SEOM clinical guidelines for the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (2020).

Mesothelioma is a rare and aggressive tumour with dismal prognosis arising in the pleura and associated with asbestos exposure. Its incidence is on the rise worldwide. In selected patients with early-stage MPM, a maximal surgical cytoreduction in combination with additional antitumour treatment may be considered in selected patients assessed by a multidisciplinary tumor board. In patients with unresectable or advanced MPM, chemotherapy with platinum plus pemetrexed is the standard of care. Currently, no standard salvage therapy has been approved yet, but second-line chemotherapy with vinorelbine or gemcitabine is commonly used. Novel therapeutic approaches based on dual immunotherapy or chemotherapy plus immunotherapy demonstrated promising survival benefit and will probably be incorporated in the future.

Analysis of mismatch repair (MMR) proteins expression in a series of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients.

BACKGROUND: Promising results have been reported with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in a small proportion of MPM patients. MMR deficiency (dMMR) has been well described in several malignancies and was approved as a biomarker for anti-PD-1 inhibitors. Next generation sequencing (NGS) data demonstrated that 2% of MPM harbor microsatellite instability. The aim of this study is to characterize MMR by immunohistochemistry (IHC) in a series of MPM including a subset of patients treated with immunotherapy. METHODS: Tumors of 159 MPM p diagnosed between 2002 and 2017 were reviewed. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue was stained for MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 and tumors were classified as dMMR (MMR protein expression negative) and MMR intact (all MMR proteins positively expressed). We retrospectively collected clinical outcomes under standard chemotherapy and experimental immunotherapy in the entire cohort. RESULTS: MMR protein expression was analyzed in 158 samples with enough tissue and was positive in all of the cases. Twenty two patients received ICI with anti-CTLA4 or anti-PD-1 blockade in clinical trials, 58% had a response or stable disease for more than 6 m, with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 5.7 m (2.1-26.1 m). The median overall survival (mOS) in all population was 15 months (m) (13.5-18.8 m). In a multivariable model factors associated to improved mOS were PS 0, neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) < 5 and epithelioid histology (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In our series we were unable to identify any MPM patient with dMMR by IHC. Further studies are needed to elucidate potential predictive biomarkers of ICI benefit in MPM.

Expression of Wilms' tumor gene (WT1) is associated with survival in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

INTRODUCTION: Calretinin and Wilms' tumor gene (WT1) are mesothelial markers routinely used to confirm the diagnosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). We investigated the prognostic value of calretinin and WT1 expression in predicting survival in a series of patients diagnosed with MPM in our institution. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-two patients diagnosed of MPM were retrospectively reviewed. Calretinin and WT1 were stained for IHC analysis in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded sections and positivity was considered for tumors with >1 % of tumor cells stained. Survival data were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox regression was used to evaluate the prognostic value of the variables. RESULTS: Calretinin IHC expression was positive in 83.7 % of patients and WT1 in 78.1 %. A significant association of calretinin and WT1 expression with epithelial histology was detected (p = 0.030 and p = 0.010). We found a significant increase in OS in patients with epithelial subtype, PS1 and neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) ≤5 (p < 0.05). In the IHC markers analysis, we found a significant increase in OS for patients with WT1 positive expression (16.4 vs. 2.3 m, p = 0.013), but not differences for calretinin expression (16.6 vs. 5.0 months, p = 0.37). In the multivariate analysis, epithelial histology and WT1 remained as significant prognostic factors for survival (p = 0.004 and p = 0.010, respectively). CONCLUSION: In our series of 52 MPM patients, epithelial histology, PS, NLR and WT1 expression are significant prognostic factors for survival. We concluded that WT1, but not calretinin, is a useful prognostic factor in MPM. The role of WT1 assessment is worth of prospective validation in future studies on MPM.

Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as an indicator of poor prognosis in stage IV non-small cell lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), an index of systemic inflammation, has been associated with worse survival for many types of cancer. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical significance of the blood NLR as a prognostic factor in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. METHODS AND PATIENTS: Stage IV NSCLC patients diagnosed in our institution between April 2004 and March 2009 were retrospectively reviewed. Potential prognostic factors such as histology, gender, performance status, response to chemotherapy and NLR were analyzed. NLR was assessed baseline and during chemotherapy treatment. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) were calculated by the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of 171 patients were included in the study and 60 patients (35.1 %) presented a NLR ≥ 5. Median survival for the entire cohort was 9.3 months. We found that patients with undifferentiated carcinoma and patients with NLR ≥ 5 had a worse survival. Median PFS of patients with NLR <5 was 5.62 months and in patients with NLR ≥ 5 was 3.25 months (p = 0.098), and OS was 11.1 versus 5.6 months for patients with NLR<5 and NLR ≥ 5, respectively (p = 0.017). During the chemotherapy treatment, patients who normalized NLR after one cycle presented better outcomes (OS 8.7 vs. 4.3 months, p = 0.001, for patients who normalized NLR and for patients who remained persistently elevated). After multivariate analysis, histology and NLR remained independent predictors of survival (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: In our analysis, elevated NLR is a predictor of shorter survival in patients with advanced NSCLC and the variation of NLR during the first cycle of treatment predicts survival. NLR is an easily measured, reproducible test that could be considered to be incorporated in the routine practice in NSCLC patients.