Blood group is a long-term cardiovascular risk factor after carotid endarterectomy.

BACKGROUND: ABO blood group system has been clinically related to an increased incidence of cardiovascular diseases. Preliminary data relating Rhesus (Rh) factor and these outcomes also have been published. Our aim was to analyse the impact of blood group on the short and long-term outcomes after carotid endarterectomy (CEA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: From 2012 to 2019, patients from a referral centre who underwent CEA for atherosclerotic carotid stenosis were prospectively followed. Our primary outcomes were long-term major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were perioperative complications and myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS). Median follow-up was 50 months (interquartile range 21-69). Time-to-event analysis was used to determine the effect of ABO and Rh groups in long-term outcomes. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty-four patients were included, with a mean age of 70.1 ± 9.1 years. Eighteen (25.7%) patients with O type and 48 (42.1%) patients with non-O type presented coronary artery disease (odds ratio [OR]: 2.313, 5-95% confidence interval (CI) 1.245-4.297, p = .008). Patients Rh+ presented significantly more congestive heart failure, 23 (14.7%), p = .03. The incidence of MACE in the long-term was higher in non-O patients (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.034; CI: 1.032-4.010, p = .040). Rh- patients, presented a higher incidence of perioperative MINS. However, there was no statistically significant association with long-term risk of MACE. CONCLUSION: The incidence of MACE in long-term analysis was higher in non-O blood type and 30-day MINS was significantly more common amongst Rh- patients. The benefit from a more complete preoperative cardiac study in these patients should be performed.

Metastatic pituitary neuroendocrine neoplasms: A case report of a malignant prolactinoma.

We report a rare clinical case of a malignant prolactinoma in which the exponential increase of prolactin levels with minimal tumor growth and no response to treatment led to diagnosis of abdominal, thoracic, and vertebral metastases.

Sinonasal Adenocarcinoma: Clinicopathological Characterization and Prognostic Factors.

Sinonasal (SN) malignancies are rare. Within SN adenocarcinomas, the most frequent are intestinal-type adenocarcinomas (ITACs). ITAC has been associated with wood and leather dust occupational exposure and TP53 mutations. Not much information is available regarding its characterization and treatment. The aim of this study is to characterize the clinicopathologic and prognostic factors of patients with sinonasal adenocarcinomas (SNACs) treated in our tertiary-level hospital. A retrospective, consecutive study including SNAC patients diagnosed between 2004-2023 was conducted. Clinicopathological data was collected, and p53 status was assessed in the tumor specimens. The association between p53 status and clinicopathological variables, as well as their impact on survival, was evaluated. In total, 35 were included, most of them having ITAC (91.4%) with papillary subtype (37.5%); the majority were subjected to occupational risk exposure (82.9%). Overexpression of p53 was identified in 48.6% of the tumors. Papillary and colonic subtypes were associated with higher median progression-free survival (mPFS) than mucinous and solid subtypes (mPFS 37 months, 95% CI, 20.0-54.0, vs. 9 months, 95% CI, 7.15-10.85, p=0.01); the former was also associated with higher median overall survival (mOS) (mOS 64 months, 95% CI, 37.18-90.81 vs. 14 months, 95% CI, 0-41.58, p=0.02). Histologic grade 1-2 and macroscopic complete resection were associated with higher PFS (PFS of five months of 90.9% vs. 33.3%, p=0.01; mPFS of 37 months, 95% CI, 4.93-69.07 vs. 10 months, 95% CI, 6.43-13.57, p=0.04, respectively). Disease recurrence with distant metastases was associated with lower OS (11 months, 95% CI, 6.1-15.9 vs. 53 months, 95% CI, 22.70-83.30, p=0.04). This study reinforces the importance of protective occupational measures. Future studies will be important to validate the best treatment strategy in the advanced stages of this disease and also to identify new prognostic and/or therapeutic target biomarkers in SNAC.

Study protocol of a prospective single-arm multicenter clinical study to assess the safety and performance of the aXess hemodialysis graft: The pivotal study.

BACKGROUND: Arteriovenous grafts (AVGs) are used for patients deemed unsuitable for the creation of an autogenous arteriovenous fistula (AVF) or unable to await maturation of the AVF before starting hemodialysis. However, AVGs are prone to infection and thrombosis resulting in low long-term patency rates. The novel aXess Hemodialysis Graft consists of porous polymeric biomaterial allowing the infiltration by cells and the growth of neotissue, while the graft itself is gradually absorbed, ultimately resulting in a fully functional natural blood vessel. The Pivotal Study will examine the long-term effectiveness and safety of the aXess Hemodialysis Graft. METHODS: The Pivotal Study is a prospective, single-arm, multicenter study that will be conducted in 110 subjects with end-stage renal disease who are not deemed suitable for the creation of an autogenous vascular access. The primary efficacy endpoint will be the primary patency rate at 6 months. The primary safety endpoint will be the freedom from device-related serious adverse events at 6 months. The secondary endpoints will include the procedural success rate, time to first cannulation, patency rates, the rate of access-related interventions to maintain patency, the freedom from device-related serious adverse events and the rate of access site infections. Patients will be followed for 60 months. An exploratory Health Economic and Outcomes Research sub-study will determine potential additional benefits of the aXess graft to patients, health care institutions, and reimbursement programs. DISCUSSION: The Pivotal study will examine the long-term performance and safety of the aXess Hemodialysis Graft and compare the outcome measures with historical data obtained with other graft types and autogenous AVFs. Potential advantages may include superior long-term patency rates and lower infection rates versus currently available AVGs and a shorter time to first cannulation compared to an autologous AVF. As such, the aXess Hemodialysis Graft may fulfill an unmet clinical need in the field of hemodialysis access.

Acanthosis Nigricans Manifesting as a Paraneoplastic Syndrome Associated With Cholangiocarcinoma.

We present the case of a 64-year-old woman with type 2 diabetes who was diagnosed with early-stage intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and underwent partial hepatectomy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. The patient simultaneously developed skin lesions compatible with acanthosis nigricans (AN). Thirty-seven months after completing chemotherapy, the patient had a recurrence of extensive skin and mucosal lesions compatible with AN. A thoracic-abdominal-pelvic (TAP) CT showed a relapse with hepatic hilar adenopathy. Currently, she is under evaluation to undergo radical treatment. Malignancy is a rare cause of AN and skin lesions can arise before, during, or after the diagnosis. As a paraneoplastic syndrome, it is usually related to gastric adenocarcinoma, with cholangiocarcinoma being a rare entity in this setting. Although an uncommon manifestation, the malignant etiology should be considered among other prevalent causes, such as metabolic disorders, and establishing an association can lead to an early diagnosis and initiation of curative treatment.

Timing of carotid intervention in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a topical review.

INTRODUCTION: Criteria and optimal timing for carotid artery revascularization have been polarizing subjects for investigators and clinicians dedicated to carotid artery atherosclerotic disease. A topical review was performed with the purpose of 1) providing an overview of the evidence on the definition of index event and on the definition of delay of intervention; 2) summarizing the rationale for the current definition for the optimal timing for carotid intervention, and 3) drawing a sketch for future directions implementing the aspect of timing in daily clinical practice. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A literature search was performed using the Medline database and the following query ("Endarterectomy, Carotid"[Mesh]) AND ("Stroke" [Mesh] OR Symptomatic) AND "Randomized Controlled Trial"). A comprehensive review of manuscripts addressing timing of intervention was also performed. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: A total of eleven RCTs were identified and data on index event definition, timing of intervention and BMT were resumed. The definition of the index event can have a significant impact on the delay times but has (surprisingly) received little attention. Different definitions in itself may be correct, but in terms of stroke prevention, it is most important to understand and emphasize that the risk of recurrent stroke. The optimal timing of CEA after stroke remains an important but unresolved question. No prospective, randomized study has ever been undertaken to specifically determine which patients and when they might safely undergo expedited CEA after recent stroke. CONCLUSIONS: Collecting data on events during waiting time to intervention and developing reporting standards for these waiting times seem to be the key for unraveling this controversy.

A Delphi Consensus Study on Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy: Patient Reported Outcome Measures.

OBJECTIVE: Currently, evidence is lacking for disease specific patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for use in atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis (either symptomatic or asymptomatic) submitted to carotid endarterectomy (CEA). This study aimed to obtain expert consensus on the most important items to include in a PROM designed to capture the impact of atherosclerotic carotid artery stenosis and its treatment on health related quality of life. METHODS: A three round modified Delphi consensus study was performed. A mixed expert Delphi panel of doctors (international panel of dedicated vascular surgeons and neurologists) and patients (either symptomatic or asymptomatic patients meeting criteria for carotid artery revascularisation) was implemented. The aim was to obtain pre-defined consensus on items in four pre-defined domains: generic, quality of life, symptom related, and treatment related. Consensus was reached in rounds two and three with > 70% overall expert agreement. RESULTS: The experts agreed on 23 items (out of 49) which were distributed as follows: five in the generic, six in the quality of life, six in the symptom, and six in the treatment related domain. Interestingly, comparing the items that reached consensus in this study, with the generic and disease specific PROMs previously used in carotid artery disease investigation, the only constant items were "difficulty with walking" and "ability to perform daily activities" included in the symptom domain. Considering the items that reached expert consensus in the additional domains, emphasis was given to the impact of the diagnosis, treatment and follow up, and to fear or concern "about the future" and "about severe stroke". In the treatment domain emphasis was also attained on the side effects, long term patient satisfaction, and on the information provided regarding treatment options. DISCUSSION: As hard clinical outcomes become increasingly rare, assessment of the impact of CEA becomes increasingly difficult. The consensus reached provides a newly defined disease specific PROM that warrants independent validation in specific populations in the future.

Sustainable and Active Program-Development and Application of SAVING Methodology.

The SAVING project aimed to create a sustainable and active aging program to promote the transition to sustainable aging in residential structures for the elderly (RSEs), developing research activities to apply the best strategies and good practices regarding the promotion of an active, healthy, and sustainable aging regarding social, economic, environmental, and pedagogic aspects. All this innovative methodology was built on a living-lab approach applied in one RSE, that was used as a case study. The results showed that the creation of the SAVING Brigade allowed not only increased reflection and mutual learning, but also created better conditions to face uncertainties and obstacles. Moreover, the use of indicators supported the basic themes and enabled comparison with other studies, between institutions or programs. Finally, the Action Plan acted as a tool for the development of previously defined strategies. It is possible to conclude that the breadth of the concept of quality of life encompasses the physical health of the individual, their psychological state, their social relationships, their perceptions, and the relationship with the characteristics of the context in which they are inserted. Therefore, active, sustainable, and healthy aging should be the goal.

Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Breast Cancer Management in Portugal: A Cross-Sectional Survey-Based Study of Medical Oncologists.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer care providers have faced many challenges in delivering safe care for patients during the COVID-19 pandemic. This cross-sectional survey-based study investigated the impact of the pandemic on clinical practices of Portuguese medical oncologists caring for patients with breast cancer. METHODS: An anonymous online survey comprising 42 questions gathered information regarding COVID-19 testing, treatment in (neo)adjuvant and metastatic settings, and other aspects of breast cancer management. Practices before and during the pandemic were compared, and potential differences in outcomes according to respondents' regions, case volumes, and practice type were explored. RESULTS: Of 129 respondents, 108 worked in the public health system, giving a representative national picture of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on breast cancer management. Seventy-one percent of respondents reported a reduction in visits for new cases of breast cancer, and there was a shift towards increased use of telemedicine. Clinical decision-making was largely unaffected in the most aggressive indications (i.e., triple-negative, HER2-positive, visceral crisis). The use of neoadjuvant therapy increased when access to surgery was difficult, whereas dose-dense regimens decreased, and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor treatment decreased for less aggressive disease and increased for more aggressive disease. The use of oral formulations and metronomic chemotherapy regimens increased, and clinical trial participation decreased. Some differences by respondents' region and case volume were noted. CONCLUSION: Medical oncologists in Portugal implemented many changes during the COVID-19 pandemic, most of which were logical and reasonable responses to the current healthcare emergency; however, the true impact on patient outcomes remains unknown.

This study was an online survey of Portuguese medical oncologists to determine how they managed patients with breast cancer during the COVID-19 pandemic. Forty-two questions covered topics such as how COVID testing was done, the types of cancer treatments used, and how this compared to before the pandemic. It also examined whether the geographic region, the number of patients each doctor was responsible for (caseload), and the type of medical institution influenced how patients with breast cancer were managed. One hundred and twenty-nine oncologists completed the survey, of whom 108 worked in the public health system, making this survey representative of breast cancer management during the COVID-19 pandemic across Portugal. Most (71%) said there were fewer visits for new cases of breast cancer during lockdown. The use of telemedicine increased, as did the use of pre-surgery hormone therapy or chemotherapy when access to surgery was difficult, and the use of anticancer medications taken orally or metronomically (low doses given frequently over a long time period). Chemotherapy given very frequently (dose-dense) was used less often, and fewer patients participated in clinical trials. Treatment decisions for patients with aggressive breast cancer types (e.g., triple-negative breast cancer) were largely unchanged, except for greater use of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors­drugs targeting the cell cycle and cell division control. Geographic region and caseload influenced treatment decisions. All of these changes in breast cancer treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic were logical and reasonable for the circumstances, but their long-term impact is not yet known.

Angiosarcoma of a Femoropopliteal Bypass Thrombosed Vein Graft.

BACKGROUND: Angiosarcoma is a rare subtype of malignant vascular tumours which has been only anecdotally described in patients submitted to lower limb revascularization. CASE PRESENTATION: This paper reports a patient previously submitted to a femoropopliteal bypass using autologous great saphenous vein (GSV). Nine years after the initial surgery, a primary angiosarcoma of the thrombosed vein graft was diagnosed, requiring en bloc surgical resection. Rampant metastatic spread was documented despite primary tumour surgical resection with a dismal outcome within months. CONCLUSIONS: Malignant transformation of autologous vein for lower limb revascularization is extremely rare and anecdotally described in the literature. It is a poorly studied complication with an aggressive behaviour. This report further reinforces the need for early recognition of this pathology.

Endovascular Treatment of Renal Artery Thrombosis in Living-Donor Kidney Transplant Recipient With Severe COVID-19 Disease.

PURPOSE: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) patients have a higher prevalence of micro-and macrovascular thrombotic events. However, the underlying mechanism for the increased thrombotic risk is not completely understood. Solid organ transplant recipients infected with SARS-CoV-2 may have an exponential increase in thrombotic risk and the best management strategy is unknown. CASE REPORT: A female kidney transplant recipient presented with allograft's renal artery thrombosis after a recent COVID-19 infection. Due to the risk of kidney failure or exclusion, catheter directed thrombolysis was performed. Residual thrombus was excluded using an endoprosthesis with an excellent result. There were no adverse events and kidney function improved. CONCLUSION: This paper reports the endovascular treatment of renal artery thrombosis in a living-donor kidney transplant recipient with severe COVID-19 disease.

VCAM1, HMOX1 and NOS3 differential endothelial expression may impact sickle cell anemia vasculopathy.

Endothelial dysfunction plays a major role in sickle cell anemia (SCA) systemic vasculopathy, with upregulation of adhesion molecules (e.g., VCAM-1), decreased nitric oxide bioavailability, and oxidative stress. We aimed to assess the modulation role of pro-inflammatory and pro-oxidative stimuli on endothelial VCAM1, NOS3, and HMOX1 expression. We also evaluated the effect of the main SCA therapeutic agent, hydroxyurea, on that modulation. Our results showed that two VCAM1 promoter haplotypes, we previously associated with pediatric cerebral vasculopathy and severe hemolysis in SCA, increased promoter activity in TNF-α-stimulated transfected EA.hy926 and HBEC cell lines, consistent with a higher VCAM1 expression in macro and microvascular settings. In non-transfected cells, we also observed TNF-α-induced VCAM1 overexpression as well as heme-induced overexpression of HMOX1 in both cell models. Heme did not affect VCAM1 nor NOS3 expression and the latter was also not affected by TNF-α stimulus. Hydroxyurea treatment lowered TNF-induced VCAM1 and NOS3 expression but did not affect heme-induced HMOX1 expression. These data further indicate that VCAM1 haplotypes we studied lead to higher VCAM1 expression affecting not only cerebral but also systemic vasculopathy risk. The differential endothelial expression of VCAM1, NOS3, and HMOX1 also confirms their genetic modulation role in SCA systemic vasculopathy.

Association of Weight Change, Inflammation Markers and Disease Staging with Survival of Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy for Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer-associated-cachexia represents a systemic syndrome of unintended weight-loss (WL) and systemic inflammation, affecting >80% patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA). We aimed to evaluate the association of weight change (WC) with survival of patients treated with chemotherapy (ChT) for PA and the influence of disease staging. We also studied the prognostic and predictive value of inflammation-based scores. METHODS: Observational, retrospective cohort study. Individuals were divided into two cohorts, according to WC (WL ≥5% vs. non-WL <5%) after ChT. Main endpoints were weight change and survival time. Statistical analysis was performed using Stata software. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients were included (median age 69; 48% female), 60% with advanced disease. At 3 months after ChT start, 54% experienced WL. Advanced disease independently predicted WL (OR 2.10; 95% CI, 1.11-19.6; p = 0.041). With median follow-up of 14.8 mo, median survival time of patients with WL was 18.5 mo, vs. 33.2 vs. for non-WL (HR 2.28; 95% CI, 1.15-4.52; p = 0.019). In patients with early-stage disease, WL was associated with decreased survival time (21.9 vs. 67.6 mo; HR 23.68; 95% CI 2.39-234.75; p = 0.007), while the association of WL on survival time in advanced disease was not significant (HR 0.74; 95% CI, 0.34-1.60; p = 0.449). The multivariate survival model showed that WL (HR 1.11, 95% CI 1.03-1.20, p = 0.005) and cachexia (HR 3.76, 95% CI 1.07-13-18), p = 0.041) were associated with survival time, as well as location in body or tail (HR 3.05; 95% CI, 1.75-5.31; p < 0.001) and high Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) at 3 months (HR 6.20; 95% CI, 2.59-14.87; p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: WL was an independent prognostic factor for survival. Particularly in early stage disease, interventions targeting this modifiable factor may translate into better outcomes for PA patients. NLR may be a surrogate marker of systemic inflammatory status in this setting.

Critical appraisal of evidence on bypass surgery versus endovascular treatment for intermittent claudication: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Intermittent claudication (IC) stage of peripheral artery disease (PAD) is associated with significant impairment of quality of life. In the subset of patients with disabling IC refractory to best medical treatment (BMT), revascularization procedures may be considered. However, evidence comparing open revascularization surgery, endovascular treatment and BMT focusing on the impact on quality of life is very sparse. We aim to review clinical, anatomical and hemodynamic outcomes after bypass surgery compared to BMT and/or endovascular treatment in IC patients. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: We systematically reviewed controlled trials and comparative cohort studies assessing quality of life, walking performance, clinical/ symptomatic improvement, symptom recurrence, patency rates, Ankle-Brachial Index (ABI) improvement and adverse events after bypass surgery versus endovascular treatment/BMT in IC patients. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: Eleven studies involving 16,608 patients were included. Compared to BMT, bypass surgery was associated with a significantly greater improvement on Short-Form 36 (SF-36) physical functioning score (mean difference (MD), -14.0; 95% confidence interval [CI], -21.2 to -6.8), Walking Impairment Questionnaire (WIQ) walking distance score (MD, -0.23; 95% CI, -0.29 to -0.16) and SF-36 bodily pain score (MD, -13.0; 95% CI, -20.2 to -5.8). There were no significant differences between bypass and endovascular treatment regarding the three scores. Bypass surgery presented better primary patency rates at 1 (odds ratio [OR], 0.47; 95% CI, 0.29 to 0.76) and 5 years (OR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.57) and better ABI improvement (MD, -0.07; 95% CI, -0.12 to -0.03) when compared to endovascular treatment. There were no statistically significant differences between bypass and endovascular patients regarding secondary patency rates, 30-day mortality and major amputation. CONCLUSIONS: Lower limb revascularization may be beneficial in patients with disabling and refractory IC when the primary goal is to improve quality of life and walking capacity. Bypass surgery is associated to better symptomatic status, long-term primary patency and ABI improvement when compared to endovascular surgery, especially in anatomically extensive disease. Further studies addressing patient-reported outcomes and including a BMT group are paramount for more robust evidence on IC treatment and, consequently, better decision making.

Critical analysis of the literature and standards of reporting on stroke after carotid revascularization.

OBJECTIVE: Mechanisms of procedural stroke after carotid endarterectomy (CEA) or carotid artery stenting are surprisingly underresearched. However, understanding the underlying mechanism could (1) assist in balancing the choice for revascularization vs conservative therapy, (2) assist in choosing either open or endovascular techniques, and (3) assist in taking appropriate periprocedural measures to further decrease procedural stroke rate. The purpose of this study was to overview mechanisms of procedural stroke after carotid revascularization and establish reporting standards to facilitate more granular investigation and individual patient data meta-analysis in the future. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA statement. RESULTS: The limited evidence in the literature was heterogeneous and of low quality. Thus, no formal data meta-analysis could be performed. Procedural stroke was classified as hemorrhagic or ischemic; the latter was subclassified as hemodynamic, embolic (carotid embolic or cardioembolic) or carotid occlusion derived, using a combination of clinical inference and imaging data. Most events occurred in the first 24 hours after the procedure and were related to hypoperfusion (pooled incidence 10.2% [95% confidence interval (CI), 3.0-17.5] vs 13.9% [95% CI, 0.0-60.9] after CEA vs carotid artery stenting events, respectively) or atheroembolism (28.9% [95% CI, 10.9-47.0]) vs 34.3 [95% CI, 0.0-91.5]). After the first 24 hours, hemorrhagic stroke (11.6 [95% CI, 5.7-17.4] vs 9.0 [95% CI, 1.3-16.7]) or thrombotic occlusion (18.4 [95% CI, 0.9-35.8] vs 14.8 [95% CI, 0.0-30.5]) became more likely. CONCLUSIONS: Although procedural stroke incidence and etiology may have changed over the last decades owing to technical improvements and improvements in perioperative monitoring and quality control, the lack of literature data limits further statements. To simplify and enhance future reporting, procedural stroke analysis and classification should be documented preemptively in research settings. We propose a standardized form enclosing reporting standards for procedural stroke with a systematic approach to inference of the most likely etiology, for prospective use in registries and randomized controlled trials on carotid revascularization.

Editor's Choice - Timing of Carotid Intervention in Symptomatic Carotid Artery Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: This review aimed to analyse the timing of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) after the index event as well as 30 day outcomes at varying time periods within 14 days of symptom onset. METHODS: A systematic review was performed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis statement, comprising an online search of the Medline and Cochrane databases. Methodical quality assessment of the included studies was performed. Endpoints included procedural stroke and/or death stratified by delay from the index event and surgical technique (CEA/CAS). RESULTS: Seventy-one studies with 232 952 symptomatic patients were included. Overall, 34 retrospective analyses of prospective databases, nine prospective, three RCT, three case control, and 22 retrospective studies were included. Compared with CEA, CAS was associated with higher 30 day stroke (OR 0.70; 95% CI 0.58 - 0.85) and mortality rates (OR 0.41; 95% CI 0.31 - 0.53) when performed ≤ 2 days of symptom onset. Patients undergoing CEA/CAS were analysed in different time frames (≤ 2 vs. 3 - 14 and ≤ 7 vs. 8 - 14 days). Expedited CEA (vs. 3 - 14 days) presented a sampled 30 day stroke rate of 1.4%; 95% CI 0.9 - 1.8 vs. 1.8%; 95% CI 1.8 - 2.0, with no statistically significant difference. Expedited CAS (vs. 3 - 14 days) was associated with no difference in stroke rate but statistically significantly higher mortality rate (OR 2.76; 95% CI 1.39 - 5.50). CONCLUSION: At present, CEA is safer than transfemoral CAS within 2/7 days of symptom onset. Also, considering absolute rates, expedited CEA complies with the accepted thresholds in international guidelines. The ideal timing for performing CAS (when indicated against CEA) is not yet defined. Additional granular data and standard reporting of timing of intervention will facilitate future monitoring.

Evaluation of the Impact and Implementation of Social Prescribing in Primary Healthcare Units in Lisbon: A Mixed-Methods Study Protocol.

BACKGROUND: Social Prescribing (SP) is an intervention to link users of the primary healthcare services to non-clinical organizations based on the community to tackle social determinants of health. Despite the potential benefits of SP, the effectiveness of this complex intervention remains uncertain. This paper presents the study protocol of the evaluation of the first SP project in Portugal. METHODS: A mixed-methods study will be conducted to evaluate the SP project. For the quantitative component, a longitudinal, prospective study with a pre-post design will be performed. Data on patients referred to SP will be collected in four different points in time throughout the intervention, using questionnaires on patients' health status and sociodemographic characteristics, and scales on patients' well-being, quality of life and activation. The secondary data will be collected using patients' medical records and SP's forms about the referral and social responses elaborated within the intervention. Semi-structured interviews with patients and focus groups with stakeholders will be conducted to assess experiences of participation and improvement suggestions on SP. CONCLUSION: Comprehensive and complementary evidence will provide insights and learning for the implementation of future SP interventions. This can contribute to inform policy and practice, and to increase investment in social prescribing interventions.

Predictors of adverse events in uncomplicated type B aortic dissection: a systematic review with meta-analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) has been selectively used for uncomplicated acute type B aortic dissection (TBAD); however, not all cases will benefit from TEVAR. A search for high risk clinical and radiographic predictors for complications is ongoing. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify predictors of major adverse events during follow-up of uncomplicated TBAD, in order to identify who might benefit from elective TEVAR. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A systematic review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) Statement. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS: 16 studies were included in a qualitative synthesis and 10 in the meta-analysis. Several risk factors associated to major adverse events have been described, including: 1) aortic diameter ≥40 mm; 2) greater false lumen diameter (>22 mm); 3) patent false lumen; 4) primary entry tear >10 mm; and 5) greater number of false lumen vessels origin. Quantitative synthesis identified an aortic diameter ≥40 mm significantly associated with major adverse events (HR=3.56; P<0.00001). Reporting of false lumen status, aortic diameters and growth, and demographic data was not always congruent with the most recent recommendations by Society for Vascular Surgery and Society of Thoracic Surgeons, published in 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Acute and subacute patients with uncomplicated TBAD presenting with an aortic diameter ≥40 mm and solely treated with BMT have an increased hazard of developing major adverse events (HR), making them potential candidates for TEVAR. Remaining risk factors analysed have weaker evidence.

Pre-operative Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio is Associated With 30 Day Death or Amputation After Revascularisation for Acute Limb Ischaemia.

OBJECTIVE: Inflammation is an early feature of acute limb ischaemia (ALI), hence the potential prognostic significance of inflammatory biomarkers. This study aimed to assess the value of pre-operative inflammatory biomarkers, specifically the neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and the platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), for predicting an adverse outcome after revascularisation for ALI. METHODS: All patients submitted to lower limb revascularisation for Rutherford IIa or IIb ALI at the authors' institution between 2009 and 2019 were screened retrospectively. Pre-operative NLR and PLR were analysed, along with other known prognostic factors. Primary outcome was the composite endpoint of 30 day death or amputation. RESULTS: A total of 345 patients were included, 84 of whom suffered the primary outcome (24.3%). The median follow up was 23.1 months (3.1 - 52.2). Higher age (OR 1.05 per year increase, 95% CI 1.01 - 1.09), diabetes (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.14 - 6.06), Rutherford grade IIb vs. IIa (OR 5.51, 95% CI 2.11 - 14.42), higher NLR (OR 1.28 per unit increase, 95% CI 1.12 - 1.47), and fasciotomy need (OR 3.44, 95% CI 1.14 - 10.34) were independently associated with 30 day death or amputation, whereas pre-operative statin or anticoagulant medication were associated with a risk reduction (OR 0.23, 95% CI 0.53 - 0.96 and OR 0.20, 95% CI 0.05 - 0.84, respectively). PLR did not show an independent effect on this population. Pre-operative NLR presented a good discriminative ability (AUC 0.86, 95% CI 0.82 - 0.90). A cut off NLR level ≥ 5.4 demonstrated a 90.5% sensitivity and 73.6% specificity for 30 day death or amputation. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that patients with pre-operative NLR ≥ 5.4 had significantly lower 30 day, six month and one year amputation free survival when compared with those with NLR < 5.4 (64.8 ± 4.0%, 44.1 ± 4.1%, and 37.5 ± 4.1% vs. 98.5 ± 0.9%, 91.9 ± 2.0%, and 85.9 ± 2.5%, log rank p < .001). CONCLUSION: In this study, higher pre-operative NLR was associated with 30 day death or amputation following intervention for Rutherford grade IIa or IIb ALI. NLR potentially stands as a simple, widely available and inexpensive biomarker that can refine decision making and possibly contribute to ALI morbidity and mortality reduction.