Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Neonatal Netw ; 14(5): 27-33; discussion 41, 1995 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-7630331

ABSTRACT

The purpose of this study was to describe the intra- and interexaminer reliability of weight measurements obtained from critically ill infants on an in-bed electronic scale. Weight measurements were obtained using the in-bed scale (Smart Model 35, Olympic Medical, Seattle, Washington) for 32 infants; 16 were in an incubator, and 16 were under a radiant warmer. Two nurses each obtained two weight measurements for each infant for three consecutive days, for a total of 96 data collection sessions. The nurses were blinded to their own and to the other nurse's weight measurements. The average mean absolute difference for individual nurses' weight measurements (interexaminer reliability) was 12.58 gm for weights obtained in the incubator and 19.19 gm for weights obtained under the radiant warmer. The average mean absolute difference for pairs of nurses' weight measurements (interexaminer reliability) was 14.29 gm for weights obtained in the incubator and 24.42 gm for weights obtained under the radiant warmer. The average mean absolute differences for weights obtained in the two bed types differed significantly for both intra- (Z = -2.46, p = .0141) and interexaminer (Z = -3.11, p = .0019) reliability. The number of pieces of equipment that had to be held during the weight measurement was weakly correlated with both the intra- (rs = .1878, p = .0091) and interexaminer (rs = .1600, p = .0266) mean absolute differences. These findings suggest that weight measurements of critically ill infants obtained using the Smart Model 35 in-bed electronic scale are sufficiently reliable for calculation of medication, parenteral fluid, blood replacement, and nutritional requirements.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)


Subject(s)
Anthropometry/methods , Body Weight , Critical Illness , Electronics , Humans , Incubators, Infant , Infant, Newborn , Observer Variation , Reproducibility of Results , Single-Blind Method
2.
J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs ; 21(3): 221-7, 1992.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-1322454

ABSTRACT

Although the incidence of triplet and quadruplet birth has increased in the United States, few research-based guidelines are available for assisting mothers of these multiple births with breastfeeding. The purpose of this case study is to report a successful breastfeeding experience of a mother with preterm quadruplets. The quadruplets were born by cesarean delivery at 34 weeks' gestation and weighed from 1,820 g to 2,240 g. In-hospital breastfeeding experiences were managed by the authors, according to research-based guidelines for breastfeeding preterm neonates and infants. During the first month after discharge of the four newborns, the mother breastfed 12-34 times daily. Mean daily weight gains for the quadruplets during this time varied from 30 g to 54 g, indicative of adequate maternal milk supply. Nurses in maternity and neonatal specialties can apply the findings from this study to similar cases of mothers who want to breastfeed multiple neonates or infants.


Subject(s)
Breast Feeding , Infant, Premature , Quadruplets , Weight Gain , Aftercare , Cesarean Section , Female , Humans , Infant, Newborn , Longitudinal Studies , Male , Maternal-Child Nursing/methods , Patient Discharge , Social Support
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL