Mixotrophy everywhere on land and in water: the grand écart hypothesis.

There is increasing awareness that many terrestrial and aquatic organisms are not strictly heterotrophic or autotrophic but rather mixotrophic. Mixotrophy is an intermediate nutritional strategy, merging autotrophy and heterotrophy to acquire organic carbon and/or other elements, mainly N, P or Fe. We show that both terrestrial and aquatic mixotrophs fall into three categories, namely necrotrophic (where autotrophs prey on other organisms), biotrophic (where heterotrophs gain autotrophy by symbiosis) and absorbotrophic (where autotrophs take up environmental organic molecules). Here we discuss their physiological and ecological relevance since mixotrophy is found in virtually every ecosystem and occurs across the whole eukaryotic phylogeny, suggesting an evolutionary pressure towards mixotrophy. Ecosystem dynamics tend to separate light from non-carbon nutrients (N and P resources): the biological pump and water stratification in aquatic ecosystems deplete non-carbon nutrients from the photic zone, while terrestrial plant successions create a canopy layer with light but devoid of non-carbon soil nutrients. In both aquatic and terrestrial environments organisms face a grand écart (dancer's splits, i.e., the need to reconcile two opposing needs) between optimal conditions for photosynthesis vs. gain of non-carbon elements. We suggest that mixotrophy allows adaptation of organisms to such ubiquist environmental gradients, ultimately explaining why mixotrophic strategies are widespread.

Planktonic microbial community responses to added copper.

It is generally agreed that autotrophic organisms and especially phytoplanktonic species can be harmed by copper through its effect on photosystem. However, the impact of copper on other components of the pelagic food web, such as the microbial loop (autotrophic and heterotrophic picoplankton, pigmented and non-pigmented flagellates and ciliates) has received little attention. Indoor experiments were conducted to evaluate the direct and indirect effects of copper, supplied in the range of concentrations used to control cyanobacteria growth in ponds, on non-targeted organisms of natural microbial loop communities sampled in spring and summer. Two copper concentrations were tested (80microgL(-1) and 160microgL(-1) final concentrations), set, respectively, below and above the ligand binding capacity of the water samples. Both caused a significant decrease in the biomass and diversity of pigmented organisms (picophytoplankton and pigmented flagellates). Conversely, the heterotrophic bacterioplankton and the heterotrophic flagellates did not seem to be directly affected by either copper treatment in terms of biomass or diversity, according to the descriptor chosen. The ciliate biomass was significantly reduced with increasing copper concentrations, but differences in sensitivity appeared between spring and summer communities. Potential mixotrophic and nanoplanktorivorous ciliates appeared to be more sensitive to copper treatments than bacterivorous ciliates, suggesting a stronger direct and (or) indirect effect of copper on the former. Copper sulphate treatments had a significant restructuring effect on the microbial loop communities, resulting in a dominance of heterotrophic bacterioplankton among microbial microorganisms 27 days after the beginning of the treatment. The spring microbial communities exhibited a greater sensitivity than the summer communities with respect to their initial compositions.

Effect of copper sulphate treatment on natural phytoplanktonic communities.

Copper sulphate treatment is widely used as a global and empirical method to remove or control phytoplankton blooms without precise description of the impact on phytoplanktonic populations. The effects of two copper sulphate treatments on natural phytoplanktonic communities sampled in the spring and summer seasons, were assessed by indoor mesocosm experiments. The initial copper-complexing capacity of each water sample was evaluated before each treatment. The copper concentrations applied were 80 microg l(-1) and 160 microg l(-1) of copper, below and above the water complexation capacity, respectively. The phytoplanktonic biomass recovered within a few days after treatment. The highest copper concentration, which generated a highly toxic environment, caused a global decrease in phytoplankton diversity, and led to the development and dominance of nanophytoplanktonic Chlorophyceae. In mesocosms treated with 80 microg l(-1) of copper, the effect on phytoplanktonic community size-class structure and composition was dependent on seasonal variation. This could be related to differences in community composition, and thus to species sensitivity to copper and to differences in copper bioavailability between spring and summer. Both treatments significantly affected cyanobacterial biomass and caused changes in the size-class structure and composition of phytoplanktonic communities which may imply modifications of the ecosystem structure and function.