Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 5 de 5
Filter
Add more filters











Language
Publication year range
1.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 47(4): 336-341, jul.-ago. 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-186504

ABSTRACT

Introduction and objectives: Omalizumab is present in international guidelines for the control of severe asthma, but data on the long-term effects in children are limited. Our objective was to perform a 'eal-life' long-term trial of omalizumab in children with allergic asthma. Materials and methods: An observational single center 'real-life' study was performed. Data for treatment, lung function, side effect, asthma exacerbations and hospitalizations were recorded at six months and annually. Results: Forty-eight patients <18 years of age were enrolled. Median treatment period was 2.9 (0.5-6). Fluticasone dose for the maintenance treatment decreases significantly at six months (452mcg/day to 329.89 mcg/day, respectively). This difference was maintained throughout the follow-up. Nobody used oral corticosteroid after six months. The rate of hospital admissions and visits to the emergency department for asthma exacerbations decreased significantly in the third years and fourth years follow-up, respectively. There was an improvement in lung function. Mean values of FEV1 and FEF25-75% before treatment were 79.88 and 62.94, respectively; after six months of treatment a statistically significant change was seen with a mean FEV1 of 92.29 and FEF25-75% of 76.31 (p = 0.0001). Lung function values were above normal throughout the six years of treatment. No side effects were reported. Conclusions: Overall in 'real life' omalizumab in children reduces asthma exacerbations and hospitalizations, improves lung function, and decreases the maintenance therapy. It is shown to be safe for up to six years of treatment in children


No disponible


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Adolescent , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Asthma/drug therapy , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Disease Progression , Follow-Up Studies , Hospitalization , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Immunoglobulin E/metabolism , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Severity of Illness Index , Spirometry , Treatment Outcome
2.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 47(4): 336-341, 2019.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30509559

ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: Omalizumab is present in international guidelines for the control of severe asthma, but data on the long-term effects in children are limited. Our objective was to perform a 'real-life' long-term trial of omalizumab in children with allergic asthma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An observational single center 'real-life' study was performed. Data for treatment, lung function, side effect, asthma exacerbations and hospitalizations were recorded at six months and annually. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients <18 years of age were enrolled. Median treatment period was 2.9 (0.5-6). Fluticasone dose for the maintenance treatment decreases significantly at six months (452mcg/day to 329.89mcg/day, respectively). This difference was maintained throughout the follow-up. Nobody used oral corticosteroid after six months. The rate of hospital admissions and visits to the emergency department for asthma exacerbations decreased significantly in the third years and fourth years follow-up, respectively. There was an improvement in lung function. Mean values of FEV1 and FEF25-75% before treatment were 79.88 and 62.94, respectively; after six months of treatment a statistically significant change was seen with a mean FEV1 of 92.29 and FEF25-75% of 76.31 (p=0.0001). Lung function values were above normal throughout the six years of treatment. No side effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Overall in 'real life' omalizumab in children reduces asthma exacerbations and hospitalizations, improves lung function, and decreases the maintenance therapy. It is shown to be safe for up to six years of treatment in children.


Subject(s)
Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Asthma/drug therapy , Omalizumab/therapeutic use , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Disease Progression , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Hospitalization , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Immunoglobulin E/metabolism , Male , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Severity of Illness Index , Spirometry , Treatment Outcome
3.
Clin Case Rep ; 6(4): 609-611, 2018 04.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29636924

ABSTRACT

The clinical recognition of CSF fistula is a clinical challenge. We report the case of a young woman, who presented with a late orthostatic headache 20 months after epidural anesthesia. She developed a lumbar dural fistula of CSF confirmed in myelography CT scanning and treated successfully with epidural blood patch.

4.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 44(4): 351-358, jul.-ago. 2016. tab, ilus
Article in English | IBECS | ID: ibc-154438

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The sensitisation profile at molecular level in plant-food allergy is complex. Several allergens may be involved, with different potential for severe reactions. lipid transfer proteins (LTP) are considered the most relevant plant-food allergens in adults in Mediterranean countries, but less is known in children. AIM: To describe the clinical pattern and sensitisation profile of children with plant-food allergy and LTP sensitisation from Northeast Spain. METHODS: Children with history of immediate reaction to plant-food(s), positive skin-prick-test to the culprit plant-food(s) and specific-IgE to plant-food LTPs were analysed. RESULTS: 130 children were included. 69.2% (90/130) had reacted to ≥2 taxonomically unrelated plant-foods. Peach, walnut, hazelnut and peanut were most frequently involved. Reactions severity ranged from anaphylaxis (45.4%, 59/130) to oral symptoms only. Sensitisation to a particular plant-food LTP not always caused clinical symptoms with that plant-food; 69% (40/58) and 63% (17/27) of peach- and walnut-tolerant subjects had positive rPru p 3 and nJug r 3 specific IgE, respectively. 65.4% (85/130) of children were also sensitised to storage proteins, which was associated to anaphylaxis and nut allergy. However, 60% of patients without nuts/seeds allergy were sensitised to storage proteins. Specific-IgE levels to LTPs and/or storage proteins were not useful to predict allergy (vs. tolerance) to peach, walnut, peanut or hazelnut. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitisation to LTP and/or storage proteins without clear clinical significance is relatively common. Prospective longitudinal studies are required to evaluate the relevance of these silent sensitisations over time. Caution is required when interpreting the results of molecular-based diagnostic tools in clinical practice


No disponible


Subject(s)
Humans , Male , Female , Child , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Food Hypersensitivity/pathology , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Immunization/methods , Immunization , Allergens/immunology , Biopsy/methods , Anaphylaxis/immunology , Prospective Studies , Longitudinal Studies
5.
Allergol Immunopathol (Madr) ; 44(4): 351-8, 2016.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27040809

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The sensitisation profile at molecular level in plant-food allergy is complex. Several allergens may be involved, with different potential for severe reactions. lipid transfer proteins (LTP) are considered the most relevant plant-food allergens in adults in Mediterranean countries, but less is known in children. AIM: To describe the clinical pattern and sensitisation profile of children with plant-food allergy and LTP sensitisation from Northeast Spain. METHODS: Children with history of immediate reaction to plant-food(s), positive skin-prick-test to the culprit plant-food(s) and specific-IgE to plant-food LTPs were analysed. RESULTS: 130 children were included. 69.2% (90/130) had reacted to ≥2 taxonomically unrelated plant-foods. Peach, walnut, hazelnut and peanut were most frequently involved. Reactions severity ranged from anaphylaxis (45.4%, 59/130) to oral symptoms only. Sensitisation to a particular plant-food LTP not always caused clinical symptoms with that plant-food; 69% (40/58) and 63% (17/27) of peach- and walnut-tolerant subjects had positive rPru p 3 and nJug r 3 specific IgE, respectively. 65.4% (85/130) of children were also sensitised to storage proteins, which was associated to anaphylaxis and nut allergy. However, 60% of patients without nuts/seeds allergy were sensitised to storage proteins. Specific-IgE levels to LTPs and/or storage proteins were not useful to predict allergy (vs. tolerance) to peach, walnut, peanut or hazelnut. CONCLUSIONS: Sensitisation to LTP and/or storage proteins without clear clinical significance is relatively common. Prospective longitudinal studies are required to evaluate the relevance of these silent sensitisations over time. Caution is required when interpreting the results of molecular-based diagnostic tools in clinical practice.


Subject(s)
Anaphylaxis/diagnosis , Antigens, Plant/immunology , Asymptomatic Diseases , Carrier Proteins/immunology , Food Hypersensitivity/diagnosis , Nuts/immunology , Plant Proteins/immunology , Adolescent , Anaphylaxis/immunology , Child , Child, Preschool , Cross Reactions , Female , Food Hypersensitivity/immunology , Humans , Immunoglobulin E/analysis , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Microarray Analysis , Prospective Studies , Prunus persica/immunology , Retrospective Studies , Skin Tests , Spain
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL