Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 21
Filter
1.
Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes ; 16(12): e010034, 2023 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38084613

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Days at home (DAH) represents an important patient-oriented outcome that quantifies time spent at home after a medical event; however, this outcome has not been fully evaluated for low-surgical-risk patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). We sought to compare 1- and 2-year DAH (DAH365 and DAH730) among low-risk patients participating in a randomized trial of TAVR with a self-expanding bioprosthesis versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). METHODS: Using Medicare-linked data from the Evolut Low Risk trial, we identified 619 patients: 606 (322 TAVR/284 SAVR) and 593 (312 TAVR/281 SAVR) were analyzed at 1 and 2 years, respectively. DAH was calculated as days alive and spent outside a hospital, inpatient rehabilitation, skilled nursing facility, long-term acute care hospital, emergency department, or observation stay. Mean DAH was compared using the t test. RESULTS: The mean (SD) age and female sex were 74.7 (5.1) and 74.3 (4.9) years and 34.6% (115/332) and 30.3% (87/287) in TAVR and SAVR, respectively. Postprocedural discharge to rehabilitation occurred in ≤3.0% (≤10/332) in TAVR and 4.5% (13/287) in SAVR. The mean DAH365 was comparable in TAVR versus SAVR (352.2±45.4 versus 347.8±39.0; difference in days, 4.5 [95% CI, 2.3-11.2]; P=0.20). DAH730 was also comparable in TAVR versus SAVR (701.6±106.0 versus 699.6±94.5; difference in days, 2.0 [-14.1 to 18.2]; P=0.81). Secondary outcomes DAH30 and DAH90 were higher in TAVR (DAH30, 26.0±3.6 versus 20.7±6.4; difference in days, 5.3 [4.5-6.2]; P<0.001; DAH90, 85.1±8.3 versus 78.7±13.6; difference in days, 6.4 [4.6-8.2]; P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the Evolut Low Risk trial linked to Medicare, low-risk patients undergoing TAVR spend a similar number of days at home at 1 and 2 years compared with SAVR. Days spent at home at 30 and 90 days were higher in TAVR. In contrast to higher-risk patients studied in prior work, there is no clear advantage of TAVR versus SAVR for DAH in the first 2 years after AVR in low-surgical-risk patients.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged , Female , Humans , Male , Aortic Valve/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/diagnostic imaging , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Medicare , Risk Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
2.
Am Heart J ; 255: 125-136, 2023 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36309128

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Days at home (DAH) quantifies time spent at home after a medical event but has not been fully evaluated for TAVR. We sought to compare 1- and 5-year DAH (DAH365, DAH1825) among high-risk patients participating in a randomized trial of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) with a self-expanding bioprosthesis versus surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR). METHODS: We linked data from the U.S. CoreValve High Risk Trial to Medicare Fee-for-Service claims in 456 patients with 450 (234 TAVR/216 SAVR) and 427 (222 TAVR/205 SAVR) analyzed at 1 and 5 years. DAH was calculated as the number of days alive and spent outside of a hospital, skilled nursing facility, rehabilitation, long-term acute care hospital, emergency department, or observation stay. RESULTS: Mean DAH365 was higher in patients who underwent TAVR compared with SAVR (295.1 ± 106.9 vs 267.8 ± 122.3, difference in days 27.2 [95% CI 6.0, 48.5], P = .01). Compared with SAVR, TAVR patients had a shorter index length of stay (LOS) (7.4 ± 4.5 vs 12.5 ± 9.0, difference in days -5.1 [-6.5, -3.8], P < .001). The largest contributions to decreased DAH365 were mortality days and total facility days after discharge from the index hospitalization (mortality days-TAVR: 34.7 ± 93.1 vs SAVR: 48.0 ± 108.8, difference in days -13.3 [95% CI -32.1, 5.5], P = .17; total facility days-TAVR: 27.9 ± 47.4 vs SAVR: 36.7 ± 48.9, difference in days -8.8 [95% CI -17.8, 0.1], P = .05). Mean DAH1825 was numerically but not statistically significantly higher in TAVR (TAVR: 1154.2 ± 659.0 vs SAVR: 1067.6 ± 697.3, difference in days 86.6 [95% CI -42.3, 215.6], P = .19). Landmark analysis showed no difference in DAH from years 1 to 5 (TAVR: 1040.4 ± 477.5 vs SAVR: 1022.9 ± 489.3, P = .74). CONCLUSIONS: In the U.S. CoreValve High Risk Trial linked to Medicare, high-risk patients undergoing TAVR spend an average of 27 additional DAH compared with SAVR in the first year after the procedure due to a shorter index LOS and the additive effect of fewer but nonsignificantly different mortality and total facility days after discharge from the index hospitalization compared with SAVR. After the first year, both groups spend a similar number of DAH. These results describe the postprocedural course of high-risk patients from a patient-centered perspective, which may guide expectations regarding longitudinal health care needs and inform shared decision-making.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Humans , Aged , United States/epidemiology , Aortic Valve/surgery , Aortic Valve Stenosis/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Time Factors , Medicare , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/methods , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation/adverse effects , Risk Factors
4.
EuroIntervention ; 18(4): e335-e344, 2022 Jul 22.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35135749

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Despite improvements in the safety of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), ~4% of patients experience a procedure-related stroke. Understanding long-term health and healthcare implications of these events may motivate the development and adoption of preventative strategies.  Aims: We aimed to assess the association of TAVI-related ischaemic stroke with subsequent clinical outcomes and healthcare utilisation. METHODS: We used Medicare fee-for-service claims to identify patients who underwent their first TAVI between January 2012 and December 2017. Previously used ICD-9-CM and ICD-10-CM codes were used to identify TAVI-related ischaemic stroke. Among those with and without TAVI-related ischaemic stroke, we compared the risk of a composite endpoint that included all-cause mortality, acute myocardial infarction, and subsequent stroke using inverse probability treatment weighted Cox regression. We also performed a difference-in-difference analysis to compare 1-year Medicare expenditures and days spent at home during the first year after TAVI. RESULTS:  Among 129,628 primary TAVI patients, 5,549 (4.3%) had a procedure-related stroke. These patients were more likely to be female and have had prior stroke, peripheral vascular disease, ischaemic heart disease, or renal failure. After adjustment, TAVI-related ischaemic stroke was associated with a higher risk of the 1-year composite outcome (HR 1.67, 95% CI: 1.56-1.78), higher 1-year Medicare expenditures (difference $9,245 [standard error 790], p<0.001), and fewer days at home during the first year (difference 16 days [standard error 1], p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Among Medicare beneficiaries undergoing TAVI, procedure-related ischaemic stroke was associated with worse outcomes, increased Medicare expenditures, and less time spent at home. Procedure-related ischaemic stroke during TAVI remains a critically important and potentially preventable source of patient mortality, morbidity and healthcare utilisation.


Subject(s)
Aortic Valve Stenosis , Brain Ischemia , Heart Valve Prosthesis Implantation , Ischemic Stroke , Stroke , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement , Aged , Aortic Valve/surgery , Brain Ischemia/complications , Female , Humans , Male , Medicare , Risk Factors , Stroke/complications , Stroke/etiology , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
6.
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth ; 35(12): 3496-3512, 2021 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34774252

ABSTRACT

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used to support patients with refractory cardiopulmonary failure. Given ECMO's increased use in adults and the fact that many ECMO patients are cared for by anesthesiologists, the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists ECMO working group created an expert consensus statement that is intended to help anesthesiologists manage adult ECMO patients who are cared for in the operating room. In the first part of this 2-part series, technical aspects of ECMO are discussed, and related expert consensus statements are provided.


Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Adult , Anesthesiologists , Consensus , Humans
8.
Anesth Analg ; 133(6): 1459-1477, 2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34559089

ABSTRACT

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is used to support patients with refractory cardiopulmonary failure. Given ECMO's increased use in adults and the fact that many ECMO patients are cared for by anesthesiologists, the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists ECMO working group created an expert consensus statement that is intended to help anesthesiologists manage adult ECMO patients who are cared for in the operating room. In the first part of this 2-part series, technical aspects of ECMO are discussed, and related expert consensus statements are provided.


Subject(s)
Anesthesiologists , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Intraoperative Care/methods , Consensus , Heart Arrest/therapy , Humans , Patient Selection
9.
Anesth Analg ; 133(6): 1478-1493, 2021 12 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34559091

ABSTRACT

In the second part of the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) working group expert consensus statement, venoarterial (VA) and venovenous (VV) ECMO management and troubleshooting in the operating room are discussed. Expert consensus statements are provided about intraoperative monitoring, anesthetic drug dosing, and management of intraoperative problems in VA and VV ECMO patients.


Subject(s)
Anesthesiologists , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Intraoperative Care/methods , Anesthetics/administration & dosage , Consensus , Humans
11.
Crit Care Med ; 48(11): e1097-e1101, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33045152

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the impact of obesity on disease severity in patients with coronavirus disease 2019. DESIGN: This was a retrospective cohort study designed to evaluate the association between body mass index and risk of severe disease in patients with coronavirus disease 2019. Data were abstracted from the electronic health record. The primary endpoint was a composite of intubation or death. SETTING: Two hospitals in Massachusetts (one quaternary referral center and one affiliated community hospital). PATIENTS: Consecutive patients hospitalized with confirmed coronavirus disease 2019 admitted between March 13, 2020, and April 3, 2020. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 305 patients were included in this study. We stratified patients by body mass index category: < 25 kg/m (54 patients, 18%), ≥ 25 kg/m to < 30 kg/m (124 patients, 41%), ≥ 30 kg/m to < 35 kg/m (58 patients, 19%), and ≥ 35 kg/m (69 patients, 23%). In total, 128 patients (42%) had a primary endpoint (119 patients [39%] were intubated and nine died [3%] without intubation). Sixty-five patients (51%) with body mass index greater than or equal to 30 kg/m were intubated or died. Adjusted Cox models demonstrated that body mass index greater than or equal to 30 kg/m was associated with a 2.3-fold increased risk of intubation or death (95% CI, 1.2-4.3) compared with individuals with body mass index less than 25 kg/m. Diabetes was also independently associated with risk of intubation or death (hazard ratio, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.7). Fifty-six out of 127 patients (44%) with body mass index greater than or equal to 30 kg/m had diabetes, and the combination of both diabetes and body mass index greater than or equal to 30 kg/m was associated with a 4.5-fold increased risk of intubation or death (95% CI, 2.0-10.2) compared with patients without diabetes and body mass index less than 25 kg/m. CONCLUSIONS: Among consecutive patients hospitalized with coronavirus disease 2019, obesity was an independent risk factor for intubation or death.


Subject(s)
Betacoronavirus , Coronavirus Infections/mortality , Critical Illness/mortality , Intubation, Intratracheal/mortality , Obesity/mortality , Pneumonia, Viral/mortality , Adult , Aged, 80 and over , Body Mass Index , COVID-19 , Coronavirus Infections/therapy , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Male , Middle Aged , Obesity/complications , Pandemics , Pneumonia, Viral/therapy , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , SARS-CoV-2 , Severity of Illness Index
12.
JACC Heart Fail ; 8(11): 892-902, 2020 11.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33121701

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the frequency, incidence rates over time, association with mortality, and potential risk factors for hemocompatibility-related adverse events (HRAEs) occurring during venoarterial-extracorporeal life support (VA-ECLS). BACKGROUND: HRAEs are common complications of VA-ECLS. Studies examining relevant clinical predictors and the association of HRAEs with survival are limited by small sample size and single-center setting. METHODS: We queried adult patients supported with VA-ECLS from 2010 to 2017 in the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization database to assess the impact of HRAEs on in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Among 11,984 adults meeting study inclusion, 8,457 HRAEs occurred; 62.1% were bleeding events. The HRAE rate decreased significantly over the study period (p trend <0.001), but rates of medical bleeding and ischemic stroke remained stable. HRAEs had a cumulative association with mortality in adjusted analysis: 1 event, odds ratio (OR) of 1.43; 2 events, OR of 1.86; ≥3 events, OR of 3.27 (p < 0.001 for all). HRAEs most strongly associated with mortality were medical bleeding, including intracranial (OR: 7.71), pulmonary (OR: 3.08), and gastrointestinal (OR: 1.95) hemorrhage and ischemic stroke (OR: 2.31); p < 0.001 for all. Risk factors included the following: for bleeding: older age, lower pH, and female sex; for thrombosis: younger age, male sex, Asian race, and non-polymethylpentene oxygenator; and for both: time on ECLS, central cannulation, and renal failure. CONCLUSIONS: Although decreasing, HRAEs remain common during VA-ECLS and have a cumulative association with survival. Bleeding events are twice as common as thrombotic events, with a hierarchy of HRAEs influencing survival. Differential risk factors for bleeding and thrombotic complications exist and raise the possibility of a tailored approach to ECLS management.


Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Heart Failure/therapy , Registries , Databases, Factual , Female , Heart Failure/epidemiology , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Survival Rate/trends , United States/epidemiology
13.
Br J Anaesth ; 125(6): 943-952, 2020 12.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32807381

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Patients with symptomatic and asymptomatic heart failure undergoing noncardiac surgery may benefit from the haemodynamic profile of etomidate. However, the safety of etomidate in this population is unknown. We examined anaesthesiologist variation in etomidate use and assessed its safety using an instrumental variable approach to account for differences in treatment selection. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of 19 714 patients with heart failure undergoing noncardiac surgery at two tertiary care institutions from January 2006 to December 2017 was performed. The proportion of etomidate use among 294 anaesthesiologists was examined and adjusted risk differences (aRD) for in-hospital and 30-day mortality were calculated using physician preference for etomidate as an instrumental variable. RESULTS: Etomidate was used in 14.3% (2821/19 714) of patients. Preference for etomidate varied substantially among individual anaesthesiologists with the lowest and highest quartile users using etomidate in 0-4.7% and 20.4-66.7% of their own heart failure patients, respectively. The adjusted instrumental variable analysis showed no significant differences in the risk of in-hospital (aRD -0.2%; 95% confidence interval, -2.4%-1.9%; P=0.83) or 30 day mortality (aRD 0.2%; 95% confidence interval, -2.5%-2.9%; P=0.90). Anaesthesiologists with higher preferences for etomidate were more experienced (greater heart failure and total case volume) than anaesthesiologists with lower preferences for etomidate. CONCLUSIONS: We found substantial variability in anaesthesiologists' preference for etomidate for use in patients with heart failure undergoing noncardiac surgery. There was no association between etomidate use and in-hospital or 30-day mortality. Etomidate is not inferior to other currently used options for induction of general anaesthesia in patients with heart failure.


Subject(s)
Etomidate/pharmacology , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Hemodynamics/drug effects , Hypnotics and Sedatives/pharmacology , Surgical Procedures, Operative , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Young Adult
14.
JACC Cardiovasc Interv ; 13(11): 1277-1287, 2020 06 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32499018

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to examine variation in the use of conscious sedation (CS) for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) across hospitals and over time and to evaluate outcomes of CS compared with general anesthesia (GA) using instrumental variable analysis, a quasi-experimental method to control for unmeasured confounding. BACKGROUND: Despite increasing use of CS for TAVR, contemporary data on utilization patterns are lacking, and existing studies evaluating the impact of sedation choice on outcomes may suffer from unmeasured confounding. METHODS: Among 120,080 patients in the TVT (Transcatheter Valve Therapy) Registry who underwent transfemoral TAVR between January 2016 and March 2019, the relationship between anesthesia choice and TAVR outcomes was evaluated using hospital proportional use of CS as an instrumental variable. RESULTS: Over the study period, the proportion of TAVR performed using CS increased from 33% to 64%, and CS was used in a median of 0% and 91% of cases in the lowest and highest quartiles of hospital CS use, respectively. On the basis of instrumental variable analysis, CS was associated with decreases in in-hospital mortality (adjusted risk difference: 0.2%; p = 0.010) and 30-day mortality (adjusted risk difference: 0.5%; p < 0.001), shorter length of hospital stay (adjusted difference: 0.8 days; p < 0.001), and more frequent discharge to home (adjusted risk difference: 2.8%; p < 0.001) compared with GA. The magnitude of benefit for most endpoints was less than in a traditional propensity score-based approach, however. CONCLUSIONS: In contemporary U.S. practice, the use of CS for TAVR continues to increase, although there remains wide variation across hospitals. The use of CS for TAVR is associated with improved outcomes (including reduced mortality) compared with GA, although the magnitude of benefit appears to be less than in previous studies.


Subject(s)
Anesthesia, General/trends , Conscious Sedation/trends , Healthcare Disparities/trends , Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care/trends , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/trends , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anesthesia, General/adverse effects , Anesthesia, General/mortality , Conscious Sedation/adverse effects , Conscious Sedation/mortality , Female , Hospital Mortality/trends , Hospitalization/trends , Humans , Male , Registries , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Time Factors , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/adverse effects , Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement/mortality , Treatment Outcome , United States
15.
Circ Cardiovasc Interv ; 12(1): e007270, 2019 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30608880

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: Limited knowledge exists on inter-hospital variation in the utilization of short-term, nondurable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for myocardial infarction (MI) complicated by cardiogenic shock (CS). METHODS AND RESULTS: Hospitalizations for MI with CS in 2014 in a nationally representative all-payer database were included. The proportion of hospitalizations for MI with CS using MCS (MCS ratio) and in-hospital mortality were evaluated. Hospital characteristics and outcomes were compared across quartiles of MCS usage. Of 1813 hospitals evaluated, 1440 (79.4%) performed ≥10 percutaneous coronary interventions annually. Of these, 1064 (73.9%) had at least one code for MCS. Forty-one percent of hospitals did not use MCS. The median (interquartile range) proportion of MCS use among admissions for MI with CS was 33.3% (0.0%-50.0%). High MCS utilizing hospitals were larger ( P<0.001). Eighty-five percent (2808/3301) of MCS use was intra-aortic balloon pump. There was significant variation in receipt of MCS at different hospitals (median odds ratio of receiving MCS at 2 random hospitals: 1.58; 95% CI, 1.45-1.70). Adjusted in-hospital mortality was not different across quartiles of MCS use (Q4 versus Q1; odds ratio, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.77-1.16; P=0.58). CONCLUSIONS: Wide variation exists in hospital use of MCS for MI with CS, unexplained by patient characteristics. The predominant form of MCS use is intra-aortic balloon pump. Risk-adjusted mortality rates were not different between higher and lower MCS-utilizing hospitals.


Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/trends , Healthcare Disparities/trends , Heart-Assist Devices/trends , Hospitals/trends , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/trends , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Databases, Factual , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/adverse effects , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/mortality , Female , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/adverse effects , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Myocardial Infarction/complications , Myocardial Infarction/mortality , Myocardial Infarction/physiopathology , Recovery of Function , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Shock, Cardiogenic/etiology , Shock, Cardiogenic/mortality , Shock, Cardiogenic/physiopathology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States
16.
Crit Care Med ; 47(3): e214-e221, 2019 03.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30585830

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Increasing age is a well-recognized risk factor for in-hospital mortality in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock, but the shape of this relationship is unknown. In addition, the impact of age on hospital length of stay, patterns of patient disposition, and costs has been incompletely characterized. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of the National Inpatient Sample. SETTING: U.S. nonfederal hospitals, years 2004-2016. PATIENTS: Adults with cardiogenic shock treated with extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (3,094; weighted national estimate: 15,415). INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The mean age of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation recipients was 54.8 ± 15.4 years (range, 18-90 yr). Crude in-hospital mortality was 57.7%. Median time-to-death was 8 days (interquartile range, 3-17 d). A linear relationship between age and in-hospital mortality was observed with a 14% increase in the adjusted odds of in-hospital mortality for every 10-year increase in age (adjusted odds ratio, 1.14; 95% CI, 1.08-1.21; p < 0.0001). Thirty-four percent of patients were discharged alive at a median time of 30 days (interquartile range, 19-48 d). The median length of stay and total hospitalization costs were 14 days (interquartile range, [5-29 d]) and $134,573 ($71,782-$239,439), respectively, both of which differed significantly by age group (length of stay range from 17 d [18-49 yr] to 9 d [80-90 yr]; p < 0.0001 and cost range $147,548 [18-49 yr] to $105,350 [80-90 yr]; p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Age is linearly associated with increasing in-hospital mortality in individuals receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for cardiogenic shock without evidence of a threshold effect. Median time-to-death is approximately 1 week. One third of patients are discharged from the hospital alive, but the median time-to-discharge is 1 month. Median length of stay ranges from 9 to 17 days depending on age. Hospitalization costs exceed $100,000 in all age groups.


Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation , Hospital Costs/statistics & numerical data , Length of Stay/statistics & numerical data , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Adolescent , Adult , Age Factors , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/economics , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/mortality , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/statistics & numerical data , Female , Hospital Mortality , Humans , Length of Stay/economics , Male , Middle Aged , Retrospective Studies , Shock, Cardiogenic/economics , Shock, Cardiogenic/mortality , United States , Young Adult
17.
EuroIntervention ; 13(18): e2152-e2159, 2018 04 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29400657

ABSTRACT

AIMS: Despite rising rates of cardiogenic shock (CS), data on trends and in-hospital outcomes of short-term non-durable mechanical circulatory support (MCS) are limited. Thus, we aimed to identify recent national trends in MCS utilisation in the USA, patient-level predictors of MCS use, and in-hospital outcomes in CS inclusive of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). METHODS AND RESULTS: Hospitalisations of US adults with a discharge diagnosis of CS, from January 2004 to December 2014, in the National Inpatient Sample were included. Rates of MCS were stratified by device type and clinical presentation. Outcomes included in-hospital mortality, hospitalisation costs, and number of procedures. A total of 183,516 hospitalisations with CS (47,636 [25.9%] involving MCS) were included. MCS recipients were younger, less frequently female, received more procedures, had higher costs, and more frequently presented with MI (MCS vs. non-MCS: 71.6% vs. 42.9%; p<0.0001). Growth in CS hospitalisations (214.4%) outpaced annual MCS use (160.0%), with relative declines in intra-aortic balloon pump use starting in 2008. Right heart catheterisation rates for both groups remained low (MCS vs. non-MCS: 5.9% vs. 3.3%; p<0.0001). In-hospital mortality declined but remained high in both groups (MCS vs. non-MCS [2014]: 32.7% vs. 41.5%; p<0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: In-hospital mortality for CS has declined but remains high. Rates of CS have outpaced MCS utilisation which remains uncommon in non-MI hospitalisations with shock. MCS is associated with utilisation of other procedures during hospitalisation.


Subject(s)
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/trends , Heart-Assist Devices/trends , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/trends , Practice Patterns, Physicians'/trends , Shock, Cardiogenic/therapy , Ventricular Function , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Databases, Factual , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/adverse effects , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/economics , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/mortality , Female , Heart-Assist Devices/economics , Hospital Costs/trends , Hospital Mortality/trends , Humans , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/adverse effects , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/economics , Intra-Aortic Balloon Pumping/mortality , Male , Middle Aged , Prosthesis Design , Recovery of Function , Retrospective Studies , Shock, Cardiogenic/economics , Shock, Cardiogenic/mortality , Shock, Cardiogenic/physiopathology , Time Factors , Treatment Outcome , United States/epidemiology
18.
Anesth Analg ; 126(6): 1839-1850, 2018 06.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29200070

ABSTRACT

The pandemic of heart failure and the limited options for treatment of end-stage disease have resulted in an increase in the utilization of left ventricular assist devices (LVADs). Improvements in device technology and patient survival have led to an expanding population of patients requiring noncardiac surgery while on LVAD therapy, thus leading to a growing need for familiarity with the physiology of these patients. This review describes the functional mechanics of the most prevalent continuous-flow LVAD, the HeartMate II, and focuses on perioperative anesthetic concerns.


Subject(s)
Heart Failure/surgery , Heart-Assist Devices , Intraoperative Complications/prevention & control , Perioperative Care/methods , Ventricular Function/physiology , Heart Failure/diagnosis , Heart Failure/physiopathology , Heart Ventricles , Humans , Intraoperative Complications/physiopathology , Perioperative Care/instrumentation , Treatment Outcome
19.
ScientificWorldJournal ; 2014: 393258, 2014.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24977195

ABSTRACT

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA ECMO) provides mechanical support to the patient with cardiac or cardiopulmonary failure. This paper reviews the physiology of VA ECMO including the determinants of ECMO flow and gas exchange. The efficacy of this therapy may be determined by assessing patient hemodynamics and device flow, overall gas exchange support, markers of adequate oxygen delivery, and pulsatility of the arterial blood pressure waveform.


Subject(s)
Blood Gas Analysis/methods , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Heart Arrest/diagnosis , Heart Arrest/therapy , Heart Function Tests/methods , Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods , Oximetry/methods , Heart Arrest/blood , Humans , Lactic Acid/blood
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL