Intermediate-term results and risk factors analysis of tumor endoprosthesis in paediatric patients after the resection of lower extremity bone sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Mechanical failure of the endoprostheses is a concern in paediatric patients with primary bone sarcoma. Their long-term results are variable in the Asian population, thus we aim to investigate the outcome by assessing the mechanical failure, its risk factors and the functional results. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 38 paediatric patients (mean 13.29, range 6-18) with primary bone sarcoma of lower extremity undergone chemotherapy and limb salvage surgery with tumor endoprosthesis between 2003 and 2016. All hospital notes were reviewed for any type of failures. Risk factors for implant loosening like stem size, remaining bone length, stem length, extracortical bone bridge ingrowth (EBBI), the ratio of resected bone length to whole bone length, bone stem ratio and custom-made versus modular were analyzed. The limb function was recorded by Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score. Median follow-up time was 7.42 years (3.0-15.4 years) and minimum follow-up for surviving patients was 2 years. RESULTS: Endoprosthesis survivorship, according to Kaplan Meier was 94.7%, 85.4% and 66.2% at 2, 5 and 10 years respectively. Type II failure occurred in three patients (7.9%). Type III failure occurred in four patients (10.5%). Type IV failure occured in two patients (5.2%). Only EBBI independently predicted implant loosening (p = .007). Risk factors like stem size, remaining bone length, stem length, the ratio of resected bone length to whole bone length and custom-made versus modular were not associated with increase in implant loosening (p > .05). The mean stem size was 9.41 mm in asymptomatic group, comparable with 9.22 mm in the failure group (p = .79). The MSTS score was 29.62. CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggests that paediatric Chinese patients with small body built had good and excellent mid-term results in implant survival and limb function respectively. EBBI is important in preventing loosening in tumor endoprosthesis. In contrast to the reported higher failure risk with stem size <12 mm, we found no increased loosening rate with smaller stem size endoprosthesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Class III.

Expanding the spectrum of mesenchymal neoplasms with NR1D1-rearrangement.

Undifferentiated mesenchymal neoplasms can be morphologically subclassified based on cell shape; epithelioid tumors may be diagnostically challenging, particularly since they can show morphologic and immunohistochemical overlap with epithelial neoplasms. Following the recent report of an NR1D1::MAML1 gene fusion in an undifferentiated pediatric neoplasm, we performed a retrospective archival review and identified four additional cases of undifferentiated mesenchymal neoplasms with NR1D1-rearrangement. All four tumors occurred in adult women. The tumors involved superficial and/or deep soft tissues of the extremities or abdomen. Morphologically, they showed a spectrum of overlapping features. In addition to epithelioid cells, two cases also had a prominent spindle cell component. Two cases also had admixed polygonal cells containing prominent cytoplasmic vacuoles with amorphous debris. The immunophenotype was nonspecific but all cases had at least focal keratin expression; this was extensive in two tumors. Targeted RNA-sequencing revealed two cases each with NR1D1::MAML1 and NR1D1::MAML2 gene fusions. One patient developed lung and liver metastases, and one patient required amputation due to multifocal disease and underlying bone involvement. This study confirms undifferentiated NR1D1-rearranged sarcoma represents a distinct mesenchymal neoplasm with an epithelioid morphology and potential for aggressive behavior. Further, we offer new insight into the spectrum of clinical, morphologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular findings possible in these rare neoplasms. An awareness of this entity is especially important given the potential for misclassification as a carcinoma.

Long-term outcome of vascularized iliac bone grafting for osteonecrosis of femoral head: A retrospective study with 17-year follow-up.

AIMS: This study aims to investigate the long-term results of vascularized iliac bone grafting (VIBG) for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). The primary outcome is the long-term survivorship of VIBG, using conversion to total hip arthroplasty as an end-point. Secondly, this study will also analyse the patient or disease factors influencing the long-term survivorship of VIBG. METHODS: Forty-two patients (50 hips) underwent VIBG for ONFH in our institute between September 1995 and November 2013. Only patients with a follow-up of at least 5 years were included. The risk factors, surgical complications and VIBG survivorship were recorded. The stage of ONFH was classified according to the Ficat staging of the pre-operative radiographs. VIBG was only performed to patients with ONFH of Ficat stage II and stage III. Patients with hip arthritis (Ficat stage IV) did not receive VIBG and thus excluded from the study. Long-term survivorship of VIBG is measured by conversion to total hip arthroplasty. RESULTS: Twenty-eight hips (56%) had surviving VIBG for the duration of follow-up. The overall mean graft survival was 12.2 ± 7.8 years (0.4-24.0). Steroid and alcohol-induced osteonecrosis were more predominant in the graft-failure group, which had a hazard ratio of 2.33 and 2.07 respectively for graft failure (p = 0.047). In terms of complication, there was one case of groin wound infection which required surgical debridement. CONCLUSION: At a long-term follow-up of 17 years, our results showed that VIBG is effective in treating patients with pre-collapse (Ficat Stage II) and early post-collapse (Ficat stage III) in ONFH. Alcoholics and patients with steroid are at a higher risk of graft failure, so VIBG should be performed cautiously in these patients. VIBG is an intermediate operation until osteoarthritis sets in, either by the progression of ONFH or natural degenerative change.

Local Recurrence After Minimally Invasive Curettage For Primary Giant Cell Tumor of Bone With Perioperative Bisphosphonate Is Comparable to Open Curettage: Retrospective Comparison With 9-Year Follow-Up.

PURPOSE: To compare the long-term oncological outcome of minimally invasive curettage (MIC) with conventional open curettage (OC). METHODS: We studied patients with primary giant cell tumor of bone (GCTB) of extremities who underwent intralesional tumor curettage and cementation and perioperative bisphosphonates from February 2003 to June 2016. All cases were histology-confirmed diagnoses of GCTB. Recurrent GCTB, malignant GCTB, cases in the axial skeleton (pelvis and spine), or cases with bone grafting of the curetted cavity were excluded. The local recurrence-free (LR-free) estimates of the OC and MIC groups were compared. The hazard ratio of a local recurrence was calculated for the various factors of the patients, disease, and treatment. RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 8.8 years, the overall LR rate was 24.2% (8 out of 33 patients). There was no statistical difference in LR in MIC and OC groups (27.8 % vs 20%; P = .6). The mean time to LR was 33.1 months (8 to 75). The operative time was comparable in both MIC and OC groups. None of the risk factors studied led to a significantly higher hazard of LR. CONCLUSIONS: At a long-term follow-up of 9 years, MIC showed similar LR-free survival to OC. Combining bisphosphonates and MIC with a less invasive approach showed reasonable LR-free survival in long-term follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective cohort study.