Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add more filters











Database
Language
Publication year range
1.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 46(3): 363-6, 2015 Sep.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25766889

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence of evidence of residual obstetric anal sphincter injury, to evaluate its association with anal incontinence (AI) and to establish minimal diagnostic criteria for significant (residual) external anal sphincter (EAS) trauma. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of ultrasound volume datasets of 501 patients attending a tertiary urogynecological unit. All patients underwent a standardized interview including determination of St Mark's score for those presenting with AI. Tomographic ultrasound imaging (TUI) was used to evaluate the EAS and the internal anal sphincter (IAS). RESULTS: Among a total of 501 women, significant EAS and IAS defects were found in 88 and 59, respectively, and AI was reported by 69 (14%). Optimal prediction of AI was achieved using a model that included four abnormal slices of the EAS on TUI. IAS defects were found to be less likely to be associated with AI. In a multivariable model controlling for age and IAS trauma, the presence of at least four abnormal slices gave an 18-fold (95% CI, 9-36; P < 0.0001) increase in the likelihood of AI, compared with those with fewer than four abnormal slices. Using receiver-operating characteristics curve statistics, this model yielded an area under the curve of 0.86 (95% CI, 0.80-0.92). CONCLUSIONS: Both AI and significant EAS trauma are common in patients attending urogynecological units, and are strongly associated with each other. Abnormalities of the IAS seem to be less important in predicting AI. Our data support the practice of using, as a minimal criterion, defects present in four of the six slices on TUI for the diagnosis of significant EAS trauma.


Subject(s)
Anal Canal/injuries , Fecal Incontinence/etiology , Obstetric Labor Complications/diagnostic imaging , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Anal Canal/diagnostic imaging , Fecal Incontinence/diagnostic imaging , Female , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Logistic Models , Middle Aged , Multivariate Analysis , Obstetric Labor Complications/epidemiology , Pregnancy , Prevalence , ROC Curve , Retrospective Studies , Risk Factors , Tomography , Ultrasonography , Young Adult
2.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 42(4): 461-6, 2013 Oct.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23576493

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) in a cohort of primiparous women and to evaluate their association with demographic, obstetric and ultrasound parameters. METHODS: This was a retrospective analysis of the ultrasound volume datasets of 320 primiparous women, acquired at 5 months postpartum. Tomographic ultrasound imaging (TUI) was used to evaluate the external anal sphincter (EAS). A significant EAS defect was diagnosed if a defect of > 30° was seen in four or more of six TUI slices bracketing the EAS. RESULTS: Significant EAS defects were found in 69 women (27.9% of those delivered vaginally). In nine of those a third-degree tear was diagnosed intrapartum and was sutured. In 60 women with significant defects there was no documentation of sphincter damage at birth, implying unidentified or occult defects (60/69, 87.0%). Among them, 29 had had a second-degree tear, two a first-degree tear and three an intact perineum. In 31 cases an episiotomy had been performed, with five extensions to a third-degree tear. On multivariate analysis only forceps delivery was significantly associated with OASIS. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of primiparous women we found OASIS in 27.9% of vaginally parous women, most of which had not been diagnosed in the delivery suite. There seems to be a need for better education of labor-ward staff in the recognition of OASIS. On the other hand, it is conceivable that some defects may be masked by intact tissue. The significance of such defects remains doubtful. Forceps delivery was the only identifiable risk factor.


Subject(s)
Anal Canal/injuries , Obstetric Labor Complications/etiology , Adolescent , Adult , Fecal Incontinence/diagnostic imaging , Fecal Incontinence/etiology , Female , Humans , Lacerations/etiology , Middle Aged , Obstetric Labor Complications/diagnostic imaging , Parity , Pregnancy , Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic , Retrospective Studies , Ultrasonography , Young Adult
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL