Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Dent ; 143: 104897, 2024 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38395377

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the adhesive properties in dentine after the application of silver diamine fluoride (SDF) on carious dentine lesions immediately and after 2 years of water storage. METHODS: 96 human molars used were subjected to artificial dentine caries production, and then randomly divided into 12 experimental groups according to 1. application of an SDF solution (carious dentine lesion without SDF treatment [control], with 12 % silver diamine fluoride [SDF 12 %] or 38 % silver diamine fluoride [SDF 38 %]); 2. Universal adhesives (Clearfil Universal Bond Quick [CUQ] and Single Bond Universal [SBU]); 3. adhesive strategy (etch-and-rinse [ER] and self-etch [SE]). After restoration, the specimens were sectioned and submitted to the microtensile bond strength test (µTBS) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectrometry analysis (SEM/EDX). All tests were performed immediately and after 2 years of water storage. Data from the µTBS were analyzed using four-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). RESULTS: Only the interaction of factors 'SDF' vs 'time' was significant (p = 0.03). After 2 years of storage, the groups where SDF was applied showed higher µTBS values compared to the control group. No significant decrease in µTBS values was observed for SBU when comparing immediate and 2-year results, but a significant reduction in µTBS values was observed after 2 years for CUQ. CONCLUSION: Independent of the adhesive strategy, the use of SDF may be a promising alternative to maintain the bonding of universal adhesives to carious dentinal lesions. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study may clarify and support clinicians regarding the longevity of resin-based restoration in caries-affected dentine treated with silver diamine fluoride.


Subject(s)
Bisphenol A-Glycidyl Methacrylate , Dental Bonding , Dental Caries , Quaternary Ammonium Compounds , Silver Compounds , Humans , Dental Cements , Dental Caries Susceptibility , Dentin , Water/chemistry , Materials Testing , Tensile Strength , Resin Cements/pharmacology , Resin Cements/chemistry , Dentin-Bonding Agents/pharmacology , Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry , Fluorides, Topical
2.
Oper Dent ; 48(5): 500-512, 2023 Sep 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37503689

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the absence of 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA) on the adhesive properties with enamel and dentin of universal adhesive systems containing 10-methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP). METHODS AND MATERIALS: One hundred and twelve caries-free third molars were used to test adhesion to dentin (n=64) and enamel (n=48). For each substrate, teeth were divided into eight experimental groups: four different adhesives each using two adhesive strategies. The adhesives used were: (1) Scotchbond Universal (SBU, 3M Oral Care, St Paul, MN, USA) as a HEMA-containing universal adhesive; (2) Gluma Bond Universal (GBU, Kulzer, Hanau, Germany); (3) Solare Universal Bond (SUB, GC, Tokyo, Japan); and (4) Zipbond Universal (ZIP, SDI, Victoria, Australia) as HEMA-free universal adhesives. The adhesive strategies used were etch-and-rinse (ER) and self-etch (SE). For dentin tests, the occlusal third of the crown of all teeth was removed and an adhesive protocol was applied. After completing the restoration, specimens were sectioned into bonded sticks (0.8 mm 2) and tested for microtensile bond strength (µTBS), in situ degree of conversion (DC), and nanoleakage (NL) by scanning electron microscopy. For enamel tests, teeth were sectioned into four parts (buccal, lingual, and proximal), and an adhesive protocol was applied. After completing the restoration, the specimens were tested for their microshear bond strength (µSBS). For in situ degree of conversion (DC) and nanoleakage (NL) evaluation of enamel, the specimens were sectioned in slices to be evaluated. The data for each substrate were subjected to two-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α=0.05) for each property evaluated. RESULTS: The SBU and ZIP adhesives showed the highest µSBS, and DC (dentin and enamel) and lower NL (dentin) values compared to GBU and SUB (p=0.001). However, SBU showed better results in terms of µTBS and µSBS (SE strategy), and DC (dentin and enamel) than ZIP. Strategy ER presented higher values of µTBS and µSBS when compared to strategy SE (p=0.001), except for SBU. CONCLUSION: The effect of the absence of HEMA in commercial universal adhesive systems on enamel and dentin adhesive properties appears to be material-dependent.


Subject(s)
Dental Bonding , Dental Cements , Dental Cements/therapeutic use , Dental Cements/chemistry , Dentin , Resin Cements/therapeutic use , Resin Cements/chemistry , Methacrylates/chemistry , Composite Resins/chemistry , Materials Testing , Tensile Strength , Dentin-Bonding Agents/chemistry
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL