Assessment of the comparability of CLSI, EUCAST and Stokes antimicrobial susceptibility profiles for Escherichia coli uropathogenic isolates.

BACKGROUND: As many clinical laboratories convert between Stokes, Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) and European Committee for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) methods, the problem of comparing differently derived sets of antimicrobial susceptibility testing (AST) data with each other arises, owing to a scarcity of knowledge of inter-method comparability. The purpose of the current study was to determine the comparability of CLSI, EUCAST and Stokes AST methods for determining susceptibility of uropathogenic Escherichia coli to ampicillin, amoxicillin-clavulanate, trimethoprim, cephradine/cephalexin, ciprofloxacin and nitrofurantoin. METHODS: A total of 100 E. coli isolates were obtained from boric acid urine samples from patients attending GP surgeries. For EUCAST and CLSI, the Kirby-Bauer disc diffusion method was used and results interpreted using the respective breakpoint guidelines. For the Stokes method, direct susceptibility testing was performed on the urine samples. RESULTS: The lowest levels of agreement were for amoxicillin-clavulanate (60%) and ciprofloxacin (89%) between the three AST methods, when using 2017 interpretive guidelines for CLSI and EUCAST. A comparison of EUCAST and CLSI without Stokes showed 82% agreement for amoxicillin-clavulanate and 94% agreement for ciprofloxacin. Discrepancies were compounded by varying breakpoint susceptibility guidelines issued during the period 2011-2017, and through the inclusion of a definition of intermediate susceptibility in some cases. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that the discrepancies generated through using different AST methods and different interpretive guidelines may result in confusion and inaccuracy when prescribing treatment for urinary tract infection.

Three-centre evaluation of laboratory Clostridium difficile detection algorithms and the EntericBio® realtime C. difficile assay.

The comparatively high cost of laboratory detection methods for Clostridium difficile infection (CDI) coupled to a low prevalence rate has resulted in testing algorithms that use cheaper and relatively sensitive screening methods, followed by more specific confirmatory methods. The aim of this prospectively-conducted study from two centres in the UK, and one in the Republic of Ireland was to determine the efficacy of the EntericBio® realtime C. difficile Assay (EBCD) for the detection of toxigenic C. difficile in stool samples. The EBCD was compared to the in-use testing methods for Clostridium difficile (CD) detection in each centre. In the two UK centres, the EBCD was compared to the C.diff Quik Chek Complete® kit (Techlab), and discrepancies were tested further using The Xpert®C. difficile PCR assay (Cepheid) and PCR ribotyping after cultivation using the spore culture method, respectively. In the Irish centre, EBCD comparison was to an algorithm of C. DIFF CHEK™-60 test (Techlab) for screening followed by C. difficile Premier ™ Toxins A&B assay (Meridian Bioscience®) in the case of positive results; discrepancies were tested using the Xpert®C. difficile PCR assay. In a retrospective analysis of data, a total of 947 stool samples were tested, of which eight (0.8%) proved inhibitory to the EBCD assay. Of the 939 valid tests conducted, reported sensitivities of the EBCD were 94.7%, 100% and 97.9%, respectively; specificities were 99.6%, 100% and 100%, respectively; positive predictive values were 94.7%, 100% and 100%, respectively, and negative predictive values were 99.6%, 100% and 99.8%, respectively. The CD positivity rates in the current study ranged between 6.6% and 8.2%.

Vancomycin-resistant enterococci carriage in an acute Irish hospital.

BACKGROUND: Ireland has been shown to have the highest rate of vancomycin-resistant enterococci (VRE) in cases of bacteraemia in Europe, according to a report in 2014 from the European Antimicrobial Resistance Surveillance System Network. AIM: To investigate the prevalence of VRE gut colonization in a cohort of patients in 2014 at Cork University Hospital (CUH) by performing a cross-sectional study using faecal samples submitted to the microbiology laboratory for routine investigation from both hospital inpatients and community-based patients. METHODS: Faeces were examined for VRE colonization using selective cultivation, antimicrobial susceptibility testing, and speciation using matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry. All VRE isolates were evaluated by molecular means for resistance determinants, type, and Insertion Sequence 16 as an indicator of Clonal Complex 17 (CC17). FINDINGS: From the 350 specimens investigated, 67 (19.1%) specimens were positive for VRE [95% confidence interval (CI): 15.0-23.2]. The prevalence of VRE colonization among CUH patients tested in this study (N = 194) was 31.4% (95% CI: 24.7-38.1). By contrast, the general practitioner patient samples (N=29) showed a prevalence of 0%, whereas 22.2% of samples from other hospitals (N=27) were positive for VRE. All isolates were Enterococcus faecium (VREfm) and were indicated to contain CC17, though with considerable heterogeneity among the isolates. CONCLUSION: This high prevalence goes some way towards providing an explanation for the current high rates of VRE bacteraemia in Ireland, as well as highlighting the benefits of screening and enhanced infection control practices by all hospitals to control the high rates of VRE observed.

Molecular epidemiology of Mycobacterium abscessus complex isolates in Ireland.

BACKGROUND: The Mycobacterium abscessus complex are the rapidly growing mycobacteria (RGM) most commonly causing lung disease, especially in cystic fibrosis (CF) patients. Ireland has the world's highest CF incidence. The molecular epidemiology of M. abscessus complex in Ireland is unreported. METHODS: We performed rpoB gene sequencing and multi-locus sequence typing (MLST) on M. abscessus complex strains isolated from thirty-six patients in 2006-2012 (eighteen known CF patients). RESULTS: Twenty-eight strains (78%) were M. abscessus subsp. abscessus, eight M. abscessus subsp. massiliense, none were M. abscessus subsp. bolletii. Sequence type 1 (ST1) and ST26 (M. abscessus subsp. abscessus) were commonest. Seven M. abscessus subsp. abscessus STs (25%) were novel (two with novel alleles). Seven M. abscessus subsp. massiliense STs were previously reported (88%), including two ST23, the globally successful clone. In 2012, of 552 CF patients screened, eleven were infected with M. abscessus complex strains (2%). CONCLUSIONS: The most prevalent M. abscessus subsp. abscessus and M. abscessus subsp. massiliense strains in Ireland belong to widely-distributed STs, but there is evidence of high M. abscessus subsp. abscessus diversity.

Mycobacterium diagnostics: from the primitive to the promising.

The field of clinical microbiology has been revolutionised by genomic and proteomic methods, which have facilitated more rapid diagnosis and characterisation of infection in many cases. In contrast, mycobacteriological evolution has tended to retain the traditional methods of smear microscopy for detection of acid-fast bacilli to indicate mycobacteria, along with culture, and in synergy with more modern molecular methods. Thus, efforts have been focused on reducing the time to diagnosis of infection, while increasing the amount of diagnostic information available, including more definitive speciation, and more rapid susceptibility test results. Although smear microscopy remains a mainstay for the laboratory-based diagnosis of mycobacterial infection, molecular testing has vastly reduced the time needed for identification of Mycobacterium tuberculosis in particular, when compared with traditional culture-based techniques. Molecular methods may also yield antimicrobial susceptibility results through testing for the most common resistance-inducing mutations to some of the antimicrobial agents of choice. However, the diversity of resistance mutations already characterised suggests that these currently-available molecular detection systems should be accompanied by culture-based susceptibility testing. This review compares the efficacy of microscopic, phenotypic, proteomic and genotypic methods available for mycobacterial diagnosis. The diversity of methods currently in use reflects the complexity of this area of diagnostic microbiology.

Detection and identification of gastrointestinal microsporidia using non-invasive techniques.

AIMS: To detect enteric microsporidia in faecal specimens from patients with the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS), and to identify the spores to species level without using invasive procedures. METHODS: Formalised faecal preparations were examined using a modification of the strong trichrome staining method to demonstrate microsporidian spores. Six positive specimens were prepared for electron microscopy by emulsification and separation using a 9% Ficoll gradient. RESULTS: The modified staining technique readily identified microsporidian spores. Spores of different species showed variation in size. Identification using electron microscopy was successful for five of the six positive specimens examined. It was unsuccessful for one specimen in which spores were less abundant on initial staining. CONCLUSIONS: The modified strong trichrome staining method is a useful way of detecting spores of intestinal microsporidia in faecal specimens. Variation in spore size may permit provisional identification by light microscopy. Electron microscopic examination of faecal preparations is useful for identifying spores to species level.

Neonatal osteomyelitis in Down's syndrome due to non-encapsulated Haemophilus influenzae.

A case of neonatal osteomyelitis in a baby with Down's syndrome is described. The causative organism was a non-encapsulated Haemophilus influenzae biotype I, which was isolated from pus at the site of infection. This organism has not previously been reported as a cause of neonatal osteomyelitis.