Salvage proton beam therapy in local recurrent uveal melanoma.

PURPOSE: To evaluate survival and ocular outcome in recurrent uveal melanoma treated with proton beam therapy as salvage therapy. DESIGN: Retrospective, interventional case series. METHODS: We evaluated 48 patients with local recurrence of uveal melanoma after primary treatment with brachytherapy, transpupillary thermotherapy, proton beam therapy, laser photocoagulation, CyberKnife radiation, or photodynamic therapy. All patients received proton beam therapy as a salvage therapy at the Helmholtz Zentrum Berlin between July 2000 and December 2010. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to obtain survival rates. RESULTS: The Kaplan-Meier estimator for local tumor control was 92.1% at 10 years after secondary treatment with proton beam therapy. Local recurrence developed in 3 patients; 1 of them underwent enucleation. During follow-up, 20.8% of the patients died (16.7% of metastasis, 4.1% of other causes or not specified). The most frequent surgical interventions were phacoemulsification (20.8%) and pars plana vitrectomy (10.4%). The Kaplan-Meier estimators were 77.4% for survival and 70.1% for the absence of metastasis 10 years after the primary treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Proton beam therapy as a salvage treatment resulted in high local tumor control rates in recurrent uveal melanoma, especially if the primary therapy was transpupillary thermotherapy or plaque brachytherapy. Preservation of the globe was possible in most patients. Enucleations were indicated only in case of re-recurrences of uveal melanoma, but not because of secondary complications like intractable pain or secondary glaucoma. Retreatment was associated with vision deterioration, but loss of vision remained exceptional. Further larger prospective studies are needed to confirm the presented results of our retrospective analysis.

Interferon versus methotrexate in intermediate uveitis with macular edema: results of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

PURPOSE: To compare interferon (IFN) beta with methotrexate (MTX) in the treatment of intermediate uveitis with macular edema. DESIGN: Monocentric, prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. SETTING: Specialized uveitis center at the University of Heidelberg. PATIENT OR STUDY POPULATION: Patients with either primary intermediate uveitis or uveitis associated with multiple sclerosis. MAIN INCLUSION CRITERIA: Visual acuity of 20/30 or worse (0.2 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution) and macular edema of more than 250 µm (central 1-mm in optical coherence tomography; Stratus). Randomization into either IFN beta 44 µg subcutaneously 3 times weekly or 20 mg MTX subcutaneously once weekly. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: At 3 months, the primary outcome parameter of mean change in visual acuity was evaluated and efficacy was determined. Secondary parameters were macular edema by optical coherence tomography, inflammatory activity, and retinal sensitivity by microperimetry (MP-1; Nidek). In case of treatment failure, switching to the other treatment arm was possible. RESULTS: Nineteen patients were included. Ten were randomized to MTX, and 9 were randomized to IFN beta. At 3 months, visual acuity improved a mean 0.31 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (range, -0.02 to -0.96, 15.6 letters on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study chart) in the IFN beta group versus a mean 0.09 logarithm of the minimal angle of resolution (range, 0.12 to -0.38, 4.7 letters) in the MTX arm (P = .0435, Mann-Whitney U test). Macular thickness decreased by a mean of 206 µm (range, -41 to -416 µm) in the IFN arm, but increased by 47 µm (range, 108 to -28 µm) in the MTX group (P < .0001). CONCLUSIONS: Although the sample size is small, results of the trial support superiority of IFN beta over MTX in the treatment of macular edema in the setting of intermediate uveitis.

A three-centre experience with adalimumab for the treatment of non-infectious uveitis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess the efficacy of adalimumab in patients with active non-infectious uveitis in three different centres. METHODS: In a retrospective study we identified patients from our databases who were treated with adalimumab. The composite outcome measure for efficacy included reduction of macular oedema by optic coherence tomography, visual acuity, anterior chamber cells, reduction of frequency of flares and reduction of prednisone dose during the treatment. At least one of the criteria had to be improved and none worsened to declare treatment as effective. RESULTS: 60 patients with an average age of 37.3 years (range 4-71 years) were treated with adalimumab over an average follow-up period of 87.9 weeks (range 12-222 weeks). The indication for treatment was in 41 (68.3%) patients the activity of both uveitis and systemic disease and in 19 (31.7%) patients uveitis activity only. 15 (25%) patients were treated before with etanercept and 10 (16.7%) patients with infliximab. 49 out of 60 (81.7%) patients improved, while the other 11 (18.3%) patients did not meet improvement criteria and were given additional or alternative immunosuppressive treatment. At the last follow-up, 47 (78.3%) patients were still on adalimumab treatment. 13 (21.6%) patients stopped adalimumab treatment, due to inefficacy in eight, another three patients due to side effects (liver enzyme elevation and furunculosis), one patient due to pregnancy and one patient died. CONCLUSIONS: This large retrospective case series showed that adalimumab is effective in up to 80% of patients with uveitis.

Expression of haematogenous and lymphogenous chemokine receptors and their ligands on uveal melanoma in association with liver metastasis.

PURPOSE: Chemokine receptors and their ligands are involved in a number of cell processes, including normal cell trafficking as well as metastasis in cancer. During metastasis, they are thought to play a role in determining cancer cell distribution and target organs. The aim of this study was to examine the expression of the chemokine receptors CXCR4, CCR7 and CCR10 as well as their respective chemokine ligands (CXCL12, CCL19, CCL27) in human uveal melanomas. METHODS: Seventy formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded uveal melanoma specimens from patients treated in 1996-1997 were examined using immunohistochemistry and evaluated using an immune reactive score (IRS). RESULTS: The chemokine receptors CXCR4, CCR7 and CCR10 were primarily expressed in the cytoplasm of uveal melanoma cells, with CXCR4 (average IRS 8.2) and CCR7 (average IRS 5.7) showing the strongest expression, respectively. The chemokine ligand CCL19 demonstrated a moderate expression (average IRS 5.3), whereas the expression of receptor CCR10 (average IRS of 3.4), ligand CCL27 (average IRS 2.5) and ligand CXCL12 (average IRS 0.6) by uveal melanoma cells was low. A significant association between liver metastases and chemokine expression was found for CCR7 expression (p = 0.037) only. Comparison of liver metastasis and choroid uveal melanoma (35.3%, n = 12 of 34) versus ciliary body involvement (72.7%, n = 8 of 11) was significant (p = 0.030). CONCLUSION: Chemokine receptors are more strongly expressed on uveal melanoma cells than their ligands. Our results show new aspects of the metastatic process in uveal melanoma.