Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 20 de 70
Filter
1.
Adv Rheumatol ; 62(1): 3, 2022 01 17.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35039077

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To provide guidelines on the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRD) to rheumatologists considering specific scenarios of the daily practice based on the shared-making decision (SMD) process. METHODS: A task force was constituted by 24 rheumatologists (panel members), with clinical and research expertise in immunizations and infectious diseases in immunocompromised patients, endorsed by the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology (BSR), to develop guidelines for COVID-19 vaccination in patients with IMRD. A consensus was built through the Delphi method and involved four rounds of anonymous voting, where five options were used to determine the level of agreement (LOA), based on the Likert Scale: (1) strongly disagree; (2) disagree, (3) neither agree nor disagree (neutral); (4) agree; and (5) strongly agree. Nineteen questions were addressed and discussed via teleconference to formulate the answers. In order to identify the relevant data on COVID-19 vaccines, a search with standardized descriptors and synonyms was performed on September 10th, 2021, of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and LILACS to identify studies of interest. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to assess the quality of nonrandomized studies. RESULTS: All the nineteen questions-answers (Q&A) were approved by the BSR Task Force with more than 80% of panelists voting options 4-agree-and 5-strongly agree-, and a consensus was reached. These Guidelines were focused in SMD on the most appropriate timing for IMRD patients to get vaccinated to reach the adequate covid-19 vaccination response. CONCLUSION: These guidelines were developed by a BSR Task Force with a high LOA among panelists, based on the literature review of published studies and expert opinion for COVID-19 vaccination in IMRD patients. Noteworthy, in the pandemic period, up to the time of the review and the consensus process for this document, high-quality evidence was scarce. Thus, it is not a substitute for clinical judgment.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Rheumatic Diseases , Vaccination/methods , COVID-19 Vaccines , Humans , Rheumatology , SARS-CoV-2
2.
Adv Rheumatol ; 62: 3, 2022. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1360070

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objective: To provide guidelines on the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic diseases (IMRD) to rheumatologists considering specific scenarios of the daily practice based on the shared-making decision (SMD) process. Methods: A task force was constituted by 24 rheumatologists (panel members), with clinical and research expertise in immunizations and infectious diseases in immunocompromised patients, endorsed by the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology (BSR), to develop guidelines for COVID-19 vaccination in patients with IMRD. A consensus was built through the Delphi method and involved four rounds of anonymous voting, where five options were used to determine the level of agreement (LOA), based on the Likert Scale: (1) strongly disagree; (2) disagree, (3) neither agree nor disagree (neutral); (4) agree; and (5) strongly agree. Nineteen questions were addressed and discussed via teleconference to formulate the answers. In order to identify the relevant data on COVID-19 vaccines, a search with standardized descriptors and synonyms was performed on September 10th, 2021, of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and LILACS to identify studies of interest. We used the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale to assess the quality of nonrandomized studies. Results: All the nineteen questions-answers (Q&A) were approved by the BSR Task Force with more than 80% of panelists voting options 4—agree—and 5—strongly agree—, and a consensus was reached. These Guidelines were focused in SMD on the most appropriate timing for IMRD patients to get vaccinated to reach the adequate covid-19 vaccination response. Conclusion: These guidelines were developed by a BSR Task Force with a high LOA among panelists, based on the literature review of published studies and expert opinion for COVID-19 vaccination in IMRD patients. Noteworthy, in the pandemic period, up to the time of the review and the consensus process for this document, high-quality evidence was scarce. Thus, it is not a substitute for clinical judgment.

3.
J Clin Rheumatol ; 26(2): 73-78, 2020 Mar.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32073519

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The safety profile of biologic drugs might present substantial regional differences. Since 2009, the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology has maintained BIOBADABRASIL (Brazilian Registry for Biologic Drugs), a registry for monitoring of biologic therapies in rheumatic diseases. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to verify the incidence rate (IR) of serious infections in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients on biologic drugs. METHODS: BIOBADABRASIL prospectively included patients with rheumatic diseases who started the first biologic drug or a synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drug as a parallel control group. This study focuses on serious infectious adverse events (SIAEs) in RA and SpA patients on biologic drugs compared with controls, from January 2009 to June 2015. Time of exposure was set from initiation of the drug to the date of last administration or censorship. Serious infectious adverse events IR was calculated per 1000 patient/years with 95% confidence interval (CI). RESULTS: A total of 1698 patients (RA, 1121; SpA, 577) were included, 7119 patient/years. Serious infectious adverse events were more common among patients on tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (TNFi's) than controls (adjusted IR ratio, 2.96 [95% CI, 2.01-4.36]; p < 0.001). Subsequent TNFi was associated with a higher SIAEs incidence when compared with first TNFI (adjusted IR ratio, 1.55 [95% CI, 1.15-2.08]; p = 0.004). Serious infectious adverse events were associated with age and corticosteroids intake. Serious infectious adverse events were more frequent in the respiratory tract in all subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In BIOBADABRASIL, biologic drugs, especially the subsequent TNFi, were associated with a higher risk of serious infections compared with synthetic DMARDs. Corticosteroid intake and age represented risk factors for SIAEs. Constant monitoring is required to follow the safety profile of drugs in the clinical setting of rheumatic conditions in Brazil.


Subject(s)
Antirheumatic Agents , Arthritis, Rheumatoid , Biological Products , Spondylarthritis , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/diagnosis , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/epidemiology , Biological Products/adverse effects , Brazil/epidemiology , Humans , Incidence , Registries , Spondylarthritis/diagnosis , Spondylarthritis/drug therapy , Spondylarthritis/epidemiology , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/therapeutic use
4.
Adv Rheumatol ; 59(1): 17, 2019 04 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31036077

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In Brazil, we are facing an alarming epidemic scenario of Yellow fever (YF), which is reaching the most populous areas of the country in unvaccinated people. Vaccination is the only effective tool to prevent YF. In special situations, such as patients with chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (CIMID), undergoing immunosuppressive therapy, as a higher risk of severe adverse events may occur, assessment of the risk-benefit ratio of the yellow fever vaccine (YFV) should be performed on an individual level. Faced with the scarcity of specific orientation on YFV for this special group of patients, the Brazilian Rheumatology Society (BRS) endorsed a project aiming the development of individualized YFV recommendations for patients with CIMID, guided by questions addressed by both medical professionals and patients, followed an internationally validated methodology (GIN-McMaster Guideline Development). Firstly, a systematic review was carried out and an expert panel formed to take part of the decision process, comprising BRS clinical practitioners, as well as individuals from the Brazilian Dermatology Society (BDS), Brazilian Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Study Group (GEDIIB), and specialists on infectious diseases and vaccination (from Tropical Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Immunizations National Societies); in addition, two representatives of patient groups were included as members of the panel. When the quality of the evidence was low or there was a lack of evidence to determine the recommendations, the decisions were based on the expert opinion panel and a Delphi approach was performed. A recommendation was accepted upon achieving ≥80% agreement among the panel, including the patient representatives. As a result, eight recommendations were developed regarding the safety of YFV in patients with CIMID, considering the immunosuppression degree conferred by the treatment used. It was not possible to establish recommendations on the effectiveness of YFV in these patients as there is no consistent evidence to support these recommendations. CONCLUSION: This paper approaches a real need, assessed by clinicians and patient care groups, to address specific questions on the management of YFV in patients with CIMID living or traveling to YF endemic areas, involving specialists from many areas together with patients, and might have global applicability, contributing to and supporting vaccination practices. We recommended a shared decision-making approach on taking or not the YFV.


Subject(s)
Immune System Diseases/drug therapy , Immunocompromised Host , Immunosuppressive Agents/therapeutic use , Inflammation/drug therapy , Yellow Fever Vaccine/adverse effects , Yellow Fever/prevention & control , Chronic Disease , Contraindications, Drug , Decision Making, Shared , Delphi Technique , Humans , Immune System Diseases/immunology , Inflammation/immunology , Risk Assessment , Vaccination/adverse effects , Yellow Fever Vaccine/administration & dosage
5.
Clin Rheumatol ; 38(8): 2129-2139, 2019 Aug.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31016578

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Most reports on serious infections (SI) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) are from the USA and Western Europe. Data from other regions are largely missing. We report data from South American countries with different backgrounds and health-care systems but similar registries. METHODS: We merged 2010-2016 data from two registries, BIOBADABRASIL (Brazil) and BIOBADASAR (Argentina), which share the same protocol, online platform and data monitoring process. Patients with active RA were included when they began the first bDMARD or a conventional synthetic DMARD (csDMARD, control group). The SI incidence rate (IR) per 1000 patient/years and adjusted IR ratio (aIRR) were estimated for bDMARDs and csDMARDs. RESULTS: Data were analysed for 3717 RA patients with an exposure of 13,380 patient/years. The 2591 patients treated with bDMARDs (64% tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitors (TNFi)) had a follow-up of 9300 years, and the 1126 treated with csDMARDs had an exposure of 4081 patient/years. The SI IR was 30.54 (CI 27.18-34.30) for all bDMARDs and 5.15 (CI 3.36-7.89) for csDMARDs. The aIRR between the two groups was 2.03 ([1.05, 3.9] p = 0.034) for the first 6 months of treatment but subsequently increased to 8.26 ([4.32, 15.76] p < 0.001). The SI IR for bDMARDs decreased over time in both registries, dropping from 36.59 (28.41-47.12) in 2012 to 7.27 (4.79-11.05) in 2016. CONCLUSION: While SI remains a major concern in South American patients with RA treated with bDMARDs, a favourable trend toward a reduction was observed in the last years.Key Points• New comprehensive data on biologic drugs safety from international collaboration in South America.• First proposal for national registries data merging in South America.• Serious infections remain a major concern in RA patients treated with biologics.• A significant reduction of serious infections in RA patients exposed to biologics was observed over a 7 years period.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/therapy , Biological Products/adverse effects , Infections/etiology , Adult , Aged , Antirheumatic Agents/adverse effects , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/epidemiology , Brazil , Female , Humans , Incidence , Infections/epidemiology , Infectious Disease Medicine/trends , Male , Middle Aged , Registries , Risk Factors , South America/epidemiology , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors
6.
Adv. rheumatol ; 59(1): 17, Apr. 2019. ilus, tab
Article in English | Sec. Est. Saúde SP, SESSP-IIERPROD, Sec. Est. Saúde SP | ID: biblio-1017123

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: In Brazil, we are facing an alarming epidemic scenario of Yellow fever (YF), which is reaching the most populous areas of the country in unvaccinated people. Vaccination is the only effective tool to prevent YF. In special situations, such as patients with chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (CIMID), undergoing immunosuppressive therapy, as a higher risk of severe adverse events may occur, assessment of the risk-benefit ratio of the yellow fever vaccine (YFV) should be performed on an individual level. Faced with the scarcity of specific orientation on YFV for this special group of patients, the Brazilian Rheumatology Society (BRS) endorsed a project aiming the development of individualized YFV recommendations for patients with CIMID, guided by questions addressed by both medical professionals and patients, followed an internationally validated methodology (GIN-McMaster Guideline Development). Firstly, a systematic review was carried out and an expert panel formed to take part of the decision process, comprising BRS clinical practitioners, as well as individuals from the Brazilian Dermatology Society (BDS), Brazilian Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Study Group (GEDIIB), and specialists on infectious diseases and vaccination (from Tropical Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Immunizations National Societies); in addition, two representatives of patient groups were included as members of the panel. When the quality of the evidence was low or there was a lack of evidence to determine the recommendations, the decisions were based on the expert opinion panel and a Delphi approach was performed. A recommendation was accepted upon achieving >/=80% agreement among the panel, including the patient representatives. As a result, eight recommendations were developed regarding the safety of YFV in patients with CIMID, considering the immunosuppression degree conferred by the treatment used. It was not possible to establish recommendations on the effectiveness of YFV in these patients as there is no consistent evidence to support these recommendations. CONCLUSION: This paper approaches a real need, assessed by clinicians and patient care groups, to address specific questions on the management of YFV in patients with CIMID living or traveling to YF endemic areas, involving specialists from many areas together with patients, and might have global applicability, contributing to and supporting Vaccination practices. We recommended a shared decision-making approach on taking or not the YFV


Subject(s)
Yellow Fever , Vaccination/standards , eHealth Strategies
7.
Int. j. cardiovasc. sci. (Impr.) ; 32(1): 10-18, jan.-fev. 2019. tab, graf
Article in Portuguese | LILACS | ID: biblio-981520

ABSTRACT

Background: Cardiovascular diseases are a major cause of morbidity and mortality today. Despite its wide distribution, it presents particularly prevalent in certain groups of individuals, particularly when exposed to a higher degree of inflammation, giving increased cardiovascular risk. Rheumatic diseases expose their holders to this increased cardiovascular risk condition; however only recently have been associated with spondyloarthritis, particularly ankylosing spondylitis (AS). For being a classically autoimmune disease related to HLA histocompatibility system, AS may present phenotypic variations in different ethnic groups with possible diverse cardiovascular consequences. Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of cardiovascular disease (CVD) and the cardiovascular risk profile, correlating the time since diagnosis and activity of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) in patients from the rheumatology outpatient clinic of the UFMS-affiliated hospital. Methods: Of 55 patients with AS, 42 were selected consecutively and compared to a control group (CG) in a cross-sectional study. Patients with diabetes, indigenous background and pregnant women were excluded. Quantitative variables were assessed by use of Student t test, while qualitative variables, by chi-square test. The patients underwent electrocardiography, echocardiography and carotid Doppler examination, measurement of serum lipid levels and inflammatory markers, and were stratified according to global cardiovascular risk. The AS activity and impairment were evaluated by use of the BASMI, BASDAI, BASFI and ASDAS. Results: Mean age, 42.87 ± 12.37 years; time since AS diagnosis, 10.76 ± 8.74 years. There was no difference in cardiovascular risk stratification between the groups, most of the patients being at high or moderate risk (AS: 64.3%, and CG: 52%, p = 0.134). The prevalence of manifest CVD (2%) showed no difference between the groups, except for right bundle-branch block (AS: 14%, and CG: 2%, p = 0.027). The prevalence of subclinical CVD showed no difference between the groups, except for higher carotid medial-intimal thickness (CIMT) in the AS group (AS: 1.82 ± 2.63, and CG: 0.67 ± 0.16, p = 0.018). There was no correlation between AS activity or inflammatory markers and CVD, but with time since AS diagnosis and CIMT (p = 0.039, r = 0.328). Conclusions: Prevalence of CVD and risk factors was similar in the groups. Subclinical atherosclerosis degree was higher in the AS group, related to the time since diagnosis, but was independent of the cardiovascular risk factors or inflammation. Most patients with AS are at high cardiovascular risk


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Outpatients , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/complications , Spondylitis, Ankylosing/diagnosis , Cardiovascular Diseases , Rheumatic Diseases , Echocardiography/methods , Carotid Arteries , Body Mass Index , Prevalence , Data Interpretation, Statistical , Risk Factors , Metabolic Syndrome , Diabetes Mellitus , Electrocardiography/methods , Atherosclerosis , Hypertension , Cholesterol, HDL , Cholesterol, LDL
8.
J Med Virol ; 91(2): 317-325, 2019 02.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30192406

ABSTRACT

Infection with human papillomavirus (HPV) is the main cause of cervical cancer. Viral persistence is considered the main risk factor for neoplastic progression and evidence suggests that regulatory T cells (Treg) play an important role in the failure of viral elimination. The aim of this study was to detect phenotypic markers of Treg and cytokines interleukin (IL)-10 and transforming growth factor (TGF)-ß, in the cervical microenvironment of HPV-infected patients. One hundred and one samples of uterine cervix embedded in paraffin were analyzed. We used immunohistochemistry to examine the coexpression of the CD25/FOXP3 and CD4/TGF-ß markers, and the expression of GITR and IL-10 in cells present in the cervical stroma. We detected a microenvironment composed of high proportions of CD25+ FOXP3+ , CD4+ TGFß+ , IL-10+ , and GITR+ cells in samples with high viral loads and severe lesions of HPV-infected patients. The abundance of these markers, indicative of the presence of Treg cells and immunosuppressive cytokines, was significantly associated with severe lesions and elevated viral loads in the examined samples. These results suggest that Treg cells may be involved in maintaining a microenvironment favorable for viral persistence and neoplastic progression. Our findings support those of previous studies that suggested that these markers could be used to predict HPV persistence and neoplastic progression, and as potential targets for immune response modulation.


Subject(s)
Cervix Uteri/pathology , Cytokines/analysis , Papillomavirus Infections/pathology , T-Lymphocyte Subsets/chemistry , T-Lymphocyte Subsets/immunology , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/chemistry , T-Lymphocytes, Regulatory/immunology , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Cervix Uteri/virology , Female , Humans , Middle Aged , Papillomaviridae/immunology , Papillomavirus Infections/virology , Viral Load , Young Adult
9.
Adv Rheumatol ; 59: 17, 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1088607

ABSTRACT

Abstract Background: In Brazil, we are facing an alarming epidemic scenario of Yellow fever (YF), which is reaching the most populous areas of the country in unvaccinated people. Vaccination is the only effective tool to prevent YF. In special situations, such as patients with chronic immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (CIMID), undergoing immunosuppressive therapy, as a higher risk of severe adverse events may occur, assessment of the risk-benefit ratio of the yellow fever vaccine (YFV) should be performed on an individual level. Main body of the abstract: Faced with the scarcity of specific orientation on YFV for this special group of patients, the Brazilian Rheumatology Society (BRS) endorsed a project aiming the development of individualized YFV recommendations for patients with CIMID, guided by questions addressed by both medical professionals and patients, followed an internationally validated methodology (GIN-McMaster Guideline Development). Firstly, a systematic review was carried out and an expert panel formed to take part of the decision process, comprising BRS clinical practitioners, as well as individuals from the Brazilian Dermatology Society (BDS), Brazilian Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Study Group (GEDIIB), and specialists on infectious diseases and vaccination (from Tropical Medicine, Infectious Diseases and Immunizations National Societies); in addition, two representatives of patient groups were included as members of the panel. When the quality of the evidence was low or there was a lack of evidence to determine the recommendations, the decisions were based on the expert opinion panel and a Delphi approach was performed. A recommendation was accepted upon achieving ≥80% agreement among the panel, including the patient representatives. As a result, eight recommendations were developed regarding the safety of YFV in patients with CIMID, considering the immunosuppression degree conferred by the treatment used. It was not possible to establish recommendations on the effectiveness of YFV in these patients as there is no consistent evidence to support these recommendations. Conclusion: This paper approaches a real need, assessed by clinicians and patient care groups, to address specific questions on the management of YFV in patients with CIMID living or traveling to YF endemic areas, involving specialists from many areas together with patients, and might have global applicability, contributing to and supporting vaccination practices. We recommended a shared decision-making approach on taking or not the YFV.


Subject(s)
Humans , Yellow Fever/prevention & control , Chronic Disease , Yellow Fever Vaccine/administration & dosage , Brazil/epidemiology , Efficacy/standards , Treatment Outcome
10.
Rev Bras Reumatol Engl Ed ; 57 Suppl 2: 421-437, 2017.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28751131

ABSTRACT

Chikungunya fever has become a relevant public health problem in countries where epidemics occur. Until 2013, only imported cases occurred in the Americas, but in October of that year, the first cases were reported in Saint Marin island in the Caribbean. The first autochthonous cases were confirmed in Brazil in September 2014; until epidemiological week 37 of 2016, 236,287 probable cases of infection with Chikungunya virus had been registered, 116,523 of which had serological confirmation. Environmental changes caused by humans, disorderly urban growth and an ever-increasing number of international travelers were described as the factors responsible for the emergence of large-scale epidemics. Clinically characterized by fever and joint pain in the acute stage, approximately half of patients progress to the chronic stage (beyond 3 months), which is accompanied by persistent and disabling pain. The aim of the present study was to formulate recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of Chikungunya fever in Brazil. A literature review was performed in the MEDLINE, SciELO and PubMed databases to ground the decisions for recommendations. The degree of concordance among experts was established through the Delphi method, involving 2 in-person meetings and several online voting rounds. In total, 25 recommendations were formulated and divided into 3 thematic groups: (1) clinical, laboratory and imaging diagnosis; (2) special situations; and (3) treatment. The first 2 themes are presented in part 1, and treatment is presented in part 2.


Subject(s)
Chikungunya Fever/diagnosis , Brazil , Chikungunya Fever/physiopathology , Chikungunya Fever/therapy , Consensus , Delphi Technique , Female , Humans , Male , Pregnancy , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/therapy , Rheumatology , Societies, Medical
11.
Rev Bras Reumatol Engl Ed ; 57 Suppl 2: 438-451, 2017.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28739354

ABSTRACT

Chikungunya fever has become an important public health problem in countries where epidemics occur because half of the cases progress to chronic, persistent and debilitating arthritis. Literature data on specific therapies at the various phases of arthropathy caused by chikungunya virus (CHIKV) infection are limited, lacking quality randomized trials assessing the efficacies of different therapies. There are a few studies on the treatment of musculoskeletal manifestations of chikungunya fever, but these studies have important methodological limitations. The data currently available preclude conclusions favorable or contrary to specific therapies, or an adequate comparison between the different drugs used. The objective of this study was to develop recommendations for the treatment of chikungunya fever in Brazil. A literature review was performed via evidence-based selection of articles in the databases Medline, SciELO, PubMed and Embase and conference proceedings abstracts, in addition to expert opinions to support decision-making in defining recommendations. The Delphi method was used to define the degrees of agreement in 2 face-to-face meetings and several online voting rounds. This study is part 2 of the Recommendations of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology (Sociedade Brasileira de Reumatologia - SBR) for the Diagnosis and Treatment of chikungunya fever and specifically addresses treatment.


Subject(s)
Chikungunya Fever/drug therapy , Brazil , Chikungunya Fever/diagnosis , Chikungunya Fever/rehabilitation , Consensus , Delphi Technique , Disease Progression , Humans , Physical Therapy Modalities , Rheumatology , Societies, Medical
12.
Rev Bras Reumatol Engl Ed ; 57 Suppl 2: 477-483, 2017.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28739353

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To assess the incidence of tuberculosis and to screen for latent tuberculosis infection among Brazilians with rheumatoid arthritis using biologics in clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This cohort study used data from the Brazilian Registry of Biological Therapies in Rheumatic Diseases (Registro Brasileiro de Monitoração de Terapias Biológicas - BiobadaBrasil), from 01/2009 to 05/2013, encompassing 1552 treatments, including 415 with only synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, 942 synthetic DMARDs combined with anti-tumor necrosis factor (etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab) and 195 synthetic DMARDs combined with other biologics (abatacept, rituximab and tocilizumab). The occurrence of tuberculosis and the drug exposure time were assessed, and screening for tuberculosis was performed. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Unpaired t-test and Fisher's two-tailed test; p<0.05. RESULTS: The exposure times were 981 patient-years in the controls, 1744 patient-years in the anti-TNF group (adalimumab=676, infliximab=547 and etanercept=521 patient-years) and 336 patient-years in the other biologics group. The incidence rates of tuberculosis were 1.01/1000 patient-years in the controls and 2.87 patient-years among anti-TNF users (adalimumab=4.43/1000 patient-years; etanercept=1.92/1000 patient-years and infliximab=1.82/1000 patient-years). No cases of tuberculosis occurred in the other biologics group. The mean drug exposure time until the occurrence of tuberculosis was 27(11) months for the anti-TNF group. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of tuberculosis was higher among users of synthetic DMARDs and anti-TNF than among users of synthetic DMARDs and synthetic DMARDs and non-anti-TNF biologics and also occurred later, suggesting infection during treatment and no screening failure.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Biological Factors/therapeutic use , Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor/therapeutic use , Tuberculosis/chemically induced , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/therapeutic use , Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Brazil/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Cohort Studies , Etanercept/therapeutic use , Incidence , Infliximab/therapeutic use , Registries , Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors
13.
Rev Bras Reumatol Engl Ed ; 57(6): 641-645, 2017.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28579253

ABSTRACT

We aimed to detect DNA of Borrelia burgdorferi in whole blood and serum samples of patients with clinical symptoms and epidemiology compatible with Brazilian Lyme-like disease. Four patients with positive epidemiological histories were recruited for the study. Blood samples were collected, screened by serologic testing by ELISA and Western blotting and molecular identification of B. burgdorferi by amplifying a fragment of the conserved gene that synthesizes the hook flagellar flgE. The results showed positive serology and for the first time, the presence of B. burgdorferi sensu lato in humans in the Midwest region of Brazil. The resulting sequences were similar to GenBank corresponding sequences of B. burgdorferi flgE gene. By neighbor-joining the phylogenetic analysis, the flgE sequence of the Brazilian strain clustered in a monophyletic group with the sequence of B. burgdorferi sensu lato under 100% bootstrap support. This study opens up promising perspectives and reinforces the need for additional studies to determine the epidemiological characteristics of the disease, as well as the impact of the prevalence of Brazilian borreliosis in Mato Grosso do Sul State, Brazil.


Subject(s)
Borrelia burgdorferi/isolation & purification , Lyme Disease/blood , Adult , Bacterial Proteins/genetics , Blotting, Western , Brazil/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay , Female , Humans , Lyme Disease/diagnosis , Male , Middle Aged , Polymerase Chain Reaction/methods , Young Adult
14.
Rev. bras. reumatol ; 57(2): 107-114, Mar.-Apr. 2017. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-844224

ABSTRACT

Abstract Introduction: Systemic sclerosis is an autoimmune disease which shows extreme heterogeneity in its clinical presentation and that follows a variable and unpredictable course. Although some discrepancies in the incidence and prevalence rates between geographical regions may reflect methodological differences in the definition and verification of cases, they may also reflect true local differences. Objectives: To determine the prevalence and incidence of systemic sclerosis in the city of Campo Grande, state capital of Mato Grosso do Sul (MS), Brazil, during the period from January to December 2014. Methods: All health care services of the city of Campo Grande – MS with attending in the specialty of Rheumatology were invited to participate in the study through a standardized form of clinical and socio-demographic assessment. Physicians of any specialty could report a suspected case of systemic sclerosis, but necessarily the definitive diagnosis should be established by a rheumatologist, in order to warrant the standardization of diagnostic criteria and exclusion of other diseases resembling systemic sclerosis. At the end of the study, 15 rheumatologists reported that they attended patients with systemic sclerosis and sent the completed forms containing epidemiological data of patients. Results: The incidence rate of systemic sclerosis in Campo Grande for the year 2014 was 11.9 per million inhabitants and the prevalence rate was 105.6 per million inhabitants. Systemic sclerosis patients were mostly women, white, with a mean age of 50.58 years, showing the limited form of the disease with a mean duration of the disease of 8.19 years. Regarding laboratory tests, 94.4% were positive for antinuclear antibody, 41.6% for anti-centromere antibody and 19.1% for anti-Scl70; anti-RNA Polymerase III was performed in 37 patients, with 16.2% positive. Conclusions: The city of Campo Grande, the state capital of MS, presented a lower incidence/prevalence of systemic sclerosis in comparison with those numbers found in US studies and close to European studies’ data.


Resumo Introdução: A esclerose sistêmica (ES) é uma enfermidade autoimune, extremamente heterogênea na sua apresentação clínica e segue um curso variável e imprevisível. Embora algumas discrepâncias nas taxas de incidência e prevalência entre regiões possam refletir as diferenças metodológicas na definição e verificação dos casos, elas também podem refletir as verdadeiras diferenças locais. Objetivos: Conhecer a prevalência e incidência da ES na cidade de Campo Grande, capital do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul (MS), Brasil, de janeiro a dezembro de 2014. Métodos: Todos os serviços de saúde de Campo Grande (MS) que tinham atendimentos na especialidade de reumatologia foram convidados a participar do estudo por meio de ficha padronizada de avaliação clínica e sociodemográfica. Médicos de qualquer especialidade poderiam reportar um caso suspeito de ES, mas obrigatoriamente o diagnóstico definitivo deveria ser feito por um reumatologista, para garantir a padronização dos critérios diagnósticos e excluir outras doenças que se assemelham à ES. No fim do estudo 15 reumatologistas relataram ter atendido pacientes com diagnóstico de ES e enviaram os formulários preenchidos com os dados epidemiológicos dos pacientes. Resultados: A taxa de incidência de ES em Campo Grande em 2014 foi de 11,9 por milhão/habitantes e a de prevalência foi de 105,6 por milhão/habitantes. Os pacientes com ES eram principalmente mulheres, da cor branca, média de 50,58 anos, forma limitada da doença e tempo de evolução médio da doença de 8,19 anos. Em relação aos exames laboratoriais, observou-se a positividade de 94,4% para o ANA, 41,6% para ACA e 19,1% para anti-Scl70, o anticorpo anti-POL3 foi feito em apenas 37 pacientes, com positividade de 16,2%. Conclusões: A capital do Estado de Mato Grosso do Sul, Campo Grande, apresentou dados de incidência e prevalência de ES inferiores aos encontrados em estudos americanos e próximos aos dados observados em estudos europeus.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Aged , Scleroderma, Systemic/epidemiology , Scleroderma, Systemic/therapy , Brazil/epidemiology , Incidence , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Sex Distribution , Diagnosis, Differential , Rheumatologists/statistics & numerical data , Middle Aged
15.
Rev Bras Reumatol Engl Ed ; 57(2): 107-114, 2017.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28343614

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Systemic sclerosis is an autoimmune disease which shows extreme heterogeneity in its clinical presentation and that follows a variable and unpredictable course. Although some discrepancies in the incidence and prevalence rates between geographical regions may reflect methodological differences in the definition and verification of cases, they may also reflect true local differences. OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and incidence of systemic sclerosis in the city of Campo Grande, state capital of Mato Grosso do Sul (MS), Brazil, during the period from January to December 2014. METHODS: All health care services of the city of Campo Grande - MS with attending in the specialty of Rheumatology were invited to participate in the study through a standardized form of clinical and socio-demographic assessment. Physicians of any specialty could report a suspected case of systemic sclerosis, but necessarily the definitive diagnosis should be established by a rheumatologist, in order to warrant the standardization of diagnostic criteria and exclusion of other diseases resembling systemic sclerosis. At the end of the study, 15 rheumatologists reported that they attended patients with systemic sclerosis and sent the completed forms containing epidemiological data of patients. RESULTS: The incidence rate of systemic sclerosis in Campo Grande for the year 2014 was 11.9 per million inhabitants and the prevalence rate was 105.6 per million inhabitants. Systemic sclerosis patients were mostly women, white, with a mean age of 50.58 years, showing the limited form of the disease with a mean duration of the disease of 8.19 years. Regarding laboratory tests, 94.4% were positive for antinuclear antibody, 41.6% for anti-centromere antibody and 19.1% for anti-Scl70; anti-RNA Polymerase III was performed in 37 patients, with 16.2% positive. CONCLUSIONS: The city of Campo Grande, the state capital of MS, presented a lower incidence/prevalence of systemic sclerosis in comparison with those numbers found in US studies and close to European studies' data.


Subject(s)
Scleroderma, Systemic/epidemiology , Adult , Aged , Brazil/epidemiology , Diagnosis, Differential , Female , Humans , Incidence , Male , Middle Aged , Prevalence , Prospective Studies , Rheumatologists/statistics & numerical data , Scleroderma, Systemic/therapy , Sex Distribution
16.
Rev. bras. reumatol ; 57(supl.2): s477-s483, 2017. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-899483

ABSTRACT

Abstract Objectives To assess the incidence of tuberculosis and to screen for latent tuberculosis infection among Brazilians with rheumatoid arthritis using biologics in clinical practice. Patients and methods This cohort study used data from the Brazilian Registry of Biological Therapies in Rheumatic Diseases (Registro Brasileiro de Monitoração de Terapias Biológicas - BiobadaBrasil), from 01/2009 to 05/2013, encompassing 1552 treatments, including 415 with only synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs, 942 synthetic DMARDs combined with anti-tumor necrosis factor (etanercept, infliximab, adalimumab) and 195 synthetic DMARDs combined with other biologics (abatacept, rituximab and tocilizumab). The occurrence of tuberculosis and the drug exposure time were assessed, and screening for tuberculosis was performed. Statistical analysis: Unpaired t-test and Fisher's two-tailed test; p < 0.05. Results The exposure times were 981 patient-years in the controls, 1744 patient-years in the anti-TNF group (adalimumab = 676, infliximab = 547 and etanercept = 521 patient-years) and 336 patient-years in the other biologics group. The incidence rates of tuberculosis were 1.01/1000 patient-years in the controls and 2.87 patient-years among anti-TNF users (adalimumab = 4.43/1000 patient-years; etanercept = 1.92/1000 patient-years and infliximab = 1.82/1000 patient-years). No cases of tuberculosis occurred in the other biologics group. The mean drug exposure time until the occurrence of tuberculosis was 27(11) months for the anti-TNF group. Conclusions The incidence of tuberculosis was higher among users of synthetic DMARDs and anti-TNF than among users of synthetic DMARDs and synthetic DMARDs and non-anti-TNF biologics and also occurred later, suggesting infection during treatment and no screening failure.


Resumo Objetivos Avaliar incidência de tuberculose e triagem para tuberculose latente em brasileiros com artrite reumatoide em uso de agentes biológicos na prática clinica. Pacientes e métodos Estudo de coorte com dados do Registro Brasileiro de Monitoração de Terapias Biológicas (BiobadaBrasil), de 01/2009 a 05/2013, abrangeu 1.552 tratamentos, 415 somente com drogas modificadoras do curso da doença (MMCDs) sintéticas, 942 MMCDs sintéticas em associação com anti-TNF (etanercepte, infliximabe, adalimumabe) e 195 MMCDs sintéticas em associação com outros biológicos (abatacepte, rituximabe e tocilizumabe). Avaliaram-se ocorrência de tuberculose, tempo de exposição às drogas e triagem para TB. Análise estatística: teste t não pareado e teste de Fisher bicaudal; p < 0,05. Resultados O tempo de exposição dos controles foi de 981 pacientes-ano, do grupo de anti-TNF foi de 1.744 pacientes-ano (adalimumabe = 676, infliximabe = 547 e etanercepte = 521 pacientes-ano) e o de outros biológicos de 336 pacientes-ano. A incidência de TB foi de 1,01/1.000 pacientes-ano nos controles e de 2,87 pacientes-ano nos usuários de anti-TNF (adalimumabe = 4,43/1.000 pacientes-ano; etanercepte = 1,92/1.000 pacientes-ano e infliximabe = 1,82/1.000 pacientes-ano). Não houve casos de tuberculose no grupo de outros biológicos. O tempo médio de exposição até a ocorrência de tuberculose foi de 27(11) meses para o grupo anti-TNF. Conclusões A incidência de tuberculose foi maior nos usuários de MMCDs sintéticas e anti-TNF do que nos usuários de MMCDs sintéticas e de MMCDs sintéticas e biológicos não anti-TNF, e também mais tardia, sugerindo infecção durante o tratamento, e não falha na triagem.


Subject(s)
Arthritis, Rheumatoid/drug therapy , Tuberculosis/chemically induced , Biological Factors/therapeutic use , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/therapeutic use , Receptors, Tumor Necrosis Factor/therapeutic use , Tuberculosis/epidemiology , Brazil/epidemiology , Case-Control Studies , Registries , Incidence , Cohort Studies , Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha/antagonists & inhibitors , Adalimumab/therapeutic use , Infliximab/therapeutic use , Etanercept/therapeutic use
17.
Rev. bras. reumatol ; 57(supl.2): s421-s437, 2017. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-899486

ABSTRACT

Abstract Chikungunya fever has become a relevant public health problem in countries where epidemics occur. Until 2013, only imported cases occurred in the Americas, but in October of that year, the first cases were reported in Saint Marin island in the Caribbean. The first autochthonous cases were confirmed in Brazil in September 2014; until epidemiological week 37 of 2016, 236,287 probable cases of infection with Chikungunya virus had been registered, 116,523 of which had serological confirmation. Environmental changes caused by humans, disorderly urban growth and an ever-increasing number of international travelers were described as the factors responsible for the emergence of large-scale epidemics. Clinically characterized by fever and joint pain in the acute stage, approximately half of patients progress to the chronic stage (beyond 3 months), which is accompanied by persistent and disabling pain. The aim of the present study was to formulate recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of Chikungunya fever in Brazil. A literature review was performed in the MEDLINE, SciELO and PubMed databases to ground the decisions for recommendations. The degree of concordance among experts was established through the Delphi method, involving 2 in-person meetings and several online voting rounds. In total, 25 recommendations were formulated and divided into 3 thematic groups: (1) clinical, laboratory and imaging diagnosis; (2) special situations; and (3) treatment. The first 2 themes are presented in part 1, and treatment is presented in part 2.


Resumo A febre chikungunya tem se tornado um importante problema de saúde pública nos países onde ocorrem as epidemias. Até 2013, as Américas haviam registrado apenas casos importados quando, em outubro desse mesmo ano, foram notificados os primeiros casos na Ilha de Saint Martin, no Caribe. No Brasil, os primeiros relatos autóctones foram confirmados em setembro de 2014 e até a semana epidemiológica 37 de 2016 já haviam sido registrados 236.287 casos prováveis de infecção pelo chikungunya vírus (CHIKV), 116.523 confirmados sorologicamente. As mudanças ambientais causadas pelo homem, o crescimento urbano desordenado e o número cada vez maior de viagens internacionais têm sido apontados como os fatores responsáveis pela reemergência de epidemias em grande escala. Caracterizada clinicamente por febre e dor articular na fase aguda, em cerca de metade dos casos existe evolução para a fase crônica (além de três meses), com dor persistente e incapacitante. O objetivo deste trabalho foi elaborar recomendações para diagnóstico e tratamento da febre chikungunya no Brasil. Para isso, foi feita revisão da literatura nas bases de dados Medline, SciELO e PubMed, para dar apoio às decisões tomadas para definir as recomendações. Para a definição do grau de concordância foi feita uma metodologia Delphi, em duas reuniões presenciais e várias rodadas de votação on line. Foram geradas 25 recomendações, divididas em três grupos temáticos: (1) diagnóstico clínico, laboratorial e por imagem; (2) situações especiais e (3) tratamento. Na primeira parte estão os dois primeiros temas e o tratamento na segunda.


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Pregnancy , Chikungunya Fever/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/diagnosis , Pregnancy Complications, Infectious/therapy , Rheumatology , Societies, Medical , Brazil , Delphi Technique , Consensus , Chikungunya Fever/physiopathology , Chikungunya Fever/therapy
18.
Rev. bras. reumatol ; 57(supl.2): s438-s451, 2017. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-899488

ABSTRACT

Abstract Chikungunya fever has become an important public health problem in countries where epidemics occur because half of the cases progress to chronic, persistent and debilitating arthritis. Literature data on specific therapies at the various phases of arthropathy caused by chikungunya virus (CHIKV) infection are limited, lacking quality randomized trials assessing the efficacies of different therapies. There are a few studies on the treatment of musculoskeletal manifestations of chikungunya fever, but these studies have important methodological limitations. The data currently available preclude conclusions favorable or contrary to specific therapies, or an adequate comparison between the different drugs used. The objective of this study was to develop recommendations for the treatment of chikungunya fever in Brazil. A literature review was performed via evidence-based selection of articles in the databases Medline, SciELO, PubMed and Embase and conference proceedings abstracts, in addition to expert opinions to support decision-making in defining recommendations. The Delphi method was used to define the degrees of agreement in 2 face-to-face meetings and several online voting rounds. This study is part 2 of the Recommendations of the Brazilian Society of Rheumatology (Sociedade Brasileira de Reumatologia - SBR) for the Diagnosis and Treatment of chikungunya fever and specifically addresses treatment.


Resumo A febre chikungunya tem se tornado um importante problema de saúde pública nos países onde ocorrem as epidemias, visto que metade dos casos evolui com artrite crônica, persistente e incapacitante. Os dados na literatura sobre terapêuticas específicas nas diversas fases da artropatia ocasionada pela infecção pelo vírus chikungunya (CHIKV) são limitados, não existem estudos randomizados de qualidade que avaliem a eficácia das diferentes terapias. Há algumas poucas publicações sobre o tratamento das manifestações musculoesqueléticas da febre chikungunya, porém com importantes limitações metodológicas. Os dados atualmente disponíveis não permitem conclusões favoráveis ou contrárias a terapêuticas específicas, bem como uma adequada avaliação quanto à superioridade entre as diferentes medicações empregadas. O objetivo deste trabalho foi elaborar recomendações para o tratamento da febre chikungunya no Brasil. Foi feita uma revisão da literatura com seleção de artigos baseados em evidência, nas bases de dados Medline, SciELO, PubMed e Embase e de resumos de anais de congressos, além da opinião dos especialistas para dar apoio às decisões tomadas para definir as recomendações. Para a definição do grau de concordância foi feita uma metodologia Delphi, em duas reuniões presenciais e várias rodadas de votação on line. Este artigo refere-se à parte 2 das Recomendações da Sociedade Brasileira de Reumatologia para Diagnóstico e Tratamento da Febre Chikungunya, que trata especificamente do tratamento.


Subject(s)
Humans , Chikungunya Fever/drug therapy , Rheumatology , Societies, Medical , Brazil , Delphi Technique , Physical Therapy Modalities , Disease Progression , Consensus , Chikungunya Fever/diagnosis , Chikungunya Fever/rehabilitation
19.
Rev Bras Ortop ; 51(4): 424-30, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27517021

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: Sciatic pain secondary to lumbar disc herniation is a complex condition that is often highly limiting. The causes of pain in disc herniation are multifactorial. Two physiopathological mechanisms are involved in discogenic pain: mechanical deformation of nerve roots and a biochemical inflammatory component resulting from contact between the intervertebral disc and neural tissue, by way of the nucleus pulposus. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of epidural blockade as therapy for bulging lumbar disc herniation. METHODS: A clinical study was conducted based on a retrospective and prospective survey. The blockade consisted of interlaminar puncture and bolus drug delivery. The number of procedures varied according to the clinical response, as determined through weekly evaluations and then 30, 90, and 180 days after the final session. A total of 124 patients who received one to five blockades were evaluated. RESULTS: The success rate (defining success as a reduction in sciatic pain of at least 80%) was 75.8%. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrated the therapeutic action of epidural blockade over the short term, i.e. in cases of acute pain, thus showing that intense and excruciating sciatic pain can be relieved through this technique. Because of the multifactorial genesis of sciatica and the difficulties encountered by healthcare professionals in treating this condition, epidural blockade can become part of therapeutic arsenal available. This procedure is situated between conservative treatment with an eminently clinical focus and surgical approaches.


OBJETIVO: A dor ciática secundária a hérnia discal lombar é condição complexa e, muitas vezes, intensamente limitante. As causas de dor na herniação discal são multifatoriais. Na dor discogênica há envolvimento de dois mecanismos fisiopatológicos: a deformação mecânica das raízes nervosas e o componente bioquímico inflamatório, que resulta do contato do disco intervertebral, através do núcleo pulposo, com o tecido neural. O objetivo desta investigação foi verificar a eficácia e a segurança do bloqueio epidural como terapêutica em hérnias discais lombares protrusas. MÉTODOS: Empreendeu-se um ensaio clínico com base em levantamento retrospectivo e prospectivo. O bloqueio foi feito por punção interlaminar com administração de fármacos em bolo. O número de procedimentos variou conforme a evolução clínica, com avaliações semanais e, finalmente, aos 30, 90 e 180 dias da última sessão. Foram avaliados 124 pacientes, que receberam de um a cinco bloqueios. RESULTADOS: A taxa de sucesso (considerado como redução de no mínimo 80% na dor ciática) foi de 75,8%. CONCLUSÃO: Os resultados revelaram a ação terapêutica do bloqueio epidural em curto prazo ­ ou seja, na dor aguda ­ e demonstraram que a dor ciática intensa e excruciante pode ser aliviada com essa técnica. A gênese multifatorial da ciatalgia e as dificuldades encontradas pelos profissionais em seu tratamento permitem que o bloqueio epidural integre o arsenal terapêutico disponível. O procedimento insere-se entre o tratamento conservador, eminentemente clínico, e o cirúrgico.

20.
Rev Bras Reumatol Engl Ed ; 56(4): 287-98, 2016.
Article in English, Portuguese | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27476621

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disease of the connective tissue characterized by the triad of vascular injury, autoimmunity (cellular and humoral) and tissue fibrosis. It is estimated that musculoskeletal pain is a common complaint of patients with SSc, ranging from 40 to 80%, and mainly in patients with early diffuse disease. Arthritis, clinically observed, may be a feature seen in the presentation of SSc, often leading to early diagnostic errors with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). In the course of the disease, arthritis is observed in 24-97% of patients with SSc. OBJECTIVES: To correlate the occurrence or nonoccurrence of arthritis in patients with SSc of the Midwest region of Brazil with possible distinct clinical and laboratory manifestations observed in three groups of patients. To report the frequency of true association between systemic sclerosis and rheumatoid arthritis in patients with clinically and radiologically observed synovitis. METHODS: Sixty-one SSc patients were subsequently assessed every 3 months within 1 year, in order to clinically observe the occurrence of synovitis and its patterns of progression. Patients were divided into 3 groups: 41 patients with SSc without arthritis, 16 SSc patients with arthritis and 4 patients with overlap of SSc and RA. All patients underwent a radiological examination of the hands at the end of the study. RESULTS: Among all patients evaluated, we found a female predominance (98.7%), mean age of 50.94 years, white color (49.2%), limited form of the disease (47.6%), time of diagnosis between 5 and 10 years (47.6%) and duration of the disease of 8.30 years. Among all patients, 14 (22.9%) had positive rheumatoid factor (RF), while among those with positive RF, only 10 patients had arthritis during one-year follow-up. The antibody anticitrulline (anti-CCP) test was performed in 24 patients, being positive in 4 of them (16.7%), with positivity being observed only in patients with SSc/RA overlap. Comparing the clinical manifestations among the groups of patients, there was a higher incidence of gastritis and cardiac valvulopathy in patients with SSc and arthritis, but not in the others. In the group of patients with SSc/RA overlap and in patients with SSc and arthritis a significant reduction in quality of life was observed, measured by HAQ index, especially in patients with arthritis present during clinical evaluation. We found radiographic changes in 42.6% of patients with SSc. However, in patients with synovitis, radiological changes consistent with rheumatoid arthritis were found in 50% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: While the frequency of clinical arthritis observed in patients with systemic sclerosis was 32.8%, the true overlap between of SSc and RA was 6.6% in this study. We also observed the frequency of positive anti-CCP in 20% of patients with arthritis versus no patients with SSc without arthritis.


Subject(s)
Anti-Citrullinated Protein Antibodies/blood , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/complications , Scleroderma, Systemic/complications , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/blood , Arthritis, Rheumatoid/immunology , Autoantibodies/blood , Brazil , Comorbidity , Female , Humans , Peptides, Cyclic/blood , Quality of Life , Scleroderma, Systemic/blood , Scleroderma, Systemic/immunology
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL