Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add more filters










Database
Type of study
Language
Publication year range
1.
Cell Rep ; 29(8): 2438-2449.e4, 2019 11 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31747611

ABSTRACT

The cortex and thalamus send excitatory projections to the striatum, but little is known about how these inputs, either individually or collectively, regulate striatal dynamics during behavior. The lateral striatum receives overlapping input from the secondary motor cortex (M2), an area involved in licking, and the parafascicular thalamic nucleus (PF). Using neural recordings, together with optogenetic terminal inhibition, we examine the contribution of M2 and PF projections on medium spiny projection neuron (MSN) activity as mice performed an anticipatory licking task. Each input has a similar contribution to striatal activity. By comparing how suppressing single or multiple projections altered striatal activity, we find that cortical and thalamic input signals modulate MSN gain and that this effect is more pronounced in a temporally specific period of the task following the cue presentation. These results demonstrate that cortical and thalamic inputs synergistically regulate striatal output during reward-conditioned behavior.


Subject(s)
Corpus Striatum/metabolism , Motor Cortex/metabolism , Reward , Thalamus/metabolism , Animals , Behavior, Animal , Cerebral Cortex/metabolism , Interneurons/metabolism , Male , Mice , Neural Pathways/physiology , Neurons/metabolism , Optogenetics , Synapses/metabolism
3.
Neuron ; 93(6): 1451-1463.e4, 2017 Mar 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28334608

ABSTRACT

The prevailing view is that striatal parvalbumin (PV)-positive interneurons primarily function to downregulate medium spiny projection neuron (MSN) activity via monosynaptic inhibitory signaling. Here, by combining in vivo neural recordings and optogenetics, we unexpectedly find that both suppressing and over-activating PV cells attenuates spontaneous MSN activity. To account for this, we find that, in addition to monosynaptic coupling, PV-MSN interactions are mediated by a competing disynaptic inhibitory circuit involving a variety of neuropeptide Y-expressing interneurons. Next we use optogenetic and chemogenetic approaches to show that dorsolateral striatal PV interneurons influence the initial expression of reward-conditioned responses but that their contribution to performance declines with experience. Consistent with this, we observe with large-scale recordings in behaving animals that the relative contribution of PV cells on MSN activity diminishes with training. Together, this work provides a possible mechanism by which PV interneurons modulate striatal output and selectively enhance performance early in learning.


Subject(s)
Association Learning/physiology , Corpus Striatum/physiology , Interneurons/physiology , Parvalbumins/metabolism , Action Potentials/physiology , Animals , Interneurons/metabolism , Mice , Mice, Transgenic , Neural Inhibition/physiology , Neuropeptide Y/metabolism , Reward
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL