ABSTRACT
Aseptically processed dehydrated human amnion and chorion allograft (dHACA) (AmnioBand) has shown great promise in the treatment of recalcitrant diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) when compared with standard wound care but has not yet been compared to any other tissue forms used in treating DFUs. The hypothesis was to conduct a randomized controlled trial in which dHACA was compared to one of the earliest and most commonly accepted tissue-engineered skin substitutes (TESS) (Apligraf) in the treatment of nonhealing DFUs over a period of 12 weeks to assess the superiority of healing. METHODS: Following a 2-week screening period during which subjects with DFUs were treated with collagen alginate dressing, 60 subjects were randomized at 5 sites to receive either dHACA or TESS applied weekly, with weekly follow-up for up to 12 weeks. RESULTS: The mean time to heal within 6-week time period for the dHACA group was 24 days (95% CI, 18.9-29.2) versus 39 days (95% CI, 36.4-41.9) for the TESS group; the mean time to heal at 12 weeks was 32 days (95% CI, 22.3-41.0) for dHACA-treated wounds versus 63 days (95% CI, 54.1-72.6) for TESS-treated wounds. The proportion of wounds healed at study completion (12 weeks) was 90% (27/30) for the dHACA group versus 40% (12/30) for the TESS group. The mean product cost for the dHACA group was significantly lower than that for the TESS group [dHACA: $2,200 (median: $1,300); TESS: $7,900 (median: $6,500)]. The mean wastage (%) at 12 weeks was also significantly lower for the dHACA group than that for the TESS group (36% vs 95%). CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that aseptically processed dHACA heals diabetic foot wounds more reliably, statistically significantly faster than and at significantly lower cost than TESS.
ABSTRACT
The purpose of this article is to examine complications in patients who underwent bone grafting from the calcaneus between December 2001 and June 2010. This retrospective, single-practice study included 247 procedures in 242 patients, including 200 (82.64%) female and 42 (17.36%) male patients, ranging in age from 13 to 89 (median 49) years. Overall, the incidence of experiencing any form of complication was 2.43% (6 of 247); these included 5 (2.02%) feet that displayed donor site sural neuritis and 1 (0.41) that displayed a painful, hypertrophic scar at the donor site. The only statistically significant risk factor associated with the development of a calcaneal donor site complication was white race (being African American was protective). These findings indicate that procurement of autogenous bone graft from the calcaneus, as described in this report, is safe and dependable with a low incidence of complications, and irritation of the sural nerve is the most common complication associated with the procedure. Further clinical and long-term follow-up studies controlling for confounding variables need to be performed to fully determine the overall safety and efficacy of this procedure.