Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol ; 33(5): 1663-1673, 2023 Jul.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35829964

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION: Open fractures are unique in the urgency they impart to the injury and the therapeutic challenge they pose. Non-union and infection are among the major concerns. Open tibial and femoral shaft fractures are among the commonest orthopaedic urgencies. Primary intramedullary (IM) nailing requires a skillset and knowledge of the principles of open fracture management and also a well-equipped operating room with the necessary implants and instruments. In a low resource setting, one or more of these prerequisites may not be met, and the outcome may thus be affected similarly. The objective of this study was to study these outcomes. METHODS: We prospectively studied primary IM nailing of open 1, 2 and 3A tibial and femoral fractures done in our hospital, in a simple non-modular operating room without an image intensifier. RESULTS: There were 106 fractures in 104 patients: 93 tibial and 13 femoral. The mean time from injury to surgical debridement was 19.6 h. Mean duration of antibiotics therapy was 4.3 days, and the mean duration of hospital stay was 4.1 days. All patients were followed up to union. Mean time to radiographic union was 6.1 months for the tibia and 5.7 months for the femur. Non-union was seen in 4 tibial and 1 femoral fractures. There were 3 superficial infections but no deep infection. CONCLUSION: The outcomes were comparable to, and in some cases better than, those found in existing literature. We conclude that primary IM nailing in open long bone fractures can be performed in austere environments with good success, in expert hands if the principles are adhered to.


Subject(s)
Femoral Fractures , Fracture Fixation, Intramedullary , Fractures, Open , Tibial Fractures , Humans , Tibia , Treatment Outcome , Tibial Fractures/diagnostic imaging , Tibial Fractures/surgery , Fracture Healing , Femoral Fractures/surgery , Fractures, Open/surgery , Bone Nails
4.
Int Orthop ; 33(2): 347-52, 2009 Apr.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17940767

ABSTRACT

The objective of this study was to assess the outcome of operations on acetabular fractures from a developing country in the presence of locally available facilities. Sixty-three acetabular fractures were assessed at an average follow up of 52.94 months after operation. Twenty-six patients operated upon in the first three years and 37 operated thereafter were separately studied to discover the effect of the learning curve. Regarding the fractures, 47 of 63 (74.6%) had excellent/good results (Harris Hip Score>80). The complications included broken drill bit in eight patients (12.69%), deep infection and heterotopic ossification in five patients (7.93%), avascular necrosis and sciatic nerve palsy in two patients (3.17%) and implant failure in one patient (1.58%). The results collected during the learning curve were inferior in the complex fractures (p value<0.001). Complications were common in patients opting for local implants and in those operated after over 2 weeks delay.


Subject(s)
Acetabulum/injuries , Fracture Fixation, Internal/methods , Fractures, Bone/surgery , Ossification, Heterotopic/epidemiology , Surgical Wound Infection/epidemiology , Acetabulum/diagnostic imaging , Acetabulum/surgery , Adult , Aged , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/adverse effects , Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip/methods , Bone Plates , Cohort Studies , Developing Countries , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Fracture Fixation, Internal/adverse effects , Fracture Healing/physiology , Fractures, Bone/diagnostic imaging , Humans , Incidence , India , Injury Severity Score , Male , Middle Aged , Ossification, Heterotopic/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Prosthesis Failure , Radiography , Retrospective Studies , Risk Assessment , Surgical Wound Infection/diagnosis , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL