Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
1.
Rev Esp Anestesiol Reanim ; 54(9): 537-42, 2007 Nov.
Article in Spanish | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18085106

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: There is little available information regarding contamination of perineural catheters. Incidence ranges from 5% to 57%, depending on the location of the catheter. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the incidence and predisposing factors of bacterial contamination of these catheters. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 47 patients who had an epidural (24 patients) or perineural (23 patients) catheter inserted for a minimum of 48 hours. We recorded details of the patients' characteristics, difficulty of insertion and duration of placement of the catheter, antibiotic treatment received, and signs of local or systemic infection immediately after surgery. When the catheters were removed, cultures were prepared using the Maki method. A descriptive analysis was performed and the frequency of contamination was determined using various parameters. RESULTS: The incidence of contamination was 28% (13 patients): 5/24 (21%) in epidural catheters, 6/17 (35%) in femoral catheters, and 2/6 (33%) in brachial and sciatic plexus catheters. Colonization was not influenced by the patients' characteristics, technical difficulties in placing the catheter, prophylactic antibiotic treatment, or the characteristics of the infusion administered. None of the patients presented clinical signs of infection. The most commonly isolated microorganism was Staphylococcus epidermidis, found in 10 patients (69% of the colonized catheters). CONCLUSIONS: Although infection of perineural catheters is exceptional when they are placed for 2 or more days, contamination is very common. Epidemiological studies are required to evaluate the variables involved.


Subject(s)
Analgesia, Epidural/instrumentation , Bacteria/isolation & purification , Brachial Plexus , Catheterization , Equipment Contamination/statistics & numerical data , Lumbosacral Plexus , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Bacteremia/prevention & control , Humans , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Prospective Studies , Spain/epidemiology , Staphylococcus epidermidis/isolation & purification , Time Factors
2.
Rev. esp. anestesiol. reanim ; 54(9): 537-542, nov. 2007. tab
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-71918

ABSTRACT

OBJETIVOS: Existen pocos datos acerca de la contaminaciónde catéteres dispuestos en posición perineural. Suincidencia se sitúa entre el 5% y el 57% en base a lalocalización del catéter. Planteamos este estudio prospectivo para evaluar la incidencia y factores predisponentes de la contaminación bacteriana de estos.PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Se incluyeron 47 pacientes aquienes se les colocó un catéter epidural (24 pacientes) o perineural (23 pacientes) por un periodo mínimo de 48horas. Se recogieron las características de los pacientes, dificultad de inserción y tiempo de colocación del catéter, antibioticoterapia recibida y signos de infección local o sistémica en el postoperatorio inmediato. Tras la retirada delcatéter se realizó el cultivo mediante el método de Maki. Se realizó un análisis descriptivo y se determinó la frecuencia de contaminación en función de distintos parámetros.RESULTADOS: La incidencia de contaminación fue de 13pacientes (28%): 5/24 (21%) en epidurales, 6/17 (35%) enlos femorales y 2/6 (33%) en los plexos braquial y ciático. La colonización no se vio influenciada por las características de los pacientes, las dificultades técnicas en colocación del catéter, la antibioticoterapia profiláctica, ni por las características de la infusión administrada. Ningúnpaciente presentó clínica sugestiva de infección. El microorganismo más frecuentemente aislado fue Staphylococcus epidermidis en 10 pacientes (69% de los colonizados).CONCLUSIONES: Si bien la infección de los catéteresperineurales es excepcional cuando se mantienen durantedos o más días, su contaminación es muy frecuente. Serequieren estudios epidemiológicos amplios para evaluarlas variables implicadas


OBJECTIVE: There is little available informationregarding contamination of perineural catheters. Incidence ranges from 5% to 57%, depending on the location of the catheter. The objective of this prospective study was to evaluate the incidence and predisposing factors of bacterial contamination of these catheters.PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 47 patientswho had an epidural (24 patients) or perineural (23patients) catheter inserted for a minimum of 48 hours. Werecorded details of the patients’ characteristics, difficulty of insertion and duration of placement of the catheter, antibiotic treatment received, and signs of local or systemic infection immediately after surgery. When the catheters were removed, cultures were prepared using the Maki method. A descriptive analysis was performed and the frequency of contamination was determined using various parameters.RESULTS: The incidence of contamination was 28% (13patients): 5/24 (21%) in epidural catheters, 6/17 (35%) in femoral catheters, and 2/6 (33%) in brachial and sciatic plexus catheters. Colonization was not influenced by the patients’ characteristics, technical difficulties in placing the catheter, prophylactic antibiotic treatment, or the characteristics of the infusion administered. None of the patients presented clinical signs of infection. The most commonly isolated microorganism was Staphylococcus epidermidis, found in 10 patients (69% of the colonized catheters).CONCLUSIONS: Although infection of perineural cathetersis exceptional when they are placed for 2 or more days,contamination is very common. Epidemiological studies arerequired to evaluate the variables involved


Subject(s)
Humans , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Analgesia, Epidural/methods , Catheterization/methods , Catheters, Indwelling/microbiology , Infections/epidemiology
3.
Rev. Soc. Esp. Dolor ; 11(5): 257-259, jun. 2004.
Article in Es | IBECS | ID: ibc-36384

ABSTRACT

No disponible


Subject(s)
Humans , Pain, Postoperative/therapy
4.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand ; 45(2): 240-5, 2001 Feb.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-11167171

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Transient Neurological Symptoms (TNS) syndrome following subarachnoid anaesthesia was initially associated with hyperbaric lidocaine 50 mg/ml, but has also been reported with most local anaesthetics, including hyperbaric mepivacaine 40 mg/ml. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of TNS after subarachnoid anaesthesia using isobaric mepivacaine 20 mg/ml and isobaric lidocaine 20 mg/ml. METHODS: Eighty patients of both sexes, ASA class I-II, scheduled for elective minor orthopaedic surgery under subarachnoid anaesthesia, were prospectively included and randomly allocated to receive 40-60 mg of either isobaric mepivacaine 20 mg/ml (Group M) or isobaric lidocaine 20 mg/ml (Group L). Patients were evaluated on the first postoperative day by one investigator unaware of the grouping, looking for symptoms suggestive of TNS, such as pain or dysaesthesias in the buttocks or lower limbs with or without back pain. RESULTS: TNS symptoms were observed in three patients (7.5%) of Group M and in one patient (2.5%) of Group L, without statistically significant differences between the groups. Symptoms had an abrupt onset and relief, lasted from 45 min to 24 h, and had a complete resolution without sequelae. The only statistically significant difference between groups was longer motor blockade in Group M (P=0.0031). CONCLUSION: In this study TNS was associated with isobaric mepivacaine 20 mg/ml, with an incidence of 7.5%, and with isobaric lidocaine 20 mg/ml, with an incidence of 2.5%, in patients having orthopaedic procedures in the supine position.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, Spinal/adverse effects , Anesthetics, Local/adverse effects , Lidocaine/adverse effects , Mepivacaine/adverse effects , Neurotoxicity Syndromes/physiopathology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Blood Pressure/physiology , Female , Heart Rate/physiology , Humans , Leg/surgery , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Intraoperative , Orthopedic Procedures , Pain Measurement , Prospective Studies , Subarachnoid Space , Supine Position
6.
Anaesthesia ; 53(4): 393-7, 1998 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-9613308

ABSTRACT

Thirty children undergoing urological and abdominal surgery were entered into a randomised trial comparing the effects of epidural and intramuscular morphine on postoperative respiratory function. The forced vital capacity and the forced expired volume in 1 s were measured before and 6 h after surgery and on each of the following seven days. Significant decreases (p < 0.01) in forced vital capacity and forced expired volume in 1 s were seen after surgery. After the first postoperative day, a gradual recovery in pulmonary function was observed but the measured parameters had not returned to their pre-operative control values by the end of the study. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups during the study with respect to forced vital capacity and forced expired volume in 1 s. The quality of analgesia was better in the epidural morphine group than in the intramuscular morphine group. The incomplete recovery of pulmonary function suggests that pain is not the only cause of postoperative respiratory changes in these patients.


Subject(s)
Abdomen/surgery , Analgesics, Opioid/administration & dosage , Morphine/administration & dosage , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Respiratory Mechanics/drug effects , Adolescent , Analgesia, Epidural , Analgesics, Opioid/therapeutic use , Child , Female , Forced Expiratory Volume/drug effects , Humans , Injections, Intramuscular , Male , Morphine/therapeutic use , Pain, Postoperative/physiopathology , Postoperative Period , Vital Capacity/drug effects
8.
Pharm World Sci ; 16(6): 260-4, 1994 Dec 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7889025

ABSTRACT

The objectives of this study were to assess the stability of a 1 mg/ml oral midazolam solution elaborated by our Hospital Pharmacy Service, and to confirm its clinical effect in presurgical paediatric patients. The solution's stability was tested by determining its pH and its UV-visible absorption spectrum at room temperature for up to 60 days. A high performance liquid chromatography method was used to confirm it. There was no significant change in pH value of either the test or a control solution. No loss of midazolam could be detected during the test. The Anaesthesiology Service assessed the sedation quality (very good, good, bad) and the venous puncture response, 20 minutes after the administration of 0.3 mg/kg of an oral midazolam solution. Twenty children were examined (age: 4-7 years). In addition, the haemodynamic and ventilatory functions were evaluated.


Subject(s)
Midazolam/administration & dosage , Midazolam/chemistry , Preanesthetic Medication , Administration, Oral , Calibration , Chemistry, Pharmaceutical , Child , Child, Preschool , Chromatography , Drug Stability , Female , Humans , Hydrogen-Ion Concentration , Male , Solutions , Spectrophotometry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL