Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
J Am Assoc Nurse Pract ; 35(10): 620-628, 2023 Oct 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37471528

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: An estimated 1.4 million adults in the United States have congenital heart disease (CHD). As this population grows and many pursue postsecondary education, these adults' health care needs and concerns should be at the forefront for providers, particularly nurse practitioners, at college health centers. PURPOSE: To understand how college health centers and providers identify and manage the care of students with chronic conditions to further support their health care transition, with a focus on students with CHD. METHODOLOGY: Qualitative key informant interviews were performed with providers at five college health centers to understand the processes in place and the challenges health care providers on college campuses face when caring for students with CHD. RESULTS: Most of the college health centers did not have formalized processes in place to care for these students. Although many felt that they had the capabilities in their health centers to manage these students' maintenance/preventive care needs, fewer felt comfortable with their urgent or emergent care needs. The onus was often on students or parents/guardians to initiate these transitions. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights some challenges to providing care to students with chronic conditions like CHD. More collaborative relationships with specialists may be critical to ensuring that all the care needs of chronic disease students are met on college campuses. IMPLICATIONS: Nurse practitioners, who often staff these clinics, are well positioned to support this transition onto campuses and lead the development of processes to identify these students, ease care management transitions, and ensure easy provider communication that allow students with chronic diseases to thrive on campus.


Subject(s)
Heart Defects, Congenital , Transition to Adult Care , Humans , Young Adult , United States , Students , Universities , Heart Defects, Congenital/therapy , Chronic Disease
2.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 68(5): 107-111, 2019 Feb 08.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30730872

ABSTRACT

In 2011, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services added critical congenital heart disease (CCHD), which occurs in two of every 1,000 births, to the list of conditions recommended to states for universal newborn screening (1). Without early detection, infants with CCHD are at risk for substantial morbidity and death in the first weeks and months of life (2). Based on 2007-2013 data, deaths from CCHD and other cardiac causes in infants aged <6 months significantly declined in infants born in eight states after they had fully implemented mandated newborn CCHD screening policies by June 2013 (3). CDC collaborated with the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) and the Association of Public Health Laboratories' Newborn Screening Technical Assistance and Evaluation Program (NewSTEPs) to update a 2015 report (4) on states' actions toward adopting and implementing policies supporting CCHD newborn screening. In 2018, all 50 states and the District of Columbia (DC) had implemented CCHD screening policies, and, with one exception, all states mandated that screening be done (California mandates that screening be offered). However, not all states had data systems in place for tracking all screening results and outcomes. Ongoing evaluation activities, which rely on screening data, could help identify program improvement opportunities and monitor the impact of early identification of CCHD.


Subject(s)
Health Policy , Heart Defects, Congenital/diagnosis , Neonatal Screening , Humans , Infant, Newborn , United States
3.
J Am Coll Health ; 66(4): 324-328, 2018.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29452064

ABSTRACT

As medical and surgical advances improve, more young adults with congenital heart disease (CHD) are attending college. This case study illustrates some of the issues that these young adults may face as they attend college and discusses the role that college health practitioners can play in easing that transition. PARTICIPANTS: A case of a male with CHD presenting to the college health clinic with a new onset headache. METHODS: The authors discuss some of the unique challenges that college health practitioners may face when caring for students with CHD. In addition, they make recommendations on how best to care for these patients and how best to coordinate care with CHD students other care providers. RESULTS: This student with a history of coarctation of the aorta presented with new onset headaches and was found to have high blood pressure. He was diagnosed with recurrent coarctation, underwent percutaneous treatment with stenting and quickly resumed classes. CONCLUSIONS: As more students with CHD enter college, college health providers will need to understand some of the health risks that CHD students face. In addition, understanding some of the optimal ways to coordinate care with CHD providers can ease the transition that CHD students face as they enter college.


Subject(s)
Heart Defects, Congenital/therapy , Student Health Services/organization & administration , Students , Transition to Adult Care/organization & administration , Humans , Male , Universities , Young Adult
4.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep ; 64(23): 625-30, 2015 Jun 19.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26086632

ABSTRACT

Critical congenital heart defects (CCHD) occur in approximately two of every 1,000 live births. Newborn screening provides an opportunity for reducing infant morbidity and mortality. In September 2011, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary endorsed the recommendation that critical congenital heart defects be added to the Recommended Uniform Screening Panel (RUSP) for all newborns. In 2014, CDC collaborated with the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Division of State Government Affairs and the Newborn Screening Technical Assistance and Evaluation Program (NewSTEPs) to assess states' actions for adopting newborn screening for CCHD. Forty-three states have taken action toward newborn screening for CCHD through legislation, regulations, or hospital guidelines. Among those 43, 32 (74%) are collecting or planning to collect CCHD screening data; however, the type of data collected by CCHD newborn screening programs varies by state. State mandates for newborn screening for CCHD will likely increase the number of newborns screened, allowing for the possibility of early identification and prevention of morbidity and mortality. Data collection at the state level is important for surveillance, monitoring of outcomes, and evaluation of state CCHD newborn screening programs.


Subject(s)
Heart Defects, Congenital/diagnosis , Hospitals , Neonatal Screening/legislation & jurisprudence , Practice Guidelines as Topic/standards , Data Collection , Humans , Infant, Newborn , United States
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL