utilizó un dispositivoautoinyector de adrenalina.Conclusiones: Los alimentos son la principal causa de anafilaxia en Portugal y en el subgrupo de pacientes adultos, lo son los medicamentos


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant, Newborn , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Adolescent , Young Adult , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , Anaphylaxis/etiology , Allergens/classification , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Food Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , Disease Notification , Portugal/epidemiology
2.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol ; 32(1): 23-32, 2021 Feb 21.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32732188

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Anaphylaxis is an acute, life-threatening, multiorgan hypersensitivity reaction. Objective: The aim of this study was to identify the causes of anaphylaxis in Portugal in order to improve our knowledge of epidemiology and management. METHODS: We implemented a nationwide notification system for anaphylaxis over a 10-year period, with voluntary reporting by allergists. Data on 1783 patients with anaphylaxis were included. Etiopathogenesis, manifestations, and clinical management were characterized in detail for both children and adults. RESULTS: The mean age was 32.7 (20.3) years, and 30% were under 18 years of age; 58% were female. The mean age at the first anaphylaxis episode was 27.5 (20.4) years (ranging from 1 month to 88 years). The main culprits of anaphylaxis were foods (48%), drugs (37%) (main trigger in adults, 48%), and hymenoptera venom (7%). The main culprit foods were shellfish (27%), fresh fruit (17%), cow's milk (16%), tree nuts (15%), fish (8%), egg (7%), and peanut (7%). The main drugs were nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (43%), antibiotics (39%), and anesthetic agents (6%). Other causes included exercise (3%), latex (2%), cold-induced anaphylaxis (2%), and idiopathic anaphylaxis (2%). Most patients (80%) were admitted to the emergency department; only 43% received adrenaline. Anaphylaxis recurred in 41% of patients (21% with ≥3 anaphylactic episodes); 7% used an adrenaline autoinjector device. CONCLUSION: Food is the leading cause of anaphylaxis in Portugal, while drugs were the main elicitors in adults. We emphasize undertreatment with adrenaline and recurrent episodes, highlighting the need to improve diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to anaphylaxis.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis , Food Hypersensitivity , Adolescent , Adult , Allergens/therapeutic use , Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Anaphylaxis/drug therapy , Anaphylaxis/epidemiology , Animals , Cattle , Epinephrine/therapeutic use , Female , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Humans , Milk , Registries
4.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 48(5): 417-423, sept.-oct. 2020. tab
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-201831

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Allergy to beta-lactam (BetaL) antibiotics is highly reported in children, but rarely confirmed. Risk factors for a positive diagnostic work-up are scarce. The primary aim was to characterize the cases of children with confirmed BetaL allergy, investigating potential risk factors. Secondary aims were to assess the prevalence of allergy to BetaL in this population and to confirm the safety of less extensive diagnostic protocols for milder reactions. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical data from all children evaluated in our Department for suspected BetaL allergy, over a six-year period. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty children (53% females) with a mean age of 6.5 ± 4.2 years were evaluated. Cutaneous manifestations were the most frequently reported (96.9%), mainly maculopapular exanthema (MPE). The reactions were non-immediate in 59.5% of the cases. Only 23 children (10.5%) were diagnosed with allergy to βL. The likelihood of BetaL allergy was significantly higher in children with a family history of drug allergy (p < 0.001) and in those with a smaller time period between the reaction and the study (p = 0.046). The probability of not confirming BetaL allergy is greater in children reporting less severe reactions (p < 0.001) and MPE (p < 0.001). We found the less extensive diagnostic protocol in milder reactions safe, since only 4.2% of the children presented a positive provocation test (similar reaction as the index reaction). CONCLUSION: This study highlights family history of drug allergy as a risk factor for a positive diagnostic work-up. Larger series are required, particularly genetic studies to accurately determine future risk for BetaL allergy in children


No disponible


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Infant , Child, Preschool , Child , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , beta-Lactams/adverse effects , Risk Factors , Retrospective Studies , Intradermal Tests
5.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 48(5): 417-423, 2020.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32460994

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Allergy to beta-lactam (ßL) antibiotics is highly reported in children, but rarely confirmed. Risk factors for a positive diagnostic work-up are scarce. The primary aim was to characterize the cases of children with confirmed ßL allergy, investigating potential risk factors. Secondary aims were to assess the prevalence of allergy to ßL in this population and to confirm the safety of less extensive diagnostic protocols for milder reactions. METHODS: We reviewed the clinical data from all children evaluated in our Department for suspected ßL allergy, over a six-year period. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty children (53% females) with a mean age of 6.5±4.2 years were evaluated. Cutaneous manifestations were the most frequently reported (96.9%), mainly maculopapular exanthema (MPE). The reactions were non-immediate in 59.5% of the cases. Only 23 children (10.5%) were diagnosed with allergy to ßL. The likelihood of ßL allergy was significantly higher in children with a family history of drug allergy (p<0.001) and in those with a smaller time period between the reaction and the study (p=0.046). The probability of not confirming ßL allergy is greater in children reporting less severe reactions (p<0.001) and MPE (p<0.001). We found the less extensive diagnostic protocol in milder reactions safe, since only 4.2% of the children presented a positive provocation test (similar reaction as the index reaction). CONCLUSION: This study highlights family history of drug allergy as a risk factor for a positive diagnostic work-up. Larger series are required, particularly genetic studies to accurately determine future risk for ßL allergy in children.


Subject(s)
Anti-Bacterial Agents/adverse effects , Drug Hypersensitivity/epidemiology , beta-Lactams/adverse effects , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Drug Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Drug Hypersensitivity/etiology , Female , Humans , Male , Prevalence , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Severity of Illness Index , Skin Tests
11.
Occup Med (Lond) ; 68(9): 641-643, 2018 Dec 26.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30496499

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Cassia angustifolia, or senna, is a plant belonging to the Fabaceae family, widely used as a laxative and as a colouring agent in hair dyes. Senna is rarely reported as an occupational allergic sensitizer in the current literature. AIMS: To describe the case and diagnostic approach of a suspected occupational senna allergy. CASE REPORT: A male phytopharmaceutical warehouse worker reported bronchial, conjunctival and nasal symptoms immediately upon exposure to senna. We were able to document in vitro sensitization, finding IgE-binding proteins in senna, and in vivo sensitization through positive skin tests and conjunctival provocation test. CONCLUSION: Our study confirms that senna may cause occupational rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms with an IgE-dependent mechanism and is the first to confirm it through specific conjunctival provocation test.


Subject(s)
Occupational Exposure/adverse effects , Senna Extract/adverse effects , Bronchial Provocation Tests/methods , Conjunctivitis, Allergic/etiology , Humans , Hypersensitivity/complications , Immunoglobulin E/analysis , Immunoglobulin E/blood , Male , Middle Aged , Senna Plant/adverse effects
12.
Reumatismo ; 69(2): 78-83, 2017 Aug 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28776362

ABSTRACT

Polymyositis is an idiopathic inflammatory myopathy, characterized by proximal muscle weakness and sometimes extramuscular manifestations. We report the case of a 51-year-old male, with history of complete heart block, which required pacemaker implantation, and subsequently heart failure, presenting to the emergency department with worsening of dyspnea and peripheral edema. He was admitted to the Internal Medicine ward with acute heart failure and started on diuretic therapy. During hospitalization, he was discovered to have marked rhabdomyolysis. Examination revealed proximal symmetrical muscle weakness and arthralgia. The immunological study, electromyography and muscle biopsy confirmed polymyositis. The patient was started on prednisolone with clinical improvement and resolution of rhabdomyolysis. The presence of conduction defect, ventricular dysfunction, mitral valve regurgitation, segmental hypokinesia (myocardial scintigraphy without perfusion defects) and pulmonary hypertension, as well as elevated troponin with improvement after specific therapy, points to cardiac involvement. Polymyositis is a rare entity, with an insidious evolution and a myriad of extramuscular features that can mimic other conditions. In particular, cardiac involvement may be the first and only recognized manifestation. The key point for the diagnosis is to contemplate the possibility of polymyositis.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/etiology , Polymyositis/complications , Polymyositis/diagnosis , Rhabdomyolysis/etiology , Acute Disease , Arrhythmias, Cardiac/therapy , Biopsy , Diagnosis, Differential , Edema/etiology , Electromyography/methods , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Pacemaker, Artificial , Polymyositis/drug therapy , Prednisolone/therapeutic use , Rhabdomyolysis/drug therapy , Risk Factors , Treatment Outcome
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL