ABSTRACT
Patients with Core-Binding Factor (CBF) and NPM1-mutated acute myeloid leukemia (AML) can be monitored by quantitative PCR after having achieved first complete remission (CR) to detect morphologic relapse and drive preemptive therapy. How to best manage these patients is unknown. We retrospectively analyzed 303 patients with CBF and NPM1-mutated AML, aged 18-60 years, without allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) in first CR, with molecular monitoring after first-line intensive therapy. Among these patients, 153 (51%) never relapsed, 95 (31%) had molecular relapse (53 received preemptive therapy and 42 progressed to morphologic relapse at salvage therapy), and 55 (18%) had upfront morphologic relapse. Patients who received preemptive therapy had higher OS than those who received salvage therapy after having progressed from molecular to morphologic relapse and those with upfront morphologic relapse (three-year OS: 78% vs. 51% vs. 51%, respectively, P = 0.01). Preemptive therapy included upfront allogeneic HCT (n = 19), intensive chemotherapy (n = 21), and non-intensive therapy (n = 13; three-year OS: 92% vs. 79% vs. 58%, respectively, P = 0.09). Although not definitive due to the non-randomized allocation of patients to different treatment strategies at relapse, our study suggests that molecular monitoring should be considered during follow-up to start preemptive therapy before overt morphologic relapse.
ABSTRACT
Venetoclax-azacitidine is the standard of treatment for unfit acute myeloid leukemia patients. In the VIALE-A study, treatment was given until progression but there are no data on its optimal duration for responding patients who do not tolerate indefinite therapy. We retrospectively analyzed the outcome of patients who discontinued venetoclax or venetoclax-azacitidine due to poor tolerance. Sixty-two newly diagnosed (ND) AML patients and 22 patients with morphological relapse or refractory AML were included. In the ND cohort (n = 62), 28 patients stopped venetoclax and azacitidine and 34 patients continued azacitidine monotherapy. With a median follow-up of 23 months (IQR, 20-32), median overall survival and treatment-free survival were 44 (IQR, 16-NR) and 16 (IQR, 8-27) months, respectively. Patients who stopped both treatments and those who continued azacitidine monotherapy had the same outcomes. Negative minimal residual disease was associated with a 2-year treatment-free survival of 80%. In the RR cohort (n = 22), median overall survival and treatment-free survival were 19 (IQR, 17-31) and 10 (IQR, 5-NR) months, respectively. Prior number of venetoclax-azacitidine cycles and IDH mutations were associated with increased overall survival. The only factor significantly impacting treatment-free survival was the number of prior cycles. This study suggests that patients who discontinued treatment in remission have favorable outcomes supporting the rationale for prospective controlled trials.
ABSTRACT
Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) remains a barrier to successful allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) outcomes. Contemporary comprehensive analyses of real-world clinical outcomes among patients who develop aGVHD post-HSCT are needed to better understand the unmet needs of this patient population. This multicenter, retrospective chart review describes treatment patterns and clinical outcomes among patients (≥18 years old) from Finland, Sweden, and France who developed grades II-IV aGVHD after their first HSCT (January 2016-June 2017). From 13 participating centers, 151 patients were included. The median (Q1, Q3) age at HSCT was 56 (45, 62) years old. One line of aGVHD treatment was received by 47.7%, and the most common first-line treatment was methylprednisolone (alone or in a combination regimen, 74.2%; monotherapy, 25.8%). Among patients treated with methylprednisolone, 79.5% achieved a complete or partial response. The median (Q1, Q3) number of treatment lines was 2.0 (1.0, 3.0). The median (Q1, Q3) time to obtain an aGVHD diagnosis from transplant was 29.5 (21.0, 44.0) days, and 14.5 (7.0, 34.0) days to achieve the best response for 110 evaluable patients. At 6 and 12 months, 53.6% and 49.0%, respectively, achieved a complete response. Chronic GVHD occurred in 37.7% of patients, and aGVHD reoccurred in 26.5%. Following aGVHD diagnosis, mortality rates were 30.0% at 6 months and 37.3% at 12 months. Findings from this study demonstrate a continuing unmet need for new therapies that control aGVHD and improve mortality.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) is a hematologic disorder that is an overlap syndrome between myelodysplastic syndromes and myeloproliferative neoplasms, and can be associated with autoimmune and inflammatory diseases. This study aimed to describe kidney involvement in patients with CMML, their treatments, and outcomes. Methods: We conducted a French and American multicenter retrospective study in 15 centers, identifying patients with CMML with acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and urine abnormalities. Results: Sixteen patients (males, n = 14; median age 76.5 years [71.9-83]) developed a kidney disease 6 months [1.6-25.6] after the diagnosis of CMML. At the time of kidney disease diagnosis, median urinary protein-to-creatinine ratio was 2 g/g [1.25-3.4], and median serum creatinine was 2.26 mg/dl [1.46-2.68]. Fourteen patients (87.5%) underwent a kidney biopsy, and the 2 main pathological findings were lysozyme nephropathy (56%) and renal infiltration by the CMML (37.5%). Ten patients received a new treatment following the CMML-associated kidney injury. Among patients with monitored kidney function, and after a median follow-up of 15 months [9.9-34.9], 4 patients had CKD stage 3, 4 had CKD stage 4, 1 had an end-stage kidney disease. In our patient series, 2 patients evolved to an acute myeloid leukemia (AML), and 5 died. Compared with 116 CMML controls, patients who had a kidney involvement had a higher monocyte count (P < 0.001), had more CMML-1 (P = 0.005), were more susceptible to develop an AML (P = 0.02), and were more eligible to receive a specific hematologic treatment, with hydroxyurea, or hypomethylating agents (P < 0.001), but no survival difference was seen between the 2 groups (P = 0.6978). Conclusion: In this cohort of patients with CMML with a kidney injury, the 2 most frequent renal complications were lysozyme-induced nephropathy and renal infiltration by the CMML. Kidney involvement should be closely monitored in patients with CMML.
ABSTRACT
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation remains the best curative option for higher-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. The presence of monosomal karyotype and/or complex karyotype abnormalities predicts inferior survival after allo-SCT in MDS patients. Haploidentical allo-SCT has been increasingly used in acute leukemia (AL) and has similar results as using HLA-matched donors, but data on higher-risk MDS is sparse. We compared outcomes in 266 patients with higher-risk MDS after HLA-matched sibling donor (MSD, n = 79), HLA-matched unrelated donor (MUD, n = 139) and HLA haploidentical donor (HID, n = 48) from 2010 to 2019. Median donor age differed between the three groups (p < 0.001). The overall survival was significantly different between the three groups with a better OS observed in the MUD group (p = 0.014). This observation could be explained by a higher progression-free survival with MUD (p = 0.014). The cumulative incidence of grade 2-4 acute GvHD was significantly higher in the HID group (p = 0.051). However, in multivariable analysis, patients transplanted using an HID had comparable mortality to patients transplanted using a MUD (subdistribution hazard ratio [sHR]: 0.58 [0.32-1.07]; p = 0.080) and a MSD ([sHR]: 0.56 [0.28-1.11]; p = 0.094). MUD do not remain a significant positive predictor of survival, suggesting that beyond the donor-recipient HLA matching, the donor age might impact recipient outcome.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Humans , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/complications , Tissue Donors , Acute Disease , Transplantation, Homologous/methods , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Unrelated Donors , Retrospective Studies , SiblingsABSTRACT
Late relapse (LR) after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (AHSCT) for acute leukemia is a rare event (nearly 4.5%) and raises the questions of prognosis and outcome after salvage therapy. We performed a retrospective multicentric study between January 1, 2010, and December 31, 2016, using data from the French national retrospective register ProMISe provided by the SFGM-TC (French Society for Bone Marrow Transplantation and Cellular Therapy). We included patients presenting with LR, defined as a relapse occurring at least 2 years after AHSCT. We used the Cox model to identify prognosis factors associated with LR. During the study period, a total of 7582 AHSCTs were performed in 29 centers, and 33.8% of patients relapsed. Among them, 319 (12.4%) were considered to have LR, representing an incidence of 4.2% for the entire cohort. The full dataset was available for 290 patients, including 250 (86.2%) with acute myeloid leukemia and 40 (13.8%) with acute lymphoid leukemia. The median interval from AHSCT to LR was 38.2 months (interquartile range [IQR], 29.2 to 49.7 months), and 27.2% of the patients had extramedullary involvement at LR (17.2% exclusively and 10% associated with medullary involvement). One-third of the patients had persistent full donor chimerism at LR. Median overall survival (OS) after LR was 19.9 months (IQR, 5.6 to 46.4 months). The most common salvage therapy was induction regimen (55.5%), with complete remission (CR) obtained in 50.7% of cases. Ninety-four patients (38.5%) underwent a second AHSCT, with a median OS of 20.4 months (IQR, 7.1 to 49.1 months). Nonrelapse mortality after second AHSCT was 18.2%. The Cox model identified the following factors as associated with delay of LR: disease status not in first CR at first HSCT (odds ratio [OR], 1.31; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04 to 1.64; P = .02) and the use of post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (OR, 2.23; 95% CI, 1.21 to 4.14; P = .01). Chronic GVHD appeared to be a protective factor (OR, .64; 95% CI, .42 to .96; P = .04). The prognosis of LR is better than in early relapse, with a median OS after LR of 19.9 months. Salvage therapy associated with a second AHSCT improves outcome and is feasible, without creating excess toxicity.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Bone Marrow Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Acute Disease , Chronic Disease , RecurrenceABSTRACT
The real-world efficacy and safety of gilteritinib was assessed in an ambispective study that included 167 R/R FLT3-mutated AML patients. Among them, 140 received gilteritinib as single agent (cohort B), including 67 previously treated by intensive chemotherapy and midostaurin (cohort C). The main differences in patient characteristics in this study compared to the ADMIRAL trial were ECOG ≥ 2 (83.6% vs. 16.6%), FLT3-TKD mutation (21.0% vs. 8.5%), primary induction failure (15.0% vs. 40.0%) and line of treatment (beyond 2nd in 37.1% vs. 0.0%). The rates of composite complete remission, excluding those that occurred after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT), were similar at respectively 25.4% and 27.5% in cohorts B and C. Median overall survival (OS) for these two groups was also similar at respectively 6.4 and 7.8 months. Multivariate analyses for prognostic factors associated with OS identified female gender (HR 1.61), adverse cytogenetic risk (HR 2.52), and allogenic HSCT after gilteritinib (HR 0.13). Although these patients were more heavily pretreated, these real-world data reproduce the results of ADMIRAL and provide new insights into the course of patients previously treated by intensive chemotherapy and midostaurin and beyond the 2nd line of treatment who can benefit from treatment in an outpatient setting.
Subject(s)
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Humans , Female , Mutation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Staurosporine/therapeutic use , fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3/genetics , fms-Like Tyrosine Kinase 3/therapeutic useSubject(s)
COVID-19 , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Acute Disease , Adult , COVID-19/epidemiology , France/epidemiology , Humans , SARS-CoV-2ABSTRACT
The treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with unfavorable cytogenetics treatment remains a challenge. We previously established that ex vivo exposure of AML blasts to eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), docosahexaenoic acid (DHA), or fish oil emulsion (FO) induces Nrf2 pathway activation, metabolic switch, and cell death. The FILO group launched a pilot clinical study to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of the adjunction of a commercial FO emulsion to 3 + 7 in untreated AML with unfavorable cytogenetics. The primary objective was complete response (CR). Thirty patients were included. FO administration raised the plasma levels of eicosapentaenoic (EPA) and docosahexaenoic (DHA) acids (p < 0.001). The pharmacokinetics of cytarabine and daunorubicin were unaffected. A historical comparison to the LAM2001 trial (Lioure et al. Blood 2012) found a higher frequency of grade 3 serious adverse events, with no drug-related unexpected toxicity. The CR rate was 77%, and the partial response (PR) 10%, not significantly superior to that of the previous study (CR 72%, PR 1%). RT-qPCR analysis of Nrf2 target genes and antioxidant enzymes did not show a significant in vivo response. Overall, FO emulsion adjunction to 3 + 7 is feasible. An improvement in CR was not shown in this cohort of high-risk patients. The present data does not support the use of FO in adjunction with 3 + 7 in high-risk AML patients.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01999413.
Subject(s)
Cytarabine , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects , Cytarabine/therapeutic use , Daunorubicin/therapeutic use , Docosahexaenoic Acids/therapeutic use , Eicosapentaenoic Acid , Emulsions/therapeutic use , Feasibility Studies , Fish Oils/therapeutic use , Humans , Induction Chemotherapy , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , NF-E2-Related Factor 2/geneticsABSTRACT
The aim of this study was to characterize a large series of 154 patients with acute promyelocytic leukemia (median age, 53 years; range, 18-90 years) and evaluate real-life outcome after up-front treatment with arsenic trioxide and all-trans retinoic acid. All patients were included in the prospective NAPOLEON registry (NCT02192619) between 2013 and 2019. The acute promyelocytic leukemia was de novo in 91% (n=140) and therapy-related in 9% (n=14); 13% (n=20) of the patients were older than 70 years. At diagnosis bleeding/hemorrhage was present in 38% and thrombosis in 3%. Complete remission was achieved in 152 patients (99%), whereas two patients (1%) experienced induction death within 18 days after starting therapy. With a median follow-up of 1.99 years (95% confidence interval: 1.61-2.30 years) 1-year and 2-year overall survival rates were 97% (95% confidence interval: 94-100%) and 95% (95% confidence interval: 91-99%), respectively. Age above 70 years was associated with a significantly shorter overall survival (P<0.001) compared to that of younger patients. So far no relapses have been observed. Six patients (4%) died in complete remission at a median of 0.95 years after diagnosis (range, 0.18-2.38 years). Our data confirm the efficiency and durability of arsenic trioxide and all-trans retinoic acid therapy in the primary management of adults with low-/intermediate-risk acute promyelocytic leukemia in the real-life setting, irrespective of age.
Subject(s)
Arsenic Trioxide , Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Arsenic Trioxide/therapeutic use , Humans , Leukemia, Promyelocytic, Acute/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Remission Induction , Risk Assessment , Treatment Outcome , Tretinoin/therapeutic use , Young AdultABSTRACT
Reactivation of BK virus (BKV) can occur during intensive immunosuppression such as in allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplant (AHSCT) recipients for whom a systematic PCR urine test for BKV will be positive in 50% to 100% of patients. Only 5% to 40% will develop BKV hemorrhagic cystitis (HC). Thus, BKV PCR testing is useful to confirm a diagnosis of BKV-HC but not to predict its occurrence. The aim of this retrospective study was to ascertain the risk factors of developing BKV HC, mostly in patients receiving posttransplant cyclophosphamide. The study looked at data from Grenoble Alpes University Hospital included in the national retrospective register ProMISe, administered by the "Société Francophone de Greffe de Moelle et de Thérapie Cellulaire". Urine BKV PCR was performed when patients presented grade ≥ 2 hematuria with clinical symptoms of cystitis. BKV-HC was defined as an association of clinical symptoms of cystitis, grade ≥ 2 hematuria and BKV viruria > 7 log10 copies/ml. From January 2014 to January 2018, 168 AHSCTs were considered for analysis, of which 43 (25.6%) developed BKV-HC and 44.9% of the subgroup that received posttransplant cyclophosphamide. After logistic regression, the risk factors associated with BKV-HC were reduced to posttransplantation exposure to cyclophosphamide (OR 4.25, [1.66; 10.87], P = .02), age < 40 y (OR 3.85 [1.51; 9.80], P = .005) and corticosteroid therapy (OR 3.86, [1.59; 9.36], P = .003). Exposure to cyclophosphamide, younger age (<40) and corticosteroid therapy are potential risk factors for BKV-HC.
Subject(s)
BK Virus , Cystitis , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Polyomavirus Infections , Tumor Virus Infections , BK Virus/genetics , Cystitis/epidemiology , Cystitis/etiology , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Humans , Polyomavirus Infections/diagnosis , Polyomavirus Infections/epidemiology , Retrospective Studies , Risk FactorsABSTRACT
In this randomized phase 3 study, the FILO group tested whether the addition of 6 mg/m2 of gemtuzumab ozogamycin (GO) to standard chemotherapy could improve outcome of younger patients with de novo acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and intermediate-risk cytogenetics. GO arm was prematurely closed after 254 inclusions because of toxicity. A similar complete remission rate was observed in both arms. Neither event-free survival nor overall survival were improved by GO in younger AML patients (<60 years) ineligible for allogeneic stem-cell transplantation. (P = .086; P = .149, respectively). Using unsupervised hierarchical clustering based on mutational analysis of seven genes (NPM1, FLT3-ITD, CEBPA, DNMT3A, IDH1, IDH2, and ASXL1), six clusters of patients with significant different outcome were identified. Five clusters were based on FLT3-ITD, NPM1, and CEBPA mutations as well as epigenetic modifiers (DNMT3A, IDH1/2, ASXL1), whereas the last cluster, representing 25% of patients, had no mutation and intermediate risk. One cluster isolated FLT3-ITD mutations with higher allelic ratio and a very poor outcome. The addition of GO had no impact in these molecular clusters. Although not conclusive for GO impact in AML patients <60 years, this study provides a molecular classification that distinguishes six AML clusters influencing prognosis in younger AML patients with intermediate-risk cytogenetic.
Subject(s)
Gemtuzumab/pharmacology , Gene Expression Regulation, Leukemic , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/diagnosis , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Cluster Analysis , Cytogenetic Analysis , Cytogenetics , DNA Mutational Analysis , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Gene Expression Profiling , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Humans , Karyotyping , Male , Middle Aged , Mutation , Prognosis , Remission Induction , Risk , Young AdultABSTRACT
INTRODUCTION: Despite the significant progress that has been made over the last years in the front-line treatment of Philadelphia (Ph) chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), relapses are frequent and their treatment remains a challenge, especially among patients with resistant BCR-ABL1 mutations. AREAS COVERED: This manuscript reviews available data for the treatment of adult patients with relapsed/refractory Ph-positive ALL, with a focus on the role of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), monoclonal antibodies, and immunotherapy. EXPERT OPINION: Although a majority of patients with first relapsed Ph-positive ALL respond to subsequent salvage chemotherapy plus TKI combination, their outcomes remain poor. The main predictor of survival is the achievement of major molecular response anytime during the morphological response. More treatment strategies to improve survival are under investigation. Monoclonal antibodies and bispecific antibody constructs hold considerable promise in improving the outcomes of patients with relapsed ALL including Ph-positive ALL.
Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/administration & dosage , Philadelphia Chromosome , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/drug therapy , Adult , Antibodies, Monoclonal/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/pharmacology , Drug Resistance, Neoplasm , Fusion Proteins, bcr-abl/genetics , Humans , Immunotherapy/methods , Mutation , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/genetics , Precursor Cell Lymphoblastic Leukemia-Lymphoma/pathology , Protein Kinase Inhibitors/administration & dosage , RecurrenceABSTRACT
Microtransplantation (MT) is based on injection of HLA-mismatched G-CSF mobilized hematopoietic stem cells, in combination with chemotherapy but without use of conditioning regimen nor immunosuppressive drugs. As a result, a transient microchimerism is induced without engraftment. Its efficacy relies both on host immune system stimulation (recipient versus tumor) and on a graft versus tumor effect. Data are scarce and concern mostly Asian patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and high risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HR-MDS). In comparison to conventional treatment without MT, higher complete remission rates and longer disease free survival and overall survival have been reported. Safety seems acceptable. The most frequent adverse event is non-severe cytokine release syndrome. Risk of GVHD remains very low. Here, we summarize the published data and detail the practical aspects of the procedure. Current data are not strong enough to provide recommendations on indications. Nevertheless, it seems reasonable to propose MT to patients with AML or HR-MDS, regardless of age, presenting an indication for allogeneic stem cell transplantation but ineligible for it. MT is still under investigation and rather be proposed within clinical trials.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/methods , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/therapy , Age Factors , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Chimerism , Combined Modality Therapy/methods , Cytokine Release Syndrome/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Graft vs Host Disease/immunology , Graft vs Host Disease/therapy , Granulocyte Colony-Stimulating Factor , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/standards , Host vs Graft Reaction/immunology , Humans , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/ethnology , Progression-Free Survival , Societies, MedicalABSTRACT
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains the only potentially curative option for myelodysplastic syndromes (MDSs) but is severely limited by nonrelapse mortality (NRM), especially in this mostly older population. Comorbidity assessment is crucial to predict NRM and often assessed with the Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation-Specific Comorbidity Index (HCT-CI). Moreover, the impact of age on NRM still remains a matter of debate. In recent years, the age at which transplants are made has been progressively increasing, and patients with comorbidities have become more common. Extricating the respective roles of age and comorbidities in toxic mortality is all the more important. This study by the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation registry included 1245 adult patients who underwent a first allogeneic stem cell transplantation for MDSs between 2003 and 2014. Overall, 4-year NRM and overall survival were 32% and 47%, respectively. When considered as continuous predictors, HCT-CI score and age were associated with an increased hazard ratio (HR) for NRM. In multivariate analysis, age band (HR, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.02 to 1.25; P= .016), HCT-CI ≥3 (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.04 to 1.73; Pâ¯=â¯.022), and Karnofsky Performance Status ≤80 (HR, 2.03; 95% CI, 1.52 to 2.73; P< .0001) were significantly predictive of a worse NRM. In our large cohort, both comorbidities, evaluated by the original HCT-CI score, and chronological age significantly affected NRM. Thus, age should be part of the transplant decision-making process and should be integrated in future scoring systems predicting outcomes of HSCT in MDSs.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Neoplasms , Adult , Bone Marrow , Comorbidity , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Transplantation ConditioningSubject(s)
Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/blood , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/genetics , Oxidation-Reduction , Adult , Aged , Antimycin A/pharmacology , Antioxidants/metabolism , Female , Humans , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Lipid Peroxidation , Male , Middle Aged , Mitochondria/metabolism , NADPH Oxidases/metabolism , Onium Compounds/pharmacology , Prognosis , Proportional Hazards Models , Prospective Studies , Reactive Oxygen Species/metabolism , Rotenone/pharmacology , Tetradecanoylphorbol Acetate/pharmacology , Translocation, GeneticABSTRACT
Erythropoiesis-stimulating agents are generally the first line of treatment of anemia in patients with lower-risk myelodysplastic syndrome. We prospectively investigated the predictive value of somatic mutations, and biomarkers of ineffective erythropoiesis including the flow cytometry RED score, serum growth-differentiation factor-15, and hepcidin levels. Inclusion criteria were no prior treatment with erythropoiesis-stimulating agents, low- or intermediate-1-risk myelodysplastic syndrome according to the International Prognostic Scoring System, and a hemoglobin level <10 g/dL. Patients could be red blood cell transfusion-dependent or not and were given epoetin zeta 40 000 IU/week. Serum erythropoietin level, iron parameters, hepcidin, flow cytometry Ogata and RED scores, and growth-differentiation factor-15 levels were determined at baseline, and molecular analysis by next-generation sequencing was also conducted. Erythroid response (defined according to the International Working Group 2006 criteria) was assessed at week 12. Seventy patients, with a median age of 78 years, were included in the study. There were 22 patients with refractory cytopenia with multilineage dysplasia, 19 with refractory cytopenia with unilineage dysplasia, 14 with refractory anemia with ring sideroblasts, four with refractory anemia with excess blasts-1, six with chronic myelomonocytic leukemia, two with del5q-and three with unclassifiable myelodysplastic syndrome. According to the revised International Prognostic Scoring System, 13 had very low risk, 47 had low risk, nine intermediate risk and one had high-risk disease. Twenty patients were transfusion dependent. Forty-eight percent had an erythroid response and the median duration of the response was 26 months. At baseline, non-responders had significantly higher RED scores and lower hepcidin:ferritin ratios. In multivariate analysis, only a RED score >4 (P=0.05) and a hepcidin:ferritin ratio <9 (P=0.02) were statistically significantly associated with worse erythroid response. The median response duration was shorter in patients with growth-differentiation factor-15 >2000 pg/mL and a hepcidin:ferritin ratio <9 (P=0.0008 and P=0.01, respectively). In multivariate analysis, both variables were associated with shorter response duration. Erythroid response to epoetin zeta was similar to that obtained with other erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and was correlated with higher baseline hepcidin:ferritin ratio and lower RED score. ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT 03598582.
Subject(s)
Erythropoiesis/drug effects , Erythropoietin/therapeutic use , Ferritins/blood , Hepcidins/blood , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/blood , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/drug therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Biomarkers , Erythropoietin/administration & dosage , Erythropoietin/adverse effects , Female , Flow Cytometry , Humans , Iron/metabolism , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Male , Middle Aged , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/diagnosis , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/etiology , Prognosis , ROC Curve , Recombinant Proteins/administration & dosage , Recombinant Proteins/adverse effects , Recombinant Proteins/therapeutic use , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
PURPOSE: We developed a prognostic scoring system to evaluate the prognosis of myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) patients surviving more than 100 days allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation after (allo-HCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: We performed a landmark analysis on a derivation cohort of 393 cases to identify prognostic factors for 3-year overall survival. Potential predictor variables included demographic and clinical data, transplantation modalities and early post-transplant complications. The scoring system was tested against a validation cohort which included 391 patients. RESULTS: Complications occurring before day 100 such as relapse [HR = 6.7; 95%CI, 4.5-10.0] (4 points), lack of platelet recovery [HR, 3.6; 95%CI, 2.2-5.8] (2 points), grade-II acute GVHD [HR = 1.7; 95%CI, 1.2-2.5] (1 point) and grade-III/IV [HR = 2.6; 95%CI, 1.8 -3.8] (2 points) were the only independent predictors of 3-year OS. The 3-year OS associated with low (0), intermediate (1-3) and high (≥4) risk scores was respectively 70%, 46% and 6%. The model performed consistently in both cohorts, with good calibration. CONCLUSION: This post-transplant scoring system is a powerful predictor of outcome after allo-HCT for MDS, and can provide useful guidance for clinicians. Additional studies are required to evaluate this scoring system for other hematologic malignancies.
Subject(s)
Graft vs Host Disease/diagnosis , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/adverse effects , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/diagnosis , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/therapy , Adult , Aged , Cohort Studies , Female , France/epidemiology , Graft vs Host Disease/mortality , Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation/mortality , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Myelodysplastic Syndromes/mortality , Prognosis , Research Design , Survival Analysis , Transplantation Conditioning/adverse effects , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Transplantation Conditioning/statistics & numerical data , Transplantation, Homologous/adverse effects , Transplantation, Homologous/mortality , Treatment OutcomeABSTRACT
Patients with acute myeloid leukemia (AML) in relapse or refractory to induction therapy have a dismal prognosis. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation is the only curative option. In these patients, we aimed to compare the results of a myeloablative transplant versus a sequential approach consisting in a cytoreductive chemotherapy followed by a reduced intensity conditioning regimen and prophylactic donor lymphocytes infusions. We retrospectively analyzed 99 patients aged 18-50 years, transplanted for a refractory (52%) or a relapsed AML not in remission (48%). Fifty-eight patients received a sequential approach and 41 patients a myeloablative conditioning regimen. Only 6 patients received prophylactic donor lymphocytes infusions. With a median follow-up of 48 months, 2-year overall survival was 39%, 95% confidence interval (CI) (24-53) in the myeloablative group versus 33%, 95% CI (21-45) in the sequential groups (P = .39), and 2-year cumulative incidence of relapse (CIR) was 57% versus 50% respectively (P = .99). Nonrelapse mortality was not higher in the myeloablative group (17% versus 15%, P = .44). In multivariate analysis, overall survival, CIR and nonrelapse mortality remained similar between the two groups. However, in multivariate analysis, sequential conditioning led to fewer acute grade II-IV graft versus host disease (GVHD) (HR for sequential approach = 0.37; 95% CI: 0.21-0.65; P < .001) without a significant impact on chronic GVHD (all grades and extensive). In young patients with refractory or relapsed AML, myeloablative transplant and sequential approach offer similar outcomes except for a lower incidence of acute GvHD after a sequential transplant.
Subject(s)
Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/therapy , Myeloablative Agonists/therapeutic use , Salvage Therapy , Transplantation Conditioning/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Allografts , Antimetabolites, Antineoplastic/therapeutic use , Disease-Free Survival , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Graft vs Host Disease/etiology , Humans , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Kaplan-Meier Estimate , Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality , Lymphocyte Transfusion , Male , Middle Aged , Myeloablative Agonists/administration & dosage , Recurrence , Retrospective Studies , Survival Rate , Treatment Outcome , Whole-Body Irradiation , Young AdultABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES: Anthracyclines and cytarabine are cornerstones for intensive chemotherapy in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). The goals of this study were to comprehensively assess deviations from theoretical doses and the impact of body-surface area (BSA) on patients' characteristics, physicians' strategy, dose adjustment, and clinical outcome. METHODS: The GOELAMS 2001 phase III trial included 823 AML patients below 60 years of age. In the course of treatment, anthropomorphic parameters and chemotherapy doses were prospectively registered. RESULTS: Very high BSA (≥2.15 m2 ) was the factor most significantly associated with the physician's decision to reduce chemotherapy doses during induction and postremission therapy. Despite similar AML characteristics and therapeutic strategies, the very high BSA group exhibited a significantly worse survival (5-years OS of 27%) compared to the low (BSA≤1.5 m2 ), intermediate (1.5 m2 Subject(s)
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/therapeutic use
, Body Surface Area
, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/drug therapy
, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/mortality
, Adult
, Age Factors
, Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols/adverse effects
, Body Weights and Measures
, Clinical Trials, Phase III as Topic
, Female
, Humans
, Leukemia, Myeloid, Acute/diagnosis
, Male
, Multicenter Studies as Topic
, Recurrence
, Remission Induction
, Survival Analysis
, Treatment Outcome
, Young Adult